Attachment 14 - ACM_LBP Survey Bldg 90131_1 Mar 2024_FTEV201009_Repair_Renovation.pdf

ASBESTOS AND LEAD-BASED PAINT

MATERIALS SURVEY

For the

Hurlburt Field, Building 90131 Hurlburt Air Force Base, Florida

Prepared for:

Peterson Engineering, Inc.

75 South F St.

Pensacola, Florida 32502

Prepared by:

Professional Service Industries, Inc.

175 South A St.

Pensacola, Florida 32502

March 1, 2024

PSI Project Number: 07833925

John Harris Project Specialist

Jeremy Jernigan, CIH, CSP, CHMM Principal Consultant - FLAC #AX73

REPAIR-INTERIOR RENOVATION BLDG. 90131, 2SOS CP1032233

HURLBURT FIELD, FLORIDA

APPENDIX A

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 AUTHORIZATION AND ACCESS

1.2 PROPERTY AND BUILDING INFORMATION

1.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AREA

1.4 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES

1.5 LIMITATIONS

2.0 SURVEY INFORMATION

3.0 METHODOLOGY

3.1 ASBESTOS

3.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT

4.0 FINDINGS

4.1 ASBESTOS

4.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT

5.0 CONCLUSIONS

5.1 ASBESTOS

5.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT

6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 ASBESTOS

6.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT

7.0 WARRANTY AND THIRD PARTY RELIANCE

7.1 STANDARD OF CARE AND WARRANTIES

7.2 RELIANCE

7.3 THIRD PARTY RELIANCE

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024 Page i www.intertek.com/psi

LIST OF APPENDICES

Photographs

Laboratory Analytical Report and Chain-of-Custody Documentation

Drawings

Supporting Documentation

Laboratory Accreditations

Personnel Accreditations

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024 Page ii

LIST OF ACRONYMS OR ABBREVIATIONS

Acronym or Abbreviation Definition

ACM Asbestos-Containing Material

ACBM Asbestos-Containing Building Material

AHERA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act

AIHA American Industrial Hygiene Association

CAT. I NF Category I Non-Friable

CAT. II NF Category II Non-Friable

CFC Chlorofluorocarbons

CFL Compact Fluorescent Lamps

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CMU Concrete Masonry Unit

EMLAP Environmental Microbiological Laboratory Accreditation Program

EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

F Friable

HA Homogeneous Area

HID High-Intensity Discharge

HUD U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning

LBP Lead-Based Paint

MJP Mudded Joint Packing

NELAP National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program

NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

NF Non-Friable

NLLAP National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (a.k.a. ELLAP)

NVLAP National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

O&M Operations & Maintenance

OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration

PACM Presumed Asbestos-Containing Material

PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyl

PLM Polarized Light Microscopy

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024 Page iii

Acronym or Abbreviation Definition

PSI Professional Service Industries, Inc., an Intertek company

PT Point Count

RACM Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material

TEM Transmission Electron Microscopy

TSI Thermal System Insulation

VFT Vinyl Floor Tile

VJC Vibration Joint Cloth

VSF Vinyl Sheet Flooring

XRF X-Ray Fluorescence device

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024 Page iv

1.0 INTRODUCTION

PSI was retained by Peterson Engineering, Inc. to perform a survey for suspect ACM and suspected LBP materials at Hurlburt Field, Building 90131, located at Hurlburt Air Force Base, Florida.

1.1 AUTHORIZATION AND ACCESS

Authorization to perform the survey was given on December 23, 2023 by the receipt of a signed copy by PSI of PSI Proposal Number 0783-413311, between Peterson Engineering, Inc. and PSI.

Access to the Project Area was provided by Troy Latham. PSI was not escorted during the field work for this project.

1.2 PROPERTY AND BUILDING INFORMATION

SUBJECT PROPERTY: Hurlburt Field, Building 90131 Hurlburt Air Force Base, Florida

1.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AREA

This project encompassed interior finishes as indicated on the attached drawing, hereinafter referred to as the Project Area.

The field work was conducted on February 20, 2024.

1.3.1 INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CLIENT

The following table lists the information provided for this survey.

Description of Material Provider/Source Date

Demolition Plan Drawing Peterson Engineering 01/08/

1.4 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES

PSI understands that the client is planning on renovating the Project Area.

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024

1.4.1 ASBESTOS

The purpose of the asbestos portion of this survey was to provide general information for the Project Area regarding the presence, condition, and quantity of accessible and/or exposed friable and non-friable materials suspected to contain asbestos.

The survey of the Project Area was conducted in general accordance with the EPA AHERA, and NESHAP sampling guidelines to determine the presence and general locations of exposed and/or physically accessible suspect ACM.

Each suspect material was touched, where possible, to determine the friability of the material. Samples were obtained only from suspect ACM that were readily exposed and/or physically accessible during the survey.

Samples were sent to PSI’s NVLAP accredited laboratory located at 500 Poplar St., in Pittsburg, PA, for analysis. Each sample underwent PLM analysis for detection of asbestos fibers in the building materials on a “positive stop” basis, which is defined as follows: if the first sample in the sample group has an analysis indicating that the material contains asbestos at a concentration greater than 1%, then the other samples in the group are not analyzed.

1.4.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT

The purpose of the limited lead-paint survey was to provide information regarding the potential presence of accessible and exposed lead-based paints in the Project Area.

This survey was not intended to meet the requirements of a lead inspection of target housing or child-occupied facilities as defined by appropriate Federal, State, and/or local regulatory agencies.

1.5 LIMITATIONS

1.5.1 ASBESTOS LIMITATIONS

This asbestos survey was intended to meet the requirements of the NESHAP for Asbestos renovation. The survey included a thorough inspection of the reported areas of planned renovation associated with the Project Area.

Roof Systems were not included in the scope of this survey.

Destructive sampling, such as behind finished surfaces (plaster/drywall walls, above hard ceilings, etc.) inside mechanical chases, behind mirrored walls, under carpet or tiled floors, etc., was not generally conducted to assess inaccessible or concealed materials.

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024

Although PSI made an attempt to identify all areas of ACM, an exhaustive investigation of void spaces was not included in the scope of services for this project. There may exist conditions which were unable to be identified within the scope of this survey.

Inaccessible is defined as areas of the building that were locked, or where admittance was not permitted.

It also includes areas/materials that could not be tested (sampled) without destruction of the structure or a portion of the structure, and areas/materials that could not be safely reached by the inspector or inspection team. In the event that access to a portion of the building was not obtained (which otherwise would have been tested), such limitations specifically are identified in this section.

PSI did not inspect for or sample materials in areas or locations which presented a hazard to the inspection team, such as those associated with energized electrical systems or within confined spaces.

PSI did not collect samples from building elements where the intended use would be compromised by testing, such as fire rated doors, vapor barriers, mirror mastics, etc. If observed, such materials were assumed to be asbestos-containing.

1.5.2 ACCESS LIMITATIONS

PSI did not encounter access issues or areas that were omitted from consideration due to safety concerns or other considerations.

1.5.3 OTHER LIMITATIONS

No other significant exceptions to, or deviations from, the scope of work were made during this assessment.

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024

2.0 SURVEY INFORMATION

NAME OF SURVEYOR: John Harris

LICENSE/CERTIFICATION NUMBER: 240015-9314

DATE(S) OF SURVEY AND

SAMPLING:

February 20, 2024

ESCORT: None

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024

3.0 METHODOLOGY

If available, prior to conducting the survey, PSI reviewed any documents provided by the client, including:

drawings, floor plans, historical data, maintenance records, previous survey reports, laboratory reports, etc.

for information regarding construction history and building materials. This data was used to focus the walk through and scope of work to be followed over the course of our visual survey and/or sampling.

3.1 ASBESTOS

Survey, sampling and analysis procedures were performed in general accordance with the guidelines published by the EPA in 40 CFR Part 763 Subpart E, October 30, 1987, and the OSHA Asbestos Construction Standard, found in 29 CFR 1926.1101. and in the NESHAP regulation (40 CFR Part 61, April 6, 1973, revised 1990).

3.1.1 VISUAL INSPECTION PROCEDURES

An initial walkthrough of the Project Area was conducted to determine the presence and condition of suspect materials which were physically accessible and/or exposed. Materials which were similar in general appearance were grouped into HAs. In addition, the friability of the suspect material was determined. A material is defined as friable if the material can be reduced to a powder by hand pressure when dry.

Non-Friable (NF) materials that are damaged can also be considered friable.

3.1.1.1 HOMOGENEOUS AREA CLASSIFICATIONS

During the walk-through of the Project Area, areas of materials which were visually similar in color, texture, general appearance, and which appeared to have been installed at the same time were determined. Such materials are termed HAs by the EPA AHERA regulation. During this walk-through, the approximate locations of these HAs were also noted. Only materials which were physically accessible and/or exposed and suspected to contain asbestos were identified and placed in HAs.

Following the EPA AHERA inspection protocol, each identified HA was placed in one of the following AHERA classifications for the purposes of determining the number of samples to collect:

• Surfacing Materials: spray or trowel applied to building members;

• TSI: materials generally applied to various mechanical systems; or

• Miscellaneous Materials: any materials which do not fit either of the above categories.

Following the EPA NESHAP inspection protocol, each identified suspect homogeneous material that was confirmed as an ACM was also placed in one of the following NESHAP classifications:

• Friable Materials: NESHAP defines a friable ACM as any material containing more than one percent asbestos that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024

• Category I Non-Friable (Cat. I NF): NESHAP defines a Category I non-friable ACM as packing, gaskets, resilient floor covering (except vinyl sheet flooring products which are considered friable), and asphalt roofing products which contain more than one percent asbestos.

• Category II Non-Friable (Cat. II NF): NESHAP defines a Category II non-friable ACM as any material, except for a Category I non-friable ACM, which contains more than one percent asbestos and cannot be reduced to a powder by hand pressure when dry.

In the NESHAP regulation, a regulated asbestos-containing material (RACM) is defined as any (a) friable asbestos material; (b) Category I Non-Friable ACM that has become friable; (c) Cat. I NF ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading; or (d) Category II Non-Friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations.

3.1.2 SAMPLING PROCEDURES

Following the walk-through, the inspector(s) collected selected samples of exposed and/or physically accessible materials identified as suspect ACM. Sampling was limited to those physically accessible materials not involving the destruction of walls, other building elements, physical barriers, or the structural integrity of the item being tested.

EPA guidelines were used to determine the sampling protocol. Sampling locations were chosen to be representative of the homogeneous area.

Where possible, samples of surfacing material, if present, were collected in general accordance with the EPA random sampling protocol outlined in the EPA publication, "Asbestos in Buildings: Simplified Sampling Scheme for Friable Surfacing Materials" (EPA 560/5-85-030a, October, 1985). The homogeneous area was divided into a grid of nine (9) sub-areas. If nine samples were taken, one sample was taken from each sub-area. If less than nine samples were taken, the EPA random numbering diagram was used to determine which sub-areas would be sampled. While an effort was made to extract the samples from approximately the middle of the sub-area, samples were taken preferentially from already damaged areas or areas which were the least visible.

Samples of TSI and miscellaneous materials were taken as randomly as possible while again attempting to sample already damaged areas so as to minimize disturbance of the material.

3.1.3 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

The samples were analyzed at PSI, located in Pittsburg, PA. The PSI is a NVLAP Accredited (#101350-0) Laboratory. A copy of the Laboratory’s Accreditation Certificate is included in the Appendix.

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024

The samples were analyzed for asbestos on a “positive-stop” basis by PLM in accordance with the "Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples" (EPA 600/M4-82-020). Analysis was performed by visually observing the bulk samples with a stereoscope, followed by slide preparation(s) for microscopic examination and identification. The samples were then analyzed for asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, anthophyllite, actinolite/tremolite), and fibrous non-asbestos constituents (mineral wool, fiberglass, cellulose, etc.). Using a stereoscope, the microscopist visually estimated relative amounts of each constituent by determining the volume of each constituent in proportion to the total volume of the sample. Asbestos was identified by refractive indices, morphology, color, pleochroism, birefringence, extinction characteristics, and signs of elongation. The same characteristics were used to identify the non-asbestos constituents.

It should be noted that some ACM might not be accurately identified or quantified by PLM. As an example, the original fabrication of vinyl floor tiles routinely involved milling of asbestos fibers to extremely small sizes.

As a result, these fibers may go undetected under the standard PLM method. TEM is another method that can provide a more definitive analysis of these materials, but was not in the scope of work for this project.

3.1.3.1 LABORATORY QUALITY CONTROL PROGRAM

The PSI in Pittsburg, PA, maintains an in-house quality control program. This program involves blind reanalysis of ten (10) percent of all samples, precision and accuracy controls, and use of standard bulk reference materials. In addition, the laboratory is accredited by NVLAP, which also has quality control procedures inherent in its program.

3.1.4 QUANTIFICATION

Quantities of physically accessible and/or exposed confirmed ACM were estimated. This estimation was performed by taking approximate measurements in the field or estimating quantities based on as-built mechanical or structural drawings. Materials such as pipe insulation and associated MJP were categorized according to the outside diameter of the insulation. Pipe insulation was quantified by linear footage of the insulation while the actual number of MJPs was counted. Insulation on mechanical equipment such as boilers and duct work was quantified by the square footage of the surface area of suspect insulation. Similarly, fireproofings, plasters, ceiling and floor tiles, and cementitious panels were measured in square feet of surface area. The quantities of confirmed ACM that were identified during this investigation are reported in the Tables later in this report.

Quantities identified in this report are estimates, are intended as order of magnitude information or for general policy discussions, and should be confirmed by an abatement contractor since renovation or demolition is contemplated.

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024

3.1.5 PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION

Photographs of HAs and/or sample locations were taken during the course of this survey. While these photographs were not intended to provide a complete record of the survey, they do provide a visual description of the HA and/or sample locations. Photographs of HAs are intended to depict a representative portion of that HA. The captioned photographs taken during this survey are appended.

3.1.6 DRAWINGS

Drawings were prepared to indicate the location of HAs that are identified as ACM and/or assumed to be ACM, and the location of the samples that were collected during the course of this survey. The drawings are not intended to be used for construction purposes. Drawings prepared during the course of this survey are appended.

3.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT

PSI performed a walk-through of the Project Area to be surveyed, and documented, with written notes and photographs, painted areas, painted or primed structural steel areas, or areas of deteriorated paint observed. If present, PSI estimated the amount of the painted areas (if in excess of 1,000 square feet), painted or primed structural steel, and areas of deteriorated paint observed. PSI also provided an opinion, based on the age of the Project Area, whether the observed paints are potentially lead-based paint. If deteriorated paints were observed, PSI provided an opinion as to the cause of the deteriorated paints.

3.2.1 SAMPLING OR TESTING METHODOLOGIES

If painted surfaces in excess of 1,000 square feet of area, painted or primed structural steel or deteriorated paints were observed during this assessment, samples and/or additional testing was performed to determine if the paints were lead-based paint.

3.2.1.1 FIELD INSPECTION AND XRF TESTING

XRF testing of interior and exterior components in the Project Area was performed in general accordance with the HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, July 2012 (HUD guidelines), Chapter 7 (Lead-Based Paint Inspections). The survey was performed by lead-based paint inspection trained personnel and whose accreditations are appended.

XRF field testing was performed with Heuresis, Pb200i instrument (Serial Number 2277) on February 20, 2024. The use of a portable, non-destructive testing device is advantageous when numerous tests must be performed because of its brief testing time and relatively low cost compared to laboratory methods.

XRF values were collected by placing the XRF device on the test surface and opening the shutter to expose the paint or surface coating to gamma radiation. XRF devices are typically capable of penetrating up to approximately 3/8 of an inch to determine lead content. At the conclusion of each test, the shutter was closed

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024 and the display on the control console showed the lead concentration in milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2) for manual tabulation. It should be noted that per the Performance Characteristic Sheet (PCS) for this XRF device, there is no inconclusive range or substrate correction needed.

The accuracy and precision of any measurement is determined by the length of each test, instrument calibration verifications against known standards or control blocks, measurement conditions, and mathematical laws of random error. Even when XRF equipment is properly operated within the manufacturer’s specification, unusual substrates, paint additives, uneven paint applications, electrical fields, lead components in wall cavities, and many other variables may cause significant fluctuations in apparent test values. Due to the limitations and inherent problems associated with XRF field testing, confirmation (paint-chip) sampling and assessment of XRF data is typically recommended before major abatement activities are started.

Calibration verification (quality control) readings are taken each time the XRF was turned on and off and every four hours during the inspection process. Each time calibration verification readings are made; three nominal readings are taken on the XRF manufacturer's provided 1.0 mg/cm2 reference block and recorded. The calibration verification reading should not differ from 1.0 mg/cm2 by more than the calibration verification tolerance specified in the XRF PCS. This comparison is referred to as the calibration verification test.

In addition, the reading value in mg/cm2 is also recorded on the XRF Testing Data Table. XRF results were classified as positive or negative by the following rules:

• “Positive” is defined as a reading that had a lead concentration of 1.0 mg/cm2 or greater.

• “Negative” is defined as a reading that had a lead concentration of less than 1.0 mg/cm2.

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024

4.0 FINDINGS

4.1 ASBESTOS

A total of twenty-three samples were collected from six suspect HAs during the asbestos survey. In addition, zero suspect HAs were observed during the asbestos survey but were not sampled or were not able to be sampled, and is assumed to contain asbestos until sampling and laboratory analysis can be conducted.

The tables below list the suspect ACM observed in the Project Area. Table 1 lists the materials that were sampled, along with the results of the inspection and laboratory analysis.

The table or tables provide a description of the materials, their general locations, condition, friability, and, if applicable and/or within the scope of work, EPA NESHAP Category, and estimated quantities.

In the following table or tables, items that are confirmed or assumed to be ACM are indicated in bold and items that contain less than 1% asbestos, but are not 'no asbestos detected' are indicated by italics.

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024

TABLE 1 - SUSPECT ACM - SAMPLED

HA & #

of samples Material Description Material Location Sample Locations F/NF Condition % Asbestos & Type EPA NESHAP Category Estimated Quantity

01-02 12" Tan Floor Tile w/Yellow Mastics KItchen Kitchen NF Good NAD N/A N/A

02-04 12" Gray Floor Tile w/Yellow Mastics (Top Layer) 9" Tan Floor Tile w/Black Mastics (Bottom Layer)

East Central Office / Northeast Office

East Central Office / Northeast Office

NF Good FT=2%CH

MS=2&CH

Cat. I NF/Cat. II NF 650 S.F.

03-03 White / Black Pipe Mastics Room A45 Room A45 F Good NAD N/A N/A

04-02 2'x2' White Fissured Ceiling Tile Throughout Offices Throughout Offices F Good NAD N/A N/A

05-03 Drywall System Men's Bathroom / Ladys Bathroom / Kitchen / Custodial Closet

Custodial Closet / Men's Bathroom

NF Good NAD N/A N/A

06-09 HVAC Pipe Mastics Open Area HVAC Systems (3 Units) Open Area HVAC Systems

F Dam. NAD N/A N/A

NOTES: F=Friable, NF=Non-Friable; Dam.=Damaged, Sig. Dam.=Significantly Damaged; NAD=No Asbestos Detected, CH=Chrysotile, AM=Amosite, CR=Crocidolite, TR=Tremolite, AC=Actinolite, AN=Anthophyllite, PT=Point Count Analysis; RACM=Regulated ACM, Cat. I NF=Category I Non-Friable ACM, Cat. II

NF=Category II Non-Friable ACM; SF=square feet; LF=lineal feet; EA=each; N/A=Not Applicable

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024

4.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT

Deteriorated paints were not observed during the walk-through of the Project Area at the time of the field activities.

4.2.1 WALK-THROUGH FINDINGS

4.2.1.1 PAINTED SURFACES

Single-colored painted surfaces covering more than 1,000-square feet was observed during the walk-through of the Project Area at the time of the field activities.

Based on the reported age of the building, it is likely that the painted surfaces observed could be lead-based paint.

Photographs documenting the Project Area and the area or areas of the painted surfaces observed during the survey are appended.

4.2.1.2 PAINTED OR PRIMED STRUCTURAL STEEL

Painted or primed structural steel was observed during the walk-through of the Project Area at the time of the field activities.

Location of Painted or Primed Structural Steel Color Estimated Area

Throughout Building Tan N/A

Based on the reported age of the building, it is likely that the painted or primed structural steel observed are lead-based paint.

Photographs documenting the Project Area and the area or areas of painted or primed steel observed during the survey are appended.

4.2.1.3 DETERIORATED PAINTED SURFACES

Deteriorated paints were not observed during the walk-through of the Project Area at the time of the field activities.

4.2.2 SAMPLING OR TESTING FINDINGS

4.2.2.1 XRF TESTING RESULTS

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024

Summary

Negative for LBP Positive for LBP Calibration Verifications Total Number of Tests

15 4 6 24

Positive Lead-Based Paint Summary

Reading Number Room Number or Area Color Substrate Component

8 N Storage Room Tan Concrete Wall

9 Office Tan Wood Door

12 Exercise Area Tan Metal Vertical Support Beam

14 Room Center Tan Metal Vertical Support Beam

Complete XRF data tables are appended to this report.

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024

5.0 CONCLUSIONS

5.1 ASBESTOS

ACM (>1% asbestos) was identified based on the samples collected from the materials at Hurlburt Field, Building 90131.

Assumed ACM was not identified in the project area at Hurlburt Field, Building 90131.

Low concentrations of asbestos (trace to 1%) were not identified in the materials sampled at Hurlburt Field, Building 90131.

5.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT

Based upon the methodologies presented in this report and the findings reported, the following conclusions can be made:

According to state and federal guidelines, a paint or surface coating is considered to be “lead-based” or “leaded paint” if its lead concentration is greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/cm2 or 0.5%. However, any painted surface where lead was detected above a laboratory reporting limit below the regulatory concentrations contains lead. This includes those paints that also meet the definition of lead-based paint.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulates workers exposure to lead concentrations based on the permissible exposure limit of 50 micrograms per cubic meter (mg/m3).

Therefore, in order to satisfy OSHA requirements, worker protection and monitoring may be required for work activities that disturb paints that contain lead in any amount. In accordance with the OSHA Construction Standard for Lead (29 CFR 1926.62), it is the contractors’ responsibility to protect their workers when an employee may be occupationally exposed to lead.

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024

6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1 ASBESTOS

ACM or assumed ACM should be maintained in a good, relatively undamaged condition and periodically surveyed, typically through use of an operations and maintenance (O&M) program. Damaged or significantly damaged ACM should be repaired, encapsulated, enclosed or removed.

Category I non-friable ACMs must be properly removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor prior to renovations that would disturb the material. Federal, State and Local regulations and guidelines should be strictly adhered to when removing the ACM.

If additional suspect materials not documented in this report are encountered during work activities, the material should be considered asbestos-containing unless bulk sampling is performed and laboratory analysis proves otherwise. The renovation and/or demolition contractor should provide oversight to ensure that additional found suspect ACM is properly tested, if practical, or treated as asbestos-containing.

The client should consult the EPA’s NESHAP standard, the State of Florida’s asbestos regulations, and any local regulations, for additional details regarding asbestos-related demolition or renovation procedures and requirements.

6.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT

According to state and federal guidelines, a paint or surface coating is considered to be “lead-based” or “leaded paint” if its lead concentration is greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/cm2 or 0.5% by weight. However, any painted surface where lead was detected above the laboratory reporting limit contains lead according to OSHA. This includes those paints that also meet the definition of lead-based paint and/or paints tested by

XRF.

OSHA regulates workers exposure to lead concentrations based on the permissible exposure limit of 50 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3). Therefore, in order to satisfy OSHA requirements, worker protection and monitoring may be required for work activities that disturb paints that contain lead in any amount.

In accordance with the OSHA Construction Standard for Lead (29 CFR 1926.62), it is the contractors’ responsibility to protect their workers when an employee may be occupationally exposed to lead.

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024

7.0 WARRANTY AND THIRD PARTY RELIANCE

7.1 STANDARD OF CARE AND WARRANTIES

The field and laboratory results reported herein are considered sufficient in detail and scope to determine the presence of accessible and/or exposed suspect ACM and LBP materials for the Project Area. PSI warrants that the findings contained herein have been prepared in general accordance with accepted professional practices at the time of its preparation as applied by professionals in the community. Changes in the state of the art or in applicable regulations cannot be anticipated and have not been addressed in this report.

The survey and analytical methods have been used to provide the client with information regarding the presence of accessible and/or exposed suspect ACM and LBP existing at the time of the survey. Test results are valid only for the material or materials tested. There is a distinct possibility that conditions may exist which could not be identified within the scope of the survey or which were not apparent during the site visit.

This survey covered only those areas that were exposed and/or physically accessible to the Inspector.

PSI has assumed that factual information provided to us by the Client, or obtained from governmental sources, the public domain, interviews, and other sources is accurate, unbiased and complete. PSI assumes no liability for the accuracy of data provided to us by others and does not warrant or guarantee that the information provided by these sources is accurate, unbiased or complete.

Our services were not intended to be technically exhaustive. There is a possibility that with the proper application of methodologies, conditions may exist on the property that could not be identified within the scope of the survey or that were not reasonably identifiable from the available information. The report may not represent all conditions at the subject property or project area as it only reflects the information gathered from specific locations on the date of the survey. No inspection can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for asbestos in connection with the subject property.

As directed by the client, PSI did not provide any service to investigate or detect the presence of moisture, mold or other biological contaminants in or around any structure, or any service that was designed or intended to prevent or lower the risk of the occurrence of the amplification of the same. Client acknowledges that mold is ubiquitous to the environment with mold amplification occurring when building materials are impacted by moisture. Client further acknowledges that site conditions are outside of PSI’s control, and that mold amplification will likely occur, or continue to occur, in the presence of moisture. As such, PSI cannot and shall not be held responsible for the occurrence or recurrence of mold amplification.

No other warranties are implied or expressed.

7.2 RELIANCE

Peterson Engineering, Inc., PSI's client, may rely on this report.

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024

7.3 THIRD PARTY RELIANCE

This report was prepared pursuant to a contract between PSI and its client. That contractual relationship included an exchange of information about the property that was unique and serves as the basis upon which this report was prepared. Because of the importance of these understandings, our assessment may not be sufficient for the intended purposes of another party.

Reliance or any use of this report by anyone other than those parties identified above for which it was prepared, except with express written permission, is prohibited and therefore not foreseeable to PSI. Any unauthorized reliance on or use of this report, including any of the information or conclusions contained herein, will be at the third party's risk. No warranties or representations expressed or implied in this report are made to any such third party.

Third party reliance letters may be issued:

• upon timely request;

• subject to the permission of our original client; and

• payment of the then-current fee for such letters.

All third parties relying on our report, by such reliance, agree that such reliance is limited by our proposal and/or General Conditions, as applicable.

PSI Work Order Number 07833925 Hurlburt Field, Building 90131

March 1, 2024

Photographs

Photo 1: Building 90131

Photo 2: ACM Samples 03, 04

Photo 3: ACM Samples 05, 06

Photo 4: HVAC Piping

Photo 5: HVAC Piping

Photo 6: HVAC Piping

Photo 7: LBP Door

Photo 8: LBP Wall

Photo 9: LBP Column

Photo 10: Interior

Photo 11: Interior

Photo 12: Interior

Photo 13: Interior

Photo 14: Mech Room

Laboratory Analytical Report and Chain-of-Custody

Documentation

REPORT OF BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR ASBESTOS

TESTED FOR: PSI, Inc Peterson Engineering

Date Received: 2/21/2024 Date Completed: 2/28/2024

175 South A Street Pensacola, FL 32502 Attn: John Harris

Project ID: 07833925

Hurlbert Field Bldg. 90131

Date Reported: 2/28/2024

Page: 1 of 3Analyst: Lori Huss Work Order: 2402586

Lab ID (Layer)

Asbestos Content

(Percent and Type)

Non-asbestos Fibers

(Percent and Type)

Client ID Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.)

Analyst's Comment

001A01 (1) Tan, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

002A02 (1) Tan, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

003A03 (1) Gray, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(3) Tan, Floor Tile, Homogeneous Chrysotile2% None Reported

(4) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous Chrysotile2% None Reported

004A04 (1) Gray, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(3) Tan, Floor Tile, Homogeneous Chrysotile2% None Reported

(4) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous Chrysotile2% None Reported

005A05 (1) Gray, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(3) Tan, Floor Tile, Homogeneous Chrysotile2% None Reported

(4) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous Chrysotile2% None Reported

006A06 (1) Gray, Floor Tile, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(3) Tan, Floor Tile, Homogeneous Chrysotile2% None Reported

(4) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous Chrysotile2% None Reported

Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested as received. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A.

Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples (EPA 600/M4-82-020). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code 101350-0.

Respectfully submitted, Approved Signatory

PSI, Inc.

Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15220 Phone 412/922-4010 Fax 412/922-4014

George Skarupa

Page: 2 of 3Analyst: Lori Huss Work Order: 2402586

Lab ID (Layer)

Asbestos Content

(Percent and Type)

Non-asbestos Fibers

(Percent and Type)

Client ID Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.)

Analyst's Comment

007A07 (1) White, Mastic, Homogeneous 2% Polyethylene

3% WollastoniteNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

008A08 (1) White, Mastic, Homogeneous 2% Polyethylene

3% WollastoniteNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

009A09 (1) White, Mastic, Homogeneous 2% Polyethylene

3% WollastoniteNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) Black, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

010A10 (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 35% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

35% Fibrous Glass

011A11 (1) White, Ceiling Tile, Homogeneous 35% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

35% Fibrous Glass

012A12 (1) White, Drywall, Homogeneous 15% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) White, Joint Compound, Homogeneous

NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

013A13 (1) White, Drywall, Homogeneous 15% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) White, Joint Compound, Homogeneous

NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

014A14 (1) White, Drywall, Homogeneous 15% Cellulose FiberNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) White, Joint Compound, Homogeneous

NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

015A15 (1) White, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

016A16 (1) White, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Gray, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

017A17 (1) White, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

018A18 (1) White, Mastic, Homogeneous 2% WollastoniteNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested as received. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A.

Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples (EPA 600/M4-82-020). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code 101350-0.

Respectfully submitted, Approved Signatory

PSI, Inc.

Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15220 Phone 412/922-4010 Fax 412/922-4014

Page: 3 of 3Analyst: Lori Huss Work Order: 2402586

Lab ID (Layer)

Asbestos Content

(Percent and Type)

Non-asbestos Fibers

(Percent and Type)

Client ID Sample Description (Color, Texture, Etc.)

Analyst's Comment

019A19 (1) White, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

020A20 (1) White, Mastic, Homogeneous 2% WollastoniteNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

021A21 (1) White, Mastic, Homogeneous 2% WollastoniteNO ASBESTOS DETECTED

(2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

022A22 (1) White, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

023A23 (1) White, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

(2) Yellow, Mastic, Homogeneous NO ASBESTOS DETECTED None Reported

Report Notes: (PT) Point Count Results

Quantitation is based on a visual estimation of the relative area of bulk sample components, unless otherwise noted in the "Comments" section of this report. The results are valid only for the item tested as received. This report may not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. Method used: E.P.A.

Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Insulation Samples (EPA 600/M4-82-020). Polarized Light Microscopy is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Quantitative Transmission Electron Microscopy is currently the only method that can be used to determine if the material can be considered or treated as non-asbestos containing. Samples will be disposed of within 30 days unless notified in writing by the client. No part of this report may reproduced, except in full, without written permission of the laboratory. The reporting limit is 1% by weight. NVLAP Lab Code 101350-0.

Respectfully submitted, Approved Signatory

PSI, Inc.

Professional Service Industries, Inc. 850 Poplar Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15220 Phone 412/922-4010 Fax 412/922-4014

Drawings

'-2

3'-

4"

9"

'-1

0" 7'-

9"

0"

5'- 3"

5'-0"

13 13

13 13 13

FFICE

COMM

EA14

STAIR 2

EA12

ELEC

EA13

ELEC

EA15

MECH

EA16

MECH

A45

ELECTRICAL

A44

BRIEFING / BREAK AREA

UP

UP

20 20

21X

EA28

(NO WORK THIS AREA)

RK THIS

REA

RUCTION

Hurlburt Field AFB Building 90131 – Peterson Engineering, Inc.

ACM Positive Floor Sample Locations

Supporting Documentation

ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE LOG

Client: Peterson Engineering Date: 02/20/24

Client Address: Collected By: Harris

Project Site: Hurlbert Field Bldg. 90131 Project No.: 07833925

Sample Number

Sample Location and Material Description

01 Kitchen / 12” Tan Floor Tile w/Mastics

02 Kitchen / 12” Tan Floor Tile w/Mastics

03 Center NW Office / 12” Foor Tile w/Mastics (2 layers)

04 Center NW Office / 12” Foor Tile w/Mastics (2 layers)

05 N Office / 12” Floor Tile w/Mastics (2 layers)

06 N Office / 12” Floor Tile w/Mastics (2 layers)

07 Room A45 Mech / Pipe Mastics

08 Room A45 Mech / Pipe Mastics

09 Room A45 Mech / Pipe Mastics

10 Throughout Offices / 2x2 white Ceiling Tiles

11 Throughout Offices / 2x2 white Ceiling Tiles

12 Custodial Closet / Drywall System

13 Men’s Bathroom / Drywall System

14 Kitchen / Drywall System

15 HVAC Piping / Pipe Mastics

16 HVAC Piping / Pipe Mastics

17 HVAC Piping / Pipe Mastics

18 HVAC Piping / Pipe Mastics

19 HVAC Piping / Pipe Mastics

20 HVAC Piping / Pipe Mastics

21 HVAC Piping / Pipe Mastics

22 HVAC Piping / Pipe Mastics

23 HVAC Piping / Pipe Mastics www.intertek.com/building

LBP SURVEY XRF TESTING LOG

Client: Peterson Engineering Date: 2/20/24

XRF Serial No.: 2277 Inspector: Harris

Project Site: Hurlbert Field Bldg. 90131 Project No.: 07833925

Sample Number Component Description Component Location BGS PC XRF Reading

(mg/cm2)

- RMD 1.0 mg/cm2 Reference Test Block Parking Area W I 1.0

- RMD 1.0 mg/cm2 Reference Test Block Parking Area W I 1.0

- RMD 1.0 mg/cm2 Reference Test Block Parking Area W I 1.0

01 Yellow Stripe Floor C I 0.3

02 Yellow Stripe Floor C I 0.2

03 Tan Door Frame Bay Door #2 M I 0.1

04 Tan Door Frame Rear Exit M I 0.2

05 Tan Door N Office M I 0.2

06 Tan Wall N Wall CB I -0.1

07 Tan Door N Storage M I -0.1

08 Lt Tan Wall (Ceramic Coating) N Storage CB I 2.9

09 Tan Door Office M I 1.5

10 Tan Wall Kitchen GB I 0.1

11 Yellow Wall Men’s Bathroom CT I 0.0

12 Tan Vertical Support Beam Exercise Area M I 23.8

13 Tan Stair Riser Sleep Room M I 0.2

14 Tan Vertical Support Beam Room Center M I 21.3

15 Tan Door Frame Bay Door #1 M I 0.2

16 Tan Wall Electrical Room GB I -0.1

17 Tan Door Rm A14 M I 0.0

18 Blue Wall Sleep Room W I 0.0

- RMD 1.0 mg/cm2 Reference Test Block Parking Area W I 1.0

- RMD 1.0 mg/cm2 Reference Test Block Parking Area W I 1.0

- RMD 1.0 mg/cm2 Reference Test Block Parking Area W I 1.0

Paint Condition: I Intact, D Deteriorated

Background Substrate: W Wood, M Metal, C Concrete, CB Concrete Block, GB Gypsum Board, B Brick, P Plaster

Laboratory Accreditations

Personnel Accreditations

RRRcertifies

John C. Harris Intertek - PSI 175 S A St. , Pensacola, FL 32502

Having passed a 25-question exam with a score of 70% or higher has successfully met training requirements for

Asbestos Refresher: Inspector FDBPR Asbestos Licensing Unit: Provider #0000995; Course #FL49-0004731 (½ Day; 3.40 Contact Hours)

(Reaccreditation for Inspector under TSCA Title II/AHERA) Conducted

08/01/2023

Certificate #: 240015-9314 Exam Date: 08/01/2023 EPA accreditation expires: 08/01/2024 Principal Instructor: Brian Duchene, PE, LAC CEUs: .4 FBPR LAC: #0000995; Course #0004731 FBPE CEHs: #0004021; Course #0009083/Educational Institutions: 4 CEHs

Melanie S. Griffin, SecretaryRon DeSantis, Governor

STATE OF FLORIDA

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION

ASBESTOS LICENSING UNIT

THE ASBESTOS CONSULTANT HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE

PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 469, FLORIDA STATUTES

JERNIGAN, JEREMY RYAN

Do not alter this document in any form.

PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.

LICENSE NUMBER: AX73

EXPIRATION DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 2024

This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document.

545 EAST ALGONQUIN ROAD

ARLINGTON HEIGHTS IL 60005

Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=bdbf6ec9ffe891a69dcc0f823fafbd4e

SURVEY

APPENDIX B - GEOTECHNICAL REPORT