Solicitation Amendment FA301025R00160001 SF 30.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of theoffer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this Amendment is to: Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

1) Incorporate Addendum 1 (Attachment #9)

2) Incorporate Spec ETL 04-2 Chg 2 (Attachment #10)

3) Incorporate Revised SOW (Attachment #1)

4) Incorporate Revised Drawings (Attachment #2)

5) Revise Technical Factors in Section L and M

6) Notify offerors that Pre-Bid Site Visit Questions and Answers have been uploaded to the solicitation posting in the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) on 2 July 2025. By signing this amendment, the offeror acknowledges the questions and answers posted to Sam.gov.

7) Extend proposal due date to 23 July 2025 at 11am CDT

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following modifications were made:

Information From To Response Due Time 02:00 PM 11:00 AM Response Due Date 18 Jul 2025 23 Jul 2025

Section J - List of Attachments

The following Attachment(s) were added:

Attachment 1 - MAHG241077 Remove Rubber and Restripe Runway - Revised SOW Attachment 10 - MAHG241077 Remove Rubber and Restripe Runway - Spec ETL 04-2 Chg 2 Attachment 2 - MAHG241077 Remove Rubber and Restripe Runway - Revised Drawings Attachment 9 - MAHG241077 Remove Rubber and Restripe Runway - Addendum 1

The following Attachment(s) were deleted:

Attachment 1 - MAHG241077 Remove Rubber and Restripe Runway - Statement of Work (SOW) Attachment 2 - MAHG241077 Remove Rubber and Restripe Runway - Drawings

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

A. General Information

1. Contractor Selection

Selection of a contractor will be based on competitive, lowest price technically acceptable acquisition, consistent with the evaluation factors described in Section M

- Evaluation Factors for Award. Pursuant to the provisions of the clause at FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors - Competitive Acquisition, the Government intends to evaluate and award a contract without discussions with Offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the Offeror's initial proposal should contain the Offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer (CO) later determines them to be necessary. If the CO determines the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the CO may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

2. Point of Contact

The Contract Specialist and the CO are the sole points of contact for this acquisition. Address any and all questions or concerns in writing by email. The Contract Specialist and CO's address is as follows:

Contract Specialist:

Alicia Bowman 310 M Street, Bldg 4605 Keesler AFB, MS 39534 E-mail: alicia.bowman@us.af.mil

CO:

Tiffany Aultman 310 M Street, Bldg 4605 Keesler AFB, MS 39534 E-mail: tiffany.aultman@us.af.mil

3. Debriefings

All Offerors may request debriefings by providing a written request to the CO at the address located in Block 8 of Section A within three calendar days after receiving notification from the CO of elimination from the competitive range or award of contract. Offerors excluded from the competitive range may request a pre-award debriefing or a post-award debriefing upon notification of exclusion from the competitive range. However, offerors excluded from the competitive range are entitled to no more than one debriefing for each proposal. To the maximum extent practicable, debriefings will be conducted within five days of the debriefing request.

4. Proprietary Information

FA301025R00160001

Information deemed by the Offeror to be proprietary shall be clearly marked as proprietary information. Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation will not be returned.

5. Non-Government Advisors

(a) Offerors are advised that technical and cost/price data submitted to the government in response to this solicitation may be released to non-government advisors for review and analysis. The non-government advisor support will be provided by:

Company Name Address

HDR 1917 S 67th Street, Omaha, NE 68106-2973

Akima 2553 Dulles View Drive, Suite 700, Herndon, VA 20171

(b) Offerors shall complete paragraph (b)(2) or provide written objection to disclosure as indicated in paragraph (b)(1) if the offeror objects to disclosure of a portion of the proposal, the consent in (b)(2) should be provided for the remainder of the proposal.

(1) Any objection to disclosure*:

(i) Shall be provided in writing to the CO within 10 days of RFP issuance: and

(ii) Shall include a detailed statement of the basis for the objection. The detailed statement shall identify the specific portions of the proposal the offeror objects to disclosure to non-government advisors.

(2) I understand technical and cost/price data submitted to the government in response to this solicitation may be released to non-government advisors. I consent to release of any (unless objection is provided in (b)(1) above) proprietary, confidential, or privileged commercial or financial data provided by the firm(s) named below in response to this solicitation, to non-government advisors for review and analysis.

Firm:

Name (individual authorized to commit firm):

Title:

Date of Execution:

Signature:

*Note: The Government is the final arbiter in the disposition of any disclosure objections.

6. Period of Validity

The proposal shall remain valid through 180 days from the proposal due date.

7. Number of Awards

A single contract will be awarded for the project.

B. General Instructions

1. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts, Part I - Price Proposal, Part II - Technical Proposal and Part III - Past Performance Information.

2. The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements but, rather, shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities or experience and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror's proposal. Each part of the proposal shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its content may be evaluated without cross-referencing.

Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

3. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional cost information will be requested. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit information to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness of the price.

4. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. If an Offeror believes the requirements in these instructions contain an error or omission, or are otherwise unsound, the Offeror shall immediately notify the CO and Contract Specialist in writing with supporting rationale, as well as the remedies the Offeror is asking the CO to consider as related to the omission or error.

5. Written questions or requests for clarification may be sent via email to the 81st Contracting Org box: 81CONS.PKA.Flight@us.af.mil. After RFP release, it is encouraged that any questions or clarifications be submitted within ten (10) days of the RFP release date. The decision whether to respond to questions and requests for clarification submitted after those ten (10) days shall be at the sole discretion of the CO.

6. A pre-bid site visit will be conducted on 25 June 2025 at 2:00PM CDT. Information provided at this conference shall not qualify the terms and conditions of the solicitation and specifications. Terms of the solicitation and specifications remain unchanged unless the solicitation is amended in writing.

If an amendment is issued, normal procedures relating to the acknowledgment and receipt of solicitation amendments shall apply.

All prospective Offerors are highly encouraged to attend this conference/site visit and are advised that this will be held solely for the purpose of explaining the concepts involved in the project and the specification, terms, and conditions of this solicitation. Failure of a prospective Offeror to submit any questions or attend the conference will be construed to mean that the prospective Offeror fully understands all requirements of the solicitation.

C. Specific Instructions:

1. Offerors shall submit their proposals in either of the following ways:

Electronic proposals (in PDF format) may be submitted via email to 81CONS.PKA.Flight@us.af.mil and alicia.bowman@us.af.mil or via CD/DVD.

Hard copy submissions may be hand-carried or mailed to the address listed in solicitation block 8.

Electronic proposal should be no more than one hundred fifty megabytes (150MB) in size. Offerors are encouraged to refrain from incorporating detailed graphic items (other than any plans or drawings) as they are not required or desired. Any scanned documents incorporated into an Offeror's proposal shall be split into multiple files so that each individual file is no more than 50MB. Each part of the proposal (Parts I, II, and III) shall be a separate file. Each CD/DVD shall contain an electronic label, which is to be established on the CD/DVD when the CD/DVD is formatted. No password-protected, zipped, or self-extracting files shall be used.

***It's the offeror's responsibility to verify the receipt of their proposal prior to solicitation close date and time. ***

2. Cover Letter

The Offeror shall provide a cover letter listing the name(s), title(s), office phone number (if applicable, mobile number), and e-mail address(es) of those individuals authorized to make decisions on behalf of the Offeror with respect to the proposal and those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government for this solicitation. The Offeror shall also provide the official company/division street address, CAGE code, and UEI number as reflected in the current System for Award Management (SAM) registration.

3. PART I - PRICE PROPOSAL

Factor 1: Price All pricing information shall be addressed in this part of the offer. The source selection will be conducted with the expectation of adequate price competition per FAR 15.403-1(c)(1)(i); therefore, certified cost or pricing data is not required. However, if adequate price competition does not exist or the CO cannot determine price reasonableness, the Offeror may be required to submit data other than certified cost or pricing data or certified cost or pricing data to the extent necessary for the CO to determine price reasonableness.

(a) Complete blocks 14-20C of the RFP, SF1442. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP Sections A through J.

These sections constitute the model contract.

(b) Insert proposed unit price(s) in Section B for Contract Line-Item Number (CLIN) 0001.

(c) The contractor shall provide a signed and completed Standard Form 1442 along with a signed copy of any amendments.

(d) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in Sections B through K. Section K if this information is not in Sam.gov profile. Section I requires fill-in for 52.223-3 and 252.223-7001 if applicable.

(e) Submit bonding as specified in 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee.

4. PART II - TECHNICAL PROPOSAL:

Factor 2: Technical

(a) Use of Non-Government Advisors: The CO must ensure that before a Non-Government Advisor is given access to proprietary information, that the Government has received the consent of the submitting contractor(s) to provide access to the contractor(s) who are assisting the Government in the source selection. Therefore, the Offeror shall expressly provide its consent in the Technical Proposal, or by completing paragraph 5(b)(2) of the General Instructions, to the release of its proposal information to the companies listed in Table 1. Contact the CO prior to the receipt of proposals with any questions regarding participation or if there is an issue with providing consent. Please understand that failing to provide consent may affect Offeror's ability to propose for this effort.

Company Name Address

HDR 1917 S 67th Street, Omaha, NE 68106-2973

Akima 2553 Dulles View Drive, Suite 700, Herndon, VA 20171

Individuals from the above support contractors have signed individual non-disclosure agreements with the Government, which strictly prohibits any release or disclosure of information outside the source selection team.

(b) The offeror's technical proposal must be a Project Execution Plan, including all planned activities the offeror will use to complete the project in accordance with the Statement of Work, drawings, specifications, and appendices. The Project Execution Plan must address/include items (1) through (8) below:

(1) - Offeror's Construction Approach shall describe planned activities that are relevant to the specific project. The Offeror shall provide an approach that demonstrates their ability to execute all critical aspects of the construction within the performance period of the contract. including proposed labor hours and classification/skill sets that adequately address the Statement of Work, drawings and specifications.

(2) - Offeror shall provide a detailed construction progress schedule on a Gantt Chart (or similar) highlighting a breakdown of the items/tasks (milestones) identified in the SOW/Specifications/Drawings and how the offeror plans on accomplishing each individual task within the performance period specified for the project. At a minimum, the project schedule itself shall visually depict and address each of the following elements:

i. Order of work elements to include project phasing

ii. Number of days for each work element

iii. Identification of long lead time materials and their anticipated arrival and install date(s) (if applicable).

(3) - Offeror shall provide a narrative Quality Control Plan to include the following information: plan overview, matrix of roles and responsibilities, inspections testing required associated with project, record keeping and reporting, and standards for materials and workmanship.

(4) - Offeror shall provide a narrative environmental plan to show how spillage will be mitigated during construction.

(5) - Offeror shall provide a safety plan demonstrating compliance with OSHA standards.

(6) - Offeror shall provide a complete list of the materials needed and their quantities. All foreign materials shall be identified as such.

(7) - Offeror shall provide a complete list of the types and quantities of heavy equipment needed. No handheld or single-driver equipment will be acceptable.

(8) - Key personnel could include the Project Managers, Contractor Quality Control Managers (CQC Managers), Superintendents, Site Safety and Health Officers (SSHO) and any Office Administrators. Provide documentation demonstrating qualifications and experience of proposed key personnel. The Superintendent is not permitted to hold the same title as the Contractor Quality Control Managers (CQC Managers). Describe how communications with the Government shall be addressed, focusing in particular on problem avoidance/resolution.

***Note: Do not include price or cost information in Part II. If price or cost information is included in the Technical Proposal, the proposal may be deemed unacceptable and may not be evaluated.***

5. PART III - PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

Factor 3: Past Performance

(a) Provide a list of no more than five (5), of the most relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies or private customers within the last five (5) years. For the purpose of this solicitation, recent contracts are defined as those on which some portion of performance occurred during the last five (5) years from date of receipt of proposal. Relevant performance includes present/past performance effort involving similar scope, magnitude of effort and complexities of this solicitation. Only references for same or similar type contract will be acceptable. The offeror shall submit references by completing the Solicitation Attachment titled PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE LIST (PPRL), for contracts that you consider relevant in demonstrating your ability to perform the requirements in this solicitation.

The completed PPRL must be submitted with your offer and received by the RFP closing date and time. The offeror shall ensure that the references listed in the PPRL are provided the attachment titled PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ) for completion after the offeror completes Section A of the PPQ. If a CPAR is available for your references, annotate on the PPRL and no PPQ will be required. Completed questionnaires shall be sent by the reference completing the questionnaires directly to the Government Contract Specialist at the address shown in Block 7 of the SF 1442 or the email address below. THIS OFFICE STRONGLY RECOMMENDS ALL OFFERORS REQUEST THEIR REFERENCES TO SUBMIT THEIR PAST PERFORMANCEQUESTIONNAIRES IMMEDIATELY TO THE 81ST CONTRACTING SQUADRON, 81 CONS/PKA, 310 M STREET ROOM 106, KEESLER AFB, MS 39534-2147 OR EMAIL THEM TO 81CONS.PKA.Flight@us.af.mil.

If the Offeror is referencing on their PPRL an effort in which a PPQ was previously submitted in response to another solicitation issued by Keesler AFB, please annotate this on the PPRL and the PPQ submitted previously can be used by the Contracting Office for Past Performance Evaluation.

(b) The evaluation of Past Performance Information (PPI) will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to this solicitation.

The type of PPI identified within the PPRL will determine which of the remaining paragraphs apply.

(1) For PPI where the offeror was the prime contractor; comply with paragraph (c)

(2) For PPI where the offeror was a subcontractor; comply with paragraphs (c) & (d)

(3) For PPI where the offeror is using a subcontractor's PPI; comply with paragraph (c)& (e)

(4) For PPI where the offeror is part of a teaming arrangement; comply with paragraph (f)

(5) For PPI where the offeror is citing key personnel; comply with paragraph (g)

(c) Furnish the following information for each contract listed:

(1) Company name

(2) Contract number and Task Order number if applicable

(3) Contracting Agency/Customer

(4) Total Contract/Task Order Dollar Value

(5) Period of Performance (identify Task Order Period of Performance if applicable)

(6) Verified, up-to-date name, address & telephone number of the contracting officer or customer POC

(7) Description of work performed relevant to this solicitation

(8) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

(d) If offeror is using PPI from work, they performed as a subcontractor listed on the PPRL, in addition to information requested in paragraph (c) above, furnish the following information:

(1) What function(s)/task(s) did the offeror perform on the PPRL listed contract?

(2) What percentage of the total contract value did the offeror perform on the PPRL listed contract?

(3) What was the value of the subcontract on the PPRL listed contract?

(e) If using PPI from subcontractors as part of the PPRL, in addition to information requested in paragraph (c) above, furnish the following information:

(1) What function(s)/task(s) did the subcontractor perform on the PPRL listed contract?

(2) What function(s)/task(s) will the subcontractor perform on this contract?

(3) What percentage of the total contract value did the subcontractor perform on the PPRL listed contract?

(4) What percentage of the total contract value will the subcontractor perform on this contract?

(f) If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, the offerors shall provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past/present performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner. If this is a first-time joint effort each party of the arrangement shall provide any past and present relevant contracts to be evaluated, a maximum of three relevant contracts per party. Additionally furnish the following information:

(1) What function(s)/task(s) did the party perform on the PPRL listed contract?

(2) What function(s)/task(s) will the party perform on this contract?

(g) If using PPI from key personnel as part of the PPRL, in addition to information requested in paragraph (c) above, furnish the following information:

(1) What function(s)/task(s) did the key personnel perform on the PPRL listed contract?

(2) What function(s)/task(s) would the key personnel perform on this contract?

(3) What percentage of the total contract value did the key personnel perform on the PPRL listed contract?

(4) What percentage of the total contract value will the key personnel perform on this contract?

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD - The evaluation factors are:

I. PRICE PROPOSAL

II. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

III. PAST PERFORMANCE

1. This acquisition will be evaluated using the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) method. To be considered for award, an Offeror's proposal must conform to all solicitation requirements and the Offeror must be deemed responsible. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions unacceptable and the proposal, therefore, ineligible for award. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the evaluation process is subjective by nature and, therefore, professional judgement is implicit throughout the entire process.

2. The Government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective Offerors; therefore, the initial offer should contain the Offeror's best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

3. An Offeror may be asked to clarify certain aspects of its proposal (e.g., the relevance of past performance information) or respond to adverse past performance information to which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Exchanges conducted with regard to adverse past performance or to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions, and the Government reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

4. For the purpose of conducting evaluations, the Government will first rank all proposals by Total Evaluated Price (TEP), the total sum of all CLINs, calculated in accordance with the procedures outlined in Part I, Price Proposal. Then, the Government will evaluate Part II, Technical Proposal of the Offeror presenting the lowest TEP. If the Technical Proposal is rated "Acceptable" then the Government will evaluate Part III, Past Performance of the Offeror with the lowest TEP. If the Past Performance is rated "Acceptable" and the TEP is determined fair and reasonable, then award shall be made to that Offeror without entering into discussions or conducting Technical or Past Performance evaluations on other proposals, as this represents the best value to the Government.

5. If the lowest priced proposal does not have acceptable technical and/or past performance or the TEP is not deemed fair and reasonable, the Government shall evaluate the Offeror presenting the second-lowest TEP in accordance with paragraph 4 above. If the second-lowest priced proposal does not have acceptable technical and/or past performance or is not deemed fair and reasonable, the Government shall evaluate the Offeror presenting the third-lowest TEP (and so forth) until the LPTA offer is identified. The CO anticipates a high volume of proposals in response to this solicitation. Written notices shall be provided to unsuccessful Offeror(s) as appropriate.

6. Though it is the Government's intent to award without discussions, the Government may hold discussions if determined to be in its best interest. If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, Offeror responses to Evaluation Notices and the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the source selection decision. If the Offeror's proposal has been evaluated as Acceptable at the time discussions are closed, changes or exceptions in the FPR are subject to evaluation and may render the Offeror's proposal unacceptable and ineligible for award.

7. The Government will consider, throughout the evaluation, the "correction potential" of any deficiency. The judgment of such "correction potential" is within the sole discretion of the Government. If an aspect of an offeror's proposal does not meet the Government's requirements and is not considered correctable, the offeror may be eliminated from the competitive range.

Price proposals will be evaluated for reasonableness. Offerors whose TEP is determined to be unreasonable will not be considered for award. A. Price Proposal:

The TEP is the total sum of CLIN 0001 and CLIN 0002.

i.) Reasonableness: A comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation will be conducted and will be evaluated for reasonableness with one or more of the proposal analysis techniques described in FAR 15.404, which may include, but not limited to, comparison to similar contracts to include comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation and comparison to the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE). The proposed price will also be looked at for unbalanced pricing.

ii.) The bid guarantee will be inspected to ensure it is in the proper form and amount and adheres to the requirements found at FAR 52.228-1.

The Government's technical evaluation team will evaluate the Offeror's technical proposal on a pass/fail basis, assigning a rating of B. Technical Proposal:

Acceptable or Unacceptable, as defined in the table below.

i.) Project Execution Plan

The offeror's technical proposal must be a Project Execution Plan, including all planned activities the offeror will use to complete the project in accordance with the Statement of Work, drawings, and specifications. To be rated as acceptable, and to clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation, the offeror must provide a clear Project Execution Plan, and must adequately address/include items (1) though (8) below.

(1) Construction Approach

(2) Detailed construction Progress Schedule

(3) Quality Control Plan

(4) Environmental Plan (Spillage)

(5) Safety Plan

(6) List of Materials

(7) List of Heavy Equipment

(8) List of Key Personnel and Subcontractors.

The Government must be assured that the Offeror has the ability to perform the requirements of the Statement of Work, drawings, and specifications through the proposed Project Execution Plan. The plan shall not simply restate or rephrase the Government's requirements, but rather provide a convincing rationale explaining how the Offeror intends to meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation. If any aspect of items (1) through (8) above are determined to be deficient, incomplete, or unacceptable to the Government technical evaluation team then the overall technical proposal will be assigned an unacceptable rating.

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation

C. Past Performance: Past performance will be reviewed to confirm no Marginal or lower ratings exist. The CO shall seek recent and relevant past performance information based on (1) the past and present efforts provided by the offeror (ex: past performance questionnaires) and (2) data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources (ex: Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) ratings). Past performance evaluation ratings are defined in the table below. Offerors evaluated for past performance will receive a rating of "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable."

i) Recency: Past performance will be limited to work performed in the last five years from the issue date of the solicitation.

ii) Relevancy: Relevancy is defined as a stand-alone project comparable to this requirement in scope and magnitude. Contractor's performance on projects completed within the last five years from the issuance date, not completed but over 30%, and/or past CPARS ratings will determine acceptability. Relevant performance includes performance of efforts involving requirements that are similar to or greater in scope, magnitude, and complexity than the effort described in this solicitation.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not readily available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2) (iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or "neutral") past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered "acceptable."

Rating Description

Acceptable No marginal or lower rating exists in the offeror's performance record, or the offeror's performance record is unknown (neutral).

Unacceptable Marginal or lower rating exists in the offeror's performance record.