PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

DOCX document 21 KB Posted

Attached to
Roofing Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Contract Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA2521-09-R-0052
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Space Command

About this file

Performance Evaluation Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Roofing Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Contract, newest first.
File Type Posted
Question 6.docx DOCX document
Questions 5.docx DOCX document
June 2011 Bid Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA2521-11-R-0052 0004 Conformed Document.doc DOC document
FA2521-11-R-0052 0004 Modification Document.doc DOC document
June 2011 SXHT 12-1017 - IDIQ Spec 062211.docx DOCX document
FA2521-11-R-0052 0003 Modification Document.doc DOC document
Questions2.pdf PDF
FA2521-11-R-0052 0003 Conformed Document.doc DOC document
FA2521-11-R-0052 0002 Conformed Document.doc DOC document
FA2521-11-R-0052 0002 Modification Document.doc DOC document
Questions1.pdf PDF
5-23-2011 Bid Schedule Updated.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA2521-11-R-0052 U0001.doc DOC document
PEQ COVER LETTER.docx DOCX document
FA2521-11-R-0052 U0001 Conformed.doc DOC document
5-23-2011 Bid Schedule Updated.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SXHT 12-1017 - IDIQ Spec 042010.docx DOCX document
PEQ COVER LETTER.docx DOCX document
FA2521-11-R-0052 Roofing Solicitation.doc DOC document
SXHT 12-1017 Drawings.pdf PDF
Updated Bid Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Davis Bacon Act WD FL17 Mod 7 dated 31 Dec 10.pdf PDF
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE

FA2521-11-R-0052

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________Telephone Number: ____________________
Address: ____________________________Fax Number: _________________________
____________________________Point of Contact: ______________________
____________________________
____________________________

(The offeror will enter this information..)

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________* Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: _____________________________________

Address: ___________________________ Telephone Number: _________________________

___________________________________ Fax Number: _____________________________

___________________________________ Email Address: _____________________________

C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: Scott Syring, Contracting Officer, at scott.syring@patrick.af.mil, Kristine Lundblad, Contract Specialist, at Kristine.lundblad@patrick.af.mil and Candon Haynicz, Contract Specialist, at Candon.haynicz@patrick.af.mil.

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
3.
Compliance with Davis-Bacon Act and EEO requirements to include Payrolls properly completed and submitted
4.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
5.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
6.
Identified problems as they occurred & notified Contracting Officer promptly.
7.
Suggested alternative approaches and displayed initiative to solve problems.
8.
Developed realistic progress schedules and stayed on schedule.
9.
Completion of punch-list items.
10.
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
11.
Adequacy of site cleanup- all work and storage areas are cleaned and secured at end of each day.
12.
Effectiveness of jobsite supervision – site is safe and secure, clear line of supervision.
13.
Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
14.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
15.
Use of Specified Materials – contractor used specified or equal material or products.
16.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
17.
Contractor’s reasonableness in pricing change order modifications.
18.
Contractor’s quick response to emergency involving roofing damage.
19.
Contractor’s ability to meet Modified Bitumen roofing system requirements
20.
Contractor’s ability to meet Cold Fluid Applied roofing system requirements
21.
Contractor’s ability to meet Thermoplastic Membrane roofing system requirements
22.
Contractor’s ability to meet Metal roofing system requirements
23.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
24.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO
25.
Is the contractor rated in CCASS?
YES/NO

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER __________

Remarks:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION SEE FAR 2.101 AND 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .