ATTACHMENT_12__PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.docx
DOCX document 39 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA2517-15-R-7001
About this file
ATTACHMENT 12 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 70 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA2517-15-R-7001
ATTACHMENT 12 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
ATTACHMENT 12 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When completed, this document is source selection sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS SENDING REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE FORMS:
Section A (Part I and Part II) shall be completed by the Offeror (the team requesting the reference) prior to issuing the questionnaires. The Offeror shall send the questionnaires for relevant projects for work performed within the last three (3) years and work completed at least 12 consecutive months within those three (3) years to the individuals who will provide the reference. For Government contracts, send to the Contracting Officer or Contracting Officer’s Representative. For commercial references, send to personnel with duties similar to those for Government contracts. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to follow-up and encourages references to submit the questionnaire.
INSTRUCTIONS TO PERSON PROVIDING REFERENCE:
In order to assess potential vendors under the NORAD and USNORTHCOM Information Technology Service Management (N2ITSM) Support, Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract, the contracting office is obtaining past performance information with respect to each Offeror. As a reference for work performed by the firm identified in Section A of this questionnaire, your candid response will assist in the evaluation process. Please complete Section B (Part I and Part II) of the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible and submit to christian.freire@us.af.mil, with a copy submitted to karen.holdierfield@us.af.mil no later than the due date established in the solicitation. The subject line in the submission e-mail shall clearly indicate: N2ITSM Past Performance Questionnaire Submission for Company Name, and the message shall originate from the reference’s government or commercial e-mail system.
In addition to this questionnaire, you may receive a follow-up phone call to confirm or clarify information. This is a major Network Operations and Maintenance Support Contract acquisition and your input into this evaluation is greatly appreciated. If you have questions regarding this questionnaire or require assistance, please submit inquiries to christian.freire@us.af.mil.
Sincerely, KAREN HOLDERFIELD, Contracting Officer
SECTION A
TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR (THE FIRM REQUESTING THE REFERENCE)
PART I: MISSION SUPPORT OFFEROR INFORMATION
COMPANY NAME AND DIVISION NAME OF OFFEROR:
OFFEROR ADDRESS:
OFFEROR DUNS:
OFFEROR CAGE CODE:
PART II: PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
TITLE OF PROJECT:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
COMPETITIVE CONTRACT: YES |_| NO |_|
PRICING TYPE: (Check all that apply) |_| FFP |_| FFP-EAP |_| CPFF-Completion |_| CPFF-Term |_| CPIF |_| CPAF |_| ID/IQ |_| BOA
|_| Requirements |_| Labor-Hour |_| T&M |_| CR |_| Other (Specify) _______________
DATE OF AWARD:
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE (INCLUDING OPTIONS):
CONTRACT AMOUNT:
· INITIAL CONTRACT DOLLAR VALUE (W/OPTIONS): _________________
· FINAL CONTRACT DOLLAR VALUE (W/OPTIONS): _________________
ROLE ON PROJECT:
|_| PRIME
|_| SUBCONTRACTOR (EXPLAIN TYPE AND EXTENT OF SUBCONTRACTING, IF APPLICABLE):
|_| OTHER (EXPLAIN)
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF TYPE OF SERVICES/PRODUCTS REQUIRED UNDER THE CONTRACT:
DESCRIBE COMPLEXITY OF WORK:
SECTION B
TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR (PERSON PROVIDING REFERENCE)
PART I: REFERENCE INFORMATION
NAME & TITLE:
ORGANIZATION (INCLUDING AGENCYAND/OR COMPANY):
CONTRACT ROLE (e.g. CO, COR, PM):
ADDRESS:
PHONE NUMBER:
FAX NUMBER:
E-MAIL:
PART II: INFORMATION ABOUT PROJECT/CONTRACT FOR WHICH REFERENCE IS REQUESTED
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. The scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL
E EXCEPTIONAL – During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any, minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective action.
| VG | VERY GOOD – During the contract period, contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action. |
| S | SATISFACTORY - During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective action. |
| M | MARGINAL – During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective action appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required. |
U UNSATISFACTORY - During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or fail) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive Customer oversight and involvement was required.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know.
Performance Element
| TECHNICAL |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 1 |
| How well did the Contractor understand the scope and requirements at contract start and the IT capability and services that were required to support the organization? |
| 2 |
| How well did the Contractor perform to understand and meet mission requirements for the organization? |
| 3 |
| Perform IT Service Management requirements utilizing industry best practices (e.g. ITIL, COBIT, etc.) to meet performance measurements? |
| 4 |
| If the Contractor was required to support geographically dispersed organization how did the Contractor perform to meet these requirements? |
| 5 |
| Provide and maintain the appropriate DoD 8570 compliant technical management and system administration staff for cybersecurity and computing environment throughout the contract? |
| 6 |
| Ability to surge and meet contractual performance requirements during a contingencies and/or exercises? |
| 7 |
| Ability to effectively escalate and report program issues and problems to the COR, TPOC, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner? |
| 8 |
| If the Contractor was contractually responsible for the following IT Service Operations processes and functions, please rate their performance in each; |
a. Service Desk, Incident/Problem Management
b. Network Operations
c. Technical and Application Management
d. Cybersecurity Management
e. Network Operations
f. IT Service Continuity – COOP/Disaster Recover
| 9 |
| If the Contractor was contractually responsible for the following IT Service Transition processes and functions, please rate their performance in each; |
a. Change Management
b. Configuration Management
c. Asset Management
d. Enterprise Architecture
e. Supplier Management/IT Procurement
| 10 |
| If the Contractor was contractually responsible for the following IT Service Optimization processes and functions, please rate their performance in each; |
a. Project Management
b. Service Design/Engineering
c. Requirements Analysis
d. Service Release & Deployment
e. Service Testing & Validation
f. Service Improvements/Recommendations
| SCHEDULE |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 11 |
| Timely delivery of deliverables, accurate/concise reports and requests for information? |
| 12 |
| If applicable, provide project Task Order technical and cost proposals to meet delivery objectives within required response time that resulted in meeting the requirement and coming in on budget? |
| 13 |
| Successfully complete project Task Order deliverables meeting milestones and project period of performance or maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and/or Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues? |
| MANAGEMENT |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 14 |
| Provide experienced Program Manager, managers and supervisors with the management skills needed to meet contract requirements and performance with minimal or no direction from the COR or the TPOC? |
| 15 |
| Provide and maintain key contract personnel, demonstrate the ability to recruit, hire, train, retain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel with experience, education/certification, and qualifications appropriate to the effort performed for the contract period? |
| 16 |
| The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors? |
| 17 |
| Display initiative to take corrective actions relating to contract performance through their own quality control procedures and correct deficiencies in deliverables in a timely manner? |
| 18 |
| Cooperate with government personnel, responding efficiently and providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues as well as any technical and/or contractual changes? |
| OTHER |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 19 |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract? (Use additional sheets, if necessary)
What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract? (Use additional sheets, if necessary)
Given the choice, would you do business with this contractor again? YES_____ NO _____
Evaluator’s Signature Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .