Questions Responses - Amendment 4.doc

DOC document 28 KB Posted

Attached to
Advisory & Assistance Services & Systems Engineering & Technical Assistance Services for Headquarters, Air Force Space Command
Solicitation number
FA2517-08-R-9000
Issued by

About this file

Questions and Answers for Amendment 4

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
FedBizOpps Posting.docx DOCX document
Amendment 10 SF30 Summary of Changes.doc DOC document
Amendment 10 CSMC RFP 11 Dec 09.docx DOCX document
Amendment 9 CSMC RFP 11 Dec 09.docx DOCX document
Amendment 9 SF30 Summary of Changes.doc DOC document
Amendment 8 Attachment L-3 MWMD PWS FINAL 13 Oct 09.doc DOC document
Amendment 8 CSMC RFP.doc DOC document
Amendment 8 SF30 Summary of Changes.doc DOC document
Q A 13 Oct 09.docx DOCX document
Amendment 7 SF30 Summary of Changes.doc DOC document
Amendment 7 CSMC RFP.doc DOC document
Amendment 7 Questions Responses.doc DOC document
Attachment 5 Section L Attachments Amendment 6.doc DOC document
SF30 Summary of Changes - Amendment 6.doc DOC document
CSMC RFP Amendment 6.doc DOC document
Block 13 Continuation Sheet 2 Oct 09.docx DOCX document
Q A 29 Sep 09.docx DOCX document
Amendment 5 Attachment L-3 MWMD PWS FINAL 29 Sep 09.doc DOC document
Questions Responses - Amendment 5.doc DOC document
CSMC RFP 29 Sep 09 Amendment 5.doc DOC document
SF30 Summary of Changes - Amendment 5.doc DOC document
SF30 Summary of Changes - Amendment 4.doc DOC document
Amendment 4 Attachment L-3 MWMD PWS FINAL 25 Sep 09.doc DOC document
CSMC RFP 25 Sep 09 Amendment 4.doc DOC document
Q A 25 Sep 09.doc DOC document
SF30 Summary of Changes - Amendment 3.doc DOC document
Amendment 3 Attachment L-3 MWMD PWS FINAL 23 Sep 09.doc DOC document
CSMC RFP 23 Sep 09 Amendment 3.doc DOC document
Attachment L-2 MILSATCOM CSMC PWS Amendment 3.docx DOCX document
Questions Responses - Amendment 3.doc DOC document
Attachment 5 Section L Attachments Amendment 3.doc DOC document
Q A 23 Sep 09.doc DOC document
Questions Responses - Amendment 2.doc DOC document
Attachment 8 Contingency Plan Template.doc DOC document
Amendment 2 Attachment L-3 MWMD PWS FINAL 21 Sep 09.doc DOC document
Attachment 9 OCI Disclosure and Analysis Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1 CSMC PWS FINAL 21 Sep 09.docx DOCX document
Attachment 3 CSMC 254 21 Sep 09.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 Section L Attachments 21 Sep 09.doc DOC document
SF30 Summary of Changes - Amendment 2.doc DOC document
CSMC RFP 21 Sep 09 Amendment 2.doc DOC document
Q A 22 Sep 09.doc DOC document
Q A 21 Sep 09.doc DOC document
Attachment 5 Section L Attachments Amendment 1.doc DOC document
CSMC RFP 15 Sep 09 Amendment 1.doc DOC document
CDRL 0026 Sec H-2 Limitations on Subcontracting 15 Sep 09.rtf RTF text file
Questions Responses - Amendment 1.doc DOC document
Attachment 6 Proposal Delivery Directions.docx DOCX document
CDRLS Master List MCCR 24.rtf RTF text file
CDRLS Master List IPSC 22 23.rtf RTF text file
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 347 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Amendment 4

Questions & Answers

1. Question: Reference: RFP Paragraph L-8B. The 7th sentence of the referenced paragraph states: “Citations for TOs issued under General Services Administration (GSA) or any other IDIQ contracts shall cite the GSA/IDIQ contract number and the individual TO number with associated information on that TO versus the main GSA/IDIQ contract.” The verbiage, “Citations for TOs…” is causing confusion since it may imply more than one TO is permitted per citation. On 27 Jul 09, we asked this question: In our One-on-One discussions with the 21CONS on [XX] July 2009, we asked Ms Steed if the past performance citations would be Task Order, or Contract based. She replied that they would be Task Order based. Question: Will we be permitted to show our Prime qualifications and relevancy for Overall Contract Management, Subcontracting, & Cost by submitting a citation for our base N2A2S contract work? On 3 August 2009, 21 CONS replied: Response: No, the citation would have to be at the TO level, not at the IDIQ level. We seek confirmation that this guidance is still correct. Based on this answer, we understand that a single IDIQ contract composed of multiple task orders with an aggregate value of $9M or more would not qualify to meet the $9M relevancy requirement for Contract Management. We further understand that only a single task order with a value of $9M or greater would qualify for the relevancy requirement. Is our understanding correct?

Answer: Yes, to both questions above. See revision to RFP, Section L-8B.

2. Question: MW/MD PWS, page 21, paragraph 1.3.7.1.1 – reference to FAA, FNA, and FSA. Given the new JCIDS guidance in CJCSI 3170.01G (dated 1 March 2009), FAA, FNA, and FSA have been superseded.

Answer: See revision to MW/MD PWS, page 21.

3. Question: The Government identified a large number of "Quick Look Reports" as deliverables with the various PWS paragraphs of the OPIR section of the MW/MD PWS. It is the Government’s intent that the successful offeror provide that number of "Quick Look Reports" each year of the task order?

Answer: See revisions to MW/MD PWS, page 5, 6, 7, 8.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .