SETA_V_Final_RFP_Q A_Part_4.pdf

13 May 2015

NO. REFERENCE PG.

NO.

PARA.

NO

ISSUE / COMMENT QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

Can you clarify what is intended by having ODCs as a part of the labor rate calculation and not as a separate item in the TEP worksheet?

Can we zero out Columns C & K since our accounting practices do not apply ODCs to our Labor Rates?

2 RFP, Section M (previously submitted on 4 May 2015)

101 4.4 Paragraph 4.4 Section (ii) states that the pricing model (Attachment

6) “ includes labor categories, associated labor hours, and other direct costs, as predetermined by the Government.” We did not see any ODCs included in the pricing model and it appears that the model only uses labor and its associated indirect costs.

Please clarify Revised Govt Response from Q&A dated 4 May 2015. Removed ODC in the pricing model.

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (SETA) V

FA0021-15-R-0004

Questions and Answers RFP

1 Amendment 4, Solicitation

Attachment 1, On- Site FBLR Rates for Hurlburt Field and Cannon AFB

Column C and K on Years 1-6

Tabs

Columns C and K were added in the Years 1 through 6 Tabs in order to include an ODC Rate for the FBLR Calculation. Other Direct Costs (ODCs) are separate from Labor and we believe they should not be a part of any labor rate calculation. They are not a function of hours worked on site. We usually see ODCs (at a specified government level) for travel, supplies, etc., as a separate item in the TEP, but not in the Labor Rate Calculation. We noticed ODCs for Travel and Supplies are not in the TEP worksheet.

ODCs will be addressed at the task order level.

Attachment 1 revised to remove ODC from FBLR calculation.

Sheet1