SETA_V_Final_RFP_Q A_Part_2.pdf

PDF 18 KB Posted

Attached to
AFICA Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA) V Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA0021-15-R-0004
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Installation and Mission Support Center Installation Contracting Agency

About this file

Questions and Answers Part 2

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to AFICA Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA) V, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA0021-15-R-0004_Amendment_005.pdf PDF
SETA_V_Final_RFP_Q A_Part_4.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_On-Site_Fully_Burdened_Labor_Rates_(revised_21_May_2015).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA0021-15-R-0004_Amendment_004.pdf PDF
FA0021-15-R-0004_Conformed_Copy_dated_19_May_2015.pdf PDF
FA0021-15-R-0004_Amendment_003.pdf PDF
Attachment_7_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_rvsd.pdf PDF
FA0021-15-R-0004_Amendment_002.pdf PDF
FA0021-15-R-0004_Conformed_Copy_dated_11_May_2015.pdf PDF
FA0021-15-R-0004_Amendment_001.pdf PDF
SETA_V_Final_RFP_Q A.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_On-Site_Fully_Burdened_Labor_Rates_(revised).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_9_-_Consent_Letter.doc DOC document
Attachment_4F_-_PWS_Appendix_F_Acronyms.pdf PDF
Attachment_10_-_PPQRecipientList.doc DOC document
SETA_V_RFP_FA0021-15-R-0004.pdf PDF
Attachment_4C_-_PWS_Appendix_C_OCONUS_LOA.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_-_Total_Evaluated_Price.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_7_-_Present_and_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_ _Cover_Letter.pdf PDF
Attachment_11_-_Financial_Responsibility_Questionnaire.doc DOC document
Attachment_5A_-_WD2005-3033Rev14.pdf PDF
Attachment_4E(1)_-_PWS_Appendix_E_Addendum_1.xls XLS spreadsheet
Attachment_4E_-_PWS_Appendix_E_DD1423-2_Contract_Data_Requirements_List.pdf PDF
Attachment_4D_-_PWS_Appendix_D_DD254wAdd.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-_Education_Experience.pdf PDF
Attachment_4E(2)_-_PWS_Appendix_E_Addendum_2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_4B_-_PWS_Appendix_B_LOI.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_On-Site_Fully_Burdened_Labor_Rates.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_4_-_PWS.pdf PDF
Attachment_4A_-_PWS_Appendix_A_Mission_Description.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_Labor_Categories.pdf PDF
Q A.pdf PDF
DAtch04AASETAVPWS 1 .pdf PDF
DAtch04AppFAcronyms 1 .pdf PDF
DAtch04AppAMissDesc 1 .pdf PDF
DAtch12PPQRecipientList 1 .pdf PDF
DAtch04AppCOCONUSLOA 1 .pdf PDF
DAtch04AppDDD254wAdd 1 .pdf PDF
DAtch10PPCitationList 1 .pdf PDF
DAtch01ALaborRateTableHurlburt 1 .pdf PDF
Draft_RFP_SETA_V_14_Nov.pdf PDF
DAtch03LaborCategories 1 .pdf PDF
DAtch07_Cost_Workbook_SETA_V_14_NOV.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DAtch01BLaborRateTableCannon 1 .pdf PDF
DAtch11PPConsentLtr 1 .pdf PDF
DAtch08PPQ_and_CvrLtr 1 .pdf PDF
DAtch02_Education_Experience 1 .pdf PDF
DAtch04AppECDRLSA017Add1(1).xls XLS spreadsheet
DAtch04AppECDRLSA014Add1(1).xls XLS spreadsheet
DAtch04AppBLOIBlank 1 .pdf PDF
Show all 50

AFICA Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA) V has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

11 May 2015

NO. REFERENCE PG.

NO.

PARA.

NO

ISSUE / COMMENT QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

1 Solicitation 84 1.8.2 (c) Request the Government Clarify what is required to be attached, are you looking for a copy of the bidder’s response to Volume II, Subfactor 3: Quality Control Plan?

If not, please advise and clarify.

Yes. Attach a copy of your Quality Control Plan with Volume I.

2 Amendment 1, Section L

18-19, Table L0004-1 and para

3.4.2

There are apparently conflicting definitions of Prime Contributors.

In Note (1) in Table L0004-1 it says, “ “Prime Contributors” refers to contractors that will be performing 20% or more for each of the PWS functional areas.” In Para 4.3 it says, “ “Prime Contributors” refers to contractor, subcontractor, teaming partners, and/or joint venture partners who proposed to perform 20% or more of the proposed effort based on the total proposed price or perform aspects of the effort the offeror considers critical to overall successful performance.”

Which definition should we use? Is it 20% or more for each PWS functional area? or is it 20% or more of the proposed effort or perform aspects of the effort the offer considers critical...?

Revised paragraph 3.4.2 to read "Offeror shall submit no more than five (5) PPIs (at a minimum two (2) shall be from the Prime Contractor) from “Prime Contributors”. “Prime Contributors” refers to contractor, subcontractor, teaming partners, and/or joint venture partners who proposed to perform 20% or more of the proposed effort based on the total proposed price and perform aspects of the effort the offeror considers critical to overall successful performance. Each of the five (5) PPIs shall be on a separate Present and Past Performance Information Form (PPIF) (Attachment 8). Offerors are cautioned that the Government will use data provided by each offeror in this volume and data obtained from other sources in the evaluation of past performance."

3 Amendment 1, Section L

22 3.4.2 The instruction in the 1st sentence says, “Offer shall submit no more than five (5) PPIs (at a minimum two (2) from the Prime) for all “Prime Contributors” identified in the “Team Structure Matrix” in Volume II.” The instruction in the 3rd sentence reads At least one

(1) PPI is required for each “Prime Contributors.” We cannot comply with both instructions no matter which definition you use to define prime contributors (see Question 1). Our team has many more than 3 Prime Contributors subcontractors in addition to the Prime Contractor; i.e. we have more than three companies that are not the prime that will either do more than 20% for the specific PWS functional areas they are on the team for, or that we consider critical to success. If we can only submit 5 PPIs, and two have to come from the Prime, that only leaves 3 PPIs for subcontractors.

Since a PPI is required for all Prime Contributors (3rd sentence in 3.4.2), we cannot comply and stay under the 5 PPI limit (1st sentence in 3.4.2).

Please clarify which instruction has primacy? Paragraph 3.4.2 revised to clarify proposal requirements. See response to question 2.

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (SETA) V

FA0021-15-R-0004

Questions and Answers RFP

11 May 2015

NO. REFERENCE PG.

NO.

PARA.

NO

ISSUE / COMMENT QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

4 The summary shall include key technical capability features describing key technical, performance, and management features of the Offeror.The summary shall also include key contract features describing subcontractors, or Teaming Arrangements (TAs), delivery schedules for the period of performance including schedules for the basic and all options.

In the above requirement would you be able to clarify what is meant by “delivery schedules for the period of performance including schedules for the basic and all options”.

Please refer to PWS for delivery schedule requirements.

5 Since the proposal submission date for subject RFP has been extended to 26 May 2015, has the date for receiving PPQs also been extended 1 week?

Yes. PPQ submission due date revised. Please see attached updated PPQ template.

Sheet1

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .