Attachment_7_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_rvsd.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

AIR FORCE INSTALLATION CONTRACTING AGENCY

MEMORANDUM FOR _________________________________________ _______________

(Respondent) (Date)

FROM: HQ AFSOC/765SCONF

427 Cody Ave Hurlburt Field FL 32544-5407

SUBJECT: Request for Present and Past Performance Information, Solicitation No. FA0021-15-R-0004

1. Headquarters Air Force Special Operations Command (HQ AFSOC) is in the process of selecting contractors for award of a Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA V) Service contract. The estimated total value of this acquisition is $45 million to all awardees over the life of the 5-year contract. Detailed information regarding this solicitation may be found at http://www.fedbizopps.gov by searching Reference No.: FA0021-15-R-0004.

2. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offeror’s Present and Past Performance on contracts, which reflects the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts.

3. Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the attached questionnaire, which we have requested be forwarded by the offeror to his customers. We need your written response by 26 May 2015. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the information prior to start of negotiations. It is important that you return the completed questionnaire directly to the Government.

4. To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out by hand and scaned/emailed to, Attention: Kurt Buchanan at kurt.buchanan.1@us.af.mil . Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

5. Your assistance is greatly appreciated, and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

//Signed// MARTIN MUNIZ, Major, USAF Contracting Officer

1 Attachment Present and Past Performance Questionnaire

War-winning capabilities … on time, on cost http://www.fedbizopps.gov/ mailto:kurt.buchanan.1@us.af.mil

FA0021-15-R-0004

Attachment 7 11 May 2015

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor: ________________________________________________________________________________

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to: _________________________________________________

C. Contract number: ___________________________________________________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________________________________________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance: ______________________________________________________________________

G. Initial contract cost: $________________________________________________________________________

H. Current/final contract cost: $__________________________________________________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided:

Please identify relevancy of services provided to the following categories

Services Description

R el ev an t

N ot

R el ev an t

D on

’t K no w

(1) Management and Professional Support Services (PWS 1.3.1)

(a) Operations and Training Management and Professional Services (PWS 1.3.1.1)

(b) Acquisition and Logistics Management and Professional Support Services (PWS

1.3.1.2)

(c) Intellegence Management and Professional Support Services (PWS 1.3.1.3)

(2) Studies, Analysis, and Evaluations (PWS 1.3.2)

(3) Engineering and Technical Services (PWS 1.3.3)

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: ____________________________________________________________________

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): ___________________________________________________

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: ___________________________________________________________________________

B. Evaluator's title: ____________________________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________________

Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract: _________________________________________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

RATING SCALE: Please use the following ratings to answer the questions on the following page Rating Definition

Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Neutral No record exists.

N/A (Not applicable) should be used if the ratings are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation

NOTE: For statements indicating less than “Satisfactory”, please provide a brief explanation in the comments section of the survey.

11 May 2015

CONTRACTOR PAST PERFORMANCE

EVALUATION SURVEY FOR SERVICES

N /A

N eu tra l

U ns at is fa ct or y

M ar gi na l

Sa tis fa ct or y

V er y G oo d

Ex ce pt io na l a.) QUALITY OF SERVICE:

(1) The Contractor provided a product or service that conformed to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship.

(2) The Contractor submitted accurate reports.

(3) The Contractor utilized personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

b.) COST CONTROL:

(1) The Contractor performed the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(2) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(3) The Contractor demonstrated cost efficiencies in performing the required effort.

(4) The actual costs/rates realized closely reflected the negotiated costs/rates.

c.) SCHEDULE:

(1) The tasks required under this effort were performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the period of performance of the contract.

(2) The Contractor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

d.) BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:

(1) The Contractor demonstrated effective management over the effort performed.

(2) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and/or Technical Point of Contact (TPOC) were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.

(3) The Contractor presented information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

(4) The Contractor promptly notified the COR, TPOC, and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

(5) The Contractor cooperated with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to critical program issues.

(6) The Contractor made timely award to, and demonstrated effective management of, its subcontractors.

(7) The Contractor demonstrated an effective small/small disadvantaged business subcontracting program.

e.) MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL:

(1) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor performance.

(2) The Contractor proposed qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract.

f.) CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

(1) The services provided adequately met the needs of the program.

(2) The Contractor was able to perform with minimal or no direction from the COR or the TPOC.

(3) I am satisfied with the performance of the Contractor under this effort.

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or U (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above.

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

No ___ Yes___

Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

11 May 2015

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired. You may include information on any other contracts with the contractor that you believe are relevant to this source selection.

Evaluator’s Signature:

Printed Name of Evaluator: _____________________________________________________Date: ____________

Please email this completed “Present and Past Performance Questionnaire” directly to kurt buchanan at kurt.buchanan.1@us.af.mil or maria_jaine.sipin@us.af.mil by 26 May 2015.

If you do not have email capability, please mail your response marked “TO BE OPENED BY ADDRESSEE ONLY” to:

HQ AFSOC/765 SCONF

ATTN: KURT BUCHANAN

427 CODY AVE, SUITE 215

HURLBURT FIELD FL 32544-5407

Your prompt response is appreciated. Thank you for your assistance!