EXHIBIT C- Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 134 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W58RGZ-25-R-0002
About this file
The document is an Army Source Selection Supplement Past Performance Questionnaire dated December 21, 2012, designed to collect detailed performance evaluations for federal contract opportunities. The questionnaire provides a structured method for assessing contractor performance across five key areas: quality of work, timeliness of performance, cost control, customer satisfaction, and overall business conduct. Evaluators can rate performance using a five-tier scale ranging from Outstanding to Unsatisfactory, with requirements for explanatory comments for ratings at the extreme ends of the spectrum (Outstanding, Marginal, and Unsatisfactory).
The form requires comprehensive contractor identification details, including contract specifics like contract number, award date, and nature of contractual effort. It also solicits additional performance references and allows respondents to provide general comments about the contractor's performance. The document emphasizes the importance of providing factual, accurate, and complete information to support federal contract award decisions, with a request to return the completed questionnaire within three days of receipt.
View the file
Other files
Show all 43
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ARMY SOURCE SELECTION SUPPLEMENT (December 21, 2012) G-1
Past Performance Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the requesting firm within 3 days.
Adjectival Rating Definitions:
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
ARMY SOURCE SELECTION SUPPLEMENT (December 21, 2012) G-2
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
A. Quality of Work
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
B. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
Acceptable
ARMY SOURCE SELECTION SUPPLEMENT (December 21, 2012) G-3
C. Controlling Costs
Acceptable
D. Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
Acceptable
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number
Address:
E-mail Address:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .