MIL-STD-1625C.pdf

NOTE: MIL-STD-1625 has been redesignated as a Standard Practice. The cover page has been changed for Administrative reasons. There are no other changes to this Document.

MIL-STD-1625C(SH)

25 August 1987___

SUPERSEDING

MIL-STD-1625B(SH)

31 August 1984 (See 10.3)

AMSC N/A FSC 1950

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

STANDARD PRACTICE

SAFETY CERTIFICATION PROGRAM

FOR

DRYDOCKING FACILITIES AND SHIPBUILDING WAYS

FOR

U.S. NAVY SHIPS

Downloaded from http://www.everyspec.com

SafetyCertification for U.S. Navy Ships.

MIL-STD-1625C(SN)

25 August 1987

DEPAS2WNT OF TNS NAVY

NAVAL SEA SYSTEKiCOMMAND

Washington,DC 20362-5101

Program for DrydockingFacilities

,1 and Shipbuildingways

1. This UilitaryStandardis approvedfor use by the Naval Sea Systems Command,Departmentof the Navy, and is availablefor use by all Departments and Agenciesof the Departmentof Defense.

2. Beneficialcomments(rec_ndntions, additions,deletions)and any I&t i-nent data which may be’of use in improvingthis documentshouldbe addressed to: Commander,Naval Sea Systems Coiumand,SSA 55Z3, Departmentof the Nakyi Washington,DC 20362-5101by using,the self-addressedStandardizationDocument ImprovementProposal(DD Form 1426) appearingat the end of cM6 document or by letter.

ii

MIL-STD-1625C(Sli) 25 August 1987

FORSWORO

1. The SafetyCertificationProgram (SCP) for drydockingfacilitiesand shipbuildingways, includingtransferfacilities,has been establishedto enfiure the safetyof U.S. Navy ships which are to be drydockedor built on these facil-ities. The procedureentails an evaluationand approvalof data associatedwith the design,physicalcondition.and operationof the facilities. This procedure is describedin detail in this Nflitaty Standard(hereinafterreferredtc ae the “standard”).

2. The certificationprocedures,contentsof certificationreports,and technicalrequireuetttafor certificationare describedin this standard. The SCP descriptionand general certificationreqeircmentsare prOvidedin section 6.

Detailedtechnicalrequireob?tttsare describedin sections5 through9.

3. This documentis applicablefor certifyingNavy-operatedand com-merciallyaperateddrydocking,building,and launchfngfacilities: but does not necessarilyreflect all of.the design requirementsof dry docks, building ways or launchways which are requiredby tikwdesign ship specifications.

4. The certificationof a facilityis based upon the evaluationof the facilltydata providedfor certificationby tlieoperatingactivity. The operat-ing activityremainssolely responsiblefor maintainingand operatingthe facilityin a safe manner and condition.

S. Certificationof U.S. Navy dry docks leased to cotnm?rcialoperators should be obtainedby the operatorprio,rto docking Navy sMp E. The Navy is not respnnaiblefor providingor preparittgcertificationdata. Certificationof the dock is not “requiredfor dockins nom-Navy ships.

I 6. In any safety program, there im the need for a strong positionregarding the trainingof personnel. Training programashould enriurethat new peraomael are adequatelyqualifiedto perfotm their.aesignedfguc.t@s_and that every personhas a sound kttowledgeof how their work station interactswfth others.

The programsshould alsn have provisinnafor qualifiedpersonnelto periodically reviewthe responsibilitiesand qualificationsof their work stations,and for

I retrainingor requalificationwhenever new procedures.oroperationsare introduced.

7. Where term are used herein such’‘as%ubudtted”, “sub&tted to the ‘Navy”,“providedto the Navy”, or “made availablefor Nevy review”,the recipient is intendedto be:

(a)

(b)

I

The Naval Sea .SYatema Comtt+snd(Industrialand FacilityManagement Directorate)when a Navy shore or fleet activityis submitting the certificationreport for its ovn drydockingfacility.

The supervisorof shipbuilding,or other designatedNavy I representative,when a U.S. Navy contractoris submittingthe

, certificationreport for his own or leafieddrydockfngfacility.”

iii

. . ..-. N -N

. . . . . . W.*.“

. . . . . .{. .m

“la”””” 5,.~. . . ..o ~.. m .“O . . . . .:. .-s .Z . . . . ..w. .?

r+Ne4

EgOJ

BEJ

tJw

OIJ

0$4 fJcl

~>y ~cso

N“N“4

U-?umu-$m

. ..0..

. ...4..

mu-i L.-IMI*.D.D.D--I.- .-mmmmmco’=o

. ..5’

. . . . . . .. -J

.. U.....@. ‘.4

-ml-u .N!+riri:. . . . .U“U”U-Y U-7U o-la -Wro .-m u“u”mwiui~al. mm~ --- 4--4-4 wl--4e4eIr+NNrJe4r4 NF1l.il+.-’lnm

uu. iuevuuuu uuu. wuuue

.2 liIL-sTD-1625C(S!i) 25.August 1987

. CONTENTS- continued

I

Paragraph4.3.3 .4.3.3.1 4.3.3.2 4.3.3.3 .?$.3.3.4 4.X3. 5 4.3.3.6 4.3.3.7 4.3.4 4.3.4.1 4.3.4.2 4.4 4.4.1 4.4.1.1

4:4.2 4.4.2.1 4.4.3 4,4,3.1 4.4.3.2 4.4.3.3

,. .4.4.4 4.4.4.1.

4.4.4.2 4.4.4.3 4;4.5 4.4.5.1 4.4.6 4.5 4.5.1 4.S.2 4.5.3 4.5.4 4.5.5 4.6 4.6.1 4.6.1.1

4.6.1.2 4.6.1.3

4.6.1.4 4.6.2 4.6.3 4.7/

4.7.1 4.7.2 4.7.2.1

F~ Content Responsibility FCR preparation Proprietarydata FCR submission Revisions Retention

PAR

Content Other requirements Surveys Snleofeurveys Facilitiesconstructedunder the aupervisfon of classificationsocietiesor the U.S. Navy Requiremencefor eurveye . . . ., Responsibilitiesof the operator Surveyor Selection Tasks Qualificationsof surveyor Evaluationof survey results Classificationof itenm surveyed Surveyorrepnrtlngresponsibilities Corrosioncriteria Documentationof nurvey results Survey data retentlnn ~ On-site“visitby a Navy representative Correctiveaction end monitoringplans Correctiveaction plan f40nic0ringplan . . . . . . . . . ...’...

Surveyor’a endorsement Responsibility. . . ...’

Reportingrequirements Z&sign data and calcuhtions General Nonpermanentfacilitiesor facilitiesof tmusualdes,igm

‘Daeigndata . . . . . . . . . . ...”

Evaluationof the present state of the facility Deviations FCR content FRR content I’1+’mingproceduresand personnelqualification criteria

Harmfngproc.edure Personnelqualificationcriteria Facilicy operationssupervisor

Elss

8..

9 I

.9

,13

I v

Paragraph4.7.2.2

4.8 4.8.1 4.8.1.1 4.8.2

4.8.2.1 4.8.2.2

4.8.2.3 4.8.2.4 4.8.2.5 4.8.3 4.8.3.1 4.8.3.2 4.9 4.9.1 4.9.2, 4.9.3

4.9.4 4.9.5

4.10 4.10.1 4.10.2 4.10.3 4.10.4 4.10.4.1 4.10.4.2 4.10.4.3 4.10.4.4 4.10.4.s 4.10.5 4.10.5.1 4.10.5.2 4.10.5.3 4.10.5.4

5.

5.1 5.1.1 5.2 5.2.1 5.2.1.1 5.2.2 5.2.3 tilL-sTD-1625c(SH)‘ 25 AugusK 1987

CONTENTS- Continued

Qualificationsand certificationof a facility operationssupervisor Operatingprocedures General . . . . . . . . . . . .:

E~rgency procedures Requirementsfor operationof a certified facility

CRC . . . . . ...’

S&qufrement.sfor operationallimitationsand stabilityconsiderationsfor a particularchip.

Planning Nomaloperatl.on Emergencyoperation Accidentand incidentreports Requirements Submission Protectionof a ship duringthe lay period . . .

Applicability Securitypatroland fire watch during the lay period Systemsfor the preventionof unauthorized operationand flooding Disasterplanning Protectionof a sNp during the lay period for small facilities . . . . . . . . ....’

Ii.9intenanceprogram Purpose Procedure Generalrequirements Detailedrequirem+mts Preventivemaintenance Control inspections Correctionof deficiencies Configurationcontrolprocedure Operatingprocedurechangea 8iennialaudite Scheduling Scope Maintenanceprogramdocu!m?ntation Evaluationof audit findings

DETAILEDMQUIE2MENT5

General Types of facilities Cry Blockingcapacity .

Alignmentof blocks Availablebuoyancy.

Stability

FOR

FLOATINGDOCKS

17.

,7.

16’ vi

I MIL-sTD-1625C(SH) 25.August 1987

I

Paragraph5.3

5.3.1 5.3.2 5.3.3 5.3.3.1 5.3.3.2 5.3.3.3

5.3.4 5.3.4.1

<:) 5.3.4.1.1 5.3.4.2 5.3.5 5.3.5.1 5.3.5.2 5.’3.5.3 5.3.5.4 5.3.5.5 5.3.6 5.3.6.1 5.3.6.2 5.3.6.3.

5.3.1 5.3.7.1 5;3.7.2 5.3.7.3 5.3.7.4 5.3.7.5 5.3.8 5.3.9 5.3.10 5.3.11 5.3.11.1 5.3.11.2 5.3.12 5.3’.13 5.3.14 5.3.14.1 5.3.lfl..2

5.3.14.3 5.3.14.4 5.3.15 5.3./15.1 ‘5.3.15.2 5.4 5.4.1 5.4.1.1

CONTENTS- Continued

Deeign data and physicalcharacteristicsof the facility

Certificationreportcontent General arrangement Stabilityand buoyancy Stabilityand buoyancycriteria Deelgn data Evaluationof presentstabilityand buoyancy 28 condition Structure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...28 “,, Structuraldesign data Material etrengthcriteria Evaluationof present stmctural condition. . . 29 Ballastingand deballastingsystems Ballastingand deballastingthe Arrangement Piping systems Reliability Ballast+eballast control Electricpower system Independently-powereddo.iks Shore-dependentdocks . .‘ Distribution Indicntorfi Draft indicators. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31.

Trim and heel indicators Ballast tank levelindicators Dock deflectionindicators Ballast system valve indi,tators Cemmunicstioneystems Essential lightingayetems Uamg . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..3z Mooring and anchoring . .“ Sefamic character~6tics . . . .’. . . . . .,. . ~~ Weather history .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ‘.

ClosureB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..~~ Blocking .’....... . . . .’........ :

Fire protectioneyetems

34“Sy~,te~descr~ptitm . . . . . . . . . - - . ...“ Requirementsfor a floatingdry dock’s fire protectionwater . . . . . . . .“ Fire stations Liquid fuel and electricalfires Additionalrequiremcntefor launchpontoone . . 35 ~ Sh$p transfersystem Pontoon transfersystem Operationallimitations . . .‘ Lifting capacitycurves Effect of ship locationon liftingcapacity . . 36 vii

MIL-STD-1625C(SN)

cONTENTS- Continued

Paragraph5.5 5.5.1 5.6 5.6.1 5.6.2 5.6.3 5.6.4 5.6.5 5.6.5.1 5.6.5.1.1 5.6.5.1.1.1 5.6.5.1.1.2 5.6.5.1.2 5.6.5.1.3 5.6.5.1.4 5.6.5.1.5 5.6.5.1.6 5.6.5.2 5.6.5.2.1 5.6.5.2.2

5.6.5.2.3 .

5.6.5,.3 5.6.5.3.1 S.6.5.3.2 5.6.5.3.3 5.6.6 “5.6.6.1 5.6.6.2 5.6.6.3 5.6.6.3.1 5.6.6.3.2 ;.:.;.:.3’ 5.6.7

5.6.7.1 5.6.7.2

5.6.7.3

5.6.7.4 5.6.7.5 5.6.7.6 5.6.7.7 5.6.7.8

5.6.7.9 5.6.7.10 5.6.7.11

Es_!?

Calculationsfor dockingof a particularship. . 36 Additionaldata Surveys Checkofflist Light dock weight determination Submcrgenceteet Leakage ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...37’ StructuralSurvey Structuraleurvey of steeldocks Special case, initialcertification New docks Facilitiesrecentlyoverhauled Underwaterhill eurvey (steel) Visual inspection Evaluationof resultefrom visualirwpection. . 38 Gauging Corrosioncriteria Structuraleurvey of timberdocks Underwaterhull survey (timber) Visual inspectionof structuralmembers Caulking Structuralsurvey of concretedocks Underwaterhull survey (concrete) . . . . . . . 39 “1 Visual inspection Detailedexamination 2nspectionof blo&ing . . “ Wooden.blocks Compositeblocka Block securingmethods. . . . . . . . .’

Steel dock hlocking Concretedock blocking Wooden dock blocking Ihtulingblocking htspectionof mechanicaland electrical systems Test.ofpipingaystems Test8 of ballastingand deballastingsystems andgaugee Detailedinspectionof electricaland mechanicalsystenm Controls Communicationsystemsand alatms Fire protectionayetems Block handlingsystems Crane stops, rails,supportsand securing systems

Mooring and anchoringsystenq Electricpower systems. ;

Stern or bowclosu~es’ viii liIL-sTD-1625c(SH)

‘-:.P.eragraph5.6.7.12 -, 5.6.8

‘L; 5.6.9 5.6.10 5.6.1,1 5.7 5.7.1 5.7.2

6.

6.1 6.2 6.3

6.3.1 6.3.2 6.3.3 6.3.3.1 6.3.3.2 6.3.3.3 6.3.3.4.

1;. 6.3.3.5 ,, 6.3:3.6

; ‘L—’ 6.3.4 6.3.4.1 6.3.4.2 6.3.4.3:!’.

.. 6.3.4.4 6.3.4.5 6.3.5 6.3.6 6.3.6.1 6.3.7

,, 6.3.8 6.3.8.1

6.3.8.2 i, —. 6.3.9 6.3.9.1

6.3.9.2 6.3.9.3 6.3.10 6.3.11 6.3.12 6.3.13

1 6.3.14 .6.4-.

CONTENTS- Continued

SNppoaitioning gear” Site .sumey Eydrographicsurvey Docking or undotkiogevolution . . . . . .,. . 42 Sectionaldocks and launch ponconna Op&acieg pre&adurea Datailedrequiremantafor floatingdry dotks . . 43 Floodingprecautionsduring the lay parind . . . 43

DETAILEO~XOR CRAVXIJGDOCKS

Facili~typea i Csc . . . ...”..”

Oesigm data and physicalcharacterlaticaof.

the facility Certificationrepert content “Generaldescription Site characteriatica Central geology %il charaeteriatice %eultso faoileurveya. . . . . . . . . ...44 “.

Saau2tt3of qecia2 geoterhni.calstudies Tidal ranges and bathyuetry *iadc eharacterieti~ . . .~ “Struttur.slaealyaea Applied leada General analysle mathoda, tbxkwalle... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .46, Deek floor Uplift t?tabilit y Flooding ayatema Drwateringand drainageeyatems Gankraldala Power supply . . . . . :

Plnedfng protectionuyatema .’

Floeding protectionfor docks floodedthreugh slulcegategi Floeding protectionfor docks floededthro&h thecaisaon Pire,protectionsystem . . . . . . . .‘. . . . W ~quire~nte for a gravingdo~’ a fire protectionwater FSreatati0n9 U“quid fuel and electricalfires Communicationaystemaand alarms Eesantial lightingayetema Caisaen B1ocMIIs . . . . . . . . . . . i . . ... . ..5O Seismic effects Operationallimitations . . . -ix

MIL-STD_1625C(SH)

2> August 1987

Paragraph6.5 6.5.1 6.5.2 6.5.3 6.5.6

6.5.4.1 6.5.4.2 6.5.4.3

6.5.5 6.5.6 6.5.6.1 6.5.6.2 6.5.6.3 6.5.7 6.5.7.1

6.5.7.2 6.5.7.3 6.5.7.4 6.5.7.5 6.5.7.6 6.5.7.7 6.5.7.8 6.5.7.9 6.5.7.10 6.5.8 6.6 6.6.1 6.6.2

7.

7.1 7.2 7.3

7.3.1 7.3.2 7.3.2.1 7.3.3 7.3.4 7.3.5 1.3.6 7.3..7 7.3.8 7.3.9 7.3.10 7.3.11

CONTENTS- Continued .?%S

Surveys Checkoff list Observationof dotkingand undotking Examinationof operatingloge Basic dock, concretecaissonand pump house etrncture

Pressurerelief system Ccieaonsttucture .’

Caieson or entranceclosureunderwater Sm21aurvey Soil borings and piezoretricsurveys Inspectionof.blotkiog Wooden blocke . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . “.”53 Compositeblocks Hauling blocks Inspectionof electricaland mechanicaleystems. 53 Detailedexaminationof electricaland mechanicalsystems Controls Fire protectionequipment Cawmunicationsystemsand alarms Floodlngand pumping ayatems Block hcndli~ system Electricpower systems Draft gauges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .“54 MOoring systems ..’

Ventilationsystems Evaluationof eurvey results Operatingprocedure - . . . . . .“ Detailedrequfrcmentnfor gravingdocks Flooding precaution during the lay period . .”. 54

DETAILSDRSQUIREMSNTKFOR !iAR2SSRAIIXAYS Facility types ~c Design data and physicalcharacteristlcaof thcfatility

Certificationreport wnttit .Site characteristics Seiemic characteristics &neralarrang-nt Cradle weight Stability Blocking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .56.

Cradle structure Fdlers, wheels and bcaringe Groundwaysetructure. . . . - Essential lightingsyateti. . . . . . . . . . . S7 Fire protectioneystems x

MIL-ST!J-1625C(SH)

25 Au@st 1987

I “j

Paragraph7.3.11.1

7.3.11.2

7.3.11.3 7.3.11..4 7.3.12 7.3.13 7.3.14 7.3.15 7.3.16 7.3.17 7.3.18 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.6.1 7.6.2 7.6.3 7.6.4 7.6.4.1 7.6.5 ,7.6.5.Y 7.6.5.2 7.6.5.3 7.6.6 7.6.6.1 7.6.6.2 7.6.6.3 7.6.6.6 7.6.6.5 7.6.6.6 7.6.6.7 7.6.7 7.6.8 7.7

8.

8.1 8.2 8.3

8.3.1 8.3.2 8.3.2.1 8.3./3 8.3.4 8.3.5 8.3.6 8.3.7

CONTSNIS- Continued w

Rcquire~nts for mcrine railwayswith a CRC of 500t0ne0rm0re

Rcquirerent6for marine railwayswith a CSC under 500 tons Fire stations ..;

Liquid fuel and electricalfires Imhaulchcins orwireropc Znhaulmcchinery Poucrload analysis:

Communicationoyatcmcand ahcmc Bilge blo&’bcnd2ing systems , Equipment for ship hcndling . . . . .. . . . . 5B Transfer system OperationalIimitatienc Pre-dockingcalculations Surveys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...58” Checkoff list Observationof a mcrine railwayin operation. . 58 Line and grade survey 5tficturalsurvey Cradle 2nspectionof blocking Sioodenblorkc Blotlsecuriag methods. . . . . . . . . . . ..”60 Eaidinfjblocking Inspectionof electricaland mechenicclayetems. .60 WlieeIa,rollers and rollerframes Chcinsapd wire rope -ulingges.r . . . . . . . . . ...”..... .60.

Fire protectionsystem Block hcndlingayatems Electric power syetcm Communicationayatemsand alarms Draft.mcrkera Mooring equipmentsnd fittings Operating procedures. . . ., DETA2LED ESQO18EMENTSPollVERTICALL2.PTB i . . . 61 Types Of fa@litiea . . . . . . ........~~

CRC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...’

Design data and physicalcharacteriaticaof the facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...61.

Certificationreport content Site arrangemnt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .62- Seiemic characterintica General arrangement BloikinK platform sioiets Wire rope and chains xi

HIL-STD-1625C(SH)

Paragraph8.3.8 8.3.9 8.3.10 8.3.11 8.3.12 8.3.13 8.3.14 8.3.15 8.3.15.1

8.3.15:2

8.3.15.3 8.3.15.4 8.3.16 8.3.17 8.4 8.5 8.5.1 8.5.2 8.5.3 8.5.4 8.5.5 8.5.6 8.5.6.1 ‘8.5.6.2 8.5.6.3 8.5.6.4 8.5.7 8.5.8 8.5.9 8.5.10 8.6

9.

9.1 9.2 9.3 9.3.1 9.3.2 9.3.3 9.3.3.i 9.3.3.2 9.3.3.3 9.3.3..4 9.3;3.5 9.3.4 9.3.4.1 9.3.4.2 cONTSNTS- Continued

Braking ayetems Structureeupporthg hoists Transfersystem Centrol eyate- and alarms Power supply Communicationeyata , Essentiallightingeystema Fire protectionSystm Requirementsfor verticalliftnwith a CRC of 500t0n60rmre Requiremeutefor verticelliftswith a CRC under 5D0 tons Fire atati0n6” Liquid fuel and electricalfires Deflectionmeasuringsyetem Equipmentfor ship handling Operationallimitations Surveys Checkofflist Obsewation of a verticallift in operation . .

Ifoiats. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Platform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Controls Znepectionof blotkiog Wooden blocke Block seruring=thodc Baulingblocke Block handlingsyetema Electric power system Communicationand alecm eyetems Fire protectioneyetem Deflectionmeasuringsyetem Operatingprocedure . . ., 64.

64.

.66

DETAILEDBSQUINEUSNTSFOR BUILDINGUAYS

Facilitytepee CYtC Design data and physicalcbarecterietfcu Certification reportcontent General description Site characterietlrc ~neralg eology SOiI characterietice Geotechnicalstudiee Tidal ranges and bathymetry Seismic characterietirs Stt-uctiualanclyeea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6B Loads..........”. . . . . ..” . . ..~8 Propertiesof structuralmaterials xii

I uIL-sTD-1625C(SH) .25August 1987

1 ..

Paragraph9.3.4.3 9.3.5

II

1’ r-

Figure

9.3.6 9.3.7 9.3.8 9.3.9 9.3.9.1

9.3.9.2 9.3.9.3 9.3.10 9.3.11 9.3.12 9.3.13 9.4 9.5 9.5.1 9.5.2 9.5.3 9.5.3.1 9.5.3.2 9.5.3.3 9.5.4 9.5.4.1

9.5.4.2 9.5.4.3 9.5.4.4 9.5.4.5 9.5.4.6 9.5.4.7 9.6

10.

10.1 10.2 10.3

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

CONTENTS- ContLnued

E?i3s

Acceptancecriteria ., Seel tracks,blocks and bilge cribbing Groundwaysand launchingways Triggers Carriagesfor ship cnd -U3e transfer Fire protectionaystcms Requireaentefor bulldiogtiay*a fire protection water Fire stations Liquid fuel andelectrical fires Cnnbnunicu@oneystemsend d.ecms EssentialIigbtingsystems Electricpower ayetem Draincgeeyetem Operationallimitations Surveys Checkoff list Observation Structuralpurvey Slabs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...70.

Tracks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .70.

Blockias . . . . . . . . .. ’ Survey of electricaland ~chaniccl systems . . 71 Detailedexaminationof electricaland mxhcnitalsyste~ Fire protectionequfpment Communicationsystemsand.●larms Electricalsyste.ms Transfersystems Materialhandling eystems Launchingaechcniomand mooringsystem Ope,ratlngprocedures

NOTES .’

Guidancedocumsnte Subject term (key‘wnrd)listing Cbangee from previnm issue

FICUNES

Sample facility operation nupertisor certificate lfinimumpontoon freeboardvereue rated lifting capacity PhaseB in the dockingevolutionfor stability calculations

Minimum‘GNvereue CSC of f@ati~ dry docks . . 76 Sail area”ruxnentdue to the ship and dock . . . 77 xiii ttlL-STD-1625C(Sti)

CONTENTS- Continued

Figure 6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

Appendix A 10.

20.

20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 20.5 30.

30.1 30.2 30.2.1 30.2.2 30.2.3 30.2.4 30.2.5 30.2.6 30.3 30.3.1 30.3.2 30.4 w Ballast distributionfor liftingdock vithout ship Limiting curve of ship’sadjustedVCG versus lifting c.rpacity

Vertical moment . . . . . . . . ..”

Lifting capacityvariationwith ship location.. 81 Forcee on cradleduringdocking . . . . . . . . 82.

Facility certificationreportand facility recertificationreport contents

‘Samplecover sheet for certificationreports . . 89 Samplecover letterfor a Navy-operated facility, Sample cover letterfor a commercially-operated -facility Sample proprietarydata list Sample of eurveyor’sendoreemcnt Sample liet of revisedpages Ship load distributionon dock Sample table for water to be removedfrom tank forlifting a.ship Tank soundingcalculation Sample format for requiredtank levels . . . . . 105/106

AFPSNOICES

CONTF.NTSOF TSE CERTIFICATIONRSPORT .

General Format Changes and additions Uniformityof style Typing Sketchesand drawings Numbering COntente General organii.ationof c0ntent8. . .

Front matter Cover sheet tiver letter Proprietarydata lfst (optional). . .

Surveyor’e endorse=nt (optional) . .

Certificationreportrevisionsheet .

Table of contents Nain body of the certificationreport summa r y- General descriptionof Enclosures the facility xiv

HIL-sTD-1625C(SH) 25,tigu.t 1987

CONTENTS - Continued

,,Y i

<~J-

_l i, ,1 i:.

Ap~ndix 30.4.1 30.4.2 30.4.3 30.4.4, 30.4.5

30.4.6 30.4.7

30.4.8 30.4.9 30.4.10 40.

40.I 40.2

B

10.

10.1 10.2 io.3 10.4 c

10.

10.1 10.1.1 10.2 10.3 10.4

D 10.

20.

20.1 20.2 30.

30.1 30.2 30.2.1 30.2.2 30.2.3 30.2.$

E 10.

10.1

EnclosureI: Efetoricaldata BnclosureII: Dcsign&,ta EnclosureIII: Operationallimitations . . . . 8S EnclosureIV: Organizationand mating EnclosureV: Sormal maintenanceechedu3eand procedure. . . ...”

Bnclosure$’2: Operatingprocedures SnclosureVII: Protectionof the ship during tbalay~,riod . . . . ..$ EnclosureVIII: Sua-yeyresults Enclosure.= Correctiveaction plan XnclosureX: Ikmitoringp3.nn Documxmation for snbellfacilities Small facilitycertificationreportformat ‘.. . 86 Smell facility certificationreport content . . S6

SLNQiAKYOF STEPS WING TO FACILITY

CERTIFICATION

J_i-ene ra g . ... . . ... . . . . . . . . ..9S PreliminaryPCS Certificationreport preparation Certificationreport revfawand certification . 96 Operationof a certifiedfacility

FACILITY0PSKAT20NSSUPSKV2SOKQUALIFICATION

Documentation Camcral ..,....., Trainin g Ncthematics Work experience Retainingqualification . . . . . . . . . . . . 9s Operationalexperience. . . . . . . . . . . . . 9S

PONPINC~LAN FOR FLOATINGDOCX5

Central . . . . ....”

Objectives Plan content . . . . . . . . . . . . ...’.. .99 Critica3.atagea pumpingplan develnpmnt Plannin g Distributionof liftingcapacity(pumpi’ngplan). 100 Distributionof sNp welghi Calculationsof ahip loadingon the dock Amount of water to be removed’from a tank . . . 101 Adju6tedtank water levelsto lift ship

SUM4ARYCNSCKOFF LIST FOR FLOATINCDOCKS

SCOPE

Scope xv

Appendix F 10.

10.1

G 10.

10.1

H 10.

10.1

I 10.

10.1

WL-STD-1625C(SH)

25 August 1987

CONTENTS- Continued

Ezss

SUKMARYCSECF.OFFLIST FOR GsAVINGDOCKS

SCOPE

Scope

SUt@lARYCHECKOFFLIST POR MARINE SA22XAYS

SCOPE

Scope . . . . ...’

SOll?lARYCESCKOFFLIST FOR VSETICALLIFTS

SCOPE

scope’

SUFU’L4SYCSSCKOFFLIST FOP.BUILDINGWAYS

SCOOP S

Scope xvi

I

I

MIL-sTm1625C(SH) : 25 August 1987

/- , 1. SCOPE

1.1 Scopeof the safety certificationprogram (SCP). The purposeof the SCP f13es follows:

1.1.1 Purpose. ‘l%epurpose of the SCP is to ensure the aafety of U.S.. :.,.

Navy ships during dockingand undockingoperation and while in dock. It also relatesto the eafety of shipe under constructionand during launchingoperations.

The capacityof the fac.ilityae deetgnedis to bc ascertained,as well aa the currentphysicalconditionof the f.ccilitywfth regard to its foundationo, etructure,end supportingaurfliary6YStcma, includingthose for ship protection.

Also includedie an assessmentof operatingprocedure, maenlegand pereonnel

‘- qualificationprocedures,and mciatecumceproceduressupportingoperational reliabilfty.

1.1.2 Um.itationsof SCP 8COPC. The ecope of tbe SCP excludee“thefol-lowing;however,compliancein tbeee ereee may ba under the cognizanceof othar COverment agencies:”

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

L-

(e)

“Personneleefety. Sequiremanteof egemcies,euch as the Occupa- -tional Safety and Health Administration.

Mechanicalhandling system. Eefety requirementsIn the deeign and operationof equipuent,such as cranee.

Pnllut& control syst&m. Pollutioncontrolbyetems,such as those required by the EnvironmentalProtectionAgency.

Service=yetem. Facility subaystamawhich are installedsolely to providehab$tabi2ityend houaekcepingcervicesto tbe ebip, such aa petable vatar and ❑tm for beating and galley. 2he facilityaubayatamraw and salt water in iaclwdadin the acepe of SCP’to tIieextent that it supportschip protectioneyatem.

Iaduetrialeyetema. Syetemaused in industrialcervices,such as welding or abr.ceiveblaetiog.

1.2 FacilitiesincludedIn SCP. Facilities

accnrdencewith 1.2.1.

1.2.1 Size. There”ie ao lower limft on the

bc certifled=er the SCP.” Yievever,in order to includedin SCP should be iu eize of facilitieswblch UIY provfdereguhtnry flexibility et the lnwer end of,the ec.rle,a gm-ti,erclaaeifi-&etionie eetabliahadso that facilitieehaving a capacfry of 500 long tons or.leme have “reducedrequiremvmta for documantation of Facility C+rrtificatioaSeporte (FCSC) ad Fa~litY ~~rt-ificationScnnrts (PSRa). Mnre exteneive reoufremnte for euch documentation ~PPIY to facilitiesWing a rated.capacityif rnre then gradetionof dncumcntatinnrequiremnte dwas not imply a consideratinneat any facility.

1.2.2 lJ?JM&.Floatingdocke, graving docks, marine lifte, conventionalinclined taildiagways, and ~ilding constructionmethodsare includedin the SCP.

500 long tow. S’bie letiiiaaingof eafety railwaye,vertical waye employingmndular

141L-STD-1625C(SH)

25 Augusr 1987

I

1.2.2.1 Nonpermanentfacilitiesor facilitiesof umuaucldesign. Non-permandutfacilitiefior facilitiesof unusualdeeignwed for performing functionssimilarto those of the facilitiesreferencedin 1.2.2are aleo covered by the SCP. The process leading to certificationof nonpermanent facilitiesor unusualfacilitieswill normallybe conductedmore expeditiously and economicallyby ~“bmissionand review of a preliminaryFCS ae Indiuted ii 4.3.2.

1.2.3 F.scilitieelocatedabroad. Facilitieslocatedoutsidethe U.S. are includedin the SCP on2y If they are operatedby the u.S. liavy.

1.2.4 Facilitiesfor nuclearaowered eb.ips.Tbie et&rd Berveeaa a certificationdocuu?ntfor dorking U.S. Ncvy ships. Additionalrequirements which are appropriatesolely‘todocking ouclenr-powereddips will & favokcd by the Navy to supplementthe requirement herein.

2. NEFESSNCEDODCUNENTS ..

2.1 Governmentdocumente. The followingGovernmentdocumentsform a part of this standcrdto the extent specifiedherein.

PUBLICATIONS

NAVAL SSA SYSTSNSCOKHAND (NAVSEA)

0901-LP-480+015 - Piping System8.

S9086+6400/(2S096 - Weights and Stability.

S9086-7MO0/Cii997 - Docking Insttuctionaand Routine

Work in Drydock.

NAVALFACILI12SSENGINEERINGCONMAND (NAVPAC)

P-355 - SeismicDmign for Buildings.

P-355.1 - SeismicEvaluationof Supportofor ExistingElectricnl-

Mchanical Equipmentand Ucilities.

DN-29.1 - Graving Drydock~.

D!i-29.2 - !farineRailways.

DM-29.3 - DrydockingFacilitiescharacteristics.

(Gpies of publicationsrequiredby contractors“inconnectionwith specific acqolsitionfunctionsehodd be obtained from the contractingactivityor as directedby the contractingofficer.)

thi@

I take

I thiw

2.2 Orderof precedence. 2U the event of a conflictbetweentbe text of etandardand tbe referencescited herein, the text of this standardshall precedence.

3. DEFINITIONS

3.1 Acronymsand abbreviations. The acronymsand abbreviationslistedin standardare defineda8 followe:

(a) CR’C - Certifiedrated capacity

(b) FCN - Facilitycertificationreport

(c) FRS - Facilityrecertificationreport

I “’

I L:

iL

I

MIL-STD-1625C(SH)

25 AII&lSt1987

(d) Q4 - Uetacentricheight (.) KG - Vertical center of gravityabove the keel

(f) LCG - Longitudinalcenter of gravity

(K) LCB - Longitudinalcenter of b.Ioyancy

(h) LT - Long tons

(i) NAVFAC - Naval FacilitiesS@neering Co=nend

(j) NAVSEA- Naval Sea Systems Cemmnd (Industrialaad FacilfcY

NanegemcntDirectorate)

(k) NDT - Non-destructivetesting

(1) NS~ - NSVal Ships0 TechnicalMmal.

(m) SC? - Bafety CertificetionRogre.m

(n) SUPSEIP- Suparviaorof Shipbuilding,Cnnveraionand Nepair, USN

(0) VCG - Vertical center of gravity

3.2 Definftioncof apeciai terms.‘”The follwing dafinltionashall be used in tMa standard.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

Configurationcontrol procedures. The comfiaration control proceduresare.the proceduresused to ?Y?t,=~ticallYevaluates coordinate,approva (or disapprove),and accomplishchanges after the basaline certification.

Control-inspection. A control inspectionis an lnspectlOn. ....-composedof planned and echeduledexaminationsand tests to determineconditionsof a f.=ility -d its equiP=nt with respactto their abilitieeto @rform all functionsfor which they ware separatelyand intarr+ntedly deeigned;and to &tatine the need for repafra,alterations,or changes to ●inure the mterial readinaaaof a facilityto tarry out ite design functions.

Urraction of daficiencfaa. Correctionof daficiencieeia the act of restoringa facilityto a cenditionequivalentto its originalor design functian, capacity,’and efficiencyby repa~r,overhaul,replace=nt or alteration.

Daviatfon. A devfation ia the departurefrom a specific require~nt of tMs stand.srdwhen adequatacompansatins featuree,+a determinedby the U.S. Navy, are providedin lieu of meating this requfre=at.

Facility. A facility is u physical~lant for drydoekingor bufldfu ~tidlaunehfug aMRa.

Facility-opcrationasuiarviaor. The te~ fa~li$Y OparatiOns supcrviaorwill bc used herain to deaignatathe dockmaster, docking officer, launkhingsuperintendent,or other title usad to fndfeate an {ndividualrenponaiblefor aupcrvlaing the eparationaof a facflitycoveradby this etandard.

Graving dock launch pontoon. A gravingdock’launch pontoon is a nontoonwhich is emative in a gratingdock and never leaves—r—..–.

this protectivelocation;it 16 lowerednot by flooding,but bv lowerincthe water in the graving dock. Certaindamage.

we8ther;

poutooms of their e;d operationalcona~derationswhich apply to launch do not apply to gravim dock launchpontoonsbeeause differentconstructionand operation.

“1

ML-STD-1625C(SH)

.25August 1987

(h)

(i)

(1)

(k)

(1)

(m)

(n)

(0)

(p)

(q)

(r)

(s)

Launch pontoon. A launch pontoonis a floatingdry dock utilized for launchingeNps, that moves from the ship transfersite to a submergencesite.

Lay period. A IaY period is the period betweenthe dockingand undockingevolution,during wbfch a ship is in the facility.

Light dock operatingcondition. The light dock operatingcon-dition for a floatingdry dock iB the dock vith all ballast tanks pumpeddown to tbe residualwater level. The dock weight in this conditionincludesthe weight of the keel and bilge blockingsystem up to a horizontalplane f.ame.dby the top of the leel blocks at the standardbight used for the mafi~m ship intact stabilitycalculation.

Margin line. A margin line is a line not less than 3 inches &low the top wingwallde+ ●t tbe side, defiafng tbe hfghest permissiblelocatiouon the aide of a floatingdry dock of any waterpl.snein the final conditionof sinkage,trim,and hael.,, Operator. AD operatoris a commercialor Naval ebfpyard,or Navalactivityoperatinga facility,applyingfor certificatitin;

preventivemaintenance. Reventive maintenanceconeiats of periodicexamination,lubrication,minor adjustment,and minor repairof items to ensure the comcimuousnperationand eafety of a facilityand ita equipment.

Seismiczone. A seismic znne is a eystem for indicatingthe probabilityand severityof earthquakeswitMn a designatedarea.

An arbitraryscale.of O through4 is used, togetherwith an adjectivedescriptionof the likelyextent of damage. SAVPAC P-355 containscontour IMPS showing the seismic zone classifi-cation of various land araaa.

Sill of the stern (or bow) Kate Of a clneed~nded dock. The sill of a gate is the upper ,surfacaof the dock structure againstwhich the bottom of the gate make contact.

Smsll facility. A small facilityis one with a CRC of less than 500 LT.

s. A mmvey is the thoro~h evaluationof the material conditionand operationalcapabilitiesof the facilities.

Surveyor. A surveyoris the engineeringfirm or classification society eelectedby co operatorto performsurveys, tests and trials of tbe facility.

~. A ton is the weight unit used interchnweably with LI in-.

the field of naval ar-titecture;equal to 2,240 pounde.

4. GiNEsALSEQUI~~S d.1 General. This section providesan overviewof tbe SCP, general requireuentefor certificationof drydockingfacilitiesand buildinguaya, and requfra~nta for operationnf certifiedfacilities.

4.2 SCP overview. The SCP is describedin 4.2.1 through4.2.10.

HIL-sTD-162SC(SN) 25 August 19S7

I

I

4.Z.1 Certificationprocess. The certificatioaproceesis initiatedby submissionof a certificationreport to the Navy by an operator. Saeed UpOU

-’.“ an evaluation.of the data submitted,the Navy decideeto certifyor not to certifythe facilityand so advises the operator. Requirementsfor the format and.contentsof a certificationreport are describedin appendixA. ‘fhe6e includehietoricaldata, design data, mainteruyiceprocedure, mannfngand operatins procedures,material conditionsurvey resultsand proposedrepairs.

If the Navy‘e review of the certificationreport eupportacertification,a facilitycertificationshall be iesued stating the !mxfmumdockingcapacity for which the facilityis certified,‘loadinglidtationu, durationof the certificationperiod,and the eonditiom for sust8iaingcertificat”io’n.”

6.2.2 Certificationrenewal attdrecertification. If a facilityis aigmffkently tpndifid, such aa a change which aff ecte do~ing capacity,if the &“rcifLcktionexpires,or-if it has been dete~ed that.the eristingcertifi-cationreportis inaccurate;tba.operetorsbali“=e~~~iy-f&F%66t{ficatton”by aulmitcinga revfaedcertificationremrt. me Certificationof a facilitymay be renewedif an YSS submittedby the operatorindicatesthat ttiefacility-..

remaittacertifiable. The FSS shall ba submittedat least 4 months before the certificationexpirationdate.if the recertificationla to bc completedby the certificationexpirationdnte.

4.2.3.Maintenanceprogram. The certificationperiod of a facilitymay bc,cxtendedby implementinga maintenanceprogrampreparedi?-accordancewith

4.10 ~.~ &EOn~t ratiu that the facility la properlymaintained-and‘operated..

For Navy owned and operateddocking fecilitiea,the maintenanceprogramIS

~’,:; compulsory.

,— .4.2.4 Key items in certificetiott:@et2ty, Limftetioneend duration.

Capacftiee,limftationa.Ad”duratien ●hall‘baM follei?a:

. . 4:2.4.1 ,Cf.& Zhis is.the WMIXimUrnellewabledisplacx=nt in LT fof-$” Navy Eltfpon a<rtified facility. Z’here ie a certaincnmparetivecomenfence in expressing.eepacityin tire-meof ● single numbar dieplacamnt toenttge.

Nowaver,..inad~ti?n to tonnage, certain facilitiesWY ~ de-rikd in ~r@ ‘“ c-; refinedterm byl&taciffihg&llwa,ble-line,-loading,ouch as tonsper @t laugth;or area loadipg, such aa tons per square foot. use of au-kbadditiO~l

) descriptorsmay be applicable.

4.2.4.2 Operational.limitationsfor a.particuhr abfp dockfe.q,buildi~ or launcbi~. In conjunctionvfth the CSC, the Navy.M’Y impetie’’’.Sdditinl!n2 operationallixitttti.onaon ● certified feciliryif comide~d =eaee~ to eneurethe eafety of the ehfp.

h.2.6.3 Sustainingcertificatien. After certification,the operetoreball amure that the“facilityremains in the ‘as certified”condftlon,with full cneaiderationbeing given to normal wear and tear for the perindof certification.

Sustainingdata mey be developed from the data end ittforeationohteirtedfrom the maintenancepr-ogram(see 4.10.3). The Navy may requirecertainfacilityrepairs or mndfficationsto be completedwitMn a epecifiedties fra= as n conditionfor suetainfttg ce’rtification.” The Navy reteins the right to inspectthe facility if itiortnationis receivedwhich indicates that ttneefeqondltlonaexist or that unsafe proceduresare in effect.

WL-STD-1625C(SH)

25 bguat 1987

4.2.4.4 Certificationperiod. The certificationperindis the duration for which a certificatere~ins valid. It dependeon the conditionof the facility,but does not exceed 5 years, commencingfrom the completiondate of the materialconditioneurvey. The certificationmay be either renewed,by submittingan Ys5; or extended,by selectingthe asintenanceprogram..The certificationperiod for thoee facilitieswhere the ruterialconditioneurvey %8 not completedwithin 1 year wfll bc determinedon a caee bceia.

4.2.5 Cha&ee affectimg certificationettttua.Changesaffectingcerti-ficationatatttaare as folloum:

4.2.5.1 -. 2he Navy reservesthe.right to euapandor cancel a facilltysscertificationor to alter it by revfsittgitems listedin 4.2.4.1 through4.2.4.4 under any one of the follnvingconditiettm:

(e)

(b) (c) (d)

(e)

~e faci2ityis ddmaged or significantlyaltered●fter cert~f~-cation to such en -tent that safetyie @aired or the physical disenaionaare modified.

New informationemergee vhfch shnws that the fttcilityis unsafe.

Cenditionedeecribedin 4.2.4.1threugh4.2.4.3are violated.

The reaming and operatingproceduresspecifiedin che approved certificationreporte are violated.

The reportingrequireuentaof 4.2.7are not met.

4.2.5.2 Suspensionand cancellationof certification.If the Navy deter-mines that a facilitycertificationis to be suapandedor cancelled(otherthan a temporarysuspensionae describedin 4.2.S.3),the Navy will advise the facility operatorof its intent to maapend tha certification. NO-lly, tha operator wI1l be allwed 2 rnntba to reepend. Hnwever,the-Navy<mayrequfrea core expeditiousreply if the situationwarrants. fhe decisionto suependnr cancel the certificationwill be made by MVSM after a reviewof tha facts in the matter and nf the operator’sreaponae.

4.2.5.3 TemporaryausPanaion of certlficctinn. Certifictttinnfor a facility wfll be temporarilysuspendedif a facility ia mva~ from the geographicallocation for which is wae certiflad; or if the facilityia undergoingmajor repairaor modificationswhich will significantlyalter tltcfeci2ityto much an extent that safetyof the ship or dock in affected,the certifiedcapacityis changed,or the physicaldimensionsare ~dified.

4.2.5.3.1 Facilitiesthat.have baen relocatedAll have their certificctions temporarilysuspcttdedfrom the ti~ the feciMty is roved from the certifiedsite until eucb time as certificationdata requiredfor the new locationis approved by the Navy. For floatingdry docks, this dcta ehall includee report on che po.st-tr.easitbull inspection,a tmbmrgetscetest, and MY applicablechanges to the certificationreport;for emmple, manningproceduresand personnelquali-ficationcriteria(see 4.7), operatingprocedures(see 4.8),protectionof a ship duringthe lay period (see 4.9), electricalpower systems(see 5.3.6), communication ayetem (see 5.3.8), mooring end anchoring (see 5.3.11),fire protectionsystem (see 5.3.14),and hy~rogrttphicsurvey (eee 5.6.9).

1-

I

ML-STD-i625C(SH) 25 hgust 1987

4.2.5.3.2 Facilitycertificationwill be temporarilyeuspendedfrom the commencementof overhaulunt11 review and approvalof a past-overhaulreport by the cognizantFleet Co.mmnder,SUPS81P,or Naval ShipyardCommander. (Over-haul in when a drydockingfacilityundergoeerepair to the extent that docking operationsare terminatedfor over 180 calendardcya.) The Poet-overhaulreport shall be submittedby the operator via thechain of commandand ahcll include the fOllowing:

(a) The materialconditionla satisfactoryto drydockships within the certificationlimitations.

(b) The parsonnelqualificationprotidureaand manningprOcedureBare adaqeate,and the aeeigned operatingperaoanelare trained.

(c) The operatingprocedure@are validated.

(d) ma ?eth.@a@ prOc=d~es for prOtectiOnOf a SMP duriu the lay perimd are tirrent end edeqnete.

4.2.6 FacilitytuodifIrationaafter certificatien. If the operatorchooaie to modify his facility,the follewingshall bc submitted:

(a) An intendeddesign change report describingthe proposedchange and tmdificationdates and the effect of tMs changeon the facility‘E cepacity.

(b) A revisionto the certificationreport after completionof the change,containingupdated design data and new capacityof the facility.as appropriate.In addition,the operatorshall nubmit the revised tranaing,mparationallimitations,end oparatingprote.durascompatiblewith the physird modifitatious.

(c) ~PQrt on the c6mpletlon of the scheduledchange,if not included in the ravised ccrtifitationreport.

4.2.7“ Seportimgrequiramente. S’heopamtor of a certifiedfacilityshall =ti a report to the N8vy if:

(a) The facilityis -dif iad to the“extentthet the basic design or ‘ ‘~xcity is.*Wed (see 4.2.6).

(b) ‘Keypersonnelchcngei occur”(sea 4.2.8).

(c) Zhe operatingproceduralare modifiedor the mmniw 18 revised

(sea 4.2.9):

(d) Repairs or rndifi$ationeprescribedin the activity’scorrective

●ction and rmnitoringpl.snere cmmpleted(see 4.S.S).

(e) Incidentor accidents occur (see 4.8.3).

4.2.8 fi3YPereonuelchanges. Ilieopaiatorshall repert kay pegaonnal CheWea tO the kq vitMm 2 weeks of any change of status of any individual for whom n facflltyoperationssupervisorqualificetien’certificatehas.baen issued or upon the initial designationand certificationof any new facility operationssupervisor(see 4.7.2).

4.2.9 Changes in operating procedures. Changes in operatingprocedures shall be reportedto theNavy before these changes are put into operationfor handlingNavy vesselsunder tinyof the follmvingconditions:

H2L-S2’D-1625C(SH)

25 hgu. t 1987

I

(a) The proceduresare being alteredbecame of changesin facility deeignand manning.

(b) The proceduresare being changedbeteuseof an incidentof the tYPe describedin 4.8.3.I.

4.2.10 Certificationalteration. After revfewfngany changereport,the Navy may, at its discretion,alter or euependcertificationan indicatedin 4.2.5.

4.3 Certificationreports. Certificationreportsehallbc as describedin

4.3.1 through4.3.4.2.

4.3.1 -. Ihere are three typas of ‘tertificctionreports:

(a) A pra2imfa.axyFC2 whose puxprmeia.defhad in 4.3.2.

(b) An FCR ●ulmfttadfor the initialtertlfititienof a facility.

(c) & F~ autitted for xenevcl of arti.fitntiort.

4.3.2 Reliminary FCfl. PreliminaryPCE shall be aa follew: “-”

4.3.2.1 Purpose. A prelimin.eryFCR may be eubxfttedto obtain concurrence from the Navy on certificationrequire~nts proposedby the oparatorfor certifi-cationof nonpermanentfacilitiesor facilitiesof unueueldesign. A preliminary FCR may alao bc submittedto obtain a ruling frem the Navy on requesteddeviations wMch are considerednecesearyby the operatorand whfch cao be justifiedas specifiedin 4.3.2.2. Addftiondly, a preliminaryVCR my ha submittedfor gui&nca from the,Navy on tha contentsof the designdata pacbge to be generated and includedin the F(X, tin a niguifir+ ~rtiou of ~ facility’a original daaigndata la Araimg.

4.3.2.2 Content. Ihe pre2iminacy,P(X abdl be imitten in the form of a .

contfae,ael”f-containedpropesa3,provfdiogthe metesaergbatkgmund information @ justificationfor the proposedrequir~nt changeaaridFCE content. The faftia2nubmftt.slof the docu~nt to NAVSEA ●bdl be a cempletaaa peaaiblein order to keep the time raquiredfor a ce@ete review to a dniram. 2n pae of nenpcrnwnentfaci2itiesor faci2itiesaith unoeud design,the operatorahcll proposetcrtificntioncriteriawhich reflect tha specialdesignand operating c-itio- of the facility. 2f deviatioae●re reqo.eated,the operatorabdl demmstrate in the preliminary’FIX the mecensityfor the deviatien,ehcll thoroughlydeacribacmpamating design and epxratingfaatures, end shell dernnstratethat safetywill be preserved.’

4.3.2.3 Formt. For fonnat requiremmts, see ●ppandf.xA, 20 tbrougb20.5.

4.3.2.4 Subdaaien.” For aubmfaaionrequfremnta, ●aa 4.3.3.s.

4.3.3 ~. fie FIX shall be m follows:—

4.3.3.1 Centent. FCE contentsare describedin 30 of appendixA.

4.3.3.2 &sponsibility. Tha operator FCR and the accuracyof its tiontenta.

18 reapoeaiblefor preparationof

MIL-STD-1625C(SII)

2.5August 1987

4.3.3.3 FCR preparation. For generalguidance.typicaleteps leadingto certificationare describedin appendixB.

4.3.3.4 Froprfetarydata. None of the data submittedby the centractor ‘ solely for the purposeof use by the Governmentin the certificationreviewof the centractor’a dry do~ s~ll & -de availabletO anYOne in the ~ve=nt not haviaga Iegitinmteintere8t.

4.3.3.5 FCR submission. The operatorof 8 Navy facilityshall submit five copiesof the F~ to lidvsa 2W operatorof a cemmercie.1facilityshall Bubmlt eix copien of the MS to the cogntiantSUFSS2F,“ubo will retainone copy and foivardfive copies to NAVSSA (the additionalcopieswill pcrxit a more rapid re~ew). For plcnniq purpoaeo, it My bc estixstedthat the Navy revicu process of ● PCS willrequire 4 ~tha.

6.3.3.6 P.aviniotm.&e operator18 requiredto renpoti to Navy rcqueots for additionaldata during t~e PCS review. Addftieneldateehall bc submitted to the Navy in a focm that cam bc insertedinto the certificationreportbinder shfler to a certificationreport revieiondeccribcdin 30.2.5 of appendixA. ,’

‘L

4.3.3.7 ~tencion. A copy of the certificationreport’shall bc retained at the facilityat all tires and shall bc availablefor use by the facility operationssupervisorand other personnel.

4.3.4 FRR. The FRR shell bc ss follows: (~.

4.3.4.1 C&teot. 21ie~ contentssbcll be derivedfrom appendixA by revisingom2y -ections sad enchsures neceesaryto update information providedin tbc FCSs’end any YSM previouslySuluttttd. da a mitimum, the 3%s sM1l includecn updcte of histociealhtq. (see sppeadixA, 30.4.1)end the resultsof a mcw =terial conditionsurvey,includingan update of hydrograpblc data (see appendixA, 30.4.8).

4.3.4.2 Other require~nte. The requlmats for FliRshall be reepOnei-bility,preparation,,proprietary&\e, ?ubudss?on,,md_re+siOm aS ewcif ied in 4.3.3.2 through 4.3.3.6. ...!.

4.6. Surveys. surveys shsll bc conductedla accor.isncewith 4.4.1 through404.6.

i.4.1 sole of surveys. Seview of xurv+ r&u2t6 ‘~~ye”a &j or role in” the Nsvy’s decisionon certiflcetlon. ,..

4.4.1.I Faciliti&sconst~cted under the Swervisieo of classifieatiom rmcietiesor”tbtiU.S. Na~. The operatorof drydockiasfacilitiesvhich ham been constructedwitNn 2 yeare precedingthe dete of certificetioareport submission”MY not b.xveto submit renulte of a mcteri.clconditinnnurvey.udees consideredappropriateby UVSSA. Ihenekfacilitien●ball lneludethose con-structedunder the aupcrviaionof an approvedclaaaificatiOnsOcietY*ch Wva been iseued a certificatc.of ClaSS, or under N-v in%mceas i=PectiOm and inspectionby the Soard of 2nspectioaand SUneY..

.. I

L

141L-sTD-1625c(sH) 25 AuguEt 1987

4.4.2 P.equirementafor eurve9e. The eurveyrequiretrenteshall include:

(a) Surveysof structuralcomponents,includingcoil and foundatione, where neceeeary. Structuralcnclyeeavith reducedeember proper-ties shall be submittedwhen the materialconditionsurvey chows deteriorationto such degreethct the abilityof a facilityto functionsafely at the designcapccityin impaired.

(b) HydrograpMc surveys.

(c) Surveysof cite characteriatitaand land-bcsedeupporteystems for electricalpower supplycnd fire protection.

.(d) Tests cnd componentaurveyaof:

(1) Electricaland uecbcnfraleystem, includiogpumps, valve =chaniems, closures,and shfp haad2fngequfpmcnt.

(2) Controlsystems (cucbas gaugee,fndfcatoraand .aZcrms) cnd communicationeyateas.

(3) SMP tr.snsfer ejstem, vhere applicable.

(e) Observationof the facilityin nperationduring docking,undockimg,” launching,or ship trancfer, when it can be scheduled.

4.4.2.1 Responsibilitiesof the operator. The operatnrehcll be respon-sible for:

(a)

(b)

(c)

Preparingand making availableall spaces to bc inspected,tn enable the survey tecm to carcy out ita tcck efficientlyand aafely. For floatingdocks, regard2asaof the size, bottom platingin every ballaattank and buoyantychambershall bc exposed for thornughtiaual f.napectinnand NDT thickness =asurecent.

Includingtha aucvey repnrt in the imftia2certificationrepnrt eubmfttal. The mcximumallowabletin period betwaen the survey and the immc date.nf tertificationahcll be 2 yeara.

The survey report shall ha submittedat lecst 4 mnntha prior to the requestedcertificationdcta to allow reviaw by NAVSSA.

AdvisingNAVSSA at least 30 daye In cdvanceof atheduledeurvey to allow for a concurrentvisit by.a fkvy technfrclrepresen-tative,if desired by NAVSSA.

4.4.3 Surveynr. Sequiremcntefor tha surveyorshall bc aa follows:

4.4.3.1 3clection. The faci2ityoperatorshall rhoosa“cnengineering firm or classificationsociety (hereincftar ~f erred”to an the “aucveyor”) to conduct surveys. If an engineeringfit-mis thoaan,the”finn and ita.peraonnelehcll,M legallyunaffiliatedwith the facilityoperator.

4.4.3.2 Tasks. The surveyor’stasks are a-rized in appendixB. In additionto conductingsurveys, the eurveyorshell be responsiblefor:

(a)/ Evaluatingresult6 of the surveys.

(b) Recommendingcorrective actions.

(c) Secoum=ndingcertifiedrated capacity.

ML-STD-1625C(SH)

25.August 1987

(d) Evaluatingthe adequacy of the correctiveaction plan and monitoringplan, if requestedby the operator(nptlonalitem).

4.4.3.3 Qualificationsof surveyor. 2’hequalificationsof the surveyor and the =mbers of the eurvey team shsll bs etated in the certificationreport.

b individualteam member =king the survey of a floatingdry dock eh.sllhsve experiencein the dealsn of floatingdry dotks, the operationof euch docks, or tn ship eurveyiag(eteel,concrete,or timber,an appropriate). An indivi-dual tx.m member msk.tngthe mucvey of a gravingdock,marine railway,vertical lift, or buildingway, shall have experiencein’the &aign, operation,or sur-veying of that type of f acilf ty .or 9i@2er type of atcucture. An f.ndividusl with experiencein soil nachsnfcaebnll be e -mber of a team eurveylnga gr~ving do+ h individualteem member for ths uadsruaterpertionof the cnrveyof a fhtiiig dry dock“sbx21have expecieaceia at..least.twoof the followiugareae: undexvatersalvege wnrk, ship ●uxveying,and underwater a8fnteaenceend repairof materialsappropriatetn the facility. A diver meetingthe requirementsof a recognizedc2esidficetl& aociecyfor similar underv.sterinspectionin lieu of drydoekingsucvey shell be consideredto be qualified. The team shall be cnmposed of at leaet nne memberwith experience i in at least two of the previously=ntioned appropriateareas. The eurveyor shall be experienced,qualified,st.sffed,and equippedto performtasks describedin 6.4.3.2on facilitiesof the type to be surveyed. The eurveyor oay use cervicesGf euKcbntrectorsspxtializingin areas such .sBcoil mechanics or underwatereurveya. (jualificetiomof MY subcontractorutilizedshall be listedin the certificationrepert.

4.4.6 Evaluationof survey resulte. Euney xepertaehsll be evaluatedas f0M2ws: .’.

4.4.4;1 Classifixation of items surveyed. “21tsre.su2tsof e fecilityeurvey shall appssr“inencloeureVIII“(see30.1 and 30.4.8 of .appen~x A) nf the cert-ificationreport. Esch item Msted therein nball be given a classification rating. The itemn surveyedebsll be xlxssified as follows:

(a) Satlsf.rctory.2he conditionof the item williiotreiiltin eystsm damage and, based on =ssured,or estimateddeteriora-tion rate, it My be sxpscted to r-in satisfactoryduring the requested certificationpsriod.

(b) Unsatisfactory. fie co@ition of the’item WY, Cayee system damage or loss end must’ be xap.siredor rep2ackdprior to h~ling a…