Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-209P.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Great Smoky Mountains-Foothills Parkway
Solicitation number
DTFH71-17-B-00015
Issued by

About this file

Bridge Inspection Rpt_STR#5460-209P

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
ROBO_-_FOOT_8E21,_F9.pdf PDF
Amend_0001_-_FOOT_8E21,_F9.pdf PDF
Plans_Sheets_T.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-207P.pdf PDF
Plans_Sheets_A_thru_S_&_U_thru_X_-_THREE_(Pages_251-391).pdf PDF
Plans_Sheets_A_thru_S_&_U_thru_X_-_TWO_(Pages_126-250).pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-204P.pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_-_FOOT_8E21_F9.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-214P.pdf PDF
Report_Pavement.pdf PDF
Report_NEPA.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-205P.pdf PDF
ADV_Subcontracting_plan.doc DOC document
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-206P.pdf PDF
As_Built_Construction_Plans_(Includes_Rev__1-14).pdf PDF
As_Built_Construction_Plans_(Includes_Rev__4).pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_-_FOOT_8E21_F9.pdf PDF
Plans_Sheets A thru S & U thru X —
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-030P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-210P.pdf PDF
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
Appendix_TDEC_NPDES_CGP.pdf PDF
Plans_Sheets_A_thru_S_&_U_thru_X_-_ONE_(Pages_1-125).pdf PDF
As_Built_Construction_Plans_(Includes_Rev__6).pdf PDF
VETS-4212.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-213P.pdf PDF
As_Built_Construction_Plans_(Includes_Rev__14).pdf PDF
Appendix_TDEC_NPDES_NOI.pdf PDF
FP03_Eng.pdf PDF
Synopsis_FOOT8E21-Rev.pdf PDF
Synopsis_FOOT8E21.pdf PDF
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

BRIDGE #10

FOOTHILLS PARKWAY OVER RAVINE

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

LW

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-209P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 5/12/14

Report prepared by: NS

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-209P

BRIDGE #10 INSPECTION DATE: 5/12/14

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUNDATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

SEGMENTAL BOX GIRDER

CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

INTEGRAL CONCRETE

SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

CONCRETE

PRA-FOOT 8E12 / 12-135

6 - RESTRICTED

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

474.3 FT (144.6 M)

196.7 FT (60.0 M)

37.6 FT (11.5 M)

33.6 FT (10.2 M)

N/A

0 °

NO

LOCATION

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 0.00 (KM PT 0.00)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 9.3 MILES EAST OF U.S. ROUTE 321

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ FOOTHILLS PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. RAVINE

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This post-tensioned concrete box girder bridge is in good condition overall. No repairs are required at this time.

This bridge has not yet been opened to public traffic. Construction of the bridge railing was going on at the time of this inspection. Minor issues, including debris in the expansion joints, vegetation growth on the approach parapets/wingwalls, and vegetation growth on the piers should be addressed when final preparations are made to open this portion of the Foothills Parkway.

It should be noted that the black paint applied on the superstructure and substructure elements hinders the visual identification of cracks.

INSPECTION TEAM: C. CASTRO, H. SALAD

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

CARLOS CASTRO, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 571-434-1546

REPORT REVIEW :

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/30/14

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-209P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: No repairs are required at this time.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-209P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK 7 ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

G1. DECK SLAB

G2. EXPANSION JOINTS

N3. WEARING SURFACE

G4. RIDEABILITY

N5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

G6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

G7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

N8. UTILITIES

G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

N10. OTHER

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7

G1. BEARING DEVICES

G2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

N3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

N5. TRUSSES

G6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

N7. PAINT

N8. FASCIA(E)

G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

G10. ALIGNMENT

N11. OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7

58.1 MINOR TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF DECK

SURFACE.

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

UNDERSIDE OF DECK OVERHANGS. PATCHING ALONG JOINTS AND

AT CORE HOLES ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK WITH LIGHT

EFFLORESCENCE.

58.2 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION IN EXPANSION JOINTS.

58.5 CONCRETE FROM CURBS HAVE BEEN REMOVED FOR BRIDGE

RAILINGS CONSTRUCTION.

59.6 CRACK ABOVE OPENING OF DIAPHRAGM ON EAST SIDE OF WEST

PIER. CRACK ON NORTH SIDE OF WEST FACE OF EAST PIER

DIAPHRAGM. CRACK ON NORTH SIDE OF EAST FACE OF EAST PIER

DIAPHRAGM.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS, SOME

WITH EFFLORESCENCE.

60.5 FOOTING IS PARTIALLY EXPOSED ON SOUTH SIDE OF EAST

ABUTMENT, 22" H X 5' L. APPEARS TO BE AN AS-BUILT CONDITION.

60.6 MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ON WINGWALLS.

60.13 HEAVY VINE GROWTH ON EAST PIER. HEAVY VEGETATION

GROWTH ON WEST PIER.

ABUTMENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS1. G

PILE BENTS2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS3. G

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. G

FOUNDATIONS5. G

WINGWALLS6. G

WEEP HOLES7. N

EXPANSION JOINTS8. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. G

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION11. N

OTHER 12. N

PIER(S)

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. G

PILE BENTS14. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS15. G

FOUNDATIONS16. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR17. G

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION18. G

OTHER 19. N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-209P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL N

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1. G

N G G G G G G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. N

N N N

222.1 MINOR TRANSVERSE, DIAGONAL AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF

APPROACH SLABS, SOME WITH EFFLORESCENCE.

222.3 MODERATE VEGETATION ON APPROACH PARAPETS.

36.A TEMPORARY FENCE AS BRIDGE RAILING IN PLACE. PERMANENT

RAILING UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-209P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 20 18 33 30

HS 36 33 60 55

TYPE 3 43 39 72 65

TYPE 3S2 47 42 78 71

TYPE 3-3 48 44 81 73

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-209P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... BRIDGE #10 (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 133 - OVERTON

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-209P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 0 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... RAVINE

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 209P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. FOOTHILLS PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 6 - RESTRICTED (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460209P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 9.3 MILES EAST OF U.S. RO

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. NPS (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ PRA-FOOT 8E12 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 0.00 (KM PT 0.00)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 12-135 (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 1 - TOLL BRIDGE

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

6 - P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

21 - SEGMENTAL BOX GIRDER

196.7 FT (60.0 M)

474.3 FT (144.6 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 2 - INTEGRAL CONCRETE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.1 TONS (54.5 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 5/14 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-209P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°42'48.30" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 33.6 FT (10.2 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°43'11.00" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 37.6 FT (11.5 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 36.0 FT (11.0 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 3.0 FT (0.9 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 3.0 FT (0.9 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 0 - OTHER (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 0 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2014 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 0 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 33.6 FT (10.2 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2034 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 4 - STEEL

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 5 - OTHER

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 3.75 FT (1.14 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... NNNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N

8 - Stable; scour above top of fo

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

KEY REQUIRED TO ACCESS THIS PORTION OF THE FOOTHILLS PARKWAY UNTIL ROAD IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. KEY AND 16'

LADDER ARE ALSO REQUIRED TO GAIN ACCESS TO INTERIOR OF BOX GIRDER.

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:83�43'11.00 http:35�42'48.30

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-209P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-209P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EAST; NOTE CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT IN

PLACE DURING CURRENT INSPECTION

PHOTO #2 - SOUTH SIDE; NOTE ONGOING CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGE

BARRIER

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW

LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL LONGITUDINAL AND MAP

CRACKING OF DECK SURFACE, DECK

SURFACE AT WEST SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION

IN EXPANSION JOINTS, JOINT OVER WEST

ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST

APPROACH LOOKING EAST; NOTE TYPICAL

VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG APPROACH

BARRIERS

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING

OF APPROACH SLABS, CRACKING AT EAST

APPROACH SLAB SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - BRIDGE BARRIERS UNDER

CONSTRUCTION, SOUTH SIDE NEAR WEST

END SHOWN; NOTE CONCRETE FROM CURB

HAS BEEN REMOVED

PHOTO #9 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AT SOUTHEAST DRAINAGE INLET

PHOTO #10 - DETERIORATION OF MORTAR JOINT IN APPROACH

BARRIER, SOUTH BARRIER OF WEST APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW

FROM EAST SPAN LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #12 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF

WEST SPAN

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

UNDERSIDE OF DECK OVERHANGS, SOUTH

OVERHANG OVER WEST ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #14 - NORTH OVERHANG NEAR EAST

END

PHOTO #15 - ACCESS BOX GIRDER NEAR EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #16 - TYPICAL BEARING, NORTH BEARING AT EAST ABUTMENT

SHOWN

PHOTO #17 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT; NOTE EXPOSED

FOOTING

PHOTO #18 - CRACKING AT BASE OF NORTH CHEEKWALL ON EAST

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #20 - VEGETATION GROWTH ON PIER

#1

PHOTO #21 - EFFLORESCENCE AT TOP OF PIER #1

PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH ON WINGWALLS,

NORTHEAST WINGWALL SHOWN

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .