Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-204P.pdf

PDF 4 MB Posted

Attached to
Great Smoky Mountains-Foothills Parkway
Solicitation number
DTFH71-17-B-00015
Issued by

About this file

Bridge Inspection Rpt_STR#5460-204P

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
ROBO_-_FOOT_8E21,_F9.pdf PDF
Amend_0001_-_FOOT_8E21,_F9.pdf PDF
Plans_Sheets_T.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-207P.pdf PDF
Plans_Sheets_A_thru_S_&_U_thru_X_-_THREE_(Pages_251-391).pdf PDF
Plans_Sheets_A_thru_S_&_U_thru_X_-_TWO_(Pages_126-250).pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-209P.pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_-_FOOT_8E21_F9.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-214P.pdf PDF
Report_Pavement.pdf PDF
Report_NEPA.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-205P.pdf PDF
ADV_Subcontracting_plan.doc DOC document
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-206P.pdf PDF
As_Built_Construction_Plans_(Includes_Rev__1-14).pdf PDF
As_Built_Construction_Plans_(Includes_Rev__4).pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_-_FOOT_8E21_F9.pdf PDF
Plans_Sheets A thru S & U thru X —
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-030P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-210P.pdf PDF
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
Appendix_TDEC_NPDES_CGP.pdf PDF
Plans_Sheets_A_thru_S_&_U_thru_X_-_ONE_(Pages_1-125).pdf PDF
As_Built_Construction_Plans_(Includes_Rev__6).pdf PDF
VETS-4212.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-213P.pdf PDF
As_Built_Construction_Plans_(Includes_Rev__14).pdf PDF
Appendix_TDEC_NPDES_NOI.pdf PDF
FP03_Eng.pdf PDF
Synopsis_FOOT8E21-Rev.pdf PDF
Synopsis_FOOT8E21.pdf PDF
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

CARR CREEK ROAD BRIDGE

FOOTHILLS PKWY OVER CARR CREEK RD & CARR CREEK

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

LW

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-204P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 5/12/14

Report prepared by: SD

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-204P

CARR CREEK ROAD BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 5/12/14

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUNDATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

MODIFIED CONCRETE

UNKNOWN

UNKNOWN

CONCRETE

0000000000 / NONE

6 - RESTRICTED

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

158.5 FT (48.3 M)

86.0 FT (26.2 M)

38.4 FT (11.7 M)

35.8 FT (10.9 M)

1985 (EST.)

N/A

0 °

NO

LOCATION

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 23.30 (KM PT 37.50)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 6.2 MILES WEST OF ROUTE 321.

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ FOOTHILLS PKWY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. CARR CREEK RD & CARR CREEK

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete box girder bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include debris along the curblines and missing object markers on the underpass roadway. In addition, there is no guardrail system on the underpass roadway.

It should be noted that this bridge is not yet open to public traffic. It is anticipated that the corrective measures outlined in this report will be completed before this portion of the foothills parkway is open.

INSPECTION TEAM: C. CASTRO, H. SALAD

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

CARLOS CASTRO, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 571-434-1546

REPORT REVIEW :

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/30/14

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-204P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

58.7, 222.1 REMOVE DEBRIS FROM CURBLINES AND VEGETATION GROWTH FROM

APPROACH SLAB CURBLINES AND PARAPETS.

1 LS $ $

222.7 INSTALL OBJECT MARKERS AT PIERS ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY. 4 EA $ $

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : $

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

222.9 INSTALL GUARDRAIL SYSTEM ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY. 100 LF $ $ $

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : $ $

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures. This bridge is not yet in service.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-204P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

G G N N N N N N G

N G

G N G N N F G F G G G N

G N G N G G N

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

58.1 MINOR SPALLING OF DECK ENDS. MINOR LONGITUDINAL

CRACKING OF DECK SURFACE AT EAST END; MINOR DIAGONAL

CRACKING AT WEST END. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF

DECK SURFACE AT 1/3 POINTS OF EACH SPAN AND OVER PIER.

MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING OF EAST SPAN NEAR PIER.

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS

WITH LIGHT EFFLORESCENCE.

58.5 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON CURBS.

58.6 SOME TREES HANGING OVER RAILINGS TRIMMED SINCE PREVIOUS

INSPECTION, SOME OTHERS REMAIN. MINOR TO MODERATE

DETERIORATION OF APPROACH PARAPETS MASONRY MORTAR

JOINTS.

58.7 MODERATE ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ALONG CURBLINES;

BLOCKING DRAINS ON SOUTH SIDE.

59.2 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKS ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER

EXTENDING UP TO VERTICAL CRACKS ON EXTERIOR FACES.

MODERATE RUST STAINING ON SLAB UNDERSIDE AT SOUTHEAST

CORNER.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BOTH

ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.

60.6 MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MORTAR

JOINTS, ESPECIALLY IN TOP CAP MORTAR JOINT. VEGETATION

GROWTH ON APPROACH PARAPETS.

60.8 JOINT MATERIAL MISSING AT VERTICAL JOINT AT END OF

SOUTHWEST WINGWALL AT TRANSITION TO APPROACH.

60.9 MINOR UNDERMINING OF DRAINAGE FLUME ALONG SOUTHWEST

WINGWALL. MODERATE EROSION OF LOWER PORTION OF WEST

ABUTMENT SLOPE.

G G G G F N

N

N

G

G

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-204P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL 6

F G G G N

MED

SUFF

24 FT.

ROCK, SAND, STONES

222. APPROACHES 5

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1.

(UNDERPASS)

F N N P G F G F F

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

60.11 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON MORTAR JOINTS AT

SOUTHWEST WINGWALL DRAINAGE FLUME.

60.13 MINOR VINE GROWTH ON PIER. MINOR SPALLS ON WEST SIDE OF

PIER FROM VEHICLE IMPACT. (LESS THAN 1 SF TOTAL X 1/2" D.)

222.1 MINOR SPALLING OF APPROACH SLABS AT APPROACH ROADWAY

EDGE. MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH AT APPROACH SLAB

CURBLINES AND ALONG JOINT ADJACENT TO DECK.

222.4,6 APPROACH SLABS HAVE 1" DROP FROM BRIDGE DECK, DUE TO

LACK OF OVERLAY ON SLABS. OVERLAY TO BE ADDED WHEN

ROADWAY IS COMPLETED AND OPEN TO PUBLIC. GRAVEL HAS

BEEN ADDED AT EAST APPROACH. WEST APPROACH HAS BEEN

PAVED WITH ASPHALT. BOTH APPROACHES UNEVEN AND

SETTLED UP TO 2".

222.7 "AREA CLOSED DUE TO HAZARDOUS CONSTRUCTION. NO HIKERS,

BICYCLISTS, HORSE RIDERS OR OTHER USERS ALLOWED BEYOND

THIS POINT" LOCATED AT WALLAND ENTRANCE.

222.8 BRIDGE IS ORIENTED IN MIDDLE OF SHARP HORIZONTAL CURVE.

222.9 NO GUARDRAIL PRESENT FOR UNDERPASS ROADWAY WITH ONLY

12'-4" HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN ROADWAY AND PIER

WALL.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-204P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 26 24 44 40

HS 36 33 60 55

TYPE 3 34 31 57 52

TYPE 3S2 43 39 71 64

TYPE 3-3 49 44 81 74

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-204P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... CARR CREEK ROAD BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 009 - BLOUNT

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-204P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 0 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... CARR CREEK RD & CARR CR

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 204P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. FOOTHILLS PKWY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 6 - RESTRICTED (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460204P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 6.2 MILES WEST OF ROUTE

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 0000000000 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 23.30 (KM PT 37.50)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

6 - P/S CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

86.0 FT (26.2 M)

158.5 FT (48.3 M)

0 - UNKNOWN

0 - UNKNOWN

0 - UNKNOWN

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 3 - MODIFIED CONCRETE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.1 TONS (54.5 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 5/14 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-204P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°43'38.50"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°44'07.70"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 6 - HIGHWAY-WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 12.3 FT (3.7 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 35.8 FT (10.9 M)

(52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 38.4 FT (11.7 M)

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 17.0 FT (5.2 M)

LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 5.0 FT (1.5 M)

RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 8.0 FT (2.4 M)

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 35.8 FT (10.9 M)

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET

MATERIAL: .............................. 6 - ALUMINUM

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 3.00 FT (0.91 M)

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 20.08 FT (6.12 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

8 - Stable; scour above top of fo

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

KEY REQUIRED TO ACCESS THIS PORTION OF FOOTHILLS PARKWAY UNTIL ROAD IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. KEY IS ALSO REQUIRED TO GAIN ACCESS TO INTERIOR OF BOX GIRDER. A BUCKET TRUCK REQUIRED TO ACCESS BOX GIRDER.

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:83�44'07.70 http:35�43'38.50

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-204P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-204P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EAST

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - NORTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW NEAR

EAST END

PHOTO #4 - DIAGONAL CRACKING ON

WEARING SURFACE NEAR WEST END

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON CURBS,

NORTH CURB IN EAST SPAN SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH RAILING; NOTE DEBRIS

ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBS AND TREES HANGING OVER RAILINGS

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ALONG CURBLINES

BLOCKING DRAINS ON SOUTH SIDE, SOUTH CURB ON WEST SPAN

SHOWN

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS, SOUTH AT WEST APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #9 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND VEGETATION OVERGROWTH

ON SOUTH PARAPET AT WEST APPROACH

PHOTO #10 - UNEVEN WEARING SURFACE ON EAST APPROACH; NOTE

FILLING WITH GRAVEL

PHOTO #11 - UNEVEN WEST APPROACH

PHOTO #12 - SOUTH PARAPET AT EAST

APPROACH COVERED WITH VEGETATION;

NOTE ALSO UTILITY CONCRETE BOX

PHOTO #13 - LACK OF MORTAR JOINT AND VEGETATION GROWTH ON

NORTH PARAPET OF EAST APPROACH

PHOTO #14 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW, EAST SPAN

PHOTO #15 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW,

WEST SPAN

PHOTO #16 - WATER LEAKAGE AND RUST

STAINING ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER

NEAR EAST ABUTMENT, SOUTH SIDE

PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE

CRACKING OF UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS

WITH EFFLORESCENCE; SOUTH OVERHANG

OVER PIER SHOWN

PHOTO #18 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST

ABUTMENT AND SLOPE

PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACK

EXTENDING UP FACE OF BOX GIRDER; EAST

SPAN AT EAST ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #20 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #21 - EROSION OF WEST ABUTMENT SLOPE

PHOTO #22 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO #23 - VEGETATION GROWTH AND

SLOPE EROSION AT SOUTH SIDE ADJACENT

TO WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #24 - GENERAL VIEW OF PIER, EAST

FACE; NOTE VEGETATION AND VINE GROWTH

PHOTO #25 - UTILITY CONDUITS ATTACHED SOUTH SIDE NEAR

ABUTMENT

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .