Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-206P.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

SOUTH CLEAR FORK ROAD BRIDGE

FOOTHILLS PARKWAY OVER SOUTH CLEAR FORK ROAD

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

LE

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-206P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 5/13/14

Report prepared by: NS

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-206P

SOUTH CLEAR FORK ROAD BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 5/13/14

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL:

MAIN SPAN TYPE:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: ..

DECK TYPE:

WEARING SURFACE:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS:

PIER FOUNDATION(S):

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ...

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO:

NPS ROAD CLASS:

STRUCTURE HISTORY:

PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

MODIFIED CONCRETE

SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

N/A

CONCRETE

0000000000 / NONE

6 - RESTRICTED

NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

DECK WIDTH:

CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

YEAR BUILT:

YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

SKEW ANGLE:

FRACTURE CRITICAL:

80.0 FT (24.4 M)

80.0 FT (24.4 M)

34.7 FT (10.6 M)

32.0 FT (9.8 M)

1985 (EST.)

N/A

0 °

NO

LOCATION

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 30.20 (KM PT 48.60)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 1.7 MILES WEST OF ROUTE 321.

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ FOOTHILLS PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. SOUTH CLEAR FORK ROAD

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This post-tensioned concrete box girder bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include deterioration of the wingwall mortar joints; settlement of the approach pavement; undermining along the north side of the east abutment exposing the steel H-piles; vegetation growth at the wingwalls; and debris accumulation along the curblines.

It should be noted that this bridge is not yet open to public traffic. It is anticipated that the corrective measures outlined in this report will be completed before this portion of the foothills parkway is open.

INSPECTION TEAM: C. CASTRO, H. SALAD

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

CARLOS CASTRO, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 571-434-1546

REPORT REVIEW :

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/30/14

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-206P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

60.6 REPOINT WINGWALL MORTAR JOINTS AS NECESSARY. 1 LS $ $

222.6 REPAIR SETTLEMENT OF APPROACH PAVEMENT. 1 LS $ $

60.9 FILL AND STABILIZE UNDERMINING AT NORTH SIDE OF EAST ABUTMENT WITH

GROUT.

2 CY $ $

58.7, 60.6, 222.1

REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH AT WINGWALLS AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION

ALONG CURBLINES.

1 LS $ $

59.2 CLEAN DRAINS INSIDE OF BOX GIRDER TO ALLEVIATE PONDING. 1 LS $ $

223.5 FILL AND STABILIZE AREA OF EROSION AND UNDERMINING AT END OF

NORTHWEST WINGWALL.

1 CY $ $

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : $

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures. This bridge is not yet in service.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-206P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

G G N N N G N N G

N G

G N G F F F N N F G N N

N N N N N N N

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

58.1 MINOR SPALLING ON DECK EDGES WHERE EXPOSED AT ASPHALT

TRANSITION PATCHES. MINOR TO MODERATE LONGITUDINAL AND

DIAGONAL CRACKING ON DECK SURFACE AT BOTH ENDS. SMALL

PATCH ON DECK SURFACE (16" X 13").

MINOR TRANSVERSE AND DIAGONAL CRACKING ON UNDERSIDE OF

OVERHANGS WITH LIGHT EFFLORESCENCE, PARTICULARLY AT

SOUTHEAST AND NORTHWEST CORNERS.

58.6 MINOR RUSTING ON NUMEROUS RAILING ANCHOR BOLTS. MINOR

TO MODERATE VEGETATION OVERHANGING RAILINGS. MINOR TO

MODERATE DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR

JOINTS.

58.7 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES.

58.10 MINOR TO MODERATE VEGETATION OVERHANGING RAILINGS.

59.2 MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING WITH LIGHT EFFLORESCENCE

AND LEAKAGE ON BOTTOM OF BOX GIRDER AT ABUTMENTS.

MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING ON EXTERIOR WEB ON BOTH

SIDES AT EAST END. SCRATCH ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX AT SOUTH

EDGE.

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING ON INTERIOR WEB WALLS AT

ISOLATED ACCESS LOCATIONS. PONDING INSIDE BOX GIRDER AT

BOTH ENDS; EVIDENCE OF LEAKAGE INSIDE BOX GIRDER

THROUGH TOP JOINT. FORMWORK REMAINS INSIDE BOX GIRDER

AT BOTH ENDS. (NO VERIFIED DURING THIS INSPECTION).

59.6 MINOR CRACKING ON EAST ABUTMENT DIAPHRAGM.

60.1 MINOR HAIRLINE VERTICAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKS WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.

N G G F G N

N

N

G

G

INSPECTION DATE: 5/13/14

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-206P FIELD INSPECTION REPORT

SOUTH CLEAR FORK ROAD BRIDGE

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

5. OTHER

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL N

9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :

222. APPROACHES 5

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1. G

N N F F F N G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

60.3 MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON WEST ABUTMENT

BEARING SEAT.

60.4 MINOR TO MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING THROUGHOUT TOP

OF BACKWALLS.

MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING ON FACE OF BACKWALLS, SOME WITH

EFFLORESCENCE.

60.6 MINOR DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MORTAR JOINTS. MINOR TO

MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH IN MORTAR JOINTS.

60.9 MODERATE EROSION (12' L X 3" H) WITH 3.3' OF UNDERMINING AT

NORTH SIDE OF EAST ABUTMENT, WITH TWO EXPOSED H-PILES.

222.1 MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING OF APPROACH SLABS. MINOR

SPALLING ON APPROACH SLABS AT APPROACH ROADWAY EDGE

(UNABLE TO VERIFY DUE TO ASPHALT SURFACING).

222.4 APPROACH SLABS HAVE 2" DROP FROM BRIDGE DECK, DUE TO

LACK OF OVERLAY ON SLABS. OVERLAY TO BE ADDED WHEN

ROADWAY IS COMPLETED AND OPEN TO PUBLIC. 2.0' ASPHALT

TRANSITION HAS BEEN ADDED AT BOTH APPROACHES IN THE

PAST.

222.5 AREA OF MODERATE EROSION (2' L X 1' H X UP TO 50" U) AT THE

END OF NORTHWEST APPROACH WALL.

222.6 MODERATE SETTLEMENT OF APPROACH PAVEMENT.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-206P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 24 22 40 37

HS 36 33 60 55

TYPE 3 35 31 58 52

TYPE 3S2 41 37 69 62

TYPE 3-3 45 41 75 68

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-206P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... SOUTH CLEAR FORK ROAD BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-206P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 0

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 206P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 6 - RESTRICTED

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S):

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

155 - SEVIER

161000000

SOUTH CLEAR FORK ROAD

FOOTHILLS PARKWAY

5460206P0000000

1.7 MILES WEST OF ROUTE

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

30.20 (KM PT 48.60)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

06 - BOX GIRDER - SINGLE or SPREAD

80.0 FT (24.4 M)

80.0 FT (24.4 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 3 - MODIFIED CONCRETE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.1 TONS (54.5 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 5/14 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-206P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°43'07.20" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 32.0 FT (9.8 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°40'11.40" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 34.7 FT (10.6 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 36.0 FT (11.0 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 30.0 FT (9.1 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 3.0 FT (0.9 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 3.0 FT (0.9 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 1 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2012 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 2 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2032 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 6 - ALUMINUM

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 8.0 FT (2.4 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.83 FT (0.86 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 15.75 FT (4.80 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N

N - Not over waterway.

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

KEY REQUIRED TO ACCESS THIS PORTION OF THE FOOTHILLS PARKWAY UNTIL ROAD IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. KEY IS ALSO

REQUIRED TO GAIN ACCESS TO INTERIOR OF BOX GIRDER. 9/16" SOCKET WRENCH REQUIRED.

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:83�40'11.40 http:35�43'07.20

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-206P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-206P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD MISSING LINK

PHOTO #2 - SOUTH SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #4 - CRACKING OF DECK NEAR WEST END

PHOTO #5 - LONGITUDINAL CRACKING AT EAST END OF DECK

PHOTO #6 - LONGITUDINAL AND DIAGONAL CRACKING ON DECK

SURFACE AT BOTH ENDS, WEST END SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL VEGETATION

OVERHANGING RAILINGS, NORTH RAILING

SHOWN; NOTE ALSO DEBRIS BUILDUP ALONG

CURBLINE AND EVIDENCE OF WATER

PONDING ALONG CURB

PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

SEALANT BETWEEN APPROACH AND BRIDGE

PARAPETS, JOINT AT SOUTHEAST WINGWALL

SHOWN

PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS, SOUTHWEST PARAPET SHOWN

PHOTO #10 - ELEVATION DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WEST APPROACH

SLAB AND BRIDGE DECK; NOTE TRANSITION ASPHALT PATCHING

ALONG DECK JOINT

PHOTO #11 - POTHOLES ON WEST APPROACH

PAVEMENT

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL LACK OF SEALANT

MATERIAL BETWEEN END OF APPROACH

PARAPET AND APPROACH WALL, END OF

SOUTH PARAPET AT EAST APPROACH

SHOWN

PHOTO #13 - TREE GROWING IN JOINT BETWEEN APPROACH

PARAPET AND BRIDGE PARAPET AT NORTHWEST CORNER

PHOTO #14 - VEGETATION GROWTH ON SOUTH PARAPET AT WEST

APPROACH

PHOTO #15 - WARNING SIGN NEAR SOUTH

PARAPET OF EAST APPROACH

PHOTO #16 - EROSION AT END OF

NORTHWEST APPROACH WINGWALL

PHOTO #17 - GENERAL UNDER SIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST, NOTE

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO #18 - DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE

EXTENDING UP TO 10FT ON UNDERSIDE OF BOX GIRDER AT EAST END

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT; NOTE

EFFLORESCENCE AND GRAFFITI ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALL

PHOTO #20 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON UNDERSIDE OF

BOX BEAM NEAR WEST ABUTMENT; NOTE GRAFFITI ON WEST

ABUTMENT BREASTWALL

PHOTO #21 - CLOSE-UP OF PREVIOUS PHOTO

SHOWING DRAINAGE OUTLET WITH

CRACKING AND EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL DIAGONAL CRACKING

ON UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS NEAR

ABUTMENTS, NORTH OVERHANG AT WEST

ABUTMENT SHOWN; NOTE EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO #23 - ACCESS FOR BOX GIRDER AT

WEST END

PHOTO #24 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS, NORTH

OVERHANG SHOWN

PHOTO #25 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST ABUTMENT; NOTE

UNDERMINING AT BREASTWALL; NOTE ALSO RIPRAP FOR SLOPE

PROTECTION

PHOTO #26 - DIAGONAL CRACKING AT EAST ABUTMENT AND AT

NORTH END OF DIAPHRAGM; NOTE ALSO 3.3FT X 12 FT UNDERMINING

OF ABUTMENT WITH EXPOSED PILES

PHOTO #27 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL NEAR SOUTH END; NOTE ALSO ACTIVE WATER

LEAKAGE ON ABUTMENT SEAT

PHOTO #28 - EROSION HOLE AT MID-SECTION OF EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #29 - FULL LENGTH CRACK WITH

EFFLORESCENCE FROM BREASTWALL TO

OVERHANG AT SOUTH SIDE OF EAST

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #30 - VEHICULAR SCRATCH MARKS ON

DECK UNDERSIDE AT SOUTH END

PHOTO #31 - VERTICAL CRACK ON

BREASTWALL AT WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #32 - NORTHWEST WINGWALL