Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5460-205P.pdf

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

HAPPY HOLLOW ROAD BRIDGE

FOOTHILLS PARKWAY OVER HAPPY HOLLOW ROAD

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

LW

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-205P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 5/13/14

Report prepared by: NS

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-205P

HAPPY HOLLOW ROAD BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 5/13/14

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 4 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 390.0 FT (118.9 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 80.0 FT (24.4 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... MODIFIED CONCRETE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 34.5 FT (10.5 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 31.8 FT (9.7 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... PRA-08E5 / NONE SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 50 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 6 - RESTRICTED FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2010 - PARAPET REPAIRS, CONCRETE BEAM AND DIAPHRAGM REPAIRS, EROSION

REPAIRS AND APPROACH SLAB REPAIRS.

LOCATION

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 30.00 (KM PT 48.28)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 1.9 MILES WEST OF ROUTE 321.

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ FOOTHILLS PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. HAPPY HOLLOW ROAD

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This prestressed concrete multi-beam bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include deterioration of mortar joints in the wingwalls and parapets; minor to moderate vegetation growth around and on the structure; and missing object markers on the underpass roadway.

Additional problems include transverse cracking with efflorescence on the deck underside, cracking of the approach slabs, and settlement of both approaches, should be addressed when final preparations are made to open this portion of the Foothills Parkway.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: C. CASTRO, H. SALAD

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

CARLOS CASTRO, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER 571-434-1546

REPORT REVIEW :

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/30/14

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-205P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

58.6, 60.6 REPOINT MASONRY AS REQUIRED. 1 LS $ $

58.1,6,7, 60.13

REMOVE VEGETATION OVERHANGING DECK AND RAILINGS. REMOVE

VEGETATION FROM SUBSTRUCTURE AS NECESSARY. TRIM TREES

ENCROACHING PIER CAP #2. REMOVE VEGETATION AND DEBRIS FROM DECK.

1 LS $ $

222.7 INSTALL OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE PIERS ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY. 4 EA $ $

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL : $

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures. This bridge is not yet in service.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-205P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

OTHER

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

FOUNDATIONS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

PIER(S)

OTHER

SLOPE PROTECTION

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

EXPANSION JOINTS

WEEP HOLES

WINGWALLS

FOUNDATIONS

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

PILE BENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

G G N N N G N G G

N G

G N G G G F N N G F G N

G N G N G G N

11.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

(SPR FTG/PILES)

58.1 MINOR EDGE SPALLING AT DECK ENDS WHERE EXPOSED AT

ASPHALT TRANSITION PATCHES. MINOR MAP CRACKING ON DECK

SURFACE ALONG CURBLINES. MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING

FULL WIDTH OF DECK AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS. MODERATE

VEGETATION GROWTH OVERHANGING DECK.

MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON DECK

UNDERSIDE. DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON

DECK UNDERSIDE NEAR EAST END. MINOR CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTH FACE OF DECK AT PIER.

58.5 MINOR CRACKING OF CONCRETE CURBS, SOME WITH

EFFLORESCENCE.

58.6 MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH OVER TOPS OF RAILINGS.

MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MORTAR

JOINTS WITH LOOSE STONES. MISSING STONE AT NORTHWEST

PARAPET.

58.7 MODERATE VEGETATION AND SAPLING GROWTH BETWEEN DECK

ENDS AND APPROACH SLABS. MODERATE DEBRIS AND

VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG CURBLINES AND ALONG

LONGITUDINAL JOINT ADJACENT TO DECK. VEGETATION GROWTH

FROM SCUPPERS ALONG SOUTH SIDE NEAR EAST END.

59.2 MINOR SCALING ON BOTTOM FLANGE OF BEAM #1, SPAN #6 AT

PIER #5.

59.6 MINOR CRACKING OF DIAPHRAGMS THROUGHOUT, SOME WITH

EFFLORESCENCE. MINOR CRACKING ON OUTSIDE FACE OF

CLOSURE DIAPHRAGMS AT PIERS.

60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND

MOISTURE SEEPAGE IN ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.

60.3 MINOR MAP CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON EAST

ABUTMENT BEARING SEAT, SOUTH SIDE.

G G G G G N

N

N

G

G

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-205P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL N

222. APPROACHES 6

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1. G

N N F G F N G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

60.4 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN ABUTMENT

BACKWALLS.

60.5 WEST ABUTMENT FOOTING EXPOSED UP TO 15" HIGH FOR FULL

LENGTH; AREA OF MINOR HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CRACKING

AT SOUTH END. MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH ON SOUTH END OF

WEST ABUTMENT FOOTING.

60.6,10 MINOR TO MODERATE DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS.

MODERATE SETTLEMENT OF NORTHWEST WINGWALL WITH

MORTAR BROKEN AND MISSING. MINOR EROSION AT SOUTHWEST

WINGWALL.

60.13,15 HEAVY VEGETATION GROWTH ON PIERS #2, #3, AND #4. GRAFFITI

ON PIER #3. TREES GROWTH ENCROACHING PIER CAP #2.

222.1 SEALANT IN LONGITUDINAL JOINT BETWEEN APPROACH SLABS

AND APPROACH PARAPETS IS MISSING. MINOR SPALLING IN

APPROACH SLABS AT APPROACH ROADWAY. MINOR TO

MODERATE TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF APPROACH SLABS.

222.4 APPROACH SLABS HAVE 2" DROP FROM BRIDGE DECK, DUE TO

LACK OF OVERLAY ON SLABS. OVERLAY TO BE ADDED WHEN

ROADWAY IS COMPLETED AND OPEN TO PUBLIC. 2.0' ASPHALT

TRANSITION HAS BEEN ADDED AT BOTH APPROACHES IN THE

PAST; 1" DROP-OFF REMAINS.

222.6 MODERATE SETTLEMENT OF WEST APPROACH SLAB, NORTH SIDE;

MINOR SETTLEMENT OF EAST APPROACH SLAB, SOUTH SIDE.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-205P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 27 24 45 40

HS 36 33 60 55

TYPE 3 34 31 57 52

TYPE 3S2 43 39 72 65

TYPE 3-3 49 45 82 75

DESIGN LOADING: HS20 (MS18)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: RATING BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-205P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... HAPPY HOLLOW ROAD BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 155 - SEVIER

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-205P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 0 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... HAPPY HOLLOW ROAD

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 205P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. FOOTHILLS PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 6 - RESTRICTED (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460205P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 1.9 MILES WEST OF ROUTE

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ PRA-08E5 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 30.00 (KM PT 48.28)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

5 - PRESTRESSED CONCRETE

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

80.0 FT (24.4 M)

390.0 FT (118.9 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 3 - MODIFIED CONCRETE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... NO

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 5 - HS20 (MS18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 36.0 TONS (32.7 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 60.1 TONS (54.5 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 5/14 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-205P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°43'00.50" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 31.8 FT (9.7 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°40'23.30" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 34.5 FT (10.5 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 24.5 FT (7.5 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 20.5 FT (6.2 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 2.0 FT (0.6 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 2.0 FT (0.6 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 1 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 50 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2012 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 2 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 31.8 FT (9.7 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2032 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 2 - MOUNTED ON PARAPET

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 6 - ALUMINUM

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 7.0 FT (2.1 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.75 FT (0.84 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 25.58 FT (7.80 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N

N

N - Not over waterway.

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2010 - PARAPET REPAIRS, CONCRETE BEAM AND DIAPHRAGM REPAIRS, EROSION REPAIRS AND APPROACH SLAB REPAIRS.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

KEY REQUIRED TO ACCESS THIS PORTION OF THE FOOTHILLS PARKWAY UNTIL ROAD IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:83�40'23.30 http:35�43'00.50

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-205P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-205P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #2 - SOUTH SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW

LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE CRACKING

FULL WIDTH OF DECK AT ISOLATED

LOCATIONS, CRACKING IN SPAN #3 SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE OF CONCRETE CURBS,

SOUTH CURB IN SPAN #3 SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL MAP CRACKING ON DECK

SURFACE ALONG CURBLINES, SOUTH

CURBLINE IN SPAN #3 SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG

CONCRETE CURB AT SOUTH RAILING; NOTE

ALSO VEGETATION GROWTH AND CLOGGED

SCUPPER DRAINS

PHOTO #8 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH

RAILING

PHOTO #9 - SOME TRIMMED TREES NEAR SOUTH RAILING AT WEST

END; NOTE VEGETATION GROWTH ON APPROACH PARAPET

PHOTO #10 - SPALLING AND TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF WEST

APPROACH SLAB AND PAVEMENT

PHOTO #11 - CLOSE UP OF TRANSVERSE CRACKING AT WEST

APPROACH SLAB

PHOTO #12 - HEIGHT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BRIDGE AND WEST

APPROACH SLAB: NOTE ASPHALT TRANSITION PATCH ALONG DECK

JOINT; NOTE ALSO CRACKING OF APPROACH SLAB

PHOTO #13 - HEIGHT DIFFERENCE IN

APPROACH SLAB AND BRIDGE DECK AT EAST

END; NOTE ASPHALT TRANSITION PATCH

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL LACK OF SEALANT IN

LONGITUDINAL JOINT BETWEEN APPROACH

SLABS AND APPROACH PARAPETS, SOUTH

SIDE OF EAST APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - NORTHEAST APPROACH

PARAPET; NOTE VEGETATION GROWTH

PHOTO #16 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF

SPAN #1; NOTE TRANSVERSE CRACKING

WITH EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO #17 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF

SPAN #2, LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #18 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF

SPAN #3, LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #19 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW

LOOKING WEST, SPAN #4; NOTE TRANSVERSE

CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE

PHOTO #20 - GENERAL VIEW OF EAST

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #21 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AT SOUTH END OF

EAST ABUTMENT

PHOTO #22 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF BEARING SEATS AND

BACKWALL; NORTH BAY OF EAST ABUTMENT SHOWN

PHOTO #23 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT; NOTE EXPOSED

FOOTING FOR FULL LENGTH

PHOTO #24 - HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CRACKING AT SOUTH END

OF WEST ABUTMENT FOOTING

PHOTO #25 - SETTLEMENT OF NORTHWEST

WINGWALL WITH BROKEN MORTAR JOINT

PHOTO #26 - GENERAL VIEW OF PIER #1,

WEST FACE

PHOTO #27 - TREES GROWTH ENCROACHING SOUTH END OF PIER

CAP #2

PHOTO #28 - GENERAL VIEW OF PIER #3, WEST FACE; NOTE GRAFFITI

PHOTO #29 - TYPICAL VINE GROWTH ON PIERS; EAST FACE OF PIER

#4 SHOWN

PHOTO #30 - TYPICAL LACK OF MORTAR JOINT AND VEGETATION

GROWTH ON APPROACH WALLS , NORTH WALL AT EAST APPROACH

SHOWN; NOTE ALSO LOOSE STONES

PHOTO #31 - LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #32 - LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #33 - SINK HOLE IN FRONT OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO #34 - MINOR EROSION IN FRONT OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL