Q&A_12.6.2017.pdf

Project: Western Region Pavement Preservation MATOC

# General Technical Question Answer Date 1 x Please verify no written notice to the CO stating the reason to not bid a Task Order is required for the MATOC RFP.

Offerors are not required to submit a written notice to the CO stating the reason for declining a project on the initial MATOC TO‐RFPs.

12/5/17

2 x

Does “headquarters” on page M‐5 of the MATOC RFP refer to contractor’s headquarters or contracting agency headquarters?

“headquarters” is referring to contractor’s headquarters.

12/5/17

3 x

Does submission requirement ii, page M‐5 of the MATOC RFP, have to follow requirement i of “75 miles from headquarters”?

No 12/5/17

4 x

There is a discrepancy in the point system for Factor 2 of the MATOC RFP. Factor 2 states that all subfactors are equal to 90 points, but all subfactors combined equal 100. Please clarify how many points Factors 2 and Subfactors of Factor 2 are.

An error was made, which will be corrected via an Amendment to the MATOC. Factor 2 is worth 100 points. Subfactor 1 is 30, Subfactor 2 is 40, Subfactor 3 is 10, and Subfactor 4 is 20.

12/5/17

5 x

On page L‐5, the MATOC RFP references “bound volumes”, can you clarify if the envelope is considered bound or shall the contractor bind together contents within the envelope.

Each original and each copy of the Volume must be bound separately. The envelope is not considered bound.

12/5/17

6 x

Referencing page L‐5 on the MATOC RFP, shall the five copies required for volume 1 be submitted within volume 1’s envelope or have their own separate envelope titled the same with “original” and “Copies”?

Offerors may choose to submit the original and separate copies in different envelopes or can submit them in one envelope.

Original and copy submittals must be independently bound.

12/5/17

Check General or Technical

7 x 8 x 9 x