Q&A_12.11.2017.pdf
PDF 78 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- DTFH7017R00002
View the file
Other files
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Project: Western Region Pavement Preservation MATOC
# General Technical Question Answer Date 1 x Please verify no written notice to the CO stating the reason to not bid a Task Order is required for the MATOC RFP.
Offerors are not required to submit a written notice to the CO stating the reason for declining a project on the initial MATOC TO‐RFPs.
12/5/17
2 x
Does “headquarters” on page M‐5 of the MATOC RFP refer to contractor’s headquarters or contracting agency headquarters?
“headquarters” is referring to contractor’s headquarters.
12/5/17
3 x
Does submission requirement ii, page M‐5 of the MATOC RFP, have to follow requirement i of “75 miles from headquarters”?
No 12/5/17
4 x
There is a discrepancy in the point system for Factor 2 of the MATOC RFP. Factor 2 states that all subfactors are equal to 90 points, but all subfactors combined equal 100. Please clarify how many points Factors 2 and Subfactors of Factor 2 are.
An error was made, which will be corrected via an Amendment to the MATOC. Factor 2 is worth 100 points. Subfactor 1 is 30, Subfactor 2 is 40, Subfactor 3 is 10, and Subfactor 4 is 20.
12/5/17
5 x
On page L‐5, the MATOC RFP references “bound volumes”, can you clarify if the envelope is considered bound or shall the contractor bind together contents within the envelope.
Each original and each copy of the Volume must be bound separately. The envelope is not considered bound.
12/5/17
6 x
Referencing page L‐5 on the MATOC RFP, shall the five copies required for volume 1 be submitted within volume 1’s envelope or have their own separate envelope titled the same with “original” and “Copies”?
Offerors may choose to submit the original and separate copies in different envelopes or can submit them in one envelope.
Original and copy submittals must be independently bound.
12/5/17
Check General or Technical
7 x
The Federal Montana Davis Bacon Wage rates are structured with different zone pays depending on how far projects are from certain cities in Montana. The line between Zone 2 and Zone 3 wage classifications appears to fall somewhere in the middle of Mill Creek project.
Will government make the determination of what Zone this project would fall under?
The road miles over the shortest practical maintained route from the County Court House of Bozeman to the center of the Mill Creek job is 50.3 miles. This will be further addressed in a forthcoming amendment. 12/11/17
8 x
Please clarify the requirements of Subfactor 3:
Quality Control System in the MATOC RFP. Is the intent to provide a QCP for all required work features stated in SCR 153.03 of the RFP we are providing pricing or are we to choose one of the required work features?
Provide a QA/QC plan for each Task Order RFP that you are providing pricing. Each QA/QC plan should address all contract work categories, as outlined in FHWA Specifications Section 153.03 – Quality Control Plan.” 12/11/17
9 x
File details come from the government source that posted it.