Q A_for_posting_on_FBO.pdf

PDF 65 KB Posted

Attached to
MT PARK 2013(1)B Gardiner Gateway, Phase 2 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
DTFH70-15-R-00014
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to MT PARK 2013(1)B Gardiner Gateway, Phase 2, newest first.
File Type Posted
A002_Gardiner_Gateway.pdf PDF
A001_Gardiner_Gateway.pdf PDF
Q A_for_posting_on_FBO.pdf PDF
Q A_for_posting_on_FBO.pdf PDF
Park_2013_1B_XS_Combined_all.pdf PDF
Plans_Gardiner_Gateway.pdf PDF
Final-Gardiner_Hydraulics_Report-combined-1r.pdf PDF
RFP_GardinerGateway.pdf PDF
Earthwork-data-listing-all.pdf PDF
Geotechnical_Report_06-14.pdf PDF
SWPPP_Gardiner_Gateway_Phase_II_MT_PARK_2013(1)B.pdf PDF
Plan_Request_form_GardinerGateway.pdf PDF
PROJECT_DESCRIPTION_MT_PARK_20131(B).pdf PDF
Preliminary-Letter_MT_Park_2013(1)B.pdf PDF
Park_2013_1B_95_.pdf PDF
Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PROJECT #: MT PARK 2013(1)B

PROJECT NAME: Gardiner Gateway, Phase 2

Check General (G) or Technical (T)

# G T Question Answer Date

X

The Tabulation of Drainage Quantities in the plan sheets does not specify an allowable pipe material. FP-03 602.03 specifies to furnish the same material as existing for culvert extensions. The plans show several instances where the pipe to be installed is tying into existing stub-outs. Does section

602.03 apply for this work? If so, please clarify the allowable pipe material and the existing pipe material.

Any compatible and appropriate pipe material having the maximum specified Manning’s Roughness coefficient should be acceptable. Most of the previously installed pipe was PVC and ADS. A new pipe material should be compatible with these types.

2/1/2016

2 X

The Tabulation of Soil Erosion Sediment Control Quantities does not match the prints.

Locations 13+08; 13+21;13+14;13+23 are not on the prints.

Location 22+56 is on the prints (sheet I.4) but not in the tabulation page.

So are there 37 locations and there is a page missing and a location not counted 33 locations?

There is not a page missing in the plans and the 4 locations (13+08; 13+21; 13+14; 13+23) that aren’t shown in the plan sheet because they are part of the existing conditions. Bid the quantity shown in the plans and final locations will be determined during construction.

2/11/16

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .