Criminal_History_Screening_Practices.pdf
PDF 140 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 26-P-00009
- Issued by
- Hillsborough County, Florida
About this file
This is a Criminal History Screening Practices form for the City of Tampa's Professional Building Plan Review & Inspections Services Request for Qualifications. The form requires proposers to declare their position regarding criminal history screening practices and potential incentives available under Section 2-284 of City ordinances. Proposers may decline any discount or incentive related to criminal history screening, indicate that they maintain similar screening practices to those in Chapter 12, Article VI of the Tampa City Code, or apply for applicable discounts and incentives by providing supporting documentation. The RFQ was released on October 27, 2025, with proposals due by November 17, 2025, at 4:30 pm, and includes a non-mandatory pre-proposal meeting scheduled for November 4, 2025. The City intends to pre-qualify a minimum of three respondents to provide ongoing and as-needed building plan review and inspection services for residential and commercial structures within Tampa's city limits across building, electrical, mechanical, and plumbing trade categories. The potential contract term is one year with options for three additional one-year renewals.
Proposers applying for criminal history screening practice incentives must submit notarized past employment analysis documenting disadvantaged workers hired, estimates of disadvantaged workers to be hired if awarded, evidence that recruitment and employment materials contain no language disadvantageous to disadvantaged workers, identification of potential job opportunities for disadvantaged workers, and commitment to consider at least one qualified disadvantaged worker for employment. Alternatively, proposers may demonstrate that they currently employ a percentage of disadvantaged workers consistent with industry standards as determined by the City's soliciting department director. Criminal history screening practices account for 5 points of the total evaluation criteria, with the evaluation framework also assessing cost (10 points), firm experience and qualifications (30 points), references (15 points), understanding of scope of work (25 points), and Small Local Business Enterprise participation (15 points). Compensation will be structured as all-inclusive unit prices per hour with no additional amounts permitted beyond the established rate.
View the file
Other files
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Criminal History Screening Practices
☐ The Proposer hereby declines any discount or incentive related to Section 2-284 Bidder's Criminal History Screening Practices.
☐ The Proposer hereby declines any discount or incentive related to Section 2-284 Bidder's Criminal History
Screening Practices; however, Proposer has Criminal History Screening practices similar in nature to the practices contained in Chapter 12, Article VI, City of Tampa Code of Ordinances.
☐ The Proposer hereby applies for applicable discount or incentive related to Section 2-284 Bidder's Criminal History Screening Practices. The following documentation and assurances are provided:
_ Notarized past employment analysis that includes the number of disadvantaged workers the proposer has hired in the past, or, if the proposer has never hired a disadvantaged worker, an explanation that the proposer made a good faith effort to hire a disadvantaged worker: and, _ An estimate of the number of disadvantaged workers that the proposer has hired or plans to hire if the proposer is awarded the project; and, _ Evidence that the proposer's recruitment literature and employment policy does not include language that is disadvantageous to a disadvantaged worker.
_ Identifies, [ ]hereon [ ]in attached document, potential job opportunities under the project that may be available for disadvantaged workers if the City awards the Proposer the project; and, Agrees to consider for job placement at least one otherwise qualified disadvantaged worker, to the extent a job opportunity is available, if and after the Proposer is awarded the project; or
The Proposer currently employs a percentage of disadvantaged workers consistent with industry standards as determined by the director of the soliciting department or designee.
Firm Name: _______________________________________________________________________
Authorized signature: _________________________________________ Date: ________________
Name: _____ ___________________________ Title: _____ ___________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .