COMBO ATTCH 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 350 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Dover AFB - HHG Packing and Crating
- Solicitation number
- FA449726Q0021
About this file
This is a Past and Present Performance Questionnaire template used to evaluate contractor performance on federal contracts.
The form is designed to be completed by government personnel or contract administrators to assess a contractor's past performance across multiple performance dimensions. Section A requests general information about the contractor, including their name, address, contact details, the project title, contract number, dollar amount, performance period, and role (prime contractor, sub-contractor, or key personnel). Section B collects respondent information from the person completing the evaluation. Section C directs the completed form to be emailed to the designated contract administrator. The document notes that separate evaluation forms should be completed for each contract if the offeror holds or has held multiple contracts with the agency within the last three years.
Section D contains 23 performance evaluation questions using a six-point rating scale: E (Exceptional), G (Good), S (Satisfactory), M (Marginal), U (Unsatisfactory), and N (Neutral/Not Applicable). The questions assess contractor capabilities across personnel management, quality control, schedule performance, problem resolution, responsiveness to changes, cost proposal accuracy, and overall performance. Questions 22 and 23 require yes/no responses regarding whether the contractor received a cure or show cause notice and whether the evaluator would award another contract to the contractor. The form includes a remarks section for narrative explanations required for any Marginal or Unsatisfactory ratings. The template note indicates these questions are generic and should be tailored to specific acquisitions as appropriate. The form is attributed to Anna G. George, GS-12, DAF, Team Lead, Commodities & Services Flight.
View the file
Other files
Show all 29
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Contract Number:
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Point of Contact:
Contractor’s Name:
Address:
Project Title and Brief Description of Work:
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: Dollar Amount: $
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror:
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent:
Title:
Address:
Telephone Number:
Fax Number:
Email Address:
C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:
COMM Phone:
Email:
Alt Email:
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
E G S M U N
Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or
Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
The contractual performance of
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Contract Administrator:
sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
The contractor: E G S M U N
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5. Followed approved quality control plan.
6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9. Identified problems as they occurred.
10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12. Developed realistic progress schedules.
13. Met established project schedules.
14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
15. Was responsive to contract changes.
16. Provided adequate project supervision.
17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
The contractor: E G S M U N
18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
22. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” YES NO
23. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES NO
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: CONTRACT NUMBER:
Remarks:
Note: While these questions are generic and will work as written in many acquisitions, consider them as they relate to each individual acquisition and tailor them as needed and appropriate. Also, when tailoring the form, consider leaving space between questions for comments.
| Text1: |
| The contractor_2: |
| Check Box2: Yes |
| Check Box3: Off |
| Check Box4: Off |
| Text 1: |
| Text 2: |
| Text 3: |
| Text 4: |
| Text 5: |
| Text3: |
| Text 8: |
| Text 6: |
| Text 9: |
| Text 11: |
| Text 10: |
| Check Box5: Off |
| Check Box6: Off |
| Check Box7: Off |
| Check Box8: Off |
| Text30: |
| Text32: ANNA G. GEORGE, GS-12, DAF |
| Text 7: Team Lead, Commodities & Services Flight |
| Group37: Choice6 |
| Group99: Choice6 |
| Group98: Choice6 |
| Group97: Choice6 |
| Group96: Choice6 |
| Group95: Choice6 |
| Group94: Choice6 |
| Group93: Choice6 |
| Group92: Choice6 |
| Group91: Choice6 |
| Group90: Choice6 |
| Group89: Choice6 |
| Group88: Choice6 |
| Group87: Choice6 |
| Group86: Choice6 |
| Group85: Choice6 |
| Group84: Choice6 |
| Group83: Choice6 |
| Group82: Choice6 |
| Group81: Choice6 |
| Group80: Choice6 |
| Text 12: |
| Text 99: Travis D Ambrose |
| Text 98: 302-677-5233 |
| Text 97: travis.ambrose.1@us.af.mil |
| Text 96: anna.george.2@us.af.mil |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .