B08_Attach_08_Solit_PSP_Vol_I_PastPerf_REQD.pdf

PDF 261 KB Posted

Attached to
MEVE 317500, Replace Morefield Waterlines, Mesa Ve
Solicitation number
140P2026R0020
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract solicitation (No. 140P20XXRXXXX). The form is designed to collect detailed performance evaluation information about a contractor's previous project, with sections for offeror information, contract details, and a comprehensive performance rating across multiple evaluation areas. The rating scale ranges from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional, with the reference completing an in-depth assessment of the contractor's performance in key areas including quality, schedule management, cost control, overall management, small business subcontracting, and regulatory compliance. The questionnaire is marked as Source Selection Sensitive and includes strict guidelines prohibiting the contractor from using the information for promotional purposes or implying governmental endorsement.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attach_23_Answers_to_Questions_Amendment_02_2_12_26_0002.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2026R0020_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
Attach_20_Answers_to_Questions_Amendment_01_2_5_26_0001.pdf PDF
Attach_22_MEVE_317500_Attendance_from_Site_Visit_0001.pdf PDF
Attach_21_Boring_Profiles_0001.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2026R0020_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_12_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_Equals_RELEASED_v1_25Feb25.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_06_Solit_PSP_Cover.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_02_MEVE_317500_Geotechnical_Investigation_Report_092123.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_16_MEVE_-_31750_Morefield_Plan_C9_No_Arc.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_13_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_GenRefs.pdf PDF
B08_Soliciation_140P2026R0020_revision_January_9_2026.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_03_MEVE-317500_Morefield_Plans.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_07_Solit_Construction_SF1442_REQD_RELEASED_v2_Jan2025.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_05_MEVE_317500_Price_Schedule_041224_BLANK.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08_Attach_19_MEVE_-_317500-Morefiled_Pland_C16.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_04_-_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_18_MEVE_-_317500-Morefiled_Pland_C14.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_10_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_BidBond.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_17_MEVE_-_31750_Morefield_Plan_C30_No_Arc.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_11_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_SubKPlan_REQD_RELEASED_v2_Mar25.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_14_Solit_PSP_Vol_II_LmtOnSubcontracting_REQD.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Sol_140P2026R0020.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_01_MEVE_317500___Specifications.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_09_Solit_PSP_Vol_I_Exp_REQD.pdf PDF
B08_Attach_15_MEVE_-_31750_Morefield_Plan_C8_No_Arc.pdf PDF
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

SOLICITATION NO. 140P20XXRXXXX

INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.

Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.

Notice to Contractor

Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.

This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.

The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.

A. OFFEROR INFORMATION

Company Name Company Street Address Address City City State State Zip Code XXXXX Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number / SAM

XXXXXXX

Point of Contact Name, Email, Phone

B. CONTRACT INFORMATION FOR PAST PROJECT (PROJECT SUBMITTED UNDER PROJECT

EXPERIENCE)

Project Title Title Contract Number XXXXXXXXXX Contract Type Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other Awarded Contract Price $X,XXX,XXX Current / Final Price $X,XXX,XXX Contract Award Date XX/XX/XXXX Contract Completion Date XX/XX/XXXX Period of Performance XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX Project Location Park or Street address, City, State Client / Owner Company Brief description of the contract & work effort:

Scope of work description

C. REFERENCE:

Name First, Last Position / Title Title Organization Agency or Company Phone Number XXX-XXX-XXXX Email Address Email Signature Signature Date XX/XX/XXXX

D. EVALUATION

Rating Definition

Exceptional Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Evaluation Area Rating Quality Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)? Choose an item.

Quality of and adherence to quality control plan? Choose an item.

Quality of informational and technical submittals? Choose an item.

Overall Quality Rating Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Schedule (& Time Management) Met project schedule milestones? Choose an item.

Responded to owner requests in a timely manner? Choose an item.

Informational and technical submittals submitted timely? Choose an item.

Promptly addressed scheduling issues? Choose an item.

Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating Choose an item.

Cost Control Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs? Choose an item.

Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications? Choose an item.

Submitted accurate and complete invoices? Choose an item.

Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers? Choose an item.

Overall Cost Control Rating Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Management General oversight by project manager and superintendent? Choose an item.

Coordination with and control of subcontractors? Choose an item.

Avoidance of accidents & safety violations? Choose an item.

Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)? Choose an item.

Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives? Choose an item.

Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems? Choose an item.

Overall Management Rating Choose an item.

Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Met regulatory and contractual labor standards? Choose an item.

Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses? Choose an item.

Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans? Choose an item.

Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating Choose an item.

Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Regulatory Compliance Met building and life safety codes? Choose an item.

Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating Choose an item.

Overall Recommendation:

Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts: Choose an item.

Overall Comments:

E. RETURN:

Return by Time / Date Name CO or CS name Title Contracting Officer / Contract Specialist Organization National Park Service – Denver Service Center Email First_Last@nps.gov

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .