B08_Attach 05 Appendix.pdf

PDF 11 MB Posted

Attached to
ANTI 225963 Rehabilitate Antietam Visitor Center
Solicitation number
140P2020R0080
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation is for the rehabilitation of the Antietam Visitor Center located at Antietam National Battlefield in Sharpsburg, Maryland. The solicitation number is 140P2020R0080 and was issued by the National Park Service National Office within the Department of the Interior.

The project will involve renovating the existing visitor center building, which was constructed in the 1960s. Work will include repairs and upgrades to the building exterior, roofing system, HVAC system and electrical system. The interior will be renovated to improve accessibility and update exhibits. Asbestos abatement and lead paint remediation will also be required. The pre-bid site visit will be held on March 23rd and bids are due by April 13th. It is anticipated that the winning contractor will be selected in June and work will commence in July.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Sol_140P2020R0080_Amd_0007.pdf PDF
REMAINING RFI Questions and Answers_0006.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2020R0080_Amd_0006.pdf PDF
1977 Restroom Renovation 302_41007A-PLNS_ELEV_0005.pdf PDF
230923 Direct Digital Control (DDC) System for HVAC cc_0005.pdf PDF
Temp Visitor Center Life Safety Markup_07.24.2020_0005.pdf PDF
ANTI 225963 Final Q and A Amend 05_0005.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2020R0080_Amd_0005.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2020R0080_Amd_0004.pdf PDF
ANTI 225963 Site Visit Attendees July 02 2020_0003.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2020R0080_Amd_0003.pdf PDF
B09_ Amend 01 140P2020R0080_0002.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2020R0080_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
B11_ANTI 225963_PreBid_Agenda_0002.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2020R0080_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
B08_Attach 03 Drawings Vol 1 of 2.pdf PDF
B08_Attach 01 Specifications Vol 1 of 2.pdf PDF
B08_Attach 02 Specifications Vol 2 of 2.pdf PDF
B08_Attach 04 Drawings Vol 2 of 2.pdf PDF
B08_140P2020R0080.pdf PDF
B08_Attach 06 Solit_PSP_Vol_II_PriceSched.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
B08_Attach 08 Wage Decision 06-04-2020.pdf PDF
B08_Attach 13 Solit_PSP_Vol_II_GenRefs ANTI 225963.doc DOC document
B08_Attach 10 Solit_PSP_Vol_I_PastPerf_REQD ANTI 225963.doc DOC document
B08_Attach 14 Solit_PSP_Vol_II_SubKPlanForm_REQD ANTI 225963.doc DOC document
B08_Attach 09 Solit_PSP_Vol_I_Exp_REQD ANTI 225963.docx DOCX document
B08_Attach 11 SF24-16d.pdf PDF
Sol_140P2020R0080.pdf PDF
B08_Attach 07 Virtual Site Visit Floor Plans.pdf PDF
B08_Attach 15 Solit_PSP_Vol_II_HazMat ANTI 225963.doc DOC document
B08_Attach 12 Solit_PSP_Vol_II_Equals ANTI 225963.doc DOC document
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Antietam National Battlefield Sharpsburg, MD

Rehabilitate Antietam Visitor Center

ANTI – 225963

PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS

FINAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS

APPENDIX A

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

DENVER SERVICE CENTER

FINAL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS

May 22, 2020

ANTI - 225963

05222020

00 01 10 - 1

APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS

DOCUMENT 00 01 10 – APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS

VOLUME 1 of 1

APPENDIX A:

HAZMAT REGULATIONS SUMMARY

PHOTO DOCUMENTATION LOG OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES REPORT

dencela Snapshot

05222020

00 01 10 - 2

APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS

04242020

APP001

HAZMAT REGULATIONS SUMMARY

APP001 – HAZMAT REGULATIONS SUMMARY

APP001

HAZMAT REGULATIONS SUMMARY

CHOH PMIS 165235 Demolish Partially Collapsed Buildings Damaged by February 2010 Storms

Material Type of

Regulation Regulation Party Responsible Summary Regulation Party Responsible Summary Regulation Party Responsible Summary Regulation Party Responsible Summary

Federal

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP; 40 CFR 61 Subpart M (61.141 and 61.145) ; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1001 and 29 CFR 1926.1101

DOT 49 CFR parts 171 and 172 NESHAP; 40 CFR 61 Subpart M (61.141, 61.150 and 61.154)

MD State Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) ‐ (COMAR 26.11.21 Control of Asbestos)

Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) ‐ (COMAR

26.11.21 Control of Asbestos)

Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) ‐ (COMAR

26.11.21 Control of Asbestos)

Federal 40 CFR 745 (not applicable); OSHA 29 CFR

1926.62 and 29 CFR 1910.134

LBP activities are the subject of several federal regulations and guidelines, which include disposal of lead based paint waste

(RCRA) and lead exposure of workers (OSHA). The volume of LBP‐related hazardous waste should be minimized to the extent most feasibly and economically possible, through segregation of waste streams. OSHA requires if lead is present in detectable levels, the Contractor must perform a negative exposure assessment to ensure that their workers will not be exposed to airborne lead above the allowable personal exposure limits

MD State Not applicable because the buildings are not target housing or child‐occupied

Lead disposal regulations found in the Code of Maryland Regulations 26.02.07

Specifications should make HazMat or T&D contractor responsible to identify compliant facilities.

Transporters must be permitted; regulates waste transportation and tracking

Transporters must be permitted; regulates waste transportation and tracking

Owner decision as reflected in project specifications

Metal with LBP can be recycled as scrap metal.

Non‐recyclable debris should be tested or disposed of as hazardous waste.

Asbestos waste may be disposed of at a permitted municipal solid waste landfill.

For a landfill to accept the asbestos waste, it must be packaged in accordance with applicable EPA, OSHA, and MD requirements.

Lead‐based paint can be assumed to fail TCLP under RCRA (D008) and can be managed as hazardous waste, or the waste itself can be tested. Maryland has authorization for RCRA. Metal with LBP can be recycled.

Deconstruction

Specifications should make HazMat/ ACM abatement contractor responsible for compliance, permitting, and notifications

Specifications should make the HazMat removal contractor responsible

Federal and state regulations apply to certain demolition and renovation projects in facilities containing asbestos‐ containing materials (ACMs). The rules require that friable ACMs, and some categories of non‐friable ACMs, be removed before a building is demolished.

OSHA regulates employee exposure to asbestos and in 1994 revised its final rule on asbestos. Maryland regulates licensing, notification and permits.

ACM ‐Projection Room and Janitor’s Closet, Office 01, Office 02, Office 02 Closet, Office 03 and Associated Hallway, Observation Room and

Closet, Exhibit Room 01 and Exhibit Room 02, Bookstore and Bookstore Office ‐ Floor Tile, Mastic Assoc.

With Floor Tile ‐ Throughout

Exterior, Expansion Joint @ Building Base

Lead‐based paints (exterior and interior)

Recycling

Specifications should make T&D contractor responsible

Landfill DisposalTransportation

Specifications should make T&D contractor responsible

Lead Notification regulations found in the Code of Maryland

Regulations 26.02.07

Specifications should make abatement or T&D contractor responsible to identify compliant facilities.

Type of

Regulation Regulation Party Responsible Summary

Federal

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP; 40 CFR 61 Subpart M (61.141 and 61.145) ; OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1001 and 29 CFR 1926.1101

MD State Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) ‐ (COMAR 26.11.21 Control of Asbestos)

Federal 40 CFR 745 (not applicable); OSHA 29 CFR

1926.62 and 29 CFR 1910.134

LBP activities are the subject of several federal regulations and guidelines, which include disposal of lead based paint waste

(RCRA) and lead exposure of workers (OSHA). The volume of LBP‐related hazardous waste should be minimized to the extent most feasibly and economically possible, through segregation of waste streams. OSHA requires if lead is present in detectable levels, the Contractor must perform a negative exposure assessment to ensure that their workers will not be exposed to airborne lead above the allowable personal exposure limits.

MD State Not applicable because the buildings are not target housing or child‐occupied

Lead‐based paints (exterior and interior)

Specifications should make the HazMat removal contractor responsible

Deconstruction

ACM ‐ Feidt Curing Shed ‐ Debris on Floor, Anthony House ‐ Tar to Porch

Flashing and Pipe Insulation

Specifications should make HazMat/ ACM abatement contractor responsible for compliance, permitting, and notifications

Federal and state regulations apply to certain demolition and renovation projects in facilities containing asbestos‐ containing materials (ACMs). The rules require that friable ACMs, and some categories of non‐friable ACMs, be removed before a building is demolished.

OSHA regulates employee exposure to asbestos and in 1994 revised its final rule on asbestos. Maryland regulates licensing, notification and permits.

Type of

Regulation Regulation Party Responsible Summary

Federal DOT 49 CFR parts 171 and 172

MD State Maryland Department of the

Environment (MDE) ‐ (COMAR 26.11.21 Control of Asbestos)

Federal

MD State

Transportation

ACM ‐ Feidt Curing Shed ‐ Debris on Floor, Anthony House ‐ Tar to Porch

Flashing and Pipe Insulation

Specifications should make T&D contractor responsible

Transporters must be permitted;

regulates waste transportation and tracking

Lead‐based paints (exterior and interior)

Lead Notification regulations found in the Code of Maryland Regulations 26.02.07

Specifications should make T&D contractor responsible

Transporters must be permitted;

regulates waste transportation and tracking

Type of

Regulation Regulation Party Responsible Summary

Federal NESHAP; 40 CFR 61 Subpart M (61.141,

61.150 and 61.154)

MD State Maryland Department of the

Environment (MDE) ‐ (COMAR 26.11.21 Control of Asbestos)

Federal

MD State Lead disposal regulations found in the Code of Maryland Regulations 26.02.07

Landfill Disposal

ACM ‐ Feidt Curing Shed ‐ Debris on Floor, Anthony House ‐ Tar to Porch

Flashing and Pipe Insulation

Specifications should make abatement or T&D contractor responsible to identify compliant facilities.

Asbestos waste may be disposed of at a permitted municipal solid waste landfill.

For a landfill to accept the asbestos waste, it must be packaged in accordance with applicable EPA, OSHA, and MD requirements.

Lead‐based paints (exterior and interior)

Specifications should make HazMat or T&D contractor responsible to identify compliant facilities.

Lead‐based paint can be assumed to fail TCLP under RCRA (D008) and can be managed as hazardous waste, or the waste itself can be tested. Maryland has authorization for RCRA. Metal with LBP can be recycled.

Type of

Regulation Regulation Party Responsible Summary

Federal

MD State

Federal

MD State

Recycling

ACM ‐ Feidt Curing Shed ‐ Debris on Floor, Anthony House ‐ Tar to Porch

Flashing and Pipe Insulation

Owner decision as reflected in project specifications

Metal with LBP can be recycled as scrap metal. Non‐recyclable debris should be tested or disposed of as hazardous waste.

Lead‐based paints (exterior and interior)

APP002

PHOTO DOCUMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION

SERVICES

APP002 – PHOTO DOCUMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION SERVICES

APP002

PHOTO DOCUMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION

SERVICES

REPORT OF ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION SERVICES

ANTIETAM VISITOR CENTER,

ANTIETAM NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD, SHARPSBURG, MD

PHOTODOCUMENTATION LOG

Photograph 1: Front View of Antietam Visitor Center

Photograph 2: Antietam Visitor Center, Non-LBP and Non-ACM Beige/Gray Paint on Wood Trellis

– Exterior

Photograph 3: Antietam Visitor Center, Non-ACM deteriorated Stone and Mortar at Observation

Roof

Photograph 4: Antietam Visitor Center, Non-ACM Skylight Flashing – Exterior

Photograph 5: Antietam Visitor Center, Non-ACM Perimeter Flashing – Exterior

Photograph 6: Antietam Visitor Center, Non-ACM Built-Up Roofing – Exterior

Photograph 7: Antietam Visitor Center, Non-ACM Drain Flashing – Exterior

Photograph 8: Antietam Visitor Center, Non-ACM Vent Stack Roofing – Exterior

Photograph 9: Antietam Visitor Center, Non-ACM Roofing Shingles (Black) and Felt Paper under

Roofing Shingles (Black)– Exterior

Photograph 10: Antietam Visitor Center, ACM Expansion Joint @ Building Base (Beige/Gray) – Exterior

Photograph 11: Antietam Visitor Center, ACM 12” x 12” Black Floor Tile and Mastic Associated with Floor Tile - Projection Room and Janitor’s Closet

Photograph 12: Antietam Visitor Center, ACM Floor Tile Under Linoleum and Mastic Associated with Floor Tile - Office 01, Office 02, Office 02 Closet, Office 03 and Associated Hallway.

Photograph 13: Antietam Visitor Center, ACM 9” x 9” Tan with White Floor Tile and Mastic

Associated with Floor Tile Under Carpet - Observation Room and Closet

Photograph 14: Antietam Visitor Center, ACM Floor Tile Under Carpet and Mastic Associated with

Floor Tile - Exhibit Room 01 and Exhibit Room 02

Photograph 15: Antietam Visitor Center, ACM 9” x 9” Grey Floor Tile Under Carpet and Mastic

Associated with Floor Tile - Bookstore and Bookstore Office

Photograph 16: Antietam Visitor Center, Clean Ceiling Plenum – Interior

Photograph 17: Antietam Visitor Center, Metal Ductwork - Interior

Photograph 18: Antietam Visitor Center, Stone Flooring Under Carpet in Lobby.

Photograph 19: Antietam Visitor Center, LBP Paint on Wood Wall and Ceiling at Lobby.

Photograph 20: Antietam Visitor Center, Universal Waste Batteries (200 Count) at Janitor’s Closet.

APP003

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES REPORT

APP003 – FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES REPORT

APP003

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES REPORT

FINAL REPORT OF

ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION SERVICES

AT

ANTIETAM VISITOR CENTER

Prepared For:

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

Prepared By:

96 Morton Street, 8th Floor New York, New York 10014

Tel. (212) 612-7900

NPS PMIS NO. ANTI-225963

LOUIS BERGER PROJECT NO. 2004584.011

Final Submission: September 13, 2019

Final Report of Environmental Assessment Services at Antietam Visitor Center

September 13, 2019

Mr. Anthony V. Bochicchio, AIA National Park Service Denver Service Center Design and Construction 12795 West Alameda Parkway Lakewood, CO 80228

Subject: Final Report of Environmental Assessment Services at Antietam Visitor Center Antietam National Battlefield, Sharpsburg, MD Louis Berger Project No. 2004584.011

Dear Mr. Bochicchio:

Louis Berger (LB) has completed a building materials/environmental survey at the Antietam Visitor Center, located in the Antietam National Battlefield, Sharpsburg, MD. This investigation involved visual surveys as well as laboratory sample analysis of suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM), Lead-Based Paints, and the quantification of Universal Waste in this building, which is targeted for rehabilitation.

The attached report presents descriptions and results of the material sampling procedures and analysis. Relevant general project information is provided, followed by our findings, assessments and recommendations. Laboratory analysis data and certifications are provided in the Appendices.

If you have any questions concerning this report or if we may be of further assistance to you, please contact us.

Sincerely, LOUIS BERGER (LB)

Prakash Saha Associate Vice President, Emergency Management & IH Services

Louis Berger Page 3 December 02, 2019

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.0 ASBESTOS INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES AND SAMPLE ANALYSIS METHODS

2.1 INSPECTION SCOPE AND MATERIAL ASSESSMENT

2.2 INSPECTION RESULTS

2.3 CONDITION, QUANTITY AND FRIABILITY TABLE

2.4 SAMPLE ANALYSIS TABLE……………………………

2.5 AREAS NOT ACCESSIBLE………………………………

3.0 LEAD FIELD INSPECTION PROCEDURES

3.1 INSPECTION SUMMARY

3.2 INSPECTION RESULTS

3.3 CONDITION ASSESSMENT TABLE

3.4 AREAS NOT ACCESSIBLE………………………………

3.5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...………

4.0 UNIVERSAL WASTES

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

6.0 LIMITATIONS, EXCEPTIONS, ASSUMPTIONS AND CERTIFICATION

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Asbestos Sample Analysis Results in Tabular Form Appendix B: Lead Sample Analysis Results in Tabular Form Appendix C: Bulk Sample Chain of Custodies & Laboratory Results Appendix D: Laboratory Accreditations & Personnel Certifications Appendix E: Sample Location Drawings Appendix F: Asbestos and Lead Containing Materials Location Drawings Appendix G: Photographic Documentation Appendix H: Previously Completed Pertinent Hazmat Reports

Louis Berger Page 4 December 02, 2019

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Louis Berger (LB) has performed an environmental inspection for the presence or absence of Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM), Lead-based Paints (LBP), and universal wastes at Antietam Visitor Center, Antietam National Battlefield, Sharpsburg, MD. The inspection was conducted at the request of the National Park Service for use in their upcoming Rehabilitate Visitor Center project. The scope of work for this project received by LB was based on the Scope of Services received from EYP Architecture & Engineering. The intent of this inspection was to locate, identify and quantify ACM, LBP and universal wastes that will be impacted during the upcoming project.

Michael Johnson and Alexander Smolyar performed this survey on July 29, 2019. Michael Johnson is a certified Asbestos Inspector and Designer, and USEPA-certified Lead Risk Assessor (LBP-R- I198619-1). Alexander Smolyar certified Asbestos Inspector, and USEPA-certified Lead Risk Assessor (LBP-R-129050-1).

Analytical results of the bulk samples collected indicate that the following materials contain asbestos in the amount greater than 1% [ACM]:

• Expansion Joint @ Building Base (Gray/Beige) – Throughout Exterior

Analytical results of the bulk samples collected indicate that the following materials contain less than 1% asbestos [Non-ACM]:

• Chimney Mortar (Gray) – Observation Room Roof

• Caulking @ Chimney (Gray) – Observation Room Roof

• Caulking at Perimeter of Roof (Gray) – Observation Room Roof

• Chimney Flashing (Black) – Observation Room Roof

• Bottom Membrane (Black) – Observation Room Roof

• Felt Paper (Gray/Black) – Observation Room Roof

• Insulation (Beige) – Observation Room Roof

• Top Membrane (Black) – Observation Room Roof

• Tar @ Bottom Layer (Black) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Felt Paper (Gray/Black) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Perlite Insulation (Tan) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Insulation (Beige) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Top Membrane (Black) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Metal Cap Flashing Caulking (Gray) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Old Tar on Parapet Wall (Black) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Coping Stone Caulking (Gray) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Perimeter Flashing (Black) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Mechanical Flashing (Black) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Vent Stack Flashing (Black) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Stone Mortar at Stone Wall (Gray) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Roof Drain Flashing (Black) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Skylight Flashing (Black) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Exterior Paint (Beige) – Throughout Exterior

• Exterior Window Frame Glazing (Black) – Throughout Exterior

• Tar @ Building Base (Black) – Throughout Exterior

• Exterior Façade Stone Mortar (Gray) – Throughout Exterior

Louis Berger Page 5 December 02, 2019

• Gypsum Board (Beige) – Auditorium Exterior Exit Overhang

• Exterior Window Frame Caulking (White) – Throughout Exterior

• Exterior Door Frame Caulking (Gray) – Throughout Exterior

• Sidewalk Expansion @ Shed Structures (Gray) –Exterior @ Storage Sheds

• Roofing Shingles (Black) –Exterior @ Storage Sheds

• Felt Paper under Roofing Shingles (Black) –Exterior @ Storage Sheds

• Stone Mortar (Red) – Auditorium

• Leveling Compound on Concrete Floor (Gray) – Auditorium

• Carpet Glue (Yellow) – Auditorium

• Caulking Around Toilet Fixtures (White) – Interior Throughout Bathrooms

• Ceramic Wall Tile Backing (White) – Interior Throughout Bathrooms

• Ceramic Wall Tile Grout (White) – Interior Throughout Bathrooms

• Ceramic Floor Tile Grout (Gray) – Interior Throughout Bathrooms

• Ceramic Floor Tile Backing Under 1st Layer (Gray) – Interior Throughout Bathrooms

• Ceramic Floor Tile Backing Under 2nd Layer (Gray) – Interior Throughout Bathrooms

• Fiberglass Duct Insulation Wrap (Silver) – Interior Throughout

• Perlite Insulation Within Ceiling Plenum (Gray/Brown) – Interior Throughout

• Interior Window Frame Caulking (White) – Interior Throughout

• Ceiling Plaster (White and Brown Coats) – Interior Throughout

• Interior Brick Mortar (Gray) – Interior Throughout

• Cinder Block Mortar (Gray) – Interior Throughout

The results of the visual inspection and results from previously completed survey report by ARC Environmental, Inc., dated February 2017 have determined that the following ACM exist in the building:

• 12” x 12” Black Floor Tile and Mastic Associated with Floor Tile – Projection Room and Janitor’s Closet

• Floor Tile Under Linoleum and Mastic Associated with Floor Tile - Office 01, Office 02, Office 02 closet, Office 03 and Associated Hallway

• 9” x 9” Tan with White Floor Tile and Mastic Associated with Floor Tile Under Carpet – Observation Room and Closet

• Floor Tile Under Carpet and Mastic Associated with Floor Tile – Exhibit Room 01 and Exhibit Room 02

• 9” x 9” Grey Floor Tile Under Carpet and Mastic Associated with Floor Tile – Bookstore and Bookstore Office

The results of the visual inspection and results from previously completed survey report by ARC Environmental, Inc., dated February 2017 have determined that the following Non-ACM exist in the building:

• 2’ x 2’ Deep Patterned ceiling Tiles – Throughout Interior

• 4” Black Cove base and Associated Mastic – Throughout Interior

• Gypsum Board and Joint Compound – Throughout Interior

• 2’ x 2’ Black Pinhole and Gouge Ceiling Tile – Throughout Interior

• 2’ x 4’ Black Pinhole and Gouge ceiling Tiles – Throughout Interior

• 4” Dark Grey Cove base and Associated Mastic – Throughout Interior

• 1’ x 1’ Spline Ceiling Tile – Throughout Interior

• 6” x 6” Patterned Linoleum – Throughout Interior

Louis Berger Page 6 December 02, 2019

• 2’ x 2’ Pinhole Ceiling Tiles – Throughout Interior

• 2’ x 4’ Wormhole Ceiling Tile – Throughout Interior

• 4” Gray Cove Base and Associated Mastic – Throughout Interior

• 6” Tan Cove Base and Associated Mastic– Throughout Interior

• 2’ x 2’ Black Rough Textured Ceiling Tile – Throughout Interior

• Carpet Mastic – Throughout Interior (Except Auditorium)

• Wall Plaster (Brown and White Coats)

• Ceiling Plaster – Throughout Interior (Except Bathrooms)

• 6” Patterned Linoleum

The results of the visual inspection, results from previously completed survey report by ARC Environmental, Inc., dated February 2017, XRF readings and paint chip sample analysis have determined that the following Lead-Based Paints exist in the building:

• Red/Blue Metal Pipe Paint – Mechanical Room

• Black Metal Pipe Paint – Slop Sink Closet

• White Ceramic Tile Wall – Men’s Bathroom

• Beige/Gray Wood Wall – Lobby

The results of the visual inspection, results from previously completed survey report by ARC Environmental, Inc., dated February 2017, XRF readings and paint chip sample analysis have determined that the following testing combinations are not coated with lead-based paint (less than

0.7 mg/cm²):

• Brown Metal Door Casing – Slop Sink Closet

• Tan Gypsum Board Wall – Slop Sink Closet, Visitor’s Center Office 01 and 02

• White Metal Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing – Visitor’s Center Office 01 and 02

• White Vinyl Base Board – Visitor’s Center Office 01

• Grey Wood Closet Shelf – Visitor’s Center Office 02

• Grey Metal Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing – Mechanical Room and Storage Closet by

Elevator

• Grey Gypsum Board Wall – Break Room, Mechanical Room and Storage Closet by

Elevator

• Grey Metal Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing – Men’s Rest Room, Gift Shop Office and

Gift Shop

• White Gypsum Board Wall – Men’s Rest Room, Gift Shop Office and Gift Shop

• White Plaster Ceiling – Men’s Rest Room

• Grey Metal Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing – Museum and Lobby/Hallway

• Tan Gypsum Board Wall – Museum

• Grey Plaster Ceiling - Lobby/Hallway

• Beige Metal Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing – Observation Room

• Tan Metal Window Casing – Observation Room

• Tan Gypsum Wall - Observation Room

• Beige/Gray Wood Wall – Exterior Façade

• Beige/Gray Wood Door/Door Frame – Exterior Façade

Louis Berger Page 7 December 02, 2019

• Beige/Gray Wood Window Frame – Exterior Façade

• Beige/Gray Wood Trellis – Exterior

• Beige/Gray Wood Window/Window Frame – Interior

• Beige/Gray Wood Door/Door Frame – Interior

• Green Cinder Block Wall – Observation Room Closet

• Red Metal Railing – Janitor’s Closet

• White Cinder Block Wall – Mechanical Room

2.0 ASBESTOS FIELD INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES AND SAMPLE ANALYSIS

METHODS

Guidelines used for the inspection were established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the Guidance for Controlling Asbestos Containing Materials in Buildings, Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Doc 560/5-85-024, and 40 CFR Part 763, Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA).

Field information was organized in accordance with the AHERA methodology of homogenous area (HA). During the survey, reasonable effort was made to identify all locations and types of ACM materials associated with the scope of work. Sampling has included multiple samples of the same materials with locations chosen at random. However, due to inconsistencies of a manufacturer's processes and the contractor’s installation methods, materials of similar construction may contain various amounts of asbestos. Furthermore, some materials that were not originally specified to contain asbestos may in fact contain this mineral.

Bulk samples of suspect ACM were analyzed using polarized light microscopy (PLM) coupled with dispersion staining, as described in 40 CFR Part 763 and the National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS). NESHAPS is the standard industry protocol for the determination of asbestos in building materials. A suspect material is immersed in a solution of known refractive index and subjected to illumination by polarized light. The color displays that result are compared to a standardized atlas whereby the specific variety of asbestos is determined. It should also be recognized that PLM is primarily a qualitative identification method whereby asbestos percentage, if any, is estimated. While EPA regulations governing ACM consider materials containing greater than 1-percent as asbestos, accurately quantifying asbestos content below 5-percent has been shown to be unreliable.

The laboratory performing this analysis procedure was Atlas Environmental Lab, Corp., located at 255 W 36th Street Suite 1503, New York, NY 10018. The laboratory has received accreditation from the following agencies:

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (Lab Code 500092-0) American Industrial Hygiene Association Accredited Laboratory (Lab No. 208306)

Louis Berger Page 8

2.1 INSPECTION SCOPE AND MATERIAL ASSESSMENT FOR ASBESTOS

The areas inspected for ACM materials which may exist:

• Antietam Visitor Center, Antietam National Battlefield, Sharpsburg, MD, throughout Interior and Exterior, Roofs

The inspection was characterized by observations of accessible areas. Predominant suspect materials were sampled and quantified.

Materials examined during the inspection included:

• Chimney Mortar (Gray) – Observation Roof

• Caulking @ Chimney (Gray) – Observation Roof

• Caulking at Perimeter of Roof (Gray) – Observation Roof

• Chimney Flashing (Black) – Observation Roof

• Bottom Membrane (Black) – Observation Roof

• Felt Paper (Gray/Black) – Observation Roof

• Insulation (Beige) – Observation Roof

• Top Membrane (Black) – Observation Roof

• Tar @ Bottom Layer (Black) – Main Roof

• Felt Paper (Gray/Black) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Perlite Insulation (Tan) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Insulation (Beige) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Top Membrane (Black) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Metal Cap Flashing Caulking (Gray) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Old Tar on Parapet Wall (Black) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Coping Stone Caulking (Gray) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Perimeter Flashing (Black) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Mechanical Flashing (Black) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Vent Stack Flashing (Black) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Stone Mortar at Stone Wall (Gray) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Roof Drain Flashing (Black) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Skylight Flashing (Black) – Main Roof and Auditorium Roof

• Exterior Paint (Beige) – Throughout Exterior

• Exterior Window Frame Glazing (Black) – Throughout Exterior

• Tar @ Building Base (Black) – Throughout Exterior

• Exterior Façade Stone Mortar (Gray) – Throughout Exterior

• Gypsum Board (Beige) – Auditorium Exterior Exit Overhang

• Exterior Window Frame Caulking (White) – Throughout Exterior

• Exterior Door Frame Caulking (Gray)

• Sidewalk Expansion @ Shed Structures (Gray) –Exterior @ Storage Sheds

• Roofing Shingles (Black) –Exterior @ Storage Sheds

Louis Berger Page 9 December 02, 2019

• Felt Paper under Roofing Shingles (Black) –Exterior @ Storage Sheds

• Stone Mortar (Red) – Auditorium

• Leveling Compound on Concrete Floor (Gray) – Auditorium

• Carpet Glue (Yellow) – Auditorium

• Caulking Around Toilet Fixtures (White) – Interior Throughout Bathrooms

• Ceramic Wall Tile Backing (White) – Interior Throughout Bathrooms

• Ceramic Wall Tile Grout (White) – Interior Throughout Bathrooms

• Ceramic Floor Tile Grout (Gray) – Interior Throughout Bathrooms

• Ceramic Floor Tile Backing Under 1st Layer (Gray) – Interior Throughout Bathrooms

• Ceramic Floor Tile Backing Under 2nd Layer (Gray) – Interior Throughout Bathrooms

• Fiberglass Duct Insulation Wrap (Silver) – Interior Throughout

• Perlite Insulation Within Ceiling Plenum (Gray/Brown) – Interior Throughout

• Interior Window Frame Caulking (White) – Interior Throughout

• Ceiling Plaster (White and Brown Coats) – Interior Throughout

• Interior Brick Mortar (Gray) – Interior Throughout

• Cinder Block Mortar (Gray) – Interior Throughout

• 12” x 12” Black Floor Tile and Mastic Associated with Floor Tile – Projection Room and

Janitor’s Closet

• Floor Tile Under Linoleum and ACM Mastic Associated with Floor Tile - Office 01, Office 02, Office 02 closet, Office 03 and Associated Hallway

• 9” x 9” Tan with White Floor Tile and Mastic Associated with Floor Tile Under Carpet –

Observation Room and Closet

• Floor Tile Under Carpet and ACM Mastic Associated with Floor Tile – Exhibit Room 01 and Exhibit Room 02

• 9” x 9” Grey Floor Tile Under Carpet and ACM Mastic Associated with Floor Tile –

Bookstore and Bookstore Office

• Expansion Joint @ Building Base (Gray/Beige)

• 2’ x 2’ Deep Patterned ceiling Tiles – Throughout Interior

• 4” Black Cove base and Associated Mastic – Throughout Interior

• Gypsum Board and Joint Compound – Throughout Interior

• 2’ x 2’ Black Pinhole and Gouge Ceiling Tile – Throughout Interior

• 2’ x 4’ Black Pinhole and Gouge ceiling Tiles – Throughout Interior

• 4” Dark Grey Cove base and Associated Mastic – Throughout Interior

• 1’ x 1’ Spline Ceiling Tile – Throughout Interior

• 6” x 6” Patterned Linoleum – Throughout Interior

• 2’ x 2’ Pinhole Ceiling Tiles – Throughout Interior

• 2’ x 4’ Wormhole Ceiling Tile – Throughout Interior

• 4” Gray Cove Base and Associated Mastic – Throughout Interior

• 6” Tan Cove Base and Associated Mastic– Throughout Interior

• 2’ x 2’ Black Rough Textured Ceiling Tile – Throughout Interior

• Carpet Mastic – Throughout Interior (Except Auditorium)

• Wall Plaster (Brown and White Coats)

• Ceiling Plaster – Throughout Interior (Except Bathrooms)

Louis Berger Page 10

• 6” Patterned Linoleum

2.2 ASBESTOS INSPECTION RESULTS

The asbestos inspection involved a thorough visual examination of all areas which may be impacted by any potential renovation. The following suspect materials were inspected and/or sampled and analyzed for asbestos content:

Homogenous Material Location Material Asbestos Content

A Observation Room Roof Chimney Mortar (Gray) NAD

B Observation Room Roof Caulking @ Chimney (Gray) NAD

C Observation Room Roof Caulking at Perimeter of Roof (Gray) NAD

D Observation Room Roof Chimney Flashing (Black) NAD

E Observation Room Roof Bottom Membrane (Black) NAD

F Observation Room Roof Felt Paper (Gray/Black) NAD

G Observation Room Roof Insulation (Beige) NAD

H Observation Room Roof Top Membrane (Black) NAD

I Main Roof and Auditorium Roof Tar @ Bottom Layer (Black) NAD

J Main Roof and Auditorium Roof Felt Paper (Gray/Black) NAD

K Main Roof and Auditorium Roof Perlite Insulation (Tan) NAD

L Main Roof and Auditorium Roof Insulation (Beige) NAD

M Main Roof and Auditorium Roof Top Membrane (Black) NAD

N Main Roof and Auditorium Roof Metal Cap Flashing Caulking (Gray) NAD

O Main Roof and Auditorium Roof Old Tar on Parapet Wall (Black) NAD

P Main Roof and Auditorium Roof Coping Stone Caulking (Gray) NAD

Q Main Roof and Auditorium Roof Perimeter Flashing (Black) NAD

R Main Roof and Auditorium Roof Mechanical Flashing (Black) NAD

S Main Roof and Auditorium Roof Vent Stack Flashing (Black) NAD

Louis Berger Page 11 December 02, 2019

Homogenous Material Location Material Asbestos Content

T Main Roof and Auditorium Roof Stone Mortar at Stone Wall (Gray) NAD

U Main Roof and Auditorium Roof Roof Drain Flashing (Black) NAD

01 Main Roof and Auditorium Roof Metal Drains Non-Suspect

V Main Roof and Auditorium Roof Skylight Flashing (Black) NAD

02 Main Roof and Auditorium Roof Skylight Non-Suspect

03 Main Roof and Auditorium Roof Skylight Glazing Not-Observed

04 Throughout Roofs Electrical Wire Insulation Assoc. w/ Lighting Fixtures Non-Suspect

W Throughout Exterior Exterior Paint (Beige) NAD

X Throughout Exterior Exterior Window Frame Glazing (Black) NAD

D1 Throughout Exterior Exterior Window Frame Caulking (White)

Y Throughout Exterior Tar @ Building Base (Black) NAD

Z Throughout Exterior Expansion Joint @ Building Base (Gray/Beige) 6% Chrysotile

B1 Throughout Exterior Exterior Façade Stone Mortar (Gray) NAD

E1 Throughout Exterior Exterior Door Frame Caulking (Gray) NAD

C1 Exterior @ Auditorium

Gypsum Board (Beige) @ Auditorium Exterior Exit Overhang NAD

F1 Exterior @ Sheds Sidewalk Expansion @ Shed Structures (Gray) NAD

G1 Exterior @ Sheds Roofing Shingles (Black) NAD

H1 Exterior @ Sheds Felt Paper under Roofing Shingles (Black) NAD

K1 Interior - Auditorium Stone Mortar (Red) NAD

L1 Interior - Auditorium Leveling Compound on Concrete Floor (Gray) NAD

M1 Interior - Auditorium Carpet Glue (Yellow) NAD

N1 Interior Throughout Bathrooms Caulking Around Toilet Fixtures (White) NAD

O1 Interior Throughout Bathrooms Ceramic Wall Tile Backing (White) NAD

P1 Interior Throughout Bathrooms Ceramic Wall Tile Grout (White) NAD

Q1 Interior Throughout Bathrooms Ceramic Floor Tile Grout (Gray) NAD

R1 Interior Throughout Bathrooms

Ceramic Floor Tile Backing Under 1st Layer (Gray) NAD

S1 Interior Throughout Bathrooms

Ceramic Floor Tile Backing Under 2nd Layer (Gray NAD

Louis Berger Page 12 December 02, 2019

Homogenous Material Location Material Asbestos Content

05 Interior Throughout Carpet Non-Suspect

06 Interior Throughout Electrical Wire Insulation Assoc. w/ Lighting Fixtures, Switches and Panels Non-Suspect

07 Interior Throughout Metal Ducts Within Ceiling Plenum Non-Suspect

08 Interior Throughout Fiberglass Fire Door Insulation Non-Suspect

09 Interior Throughout Brick Non-Suspect

B2 Interior Throughout Brick Mortar (Gray) NAD

10 Interior Throughout Cinder Block Non-Suspect

D2 Interior Throughout Cinder Block Mortar NAD

U1 Interior Throughout Fiberglass Duct Insulation Cover (Silver) NAD

W1 Interior Throughout Interior Window Frame caulking (White) NAD

11 Interior Throughout 4” Black Cove base and Associated Mastic NAD

12 Interior Throughout 4” Black Cove base and Associated Mastic NAD

13 Interior Throughout Gypsum Board and Joint Compound NAD

14 Interior Throughout 2’ x 2’ Black Pinhole and Gouge Ceiling Tile NAD

15 Interior Throughout 2’ x 4’ Black Pinhole and Gouge Ceiling Tiles NAD

16 Interior Throughout 4” Dark Grey Cove base and Associated Mastic NAD

17 Interior Throughout 1’ x 1’ Spline Ceiling Tile NAD

18 Interior Throughout 6” x 6” Patterned Linoleum NAD

19 Interior Throughout 2’ x 2’ Pinhole Ceiling Tiles NAD

20 Interior Throughout 2’ x 4’ Wormhole Ceiling Tile NAD

21 Interior Throughout 4” Gray Cove Base and Associated Mastic NAD

22 Interior Throughout 6” Tan Cove Base and Associated Mastic NAD

23 Interior Throughout 2’ x 2’ Black Rough Textured Ceiling Tile NAD

24 Interior Throughout Wall Plaster (Brown and White Coats) NAD

25 Interior Throughout 6” Patterned Linoleum NAD

Throughout Interior (Except Observation Room Closet, Men’s Toilet and Gift Shop

Office)

Ceiling Plaster (Brown and White Coats) NAD

X1 Observation Room

Closet, Men’s Toilet and Gift Shop Office

Ceiling Plaster (Brown) NAD

Y1 Observation Room

Closet, Men’s Toilet and Gift Shop Office

Ceiling Plaster (White) NAD

Louis Berger Page 13 December 02, 2019

Homogenous Material Location Material Asbestos Content

27 Throughout Interior (Except Auditorium) Carpet Mastic NAD

V1 Gift Shop Ceiling Plenum

Perlite Insulation Within Ceiling Plenum (Gray/Brown) NAD

X1 Observation Room

Closet, Men’s Toilet and Gift Shop Office

Ceiling Plaster (Brown) NAD

Y1 Observation Room

Closet, Men’s Toilet and Gift Shop Office

Ceiling Plaster (White) NAD

28 Projection Room and Janitor’s Closet 12” x 12” Black Floor Tile

ACM

Contaminated by Associated Mastic

29 Projection Room and Janitor’s Closet Mastic Associated with Floor Tile 7% Chrysotile

Office 01, Office 02, Office 02 closet, Office 03 and Associated Hallway

Linoleum NAD

Office 01, Office 02, Office 02 closet, Office 03 and Associated Hallway

Floor Tile Under Linoleum 3% Chrysotile

Office 01, Office 02, Office 02 closet, Office 03 and Associated Hallway

Mastic Associated with Floor Tile 2% Chrysotile

33 Observation Room and Closet

9” x 9” Tan with White Floor Tile Under Carpet 5% Chrysotile

34 Observation Room and Closet Mastic Associated with Floor Tile 7% Chrysotile

Exhibit Room 01 and Exhibit Room

Floor Tile Under Carpet 3% Chrysotile

Exhibit Room 01 and Exhibit Room

Mastic Associated with Floor Tile 2% Chrysotile

37 Bookstore and Bookstore Office 9” x 9” Grey Floor Tile Under Carpet 4% Chrysotile

38 Bookstore and Bookstore Office Mastic Associated with Floor Tile 3% Chrysotile

Bold=Positive for ACM NAD=No Asbestos Detected NA/PS=Not Analyzed/Positive Stop Trace=Trace amount of asbestos

Louis Berger Page 14 December 02, 2019

2.3 CONDITION, QUANTITY AND FRIABLITY ASSESSMENT TABLE

For each inspection conducted, the inspector classifies ACM materials by friability and condition.

This helps to determine the extent of damage in certain areas as well as the potential for further damage and Asbestos release due to disturbance of the material. The following table summarizes the confirmed ACM and their approximate quantities.

Material Location Quantity Friability Condition 12” x 12” Black Floor Tile and Mastic Associated with

Floor Tile

Projection Room and Janitor’s Closet 210 SF Non-

Friable Damaged

Floor Tile Under Linoleum and Mastic Associated with

Floor Tile

Office 01, Office 02, Office 02 Closet, Office 03 and Associated Hallway

450 SF Non- Friable Good

9” x 9” Tan with White Floor Tile and Mastic

Associated with Floor Tile Under Carpet

Observation Room and Closet 1,190 Non- Friable Good

Floor Tile Under Carpet and Mastic Associated with

Floor Tile

Exhibit Room 01 and Exhibit Room 02 1,540 Non-

Friable Good

9” x 9” Grey Floor Tile Under Carpet and Mastic

Associated with Floor Tile

Bookstore and Bookstore Office 1,100 Non-

Friable Good

Expansion Joint @ Building Base (Gray/Beige) Throughout Exterior 450 LF /

35 SF

Non-

Friable Damaged

Condition Definitions:

Good: None/Minimal apparent damage to ACM Damaged: Up to 10% localized damage or up to 25% of the entire ACM is damaged Significantly Damaged: Over 10% localized damage or over 25% of the entire ACM is damaged

Notes:

Quantities are an approximation and should be confirmed by contractor during pre-abatement walk through.

Asbestos abatement contractor shall be responsible to remove all layers of materials to substrate.

2.4 SAMPLE ANALYSIS TABLE

Laboratory analysis results, in tabular form, are included in Appendix A.

2.5 AREAS NOT ACCESSIBLE

At the time of inspection, Berger’s inspection team was not able to access the ceiling plenum in the Men’s and Women’s Bathroom at Antietam Visitor Center.

3.0 LEAD FIELD INSPECTION PROCEDURES

The lead-based paint inspection is an interior and exterior investigation to identify all lead-based paint on a surface-by-surface basis by paint chip sampling methodology.

Louis Berger Page 15 December 02, 2019

The lead in soil inspection consisted of collecting composite soil samples from bare soil in the dripline/foundation area or the building. Soil samples were collected with a scooping technique.

Soil samples was collected up to a depth of approx. ½ inches, following the US EPA HUD (US Dept. of Housing and Urban Development) Scoop Sampling Guidelines (Appendix 13.3).

The lead regulatory levels provided below are those used when preparing this lead-based paint evaluation or when evaluating data collected.

EPA Levels

Lead-Based Paint Guideline for Maryland Equal to or less than 0.7 mg/cm2

The laboratory performing this analysis procedure was Atlas Environmental Lab, Corp., located at 255 W 36th Street Suite 1503, New York, NY 10018. The laboratory has received accreditation from the following agencies:

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (Lab Code 500092-0) American Industrial Hygiene Association Accredited Laboratory (Lab No. 208306)

3.1 INSPECTION SUMMARY

The areas inspected for LBP included:

• Antietam Visitor Center, Interior and Exterior

The inspection was characterized by observations of accessible areas. Suspect surfaces were tested using Paint Chip Sampling.

Coated surfaces examined during the inspection included:

• Brown Metal Door Casing – Slop Sink Closet

• Tan Gypsum Board Wall – Slop Sink Closet, Visitor’s Center Office 01 and 02

• White Metal Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing – Visitor’s Center Office 01 and 02

• White Vinyl Base Board – Visitor’s Center Office 01

• Grey Wood Closet Shelf – Visitor’s Center Office 02

• Grey Metal Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing – Mechanical Room and Storage Closet by

Elevator

• Grey Gypsum Board Wall – Break Room, Mechanical Room and Storage Closet by

Elevator

• Grey Metal Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing – Men’s Rest Room, Gift Shop Office and

Gift Shop

• White Gypsum Board Wall – Men’s Rest Room, Gift Shop Office and Gift Shop

• White Plaster Ceiling – Men’s Rest Room

• Grey Metal Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing – Museum and Lobby/Hallway

Louis Berger Page 16 December 02, 2019

• Tan Gypsum Board Wall – Museum

• Grey Plaster Ceiling - Lobby/Hallway

• Beige Metal Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing – Observation Room

• Tan Metal Window Casing – Observation Room

• Tan Gypsum Wall - Observation Room

• Beige/Gray Wood Wall – Exterior Façade

• Beige/Gray Wood Door/Door Frame – Exterior Façade

• Beige/Gray Wood Window Frame – Exterior Façade

• Beige/Gray Wood Trellis – Exterior

• Beige/Gray Wood Window/Window Frame – Interior

• Beige/Gray Wood Door/Door Frame – Interior

• Green Cinder Block Wall – Observation Room Closet

• Red Metal Railing – Janitor’s Closet

• White Cinder Block Wall – Mechanical Room

• Red/Blue Metal Pipe Paint – Mechanical Room

• Black Metal Pipe Paint – Slop Sink Closet

• White Ceramic Tile Wall – Men’s Bathroom

• Beige/Gray Wood Wall – Lobby

Based upon Paint Chip Sampling results and XRF readings from a completed survey report by ARC Environmental, Inc., dated February 2017, lead has been confirmed to exist in the following tested combinations within the building:

• Red/Blue Metal Pipe Paint – Mechanical Room

• Black Metal Pipe Paint – Slop Sink Closet

• White Ceramic Tile Wall – Men’s Bathroom

• Beige/Gray Wood Wall – Lobby

Based upon paint chip sample analysis results and previously completed report by ARC Environmental, Inc., dated February 2017, lead was not detected in the following tested combinations within the building via paint chip sample analysis results:

• Brown Metal Door Casing – Slop Sink Closet

• Tan Gypsum Board Wall – Slop Sink Closet, Visitor’s Center Office 01 and 02

• White Metal Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing – Visitor’s Center Office 01 and 02

• White Vinyl Base Board – Visitor’s Center Office 01

• Grey Wood Closet Shelf – Visitor’s Center Office 02

• Grey Metal Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing – Mechanical Room and Storage Closet by

Elevator

• Grey Gypsum Board Wall – Break Room, Mechanical Room and Storage Closet by

Elevator

• Grey Metal Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing – Men’s Rest Room, Gift Shop Office and

Gift Shop

• White Gypsum Board Wall – Men’s Rest Room, Gift Shop Office and Gift Shop

• White Plaster Ceiling – Men’s Rest Room

Louis Berger Page 17 December 02, 2019

• Grey Metal Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing – Museum and Lobby/Hallway

• Tan Gypsum Board Wall – Museum

• Grey Plaster Ceiling - Lobby/Hallway

• Beige Metal Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing – Observation Room

• Tan Metal Window Casing – Observation Room

• Tan Gypsum Wall - Observation Room

• Beige/Gray Wood Wall – Exterior Façade

• Beige/Gray Wood Door/Door Frame – Exterior Façade

• Beige/Gray Wood Window Frame – Exterior Façade

• Beige/Gray Wood Trellis – Exterior

• Beige/Gray Wood Window/Window Frame – Interior

• Beige/Gray Wood Door/Door Frame – Interior

• Green Cinder Block Wall – Observation Room Closet

• Red Metal Railing – Janitor’s Closet

• White Cinder Block Wall – Mechanical Room

3.2 INSPECTION RESULTS

The lead inspection involved a thorough visual examination of all accessible areas impacted by the demolition project. The following suspect surfaces were tested for lead content:

LOCATION COMPONENT NAME COLOR SUBSTRATE RESULT

Mechanical Room Pipe Red/Blue Metal LBP*

Slop Sink Closet Pipe Black Metal LBP*

Men’s Bathroom Wall White Ceramic LBP*

Lobby Wall Beige/Gray Wood LBP

Slop Sink Closet Door Casing Brown Metal Non-LBP*

Slop Sink Closet, Visitor’s Center Office

01 and 02 Wall Tan Gypsum

Board Non-LBP*

Visitor’s Center Office 01 and 02

Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing White Metal Non-LBP*

Visitor’s Center Office 01 Base Board White Vinyl Non-LBP*

Visitor’s Center Office 02 Closet Shelf Grey Wood Non-LBP*

Mechanical Room and Storage Closet by

Elevator

Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing Grey Metal Non-LBP*

Louis Berger Page 18 December 02, 2019

LOCATION COMPONENT NAME COLOR SUBSTRATE RESULT

Break Room, Mechanical Room and

Storage Closet by Elevator

Wall Grey Gypsum Board Non-LBP*

Men’s Rest Room, Gift Shop Office and Gift

Shop

Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing Grey Metal Non-LBP*

Men’s Rest Room, Gift Shop Office and Gift

Shop Wall White Gypsum

Board Non-LBP*

Men’s Rest Room Ceiling White Plaster Non-LBP* Museum and

Lobby/Hallway Door, Door Jamb, Door

Casing Grey Metal Non-LBP*

Museum Wall Tan Gypsum Board Non-LBP*

Lobby/Hallway Ceiling Grey Plaster Non-LBP*

Observation Room Door, Door Jamb, Door Casing Beige Metal Non-LBP*

Observation Room Window Casing Tan Metal Non-LBP*

Observation Room Wall Tan Gypsum Board Non-LBP*

Exterior Wall Beige/Gray Wood Non-LBP

Exterior Door/Door Frame Beige/Gray Wood Non-LBP

Exterior Window Frame Beige/Gray Wood Non-LBP

Exterior Trellis Beige/Gray Wood Non-LBP

Interior Window/Window Frame Beige/Gray Wood Non-LBP

Interior Door/Door Frame Beige/Gray Wood Non-LBP Observation Room

Closet Wall Green Cinder Block Non-LBP

Janitor’s Closet Railing Red Metal Non-LBP

Mechanical Room Wall White Cinder Block Non-LBP Bold=Positive for LBP *LBP or Non-LBP=Confirmed via previous survey reports

3.3 CONDITION ASSESSMENT TABLE

For the inspection conducted, the inspector classifies the LBP and the condition of the surface.

The following table summarizes only the confirmed LBP.

Louis Berger Page 19 December 02, 2019

Location Component Name Substrate Color Condition Results Quantity

Mechanical Room Pipe Metal Red/Blue Fair/Good LBP 50 SF

Slop Sink Closet Pipe Metal Black Fair/Good LBP 50 SF

Men’s Bathroom Wall Ceramic White Fair/Good LBP 400 SF

Lobby Wall Wood Beige/Gray Fair/Good LBP 1,200 SF

3.4 AREAS NOT ACCESSIBLE

At the time of inspection, Berger’s inspection team was able to access all areas at Antietam Visitor Center.

3.5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Various Lead-based Paints have been identified in our inspection effort.

Any work which disturbs painted surfaces containing lead shall be performed, and waste managed and transported in accordance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction Standard), and EPA’s 40 CFR 745 regulation, and New York State 6 NYCRR 364. Personal air monitoring should be conducted when disturbing lead based paints and lead containing materials as per 29CFR1926.62 (OSHA).

Prior to any excavation activities, a site-specific health and safety plan (HASP) must be submitted by Contractor which will meet the requirements set forth by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and any other applicable regulations. The HASP should identify the possible locations and risks associated with potential contaminants that may be encountered and the administrative and engineering controls that will be utilized to mitigate concerns.

In addition, all waste generated as part of the project, regardless of the lead content in the paint, shall be tested in accordance with the EPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) to determine the classification of the waste. Under RCRA, any waste material that when tested by Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure (TCLP) results in a leachate lead concentration of five (5) parts per million or greater must be disposed of at an EPA licensed hazardous waste facility.

The finer renovation debris and paint chips that result from renovation of components with measurable quantities of lead can be tested by TCLP, or can be assumed hazardous waste and disposed of accordingly. If the scope of work is increased to include removal of actionable building components, we recommend that a TCLP test be performed on one typical component (e.g. metal, sheetrock, masonry, etc.) to determine proper disposal for all similar components.

Louis Berger Page 20

The incurred cost for disposal of lead based paint materials/debris may depend upon the TCLP results for materials/debris collected and the total weight of items which return TCLP results above the EPA allowed 5 parts per million.

The cost of the TCLP depends on the laboratory and location; but typically, a lead TCLP analysis may cost from $40 to $80. Any waste material that when tested by TCLP results in a leachate lead concentration of five (5) parts per million or greater must be disposed of at an EPA licensed hazardous waste facility. Cost of disposal may range for $5,000 to $7,000 per ton of waste.

5.0 UNIVERSAL WASTES

Universal Wastes (i.e., batteries, thermostats, lamps, ballasts, mercury-containing equipment, radioactive sources, CFCs) are regulated pursuant to the USEPA Universal Waste Requirements (40 CFR Part 273), and New York State 6 NYCRR Parts 370 series regulations. Similarly, these sampling procedures may also be used to determine disposal/management or clean-up options for Universal Wastes. Typical equipment that might contain universal wastes are emergency light batteries, CFC containing refrigerators, water fountains, mercury containing bulbs, thermostats and thermometers. Please see the below table itemizing the number of assumed universal wastes:

Facility (Floor/Level)

Fluorescent Bulbs

/Lamps

CFC

Containing Materials

Mercury Containing Materials

PCB

Containing Materials

Radioactive Materials

Miscellaneous Materials

Observation Room 8 Lamps None None None None

Ballasts-8;

Smoke detectors-1;

Fire Extinguisher-1

Gift Shop Office 2 Lamps 1 Split A/C

Unit None None None Ballasts-2;

Smoke detectors-1;

Fire Extinguisher-1

Gift Shop 8 Lamps 1 Split A/C Unit None None None

Ballasts-8;

Smoke detectors-1;

Exit Sign-1

Offices and Vestibules 11 lamps None None None None

Ballasts-11;

Smoke detectors-4;

Fire Extinguisher-1

Exhibit Rooms 27 Lamps None None None None

Ballasts-27;

Smoke detectors-4;

Fire Extinguisher-1;

Exit Sign-1

Lobby 17 Lamps 1 Water Cooler None None None

Ballasts-17;

Smoke detectors-2;

Exit Sign-1

Entry Way 2 Lamps None None None None Ballasts-2;

Exit Sign-1

Mechanical Room 3 Lamps 1 Air

Handler None None None Ballasts-3;

Smoke Detector-1;

Batteries- 50

Louis Berger Page 21 December 02, 2019

Facility (Floor/Level)

Fluorescent Bulbs

/Lamps

CFC

Containing Materials

Mercury Containing Materials

PCB

Containing Materials

Radioactive Materials

Miscellaneous Materials

Janitor’s Closet 2 Lamps None None None None

Ballasts-2;

Smoke Detectors- 3;

Batteries- 200

Hallway 2 Lamps None None None None Ballasts-2;

Fire Extinguisher-1

Men’s Room 3 Lamps None None None None Ballasts-3

Women’s Room 3 Lamps None None None None Ballasts-3

Auditorium 8 Lamps None None None None Ballasts-8;

Exit Signs- 2;

Smoke Detectors- 2

6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Various ACM and LBP have been identified in our inspection effort that will be impacted by the upcoming site restoration project. These materials, reported in Section 2.0 and Section 3.0 of this report, will require complete abatement prior to the start of the project as per all…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .