Attch 3 - PPQ.docx
DOCX document 27 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 19AQMM26R0342_Seoul_Roof_Replacements_RFP
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template document designed for the Seoul Chancery, Consular, IMOT, PCC, IPC, and ESO Outbuilding Roof Replacements project. The PPQ functions as an appendix to the Request for Proposal and does not address specific required products or services; rather, it serves as an evaluation tool for assessing contractor qualifications based on historical performance on similar projects.
The template is intended for use by prospective bidders responding to solicitation number 19AQMM26R0342 issued by the Department of State Office of Acquisition Management. Contractors completing this questionnaire would be expected to demonstrate relevant experience with roof replacement projects, design-bid-build delivery methodologies, and work performed for federal agencies, particularly those involving embassy or government facility construction. The PPQ supports the proposal evaluation process with a September 7, 2026 deadline for submission and is part of the selection criteria used to determine contractor capability and reliability for executing the Seoul roof replacement design-bid-build project.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 19AQMM26R0342 A003.pdf | ||
| Attch 4 - Price Sheet (Revised).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attch 1 - OBC Roof Replacement Specifications (Amendment 01).pdf | ||
| QandA 1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 19AQMM26R0342 A002.pdf | ||
| Attch 7 - Info For Offerors 1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 19AQMM26R0342 A001.pdf | ||
| Attch 2 - OBC Roof Replacement Drawings.pdf | ||
| Attch 4 - Price Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attch 6 - Public Release of Information 20250219.pdf | ||
| Attch 5 - Bidders DD-254.pdf | ||
| 19AQMM26R0342.pdf | ||
| Attch 1 - OBC Roof Replacement Specifications.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
19AQMM26R0342 Attachment 3
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Instructions to Quoters Sending Reference Questionnaire Forms:
Section A shall be completed by the Quoter (the firm requesting the reference) prior to issuing the questionnaires. The Quoter shall send the questionnaires for relevant projects that are in progress or have been completed in the past five (5) years to the individuals who will provide the reference. For Government contracts, send to the Contracting Officer’s Representative. For commercial references, send to personnel with duties similar to those for Government contracts. It is the responsibility of the Quoter to follow-up and encourage references to submit the questionnaire. The completed questionnaire shall be submitted via e-mail directly from the person providing the reference.
Instructions to Person Providing Reference:
In order to assess potential vendors under the Department of State (DOS), is obtaining past performance information with respect to each Quoter. As a reference for work performed by the firm identified in Section A of this questionnaire, your candid response will assist in the evaluation process. Please complete Section B of the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. The questionnaire must be submitted to edwardsrc@state.gov no later than 3:00 PM ET, September 7, 2026. The subject line in the submission e-mail shall clearly indicate: Solicitation #19AQMM26R0342 – Seoul OBC Roof Replacement Past Performance Questionnaire. Past Performance Questionnaire Submission for <Company Name> and the message shall originate from the reference’s government or commercial e-mail system.
In addition to this questionnaire, you may receive a follow-up phone call to confirm or clarify information. If you have questions regarding this questionnaire or require assistance, please submit inquiries to edwardsrc@state.gov.
SECTION A
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE QUOTER (THE FIRM REQUESTING THE REFERENCE)
PART I: QUOTER INFORMATION
Company Name and Division Name of Quoter:
Address:
SAM UEI or CAGE Code
PART II: PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
Title of Project/Contract Number for which reference is requested:
Procurement Vehicle (e.g. Contract/Order/Subcontract/Other):
Type Of Contract (e.g. Negotiated, Sealed Bid):
_____FP_____FPI_____CPFF_____CPAF_____CPIF_____IDIQ_____BOA
_____Requirements_____Labor-Hour_____T&M_____Other (Specify)
Date of Award:
Period of Performance (Including Options):
Contract Amount:
· Initial Contract Dollar Value (W/Options): _________________
· Final Contract Dollar Value (W/Options): _________________
Role On Project:
_____Prime _____Subcontractor (Explain Type and Extent of Subcontracting, If Applicable: Other (Explain)
General Description of Type of Services/Products Required Under the Contract:
Describe Complexity of Work:
SECTION B
TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATOR (PERSON PROVIDING REFERENCE)
PART I: REFERENCE INFORMATION
Name & Title:
Organization (Including Agency and/or Company):
Contract Role (e.g. CO, COR, PM):
Address:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
E-Mail:
PART II: INFORMATION ABOUT PROJECT/CONTRACT FOR WHICH REFERENCE IS REQUESTED
Please identify and correct any information that is not accurate in Section A.
Please objectively assess the requesting firm in each performance element below by assigning an “X” to the most appropriate rating:
• Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
• Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
• Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
• Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
• Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
| Performance Element |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
1. QUALITY OF PRODUCT OR SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards).
Comments:
| Performance Element |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the Contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule).
Comments:
3. COST CONTROL
Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling cost.* *Cost Control – not required for Firm Fixed Price (FFP). If FFP please extend N/A in the comments box.
Comments:
4. BUSINESS RELATIONS
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior (to include timely identification of issues in controversy), customer satisfaction, timely award, and management of subcontractors.
Comments:
| Performance Element |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL
Assess the contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing, when necessary, key personnel.
Comments:
6. UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS
FAR Subpart 19.7 and 15 U.S.C. 637 contains statutory requirements for complying with the Small Business subcontracting Program. Assess whether the contractor provided maximum practicable opportunity for small business to participate in contract performance consistent with efficient performance of the contract.* *Not required for Small Businesses.
Comments:
8. Additional comments you would like to share:
| _________________________________________ | __________________ | |
| Signature | Date |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .