Attch 1 - Past and Present Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Z2DA-- Renovate Inpatient Wards 6W, 7W & 8W
- Solicitation number
- 36C25620R0128
About this file
This document includes a past performance questionnaire for contractors bidding on a renovation project opportunity with the Department of Veterans Affairs. The opportunity involves renovating three inpatient wards at the Overton Brooks VA Medical Center in Shreveport, Louisiana. The construction cost range is between $5 million and $10 million. A solicitation will be issued as a 100% set-aside for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses. The tentative solicitation date is August 10, 2020, with proposals due around September 10, 2020. The anticipated contract award date is approximately 30 days after receipt of proposals. The contract performance period is 810 calendar days from the notice to proceed. Interested contractors must verify their service-disabled veteran-owned small business status and register in the System for Award Management database. The past performance questionnaire requires references to evaluate and rate the contractor's previous project performance.
View the file
Other files
Show all 33
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Renovate Inpatient Wards 6W, 7W, & 8W Network Contracting Office (NCO) 16 Solicitation No. 36C25620R0128
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR
Complete the CONTRACTOR INFORMATION section, below (type answers into light blue shaded boxes). Save the document. Send an electronic or hard copy print of the form to each of your reference contacts, asking them to please complete the form and submit it according to the instructions, below. It is preferred that these are the same clients/projects that you provided with Exhibit A for ease of evaluation and comparison. Projects should be relevant (within the same magnitude of construction) and recent (within 3 years).
INSTRUCTIONS TO REFERENCE CONTACT
The contractor named below is submitting an offer for a United States Department of Veterans Affairs contract requirement, and has sent this form to you, in your role as a past performance reference contact. Please complete this form in full (all areas shaded in light yellow, below). Once completed, please send the form to the Contract Specialist via postal mail or email, directly to:
Department of Veterans Affairs NCO 16 Contracting Office ATTN: Kaitlyn N. West Contract Specialist REF: 36C25620R0128 1800 Buckner Square, Bldg C-200, Rm 18 (NCO 16) Shreveport, LA 71101 Email Address: kaitlyn.west1@va.gov
Please return the completed form no later than August 28, 2020. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. West via email, or call 318-990-4390. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
GENERAL INFORMATION [completed by Contractor]
Contractor Company Name
Street Address
Contractor Point of Contact Name
City
Point of Contact Phone Number
State
Reference Project Title
Zip Code
Contract Period of Performance (start to finish):
Contract Number
Contract Dollar Value
Description of Work (was work for VA or Non-VA work)
Did work involve Phasing?
Role of Contractor on This Project (check appropriate box) ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Sub-contractor ☐ Key Personnel
RESPONDENT INFORMATION [completed by Reference Contact]
Company Name
Street Address
POC Name
City
Phone Number
State
Fax Number
Zip Code
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2 in the applicable text box OR in the Remarks section, below (text box will expand to whatever extent is necessary).
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| SATISFACTORY |
| VERY GOOD |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| NEUTRAL |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| Performance met contractual requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner. |
| No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.[endnoteRef:1] [1: Printed Name |
Title
Signature]
| The Contractor … |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 6 |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 2. | |||||
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 3. | |||||
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 4. | |||||
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 5. | |||||
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 6. | |||||
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 7. | |||||
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 8. | |||||
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 9. | |||||
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 10. | |||||
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 11. | |||||
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
Narrative
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 12. | |||||
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 13. | |||||
| Met established project schedules. |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 14. | |||||
| Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 15. | |||||
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 16. | |||||
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 17. | |||||
| Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased. |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 18. | |||||
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 19. | |||||
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 20. | |||||
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 21. | |||||
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
Narrative:
| ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| 22. | |||||
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| ☐ | YES |
| ☐ | NO |
| 23 |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain in “remarks.” |
| ☐ | YES |
| ☐ | NO |
| 24 | |
| To the best of your knowledge, is the contractor rated in CPARS? | |
| ☐ | YES |
| ☐ | NO |
REMARKS (Please use as much space as is needed – the box will expand as you type).
Source Selection Sensitive-See FAR Part 3.104Page 22 of 32 Source Selection Information--See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .