Attachment R - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 67 KB Posted

Attached to
COOK SUPPORT AND DINING FACILITY ATTENDANT (DFA) WEST POINT USMA, NY
Solicitation number
W5168W-26-R-A018
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template used by the Mission and Installation Contracting Command - Installation Readiness Center (MICC-IRC) to evaluate contractor performance history for the Army Food Services contract at West Point USMA, NY (Solicitation W5168W-26-R-A018). The questionnaire is distributed to government agencies and customers who have prior experience with offerors to provide first-hand accounts of contractor capability and performance. Completed responses must be submitted via email to the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist by a specified deadline to support the source selection process.

The questionnaire requires detailed information across five sections: contract identification (contractor name, CAGE code, contract number, type, competitiveness, period of performance, and cost data); customer or agency identification; evaluator identification and tenure; and evaluation of contractor performance using a four-point scale (Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, Not Applicable) across eleven technical performance criteria and two small business participation categories. Evaluators must provide written explanations for any Marginal or Unsatisfactory ratings, disclose any contract terminations for default or convenience, and offer narrative comments on the contractor's overall suitability for future government work. Responses submitted by entities other than the original customer are not accepted, and all completed questionnaires become part of the official source selection record.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Industry Q_and_A West Point.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment 0001- W5168W26RA018-0001 SF30.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment 0001- W5168W26RA018-0001 Conformed.pdf PDF
Attachment S Sample Menu.pptx PPTX presentation
Attachment F1 - WPNY Dining Facility Location Map.pdf PDF
Attachment F3 - WPNY Pictures of Facilities.pdf PDF
WPNY DFA and Cook Support PWS 3 NOV 25.pdf PDF
Attachment P - Specific Relevant Contracts Reference Sheet.pdf PDF
Attachment E - Sample Materials List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment F3 - WPNY Pictures of Facilities.pptx PPTX presentation
Attachment J - WPNY PMR Food Service Briefing Template.pptx PPTX presentation
Attachment Q - Consent Forms for Release of Past Performance Info.pdf PDF
Attachment L Wage Determination 15-4159 NY 3 Dec 2025.txt TXT text file
Attachment K - Contractor Accident Reporting Format.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment B - WPNY Workload Data Capabilities.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment F1 - WPNY Dining Facility Location Map_.pptx PPTX presentation
Attachment A Performance Work Statement (PWS) 3 NOV 25 CLEAN.docx DOCX document
Attachment D4 - WPNY Incidental Property.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation - W5168W26RA018 Cook Support and DFA Services.pdf PDF
Attachment G - WPNY Cook_DFA Support Pricing Matrix - 30Oct25.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment H - WPNY Cook_DFA Support Staffing Matrix 30Oct25.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Sample Questionnaire Cover Letter

Letterhead Date

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The Mission and Installation Contracting (MICC) – Installation Readiness Center (IRC) is in the process of selecting a contractor for Army Food Services. The services required are for Fort XXXX, Solicitation W5168W-XX-R-XXXX, in support of the installation food services program that support the Warfighter with flexible, efficient and cost effective service. The service encompasses XXXX FFS/DFA/Cook Support dining facility functions.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offeror’s past performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror’s performance on those contracts.

Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Our schedule is extremely tight and we need your written response no later than (INSERT DATE) after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out by hand and emailed to all the following Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist at: contractingofficer@army.mil and contractspecialist@army.mil. Please email the Contracting Officer or Contract Specialist prior to transmission if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection record.

Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this source selection.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance.

Please return this completed questionnaire via email to the following Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist at the following email addresses: contractingofficer@army.mil and contractspecialist@army.mil, subject line should reflect the corresponding solicitation number W5168W-XX-R-XXXX.

Note: Questionnaire submitted by some other entity other than the reference will not be accepted.

When filled in, this document is Source Selection Sensitive Information IAW FAR 3.104.

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor B. Cage Code

C. Contract Number D. Contract Type E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes No F. Period of performance _ G. Initial contract cost $ H. Current/final contract cost $ I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs

J. Description of service provided

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name B. Customer or agency description

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other commands

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Name B. Title C. Phone/Fax

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an X in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CodePerformance Level
SSatisfactory – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MMarginal – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
USUnsatisfactory – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
NANot Applicable – Unable to provide a score.
Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation
S
M
US
NA

S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan.

S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.

Technical Performance
S
M
US
NA

T1. Overall Contract Management.

T2. Adequacy of Contractor Workforce to Perform Contract.

T3. Quality Control.

T4. Government Furnished Property Administration.

T5. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes).

T6. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.

T7. Understand/complied with contract objectives and technical requirements.

T8. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

T9. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

T10. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

T11. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated M (Marginal) or US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

2. Government Contract Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes Default Convenience Pending Terminations No If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .