Attachment L - Contract Historical Data.pdf

PDF 203 KB Posted

Attached to
Wallops Range Contract (WRC) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
80GSFC23R0009FRFP
Issued by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Center

About this file

This document provides historical data from an incumbent contract to support a forthcoming competitive solicitation. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Center will issue solicitation number 80GSFC23R0009FRFP for the Wallops Range Contract (WRC). The incumbent contractor must provide labor category descriptions, work year equivalents, labor rates, and other performance data from the past twelve months within 30 days of the contracting officer's request. This includes number of work year equivalents or labor hours by category, weighted average wage rates, seniority levels, dates and amounts of wage escalations, and exempt or non-exempt classifications. The contractor must also provide actual non-labor expenditures by cost element for the prior year. Estimates of indirect labor and associated categories are required along with productive work year hours. Consolidated data is preferred for the prime and any significant subcontractors performing over a threshold percentage of effort.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Wallops Range Contract (WRC), newest first.
File Type Posted
80GSFC23R0009 RFI-6.pdf PDF
80GSFC23R0009 RFI-5.pdf PDF
80GSFC23R0009 - SF33 - 11-27-2023.pdf PDF
80GSFC23R0009 Amendment 003.pdf PDF
80GSFC23R0009 RFI-3.pdf PDF
80GSFC23R0009 Amendment 002.pdf PDF
Attachment A - WRC SOW 9NOV2023.pdf PDF
Enclosure 1 - Phase-in SOW - Rev. 1.pdf PDF
Exhibit A - Cost Plus FF Hybrid CORE 10-6-2023 - Rev. 1.pdf PDF
Exhibit B - WRC Exh RTO Cost - Rev. 1.pdf PDF
Attachment S - OCI-Plan-Data-Requirements - Rev.1.pdf PDF
Plug Numbers for Cost Exhibits A and B - Rev.1.pdf PDF
Plug Numbers for Cost Exhibits A and B.pdf PDF
80GSFC23R0009 RFI-1.pdf PDF
80GSFC23R0009 Amendment 001.pdf PDF
ROC II Contract Historical Data - 2.pdf PDF
ROC II Contract Historical Data - 1.pdf PDF
Exhibit C - PPQ.pdf PDF
Enclosure 2 RTO-Sounding Rocket 46-031 Requirements.pdf PDF
CBA-2023-222 KBR.pdf PDF
Attachment F - IT Security Management Plan REV.pdf PDF
Final Request for Proposal (RFP) Cover Letter signed.pdf PDF
Enclosure 1 - Phase-in SOW 28MAR.pdf PDF
Attachment Q - DEIA Plan.pdf PDF
IAM AW and KBR - ROC II - Fully Executed CBA - 2022.PDF PDF
CBA-2023-223 Saalex Solutions Inc..pdf PDF
CBA-2023-224 Rothe Enterprises Inc..pdf PDF
Attachment A-WRC SOW_GO_Chem 11SEP2023FINAL.pdf PDF
Attachment G-533 Attach Core and IDIQ--Both Onsite and Offsite.pdf PDF
Attachment C - IAGP.pdf PDF
WRC - FRFP-80GSFC23R0009 Final.pdf PDF
Exhibit A - Cost Plus FF Hybrid CORE 10-6-2023.pdf PDF
Exhibit B - WRC Exh RTO Cost 9-15-23.pdf PDF
Enclosure 3 - Government WRC QASP.pdf PDF
Enclosure 2 RTO-ELV Requirements.pdf PDF
Enclosure 2 RTO-RTO (Campaign and ELV) 7SEP2023 Final.pdf PDF
Attachment S - OCI-Plan-Data-Requirements.pdf PDF
Attachment O - GFP.pdf PDF
Attachment E - Small Business Subcontracting Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment B - Direct Labor Rates_Indirect Rates and Fee.pdf PDF
Attachment N - Contractor Proposed Enhancements.pdf PDF
IAM AW and Saalex- ROC II - CBA -Final (signed).pdf PDF
Attachment K - OCI Avoidance Plan.pdf PDF
Enclosure 4 - IT Security Management Plan Template.pdf PDF
Enclosure 2 RTO-Sounding Rocket 36-360 Requirements.pdf PDF
Attachment R - DEIA Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment P - Requirements Statements List.pdf PDF
Attachment M IT Security Applicable Docs.pdf PDF
Attachment J - DD254 - WRC.pdf PDF
Attachment I - Quality Assurance Plan.pdf PDF
Show all 50

Wallops Range Contract (WRC) has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT L

CONTRACT HISTORICAL DATA

FEBRUARY 2023

RFP 80GSFC23R0009

CONTRACT TBD

Contract TBD Attachment L

(03/2015)

CONTRACT HISTORICAL DATA

NASA may issue a competitive solicitation for a follow-on effort for services similar to those provided under this contract. As part of this follow-on competition, NASA may include historical labor category descriptions, work year equivalents (WYEs), weighted average direct labor rates, and other information from this contract in the follow-on solicitation for use by all potential offerors. Including this data in the solicitation is intended to ensure a comprehensive and fair evaluation of competitive proposals and increase the probability that realistic pricing is provided in future proposals submitted. Minimizing the potential risk for unrealistic or unsubstantiated pricing materially reduces the risk that cost/price could become an inappropriate discriminator among competing offerors.

Based on the written request from the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall provide all of the following historical data from this contract within 30 days this request:

(1) All labor resources employed under this contract in the last twelve months, by

Contract Labor Category as specified in Attachment C, IDIQ Direct Labor Rates, Indirect Rates and Fee Matrices. For each labor category, provide the number of WYEs or the total labor hours incurred for that position over the preceding 12 months, the current weighted average wage rate (unburdened “straight time” rate), and the average seniority level;

(2) For each labor category , identify the most recent date that wages were escalated and provide the percentage by which wages were escalated;

(3) For each labor category, identify whether the category is “exempt,” “non-exempt,” or “union” as governed under the Service Contract Labor Standards;

(4) For each labor category, provide a brief position description in sufficient detail to indicate the duties of each category and any minimum education and experience requirements.

Example Table of Requested Data

Labor Category

Number of *WYE by Labor Category

**Current Weighted Avg.

Unburdened Hourly Rate for this Category

Average Seniority for this Category

Date and Amount of Last Rate Escalation

Identification “Exempt,”

“Non-Exempt,” or “Union”

Engineer 4 9 $18.20 18 months April 2005 (2.8%) Exempt

*1 WYE equals the total Contractor’s Productive Work Year Hours. Example: Four contractor employees each working 1,000 hours per year, divided by the total Contractor’s Productive Work Year Hours, equals the Contractor’s Number of FTEs.

**Straight time labor rates only, not bid rates or burdened rates

Contract TBD Attachment L

(03/2015)

(5) Actual non-labor (i.e. other direct costs (ODCs)) expenditures for the prior twelve months, delineated by each of the following cost elements: materials, equipment, travel, supplies, and any other individual recurring ODCs based on an established cost estimating relationships (e.g. computer usage, program management, depreciation, administrative support.);

(6) Estimate of the number of WYEs, including associated labor category titles/descriptions, for those personnel currently supporting this contract that are accounted for as indirect. This may include administrative employees (e.g., accounting or clerical personnel), management employees and/or technical employees (e.g. computer support personnel);

(7) Provide the Contractor’s Productive Work Year Hours for exempt and non-exempt employees; and

(8) The information required in (1) through (7) above shall be provided for the prime contractor and all significant subcontractors. Significant subcontractors are those subcontractors that have performed at least “TBD” percent of the cumulative contract effort (in terms of dollars) as of the time of the Contracting Officer’s request for this data. A single, consolidated response for the prime contractor and all significant subcontractors is preferred, wherein labor rate data is a total contract average by position (and labor categories where both the prime and subcontractor are providing labor for that position are weighted averages). If such a consolidated response is not feasible due to restrictions over disclosure of company-sensitive cost data between the prime and any subcontractors, then an alternative approach should be discussed with the Contracting Officer at the time of the request for this data.

(End of Attachment)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .