Attachment L-2 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 491 KB Posted

Attached to
Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) Re-Compete
Solicitation number
FA930120R0002
Issued by

About this file

This document package includes a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for base engineering services at Edwards Air Force Base in California. The past performance questionnaire is a template to be filled out by references for offerors on the Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements re-compete contract. It requests ratings and commentary on an offeror's past quality control, timeliness, management effectiveness, compliance with labor standards and safety on previous similar contracts. The federal contract opportunity is an indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract with a minimum value of $10,000 and maximum of $55 million to provide maintenance, repair and minor construction services at Edwards AFB facilities for a one year base period and four one-year options. A pre-proposal conference will be held on March 18, 2020 and proposals are due by an unspecified future date. Registration on beta.SAM.gov and SAM.gov is required for offerors to be eligible for award.

View the file

Other files

Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment L-2: Past Performance Questionnaire Page 1

ATTACHMENT L-2: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ) COVER

LETTER

When filled in, this document is Source Selection sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

The Directorate of Contracting of the Air Force Test Center is in the process of competitively selecting a source for a Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineer Requirements (SABER)

Contract at Edwards AFB, CA. The scope of work includes efforts involving repair, sustainment, renovation and/or construction of facilities on Edwards AFB. (Refer to RFP

FA9301-20-R-0002 at https://beta.sam.gov/).

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire.

Our schedule is extremely tight and we desire your written response no later than 5 calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of evaluations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to charles.richardson.16@us.af.mil and maximiliano.oropeza@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official

Source Selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

JACOB C. AROLA

Contracting Officer

Attachement 1 – Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

L-2: Attachment 1 - Past and Present Performance Questionnaire Page 2

Attachment 1 - Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________

Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________

__________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work:_________________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ____________*

Highest amount of Task orders performed concurrently________________________________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: __________________________*

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Mentor/Protégé

Job Disciplines Performed:

☐ Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning (HVAC)

☐ Electrical (Indoor and Outdoor)

☐ Mechanical

☐ Design

☐ Carpentry

☐ Roofing

☐ Excavation

☐ Plumbing

☐ Sheet metal

☐ Painting

☐ Demolition

☐ Concrete masonry

☐ Welding

☐ Carpeting

☐ Lead abatement

☐ Asbestos abatement

L-2: Attachment 1 - Past and Present Performance Questionnaire Page 3

☐ Steam Fitting

☐ Road and parking lot repair

☐ Fire Protection

☐ Fencing

☐ Other:________________________________________________________________

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _______________________________ Title: ______________________

Address: ______________________________________________________________________

Telephone Number: _____________________________________________________________

Fax Number: _________________________________________________________________

Email Address: _________________________________________________________________

C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:

Maximiliano Oropeza Charles C. Richardson

661-277-7453 661-275-3248

AFTC/PZIOC AFTC/PZIOC

maximiliano.oropeza@us.af.mil charles.richardson.16@us.af.mil

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, V, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE

PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

L-2: Attachment 1 - Past and Present Performance Questionnaire Page 4

E V S M U N

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements

. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER: ______________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

L-2: Attachment 1 - Past and Present Performance Questionnaire Page 5

Quality Control

1. Quality of Workmanship

2. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements

3. Contractor provided effective measures in implementing their established Quality Control Plan

4. Corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to established quality control procedures

5. Contractor provided adequate Storage and facilities in order to properly store their Materials

6. Adequacy of Materials

7. Adequacy of Submittals

8. Adequacy of Quality Control Testing

9. Adequacy of As-Builts

10. How well did the contractor use the Specified Materials as required by their SOW?

11. Identified/Corrected deficient work in a timely manner

Comments on Quality Control:

Timely Performance

1. Developed realistic Progress Schedules

2. Adherence to Approved Schedule

L-2: Attachment 1 - Past and Present Performance Questionnaire Page 6

3. Resolution of Delays

4. Submission of Required Documentation

5. Completion of Punchlist Items

6. Submission of Updated and Revised Progress Schedules

7. Provided timely resolution of warranty calls

8. Provided adequate Bonding as required

9. Contractor’s ability to handle a high volume of Task

Orders concurrently

Comments on Timely Performance:

Effectiveness Management

1. Cooperation with personnel after award and

Responsiveness to the Government

2. Adequacy of effectively maintaining and sustaining Key personnel

3. Coordination and Control of Subcontractors

L-2: Attachment 1 - Past and Present Performance Questionnaire Page 7

4. Adequacy of Site Clean Up

5. Effectiveness of Job-Site Supervision

6. Compliance with Laws and Regulations

7. Professional Conduct

8. Review/Resolution of Subcontractor Issues

9. Displayed effective Subcontractor Management

10. Paid sub-contractors/suppliers in a timely manner

11. Provided accurate and complete proposals for task orders including all aspects of work required for each task

12. Provided adequate project supervision

13. Displayed initiative to solve problems

Comments on Effectiveness of Management:

Compliance with Labor Standards

1. Payrolls Properly Completed and Submitted

2. Compliance with Labor Laws and Regulations with

Specific Attention to the Wage Rate Requirements and

EEO Requirements

L-2: Attachment 1 - Past and Present Performance Questionnaire Page 8

Comments on Compliance with Labor Standards:

Compliance with Safety Standards

1. Adequacy of Safety Plan

2. Implementation of Safety Plan

3. Adequacy and efficiency in correcting noted

Deficiencies

L-2: Attachment 1 - Past and Present Performance Questionnaire Page 9

Comments on Compliance with Safety Standards:

Overall Rating of Performance

1. Overall Rating of Performance

Please provide any additional information you feel is important and not covered elsewhere in this evaluation:

How effective was the contractor in meeting the contract’s overall requirements?

IF U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) Leadership in Energy and Environmental

Design (LEED) rating was required, indicate level specified and level achieved in remarks.

L-2: Attachment 1 - Past and Present Performance Questionnaire Page 10

How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance on this contract?

Would you award another contract to this contractor? (Yes/No) if No, please explain.

Thank you for your remarks. Do not return to the Contractor you are providing a reference for.

Be sure to return to the Contracting Agency:

Maximiliano Oropeza Charles C. Richardson

661-277-7453 661-275-3248

AFTC/PZIOC AFTC/PZIOC

maximiliano.oropeza@us.af.mil charles.richardson.16@us.af.mil

Name:_______________________________Contact Phone #:__________________________

Respondent Signature:______________________________Date Completed:_______________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .