Attachment J.25 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 38 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Not listed Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- Not on record
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for a battery replacement contract opportunity with the Federal Aviation Administration. The questionnaire is for contractors proposing on an indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity multiple award contract to supply, replace, and repair battery systems at FAA National Air Space facilities across the United States and territories. It requests ratings on project management, installation, testing and commissioning of battery strings for uninterruptible power systems. Responses are due by a specified date to assist the FAA's evaluation of offerors' past performance on similar battery replacement projects involving management of asbestos, arc flash analysis, and energized work permits. The contract will utilize firm fixed-price and labor hour pricing and have a 1,250 employee size standard under NAICS 335910.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PROCUREMENT SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Battery Type, check the block for which this form is being submitted (only one form may be submitted per type):
24 to 48-Volt Flooded Cell Battery (FCB) (FCB VOR, FCB DCBUS)
120-Volt NiCd Flood Cell Battery (FCB) (FCB Critical Power)
360 to 480-Volt (Large UPS) Flooded Cell Battery (FCB UPS)
360 to 480-Volt (Large UPS) Valve Regulated Lead Acid Battery (VRLA) (VRLA UPS)
24 to 48-Volt Valve Regulated Lead Acid (VRLA) (VRLA VOR, VRLA DCBUS, VRLA Critical Power)
**Large UPS = 40+ modules installed in a cabinet or rack, not mini-UPS. **
Introduction
(Offeror’s name here) is proposing on a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) replacement of Uninterruptible Power System (UPS) battery strings at FAA facilities. Past performance is of considerable importance to this acquisition.
Please complete this questionnaire on behalf of (Add Offeror’s name here). Indicate, based on the ratings below, the Contractor’s performance on the identified program. Assessments should reflect only performance for which the Contractor is/was responsible. The following is a definition of the rating levels:
Rating Performance Level
4 EXCELLENT: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the benefit of the Government/Customer. The contractual performance of the factors being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
3 GOOD: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the benefit of the Government/Customer. The contractual performance of the factors being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
2 SATISFACTORY: Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the factors contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
1 MARGINAL: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the factors being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
0 POOR: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and corrections are not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Please circle (or underline for e-mailed responses) a “Number” or “Yes” / “No” corresponding to your rating or “N/A” if you are unable to provide a rating for an area.
PLEASE PROVIDE NARRATIVE EXPLANATIONS FOR ANY MARGINAL, POOR OR “YES” RATINGS. SPACE FOR YOUR NARRATIVE REMARKS IS PROVIDED ON THE LAST PAGE OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE. IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED, USE THE BACK OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE.
You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the Contractor’s performance with judgment of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified program, we solicit your comments on other similar programs for which your activity has contracts with this offeror.
ATTACHMENT J.25 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PART ONE: INSTRUCTIONS
(Offeror’s name here) is proposing on a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) replacement of Uninterruptible Power System (UPS) battery strings at US FAA facilities. Past performance is of considerable importance to this acquisition
We would greatly appreciate you taking the time to complete this form. Please provide an honest assessment and return to FAA not later than __________ to:
Federal Aviation Administration Attn: Stefanie Wiles (AAQ-720) E-mail: Stefanie.Wiles@faa.gov
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Stefanie Wiles.
PART TWO: GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Contractor:
Point Of Contact:
Title:
Telephone No.:
B. Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Period of Performance:
Approximate Dollar Value:
Contract Description:
If performance on the application identified above involved one or more of the following, please mark all that apply:
Replacement of Uninterruptible Power Supply battery strings _____ Replacement of battery back-up system battery string: ______ Re-installation of automatic battery monitoring systems on UPS battery strings _____ Project Management of Battery string replacement _____ Battery supplier _____
PART THREE: QUESTIONS REGARDING SELECTED APPLICATION
The numbers “0” to “4” correspond with the following descriptive values provided on the questionnaire cover page:
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| Poor Marginal Satisfactory Good Excellent |
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
| 1. |
| How successful was the contractor in providing fully trained and skilled personnel, in a timely manner, to manage this program? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
| 2. |
| How effective was the contractor in managing all phases of a task or project? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
| 3. |
| Did the contractor provide a schedule of activities for the battery string replacement? |
If provided, how would you rate its usefulness?
Yes or No
0 1 2 3 4 N/A
| 4. |
| Did the contractor perform a pre-installation site survey? |
If site survey was performed how would you rate the site survey report?
Yes or No
0 1 2 3 4 N/A
| 5. |
| Did the work involve mounting battery racks to mastic or asbestos floor tiles? |
If yes, how would you rate the contractors work methods and practices on asbestos containing material?
Yes or No
| 6. |
| Did the contractor perform an Arc Flash Hazard Analysis calculation to determine Arc Flash energy for this battery installation? |
If yes, how would you rate the contractors Arc Flash analysis?
| 7. |
| Did the contractor draft an energized work permit for approval by site technicians before the battery replacement work begins? (Only applicable on voltages >50 volts.) |
If so, how would you rate the usefulness of work permit in for de-energizing and re-energizing battery strings and equipment, and any Personal Protective Equipment required?
| 8. |
| How responsive was the contractor meeting battery delivery schedules? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
| 9. |
| How responsive was the contractor meeting battery removal and recycle schedules? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
| 10. |
| How well did key personnel communicate with Government/Company personnel? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
| 11. |
| How would you rate the contractor’s overall management of this contract? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
| 12. |
| Have any major contract requirements been terminated or rescheduled as a result of the contractor’s inability to perform? |
If so, please explain:
Yes or No
| 13. |
| Were any “cure” or “show cause” notices issued? |
a. If so, for what?
b. What corrective action did the contractor take to correct the situation?
Yes or No
| 14. |
| Was an election made not to exercise an option due to the contractor’s poor performance? |
If so, why?
Yes or No
INSTALLATION
| 1. |
| How effective was the contractor in providing installation services? |
| 0 1 2 3 4 N/A |
| 2. |
| Please rate the contractor’s performance replacing and installing the battery string. |
0 1 2 3 4 N/A
| 3. |
| Did the contractor have a battery test plan to review? |
If yes, please rate the battery test plan.
Yes or No
0 1 2 3 4 N/A
| 4. |
| Did the contractor perform battery baseline testing on the new battery string? |
If yes, how would you rate the contractors battery baseline testing and data report?
| 5. |
| Did this project require reinstallation of a battery monitoring system? |
If yes, please rate the reinstallation and battery monitoring system commissioning.
| 6. |
| Did the contractor perform an acceptance inspection with facility personnel following installation, testing, and final clean-up? |
If yes please rate the final clean-up and inspection work.
| 7. |
| How would you rate the contractor’s overall technical performance for this contract? |
0 1 2 3 4 N/A
| 8. |
| Did the contractor arrange or complete charging rate adjustment on the UPS? |
If yes, please rate the UPS charging adjustment.
Would you recommend award of a similar contract to this contractor? Yes or No
Remarks: _______________________________________________________________________
PART FOUR: RESPONDENT INFORMATION
The following information will assist in the analysis of the data provided. Information will be kept CONFIDENTIAL:
Name of Respondent:
Position Title:
Organization:
Telephone No.:
Length of Involvement in Program/Contract:
Date Questionnaire Completed:
THANK YOU!
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .