Attachment C - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 14 KB Posted

Attached to
Long-Term Lodging San Diego
Solicitation number
N4523A20R1072
Issued by

About this file

This document includes a past performance questionnaire template and details of a solicitation for long-term lodging services in San Diego. The Navy seeks a firm fixed-price indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract for lodging accommodations within 18 miles of Naval Air Station North Island from June 2020 to June 2025. Offerors must submit technical proposals including experience and past performance, with proposals due according to the solicitation schedule. The requirement is set aside for small businesses and will be awarded using lowest price technically acceptable criteria.

View the file

Other files

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment D

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ______________________________________

Client Information (Name): ______________________________________________

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS
1. QUALITY:
Circle
a) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance for long-term lodging.
E VG S M U NA
b) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery of contract compliant long-term lodging for the client. /
E VG S M U N
b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract
E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?
E VG S M U N
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
E VG S M U N
c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
E VG S M U N
d) Overall customer satisfaction
E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
E VG S M U N
b) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel
E VG S M U N
c) Ability to simultaneously manage large long-term lodging projects with multiple disciplines
E VG S M U N
d) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Client’s changes
E VG S M U N
e) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
E VG S M U N

6. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).
E VG S M U N
b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)
E VG S M U N
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)
Yes No
d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .