Attachment C - Past Performance Questionaire.pdf
PDF 108 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FBI REDSTONE JOB ORDER CONTRACT
- Solicitation number
- 15F06725R0000021
About this file
This document is a Contractor Performance Questionnaire for the FBI Redstone Job Order Contract (Solicitation 15F06725R0000021). The questionnaire is designed to evaluate a contractor's past performance across multiple dimensions, including project history, management effectiveness, quality of service, timeliness, quality control, customer satisfaction, and compliance with environmental, labor, and safety requirements.
The performance assessment uses a rating scale of Acceptable (A), Unacceptable (UA), or Not Applicable (N/A) to score the contractor's performance in key areas such as completing construction and renovation efforts (ranging from $2,000 to $750,000), managing professional teams, meeting project budgets, providing timely submittals, maintaining workmanship standards, adhering to schedules, and responding to customer needs. The form allows the evaluator to provide detailed comments and ultimately recommend whether they would award another contract to the contractor based on their overall performance.
View the file
Other files
Show all 40
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
15F06725R0000021 Source Selection Sensitive – See FAR 3.104
For Official Use Only
CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
The below-named contractor is being considered for award of a contract for Solicitation:
15F06725R0000021, Redstone Job Order Contract (JOC). The performance work statement includes efforts involving repair, sustainment, renovation and/or construction of facilities at FBI Redstone in Huntsville, AL.
A primary consideration in our selection process is the contractor’s history of performance of similar efforts. Please make every effort to be thorough in your answers/comments.
Please refer any questions to Britt Sanford at bmsanford@fbi.gov and Andre Wilson at alwilson6@fbi.gov.
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
Contractor’s Name:_____________________________________________________________
Address:______________________________________________________________________
Telephone Number: ______________________ Point of Contact: _______________________
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION
Name: __________________________________ Title: _____________________________
Organization & Address: ________________________________________________________
Telephone: ___________________ Fax: ________________ Email: ____________________
C. CONTRACT INFORMATION
Contract Number/Title: __________________________________________________________
Period of Performance: _________________ Dollar Amount of Contract: _________________
Services Performed:
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
mailto:bmsanford@fbi.gov mailto:alwilson6@fbi.gov
For Official Use Only
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE RATING
A ACCEPTABLE - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.
UA UNACCEPTABLE – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE
Please use the above ratings to describe the contractor’s performance in the following areas:
1. HISTORY COMPLETING EFFORTS INVOLVING DESIGN, CARPENTRY, ROAD
REPAIR, ROOFING, EXCAVATION, INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL,
HEATING, VENTILATION, AIR CONDITIONING, PLUMBING, SHEET METAL,
PAINTING, DEMOLITION, CONCRETE MASONRY, AND WELDING.
(PRICE RANGE OF $2,000.00 THROUGH $750,000.00)
a. Contractor had professional and qualified management team A UA N/A
b. Contractor provided submittals timely A UA N/A
c. Contractor was able to complete project within budget A UA N/A
d. Contractor successfully completed construction as designed A UA N/A
e. Were Contractor change order/equitable adjustment requests reasonable
A UA N/A
f. Contractor’s overall quality of service A UA N/A
COMMENTS/REMARKS:_______________________________________________________
2. MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS
For Official Use Only
COMMENTS/REMARKS:_______________________________________________________
3. QUALITY OF SERVICE AND WORKMANSHIP
a. Contractor maintained acceptable standards of workmanship A UA N/A
b. Contractor provided acceptable-quality materials A UA N/A
c. Contractor’s overall quality of service A UA N/A
4. TIMELINESS/ADHERENCE TO SCHEDULES
a. Contractor completed scheduled tasks within stated time frames
A UA N/A
b. Contractor was proactive in keeping you informed of schedule changes if they were going to occur
A UA N/A
c. Contractor responded to emergency requirements in a timely manner
A UA N/A
d. Overall contractor timeliness A UA N/A
COMMENTS/REMARKS:_______________________________________________________
a. Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors with technical and administrative abilities to meet contract requirements.
A UA N/A
b. Contractor maintained appropriate staffing levels (number/ qualifications)
A UA N/A
c. Contractor effectively managed materials requirements (i.e., maintained adequate stock levels)
A UA N/A
d. Contractor effectively oversaw/managed subcontractors A UA N/A
e. Contractor’s overall management effectiveness A UA N/A
For Official Use Only
5. QUALITY CONTROL
a. Contractor provided an adequate quality control plan A UA N/A
b. Contractor adhered to its quality control plan A UA N/A
c. Contractor’s quality control resulted in little/no work on your part to achieve acceptable service (i.e.-few failed inspections)
A UA N/A
d. Contractor documented its quality control checks/corrective actions
A UA N/A
e. Contractor’s overall quality control A UA N/A
COMMENTS/REMARKS:_______________________________________________________
6. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
a. Contractor maintained a professional working relationship A UA N/A
b. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in resolving customer complaints
A UA N/A
c. Contractor was flexible in responding to customer requirements
A UA N/A
d. Overall customer satisfaction A UA N/A
COMMENTS/REMARKS:_______________________________________________________
7. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL/LABOR/SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
a. Environmental requirements A UA N/A
b. Labor laws A UA N/A
c. Workplace safety A UA N/A
d. Overall compliance A UA N/A
For Official Use Only
8. OVERALL PAST PERFORMANCE RATING:
9. If a Government contract, did the contractor receive any Contract Discrepancy Reports, Letters of Concern, or Cure Notices? __________ If yes, please describe:
10. If given the opportunity, would you award another contract to this contractor? Please explain response below.
| CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE |
| A. GENERAL INFORMATION |
| B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION |
| C. CONTRACT INFORMATION |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .