Attachment 6 - Past Performance Questionnaire-.docx

DOCX document 27 KB Posted

Attached to
Amendment 0005 - Survey and Market Research Services
Solicitation number
H9821025RE012
Issued by

About this file

The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for a federal contract (RFP No. H9821025RE012) for Survey and Market Research Services issued by the Defense Human Resources Activity. The PPQ is a comprehensive evaluation form designed to assess a contractor's performance across multiple dimensions, including quality performance, management effectiveness, small business participation, security management, employee retention, and overall contract execution.

The questionnaire provides a detailed rating scale from Exceptional (E) to Unsatisfactory (U) for evaluating various aspects of contractor performance, such as technical requirements compliance, quality control practices, deliverable accuracy, contract management, cooperation, cost controls, milestone achievement, and security requirement implementation. Key sections include contractor identification, customer agency details, evaluator information, and space for narrative comments about the contractor's performance, with specific focus areas like adherence to professional standards, innovation, workforce management, and potential future contract eligibility. The solicitation indicates two proposal submission phases, with Phase 1 due June 16, 2025, at 9am Eastern time and Phase 2 due June 30, 2025, at 12pm Eastern time.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Solicitation Amendment H9821025RE0120005 SF 30 (1).pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment H9821025RE0120004 SF 30.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Survey and Market Research Services PWS Rev 2 .pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Transition Plan PWS Rev 1.pdf PDF
Consolidated QA_Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
Attachment 11 - Addendum FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation Rev 2.pdf PDF
SAM_QA Spreadsheet Rev 1.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment H9821025RE0120003 SF 30.pdf PDF
H9821025RE0120002_Signature Page.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Survey and Market Research Services PWS Rev1.pdf PDF
SAM_Combined QA.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment H9821025RE0120002 SF 30.pdf PDF
Attachment 12_QA Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 3 - Sample Task Order PWS Rev1.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment H9821025RE0120001 SF 30.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - Sample Task Order Pricing Rev1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 5 - Pricing Worksheet. Rev1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 11 - Addendum FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation Rev1.pdf PDF
Solicitation___H9821025RE012_FS.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 - Ordering Procedures-.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Sample Task Order PWS.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - Pricing Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 9 - Optional Procurement and Risk Management Narrative.pdf PDF
Attachment 10 - Step-by-Step Guide to Submitting a Proposal in PIEE.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Transition Plan PWS.pdf PDF
Attachment 11 - Addendum FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation. .pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - SBPCD.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - Sample Task Order Pricing Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 1 - Survey and Market Research Services PWS.pdf PDF
Show all 29

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 6

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

RFP No H9821025RE012

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor Name:______________________________________________

B. Contractor Cage Code (if known): _________________________________

C. Contract number (if a Government Contract): ______________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________(include cost per year separately if multi-year contract)

I. Project name/Description of service provided (add additional space as required attach a copy of the contract if available):

J. Was the contractor a Prime Contractor? Yes_____ No______

K. Was the contractor a Subcontractor? Yes_____ No ______

L. Is this Contract in Contractor Performance and Reporting System (CPARs)?

Yes______ No_______

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name: _________________________________________________________________

B. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________

C. Evaluator's phone and email: ___________________________________________________

D. Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ____________________

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

A. Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODEPERFORMANCE RATING
EEXCEPTIONAL – During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level. Performance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems that did occur.
VVERY GOOD – During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well. Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.
SSATISFACTORY – During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level. Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.
MMARGINAL – During the entire period, the contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance. There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level; performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
UUNSATISFACTORY – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.
N/ANOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know.

Quality Performance

E
V
S
M
U
N/A

Please indicate the contractor’s performance on the following factors:

Q1. How would you rate the overall quality of the contractor’s performance on this contract?

Q2. Did the contractor consistently meet PWS technical requirements and deliverables as specified in the contract (scope, timeliness and accuracy)?

Q3. Did the Contractor implement effective internal quality control practices? Were issues identified and corrected proactively?

Q4: Were reports, data analyses, or other deliverables accurate, complete and professionally presented? If errors occurred, how were they handled?

Q5: How did the contractor respond to Government comments, corrections, or requested changes in deliverables?

Q6. Did the contractor demonstrate knowledge of and adherence to applicable professional standards, guidelines, or best practices for survey methods, data collection or research design?

Q7. Did the contractor offer any process improvements or innovations that enhanced service quality?

Management Performance

E
V
S
M
U
N/A

M1. How effective was the contractor able to execute overall contract management activities (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control, and deliver on time)?

M2. To what degree was the contractor reasonable and cooperative when dealing with program staff (U.S. Government personnel, as well as other contractors supporting the project)including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes?

M3. To what degree was the contractor able to timely and effectively resolve contract challenges without extensive customer guidance and did the contractor take the initiative to do so?

M4. How effectively did the contractor understand/comply with program objectives and technical requirements?

M5. How effective were the contractor’s cost controls to provide the best value to meet the specifications of the Performance Work Statement?

M6. How well did the contractor meet physical milestone dates specified by contract or agreed to in the project schedule?

M7. How effectively did the contractor develop and meet realistic project schedules?

Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation
E
V
S
M
U
N/A

S1. To what degree was the contractor able to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan?

S2. How effectively did the contractor manage small business participation to meet technical performance?

Security Management
E
V
S
M
U
N/A

SM1. Was the contractor able to successfully implement and support security requirements protecting the confidentiality of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) when the CUI is maintained in nonfederal information systems associated with the DoD program that process, store or transmit CUI (Please elaborate)? Confidentiality of CUI Security Requirements includes: Basic and Derived

SM2. How effective was the contractor in evaluating and analyzing Defense Business Systems in compliance with NIST SP 800-171 Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Information Systems and Organizations, and NIST SP 800-171A Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information?

Employee Retention/Attraction/Transition
E
V
S
M
U
N/A

E1. How effectively was the contractor able to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort?

E2. How effectively was the contractor able to retain a qualified workforce on this effort?

Overall Performance

E
V
S
M
U
N/A

How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance on this contract? (Please elaborate below)

B. Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___Default___Convenience___Pending Terminations___
No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

C. Was the contractor ever issued a “cure” or “show cause” notice under the referenced contract?

Yes____
No____

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform on one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire via email to:

Ralph Neely: ralph.m.neely.civ@mail.mil and Courtney Fluellen: courtney.r.fluellen.civ@mail.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .