Attachment 3 Past Performance Questionnaire PPQ.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
Dugway Proving Ground Environmental Support / Central Hazardous Waste Services - RFP Amendment 0006
Solicitation number
W911S626RA001
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template designed to evaluate contractor performance on federal contracts, specifically for use in source selection evaluations. The document is designated as source selection sensitive information under FAR 3.104 and is structured to collect comprehensive feedback from government evaluators regarding contractor performance across multiple performance dimensions.

The PPQ template is organized into five main sections: contract identification (capturing CAGE code, contract number, type, competitiveness, period of performance, and cost information); customer or agency identification (including geographic scope of services); evaluator identification (name, title, contact information, and tenure on the contract); evaluation criteria; and narrative summary. The evaluation section uses a four-point performance scale (Satisfactory, Marginal, Unsatisfactory, Not Applicable) to assess contractor performance across seven key factor areas: Technical Performance (seven metrics covering quality of operations, testing, data preparation, quality control, hardware/software practices, and environmental safety); Program Management (nine metrics evaluating contract management effectiveness, cooperation, problem resolution, compliance, emergency response, subcontractor management, and cost control); Transition/Phase-In (two metrics on resource continuity); Employee Retention/Attraction (three metrics on workforce capabilities); Small Business Participation (two metrics); and Cost Performance (four metrics on cost forecasting and control). Evaluators are required to provide detailed narratives for any marginal or unsatisfactory ratings, address any contract terminations for default or convenience, and offer overall recommendations regarding future solicitation of the contractor. Completed questionnaires should be returned to Amy M. Eilerts at the U.S. Army Mission & Installation Contracting Command - Dugway.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFP W911S626RA001 - Conformed SF1449 - Amendment 0006.pdf PDF
Consolidated Q and A - Final - Revised - Amendment 0006.pdf PDF
PWS ENV Support DPG.pdf PDF
SF 30 - Amendment 0006.pdf PDF
SF30 - Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Price Proposal Spreadsheet FINAL - Am 0005.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RFP W911S626RA001 - Conformed SF1449 - Amendment 0005.pdf PDF
Performance Work Statement_PWS_FINAL.pdf PDF
SF30 - Amendment 0005.pdf PDF
Cybersecurity Compliance Requirements V3 FINAL.pdf PDF
SF30 - Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
SF30 - Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
SF30 - Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers V3 FINAL RA001 Amendment 0005.pdf PDF
TE-7 SWMU HWMU 90-Day Site Locations.pdf PDF
RFP 1449 W911S626RA001 Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers V2 RA001 Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
TE-6 CHWSF CONTAINERS.pdf PDF
Technical Exhibit 8- Title V Emission Sources.pdf PDF
RFP W911S626RA001 Amendment 0004 SF 30.pdf PDF
Cybersecurity Compliance Requirements.pdf PDF
Site Visit Roster 5-4-2026.pdf PDF
SF 30 - Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers - V1 5-7-26.pdf PDF
PWS ENV Support DPG - Amendment 0003 5-7-26.pdf PDF
Site Visit Slides 5-4-26.pdf PDF
RFQ W911S626RA001 Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
Revised Attachment 03 - Past Performance PPQ.pdf PDF
Revised Attachment 03 - Past Performance PPQ.pdf PDF
Solicitation W911S626RA001 DD1449.pdf.pdf PDF
RFP Amendment W911S626RA0010002 SF 30.pdf PDF
RFP Amendment W911S626RA0010001 SF 30.pdf PDF
Revised Technical Exhibit 1 - Facilities Map.pdf PDF
Solicitation W911S626RA001 DD1449.pdf PDF
PWS ENV Support DPG Revised 4-28 Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
Solicitation - W911S626RA001 DD1449.pdf PDF
TE-3 Generator Training Requirements.pdf PDF
TE- 4 Groundwater Monitoring Program (GMP).pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Price Proposal Spreadsheet .xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 2 Past Performance References.docx DOCX document
TE-2 90-Day Storage Sites.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - DoL Area Wage Determination.pdf PDF
Local Site Information - DPG.pdf PDF
DPG Visitor Guide.pdf PDF
PWS ENV Support DPG FY26 Final.pdf PDF
TE-1 Facilities Map.pdf PDF
TE-5 DPG UST LUST Management.pdf PDF
ANTITERRORISM_OPERATIONS SECURITY REQUIREMENTS.pdf PDF
Show all 48

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 3

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

1. Contractor: _______________________________________________________________________________

1. Cage Code: _________________________________

1. Contract number: _______________________________________

1. Contract type: ______________________________

1. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

1. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

1. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

1. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

1. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

1. Description of service provided: ______________________________________________________________

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

1. Customer or agency name: _______________________________________________________________________________________

1. Customer or agency description (if applicable): _______________________________________________________________________________________

1. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

1. Evaluator's name: ______________________________________________________________________________________

1. Evaluator's title: ______________________________________________________________________________________

1. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ______________________________________________________________________________________

1. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

S SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

US UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NA NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

The questions shown below should be tailored to the Factors/Subfactors of the instant acquisition.

Technical Performance
S
M
US
NA

T1. Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.

T2. Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts

T3. Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts

T4. Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements

T5. Ability to implement current standard practices for computer hardware design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control

T6. Ability to implement current standard practices for computer software design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control

T7. Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures

Program Management
S
M
US
NA

P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements

P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations

P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts

P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)

P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management

P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

Transition/phase-in
S
M
US
NA

T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

T2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

Employee Retention/Attraction
S
M
US
NA

E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.

Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation
S
M
US
NA

S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan

S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.

Cost Performance
S
M
US
NA

C1. Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

C2. Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

C3. Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

C4. Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting

1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated M (Marginal) or US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes____Default____Convenience____Pending Terminations____
No ____

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:Amy M. Eilerts
U.S. Army Mission & Installation Contracting Command - Dugway
CCMI-CHD-DP
5330 Valdez Circle MS#1
Dugway, UT 84022

Or E-mail to: amy.m.eilerts.civ@army.mil

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .