Attachment 15_Performance_Assessment_Questionnaire_22Oct2024.pdf
PDF 303 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Request for Proposal - Special Operations Forces Training, Engineering and Maintenance Support IV (SOF TEAMS IV) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W900KK25RA004
About this file
This document is a Performance Assessment Questionnaire related to a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Special Operations Forces Training, Engineering and Maintenance Support IV (SOF TEAMS IV), Solicitation # W900KK-25-R-A004. The U.S. Army Contracting Command - Orlando is conducting a competitive source selection and has requested this questionnaire to evaluate offerors' past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to NAICS code 541330 Exception 01. Respondents are asked to provide candid performance assessments across several criteria, including compliance, project management, timeliness, cost control, and customer satisfaction. The resultant contract will be a five-year C-Type contract, with a 12-month base and four 12-month options, to provide hardware and software maintenance, logistics, administration, and minor engineering enhancements to the Training Aids, Devices, Simulators, and Simulations (TADSS) that support the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (Airborne) at Fort Campbell, KY. Proposals are due by 4:00 PM EST on 13 December 2024.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 29
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND-ORLANDO
12211 SCIENCE DRIVE
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32826-3224
22 Oct 2024
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) for Special Operation Forces Training, Engineering and Maintenance Support IV (SOF TEAMS IV); Solicitation # W900KK-25-R-A004
Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Contracting Command – Orlando is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] code 541330 Exception 01. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.
Please complete the enclosure and no later than 10 days after receipt of request or 30 Nov 2024, whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to Contract Specialist Jason VanHoozer at jason.d.vanhoozer2.civ@army.mil.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the Contract Specialist above or the undersigned at justin.r.mauser.civ@army.mil.
Sincerely, JUSTIN R MAUSER
Contracting Officer
NOTE: DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR WHO ORIGINATED THIS
REQUEST
The completion of this questionnaire is requested from your agency/company in order for the Army Contractoing Command to evaluate the aforementioned contractor’s past performance on previous contracts and efforts as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the Government, relative to the award of a contract.
Performance Assessment Questionnaire
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contract Specialist identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale: _________________________________________________________
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments: _________________________________________________________
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contract Specialist identified above in the cover letter @ jason.d.vanhoozer2.civ@army.mil
| 2024-10-22T10:38:52-0400 | |
| MAUSER.JUSTIN.R.1398031047 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .