Attachment_1_-_Pricing_Proposal_rev._A4.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 96 KB Posted

Attached to
Enterprise Asset Management - Software & Implementation State and local contract opportunity
Solicitation number
RFP 26-0007
Issued by
Maricopa County, Phoenix City, Arizona

About this file

This is a Pricing Proposal Response Template for the City of Phoenix's RFP 26-0007 for an Enterprise Asset Management System, a five-year software and implementation contract commencing on or about May 1, 2026 (with an alternative start date of July 1, 2026). The template requires offerors to submit comprehensive cost proposals across implementation, support, and software categories for a five-year period. Key deliverables include project management, enterprise analysis and design, solution development and configuration, testing, training and knowledge transfer, production go-live and hypercare support, and post-implementation transition services. The implementation section requires detailed cost breakdowns for specific phases including validated requirements documentation, fit-gap analysis, system design, workflow automation, integration testing, user acceptance testing, and organizational change management. Offerors must complete all applicable worksheets and provide costs in firm fixed-price format; proposals that do not provide complete cost information may be excluded from the competitive field.

All pricing must be submitted in USD as whole dollars with costs including travel expenses and all associated services necessary to deliver the full proposal. The template includes separate worksheets for implementation costs (Year 1-5), production support costs covering incident triage, defect resolution, patch management, enhancements, and approximately three full-time equivalent support hours annually, and comprehensive software costs covering licensing for all environments (development, test, training, and production). Offerors are required to identify any third-party services separately in the Cost Assumptions worksheet and document all business, economic, legal, programmatic, or practical assumptions underlying their pricing with associated cost impact statements should assumptions prove invalid. Value-added services and optional features may be proposed separately but will not be included in the scored total cost or affect the evaluation; the template provides space for data validation and hosting environment sizing considerations (small, medium, large).

View the file

Other files for this state and local contract opportunity

Other files attached to Enterprise Asset Management - Software & Implementation, newest first.
File Type Posted
RFP_26-0007_Exhibit_6_-_Sensitive_System_Information_Acknowledgement_Form.docx DOCX document
Enterprise_Asset_Management_-_Software_&_Implementation_(Addendum_#1_Revision).pdf PDF
Enterprise_Asset_Management_-_Software_&_Implementation_(Addendum_#1_Revision).pdf PDF
RFP_26-0007_-_Evaluation_Criteria_Questionaire_Rev._A1.pdf PDF
RFP_26-0007_-_Evaluation_Criteria_Questionaire_Rev._A1.pdf PDF
RFP_26-0007_-_Evaluation_Criteria_Questionaire_Rev._A1.pdf PDF
Enterprise_Asset_Management_-_Software_&_Implementation.pdf PDF
Enterprise_Asset_Management_-_Software_&_Implementation.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-RFP_Data_Privacy_Questionnaire.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_3_-_RFP_26-0007_-_Evaluation_Criteria_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-RFP_Data_Privacy_Questionnaire.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_2_-RFP_Data_Privacy_Questionnaire.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_5_-_Physical_Assets_and_Equipment_Inventory.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_5_-_Physical_Assets_and_Equipment_Inventory.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_5_-_Physical_Assets_and_Equipment_Inventory.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_1_-_Detailed_System_Application_Requirements.xlsm XLSM spreadsheet
Exhibit_1_-_Detailed_System_Application_Requirements.xlsm XLSM spreadsheet
Exhibit_1_-_Detailed_System_Application_Requirements.xlsm XLSM spreadsheet
RFP_26-0007_ATTACHMENT_4.docx DOCX document
RFP_26-0007_ATTACHMENT_4.docx DOCX document
RFP_26-0007_ATTACHMENT_4.docx DOCX document
Attachment_1_-_Pricing_Proposal.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_1_-_Pricing_Proposal.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_1_-_Pricing_Proposal.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_3_-_Complexity_Guidelines.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_3_-_Complexity_Guidelines.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_4_-_Quantitative_Assumptions.pdf PDF
Exhibit_4_-_Quantitative_Assumptions.pdf PDF
Exhibit_3_-_Complexity_Guidelines.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_4_-_Quantitative_Assumptions.pdf PDF
Exhibit_2_-_Integration_Inventory.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_2_-_Integration_Inventory.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_2_-_Integration_Inventory.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exhibit_2_-_Integration_Inventory.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Supplemental_Terms_And_Conditions_To_All_Airport_Agreements_(Rev._5-22-24-Formatting_Rev._7-11-24).pdf PDF
Supplemental_Terms_And_Conditions_To_All_Airport_Agreements_(Rev._5-22-24-Formatting_Rev._7-11-24).pdf PDF
Supplemental_Terms_And_Conditions_To_All_Airport_Agreements_(Rev._5-22-24-Formatting_Rev._7-11-24).pdf PDF
Attachment_B_-_FTA_-_Federal_Certifications_(March_2025).pdf PDF
Acceptance_of_Offer_Form_2025.pdf PDF
Acceptance_of_Offer_Form_2025.pdf PDF
Attachment_B_-_FTA_-_Federal_Certifications_(March_2025).pdf PDF
Acceptance_of_Offer_Form_2025.pdf PDF
Attachment_B_-_FTA_-_Federal_Certifications_(March_2025).pdf PDF
Attachment_B_-_FTA_-_Federal_Certifications_(March_2025).pdf PDF
Acceptance_of_Offer_Form_2025.pdf PDF
Addendum_Form.docx DOCX document
Addendum_Form.docx DOCX document
Addendum_Form.docx DOCX document
Addendum_Form.docx DOCX document
Addendum_Form.docx DOCX document
Show all 50

Enterprise Asset Management - Software & Implementation has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

1. Instructions

Project: RFP 26-0007 - Enterprise Asset Management System Pricing Proposal

Response Instructions
Company Name:<Offeror Company Name Here>
This template provides a structured approach for proposing the costs associated with delivering the Enterprise Asset Management System requirements. Offerors must fill out all applicable worksheets and cells as described by the template and individual worksheet instructions. This template is the formal Cost Proposal for the Offeror's proposal. The Offeror warrants that all costs associated with the services as requested in this RFP are included in this workbook.

Offeror must complete the Cost Proposal with the expected cost rate based on the anticipated contract start date as stated in the RFP. However, should the contract start date shift for any reason, the City expects the Offeror to honor the costs as stated in their Cost Proposal. The total bid cost is a firm fixed price proposal, and the determination of the contract start date will not affect the total bid price. The Offeror should prepare a cost proposal to reflect the best available pricing to meet the requested scope of services. The City and the Offeror will establish a payment schedule.

This workbook contains cost information required for submission of a proposal for the services in this RFP. The worksheets within this response template are listed below.

All worksheets must be completed. Any proposals that do not provide complete cost information may be excluded from the competitive field.

All costs to deliver the Offeror's full proposal must be included in this workbook. This includes all associated travel expenses

- Cells requiring Offeror data entry are highlighted in light blue to indicate which cells are available for data entry

- Cells that contain titles and formulas are marked in dark gray highlight

- Cells that are not applicable are marked in black highlight

- Do NOT add, edit, or adjust cells unless specifically requested to do so

- It is the Offeror's responsibility to validate the integrity of the Cost Workbook formulas and links

Key Assumptions:

- Offerors must abide by the deadlines detailed in the RFP

- All figures should be in USD and whole dollars

- Proposals to include costs for a total of 5 years

DO NOTHING ON THIS SHEET.

Table of Contents
ID #WorksheetDescriptions
1InstructionsInstructions and Table of Contents
2Total Cost SummarySummarizes Offeror's total proposed costs
3ImplementationWorksheet for Offeror to itemize the implementation services project costs
4SupportWorksheet for Offeror to itemize application maintenance and operations costs
5SoftwareWorksheet for Offeror to itemize all one-time and ongoing packaged software costs
6Cost AssumptionsWorksheet for Offeror to itemize all assumptions upon which its pricing is dependent
7Value-Added ServicesWorksheet for Offeror to provide costs associated with any value-added services or solution capabilities beyond the features/requirements detailed in this RFP. This section will not be scored as part of the Cost Proposal

2. Total Cost Summary Total Cost Summary

The costs recorded on this Total Cost Summary worksheet should align with the information entered in the following worksheets:

3. Implementation, 4. Support, and 5. Software.

Cells highlighted in gray are automatically calculated based on entries in the aforementioned tabs.

Please note that for Implementation (Years 1–5), Offerors are required to enter their proposed cost breakdown based on the proposed project schedule.

It is the Offeror’s responsibility to ensure that the costs reflect the total proposed cost for the services outlined in this RFP. Components such as data warehouse, document management, and similar elements should be included in the Cost Proposal.

Instructions: do NOT edit this sheet. Prior to submission, confirm all costs reflect the proposal cost total.

Total Cost Summary

DescriptionYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Total
Implementation$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0
Support$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0
Software$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0
Total Costs$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0

&"Arial Black,Regular"&9Phoenix Municipal Court Request for Proposal Attachment F - Cost Workbook

3. Implementation

Implementation Costs

All tasks associated with the implementation services and deliverables described in response to RFP Scope of Work Section 3.9 - Implementation Services and proposed by Offeror shall be included per year (12-month period) for that service, based on Offeror's implementation plan described in response to RFP Scope of Work Section ----.

Note: the information displayed in the cells of this worksheet may be altered. It is the responsibility of Offeror to ensure the spreadsheet calculations are correct. All costs must be fully inclusive.

Instructions: enter costs for existing services in the light-blue cells. If a service will be provided by a third party, notate that as such in the Cost Assumptions tab and cost out that service as its own separate line item. Adjust labels in the white cells as needed. Insert additional rows as necessary where noted to record additional services.

The worksheet allows for one implementation phase. Offerors may add additional rows to correspond with their anticipated implementation plan. All figures should be in USD and whole dollars.

Solution Implementation

#PhaseImplementation ServicesTotal
1OneProject Management
2OneEnterprise Analysis and Design
3OneSolution Development and Configuration
4OneTesting
5OneTraining and Knowledge Transfer
6OneProduction Go-Live and Hypercare
7OnePost Go-Live and Transition to Support
Add additional rows/deliverables as required
Total Implementation Costs Phase I$ - 0

&"Arial Black,Regular"&9Phoenix Municipal Court

Attachment F - Cost Workbook

3. Implementation

Implementation Costs

All tasks associated with the implementation services and deliverables—as described in response to RFP Scope of Work Section 7.10 – Implementation Services and proposed by the Offeror—must be priced as a total cost per deliverable, based on the Offeror’s implementation plan. Each deliverable should reflect the full cost for that specific project phase or milestone.

The project will include a single, common discovery phase, followed by staggered implementation phases by department. Each deliverable should reflect the full cost for that specific milestone or phase, regardless of timing or department.

Note: the information displayed in the cells of this worksheet may be altered. It is the responsibility of Offeror to ensure the spreadsheet calculations are correct. All costs must be fully inclusive.

Instructions: enter costs for existing services in the light-blue cells. If a service will be provided by a third party, notate that as such in the Cost Assumptions tab and cost out that service as its own separate line item. Adjust labels in the white cells as needed. Insert additional rows as necessary where noted to record additional services.

The worksheet allows for one implementation phase. Offerors may add additional rows to correspond with their anticipated implementation plan. All figures should be in USD and whole dollars.

Phase I - Solution Implementation

#Project PhaseMilestone #DeliverableAnticipated Cost
1Project Management1.1Project Management Plan
1.2Change Control Plan
1.3Integrated Change Management Plan
1.4Quality Management Plan
1.5Resource Management Plan
1.6Communication Plan
1.7Deliverable Management Strategy
1.8Requirements Analysis and Management Plan
1.9Ongoing Project Management Cost - Weekly Reports
1.10Ongoing Project Management Cost - Monthly Reports
Project Mangement Phase Total$ - 0
Discovery and Requirements Validation2.1Validated Requirements Document$ - 0
2.2Updated and approved Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM)$ - 0
2.3Fit Gap Analysis Report$ - 0
2.4System Design Document: 1. Detailed solution specifications and workflows;2. Inventory of required reports, integrations, and analytics; 3. System Architecture Document clearly documents the proposed technology environment and integrations;$ - 0
Discovery and Requirements ValidationTotal$ - 0
3Solution Development and Configuration3.1Configured EAM System Modules$ - 0
3.2Workflow Diagrams and Automation Scripts$ - 0
3.3Technical Design Document
3.4Integration and Interface Specifications$ - 0
3.5Standard Reports and Dashboards$ - 0
Solution Development and Configuration Total$ - 0
4Testing4.1Testing Plan$ - 0
4.2Integration Testing Completion
4.3Test Scripts and Test Cases
4.4UAT Plan and Completion Results
4.5Performance and Load Testing Completion
4.6Secuirty and Accessibility Test Completion$ - 0
4.7Riinal Testing Summary Report$ - 0
Testing Total$ - 0
5Training and Knowledge Transfer5.1Training Strategy and Plan$ - 0
5.2Training Needs Assessment Report$ - 0
5.3Knowledge Transfer Plan$ - 0
5.4Training Completion Report$ - 0
Training and Knowledge Transfer Total$ - 0
6Production Go-Live and Hypercare6.1Operational Readiness Review$ - 0
6.2Final As Built System Documentation
6.3Final Technical Documentation
6.4Cutover Plan and Schedule
6.5Cutover Completion Report$ - 0
Production Go-Live and Hypercare Total$ - 0
7Post Go-Live and Transition to Support7.1First live date has been achieved$ - 0
Organizational Change Management Total$ - 0
Organizational Change Management8.1Organizational Change Management Plan$ - 0
8.2Impact and Readiness Assessment$ - 0
8.3Stakeholder Engagement$ - 0
8.4Change Support and Tracking$ - 0
$ - 0
Add additional rows/deliverables as required

$ - 0

Total Implementation Costs Phase I $ - 0

&"Arial Black,Regular"&9Phoenix Municipal Court

Attachment F - Cost Workbook

4. Support

Production Support Costs

The Offeror shall provide costs for all post-implementation and production services, inclusive of all tasks and deliverables required for the maintenance and operation of the new applications, as described in RFP Scope of Work Sections 7.11 – Post Go-Live and Transition to Support and 7.12 – Maintenance and Support Requirements.

Offerors should propose pricing for managed services support, taking into account the needs of each department that will require these services following implementation.

For the purposes of this pricing worksheet, the scope of 'Support' should be assumed to include:

• Incident and defect triage;

• Defect and incident analysis and reporting;

• Provision of ‘break fix’ service for software, configuration, interface and data issues;

• Patch and Upgrades;

• Enhancements;

• Support for required changes to implement T&L operational functionality;

• A pool of hours (approx. three (3) FTEs) to support ongoing system enhancement and implementation of City IT initiatives

Note: The information displayed in the cells of this worksheet may be altered. It is the responsibility of the Offeror to ensure the spreadsheet calculations are correct. All costs must be fully inclusive.

Instructions: Enter annual costs for all support services in the light-blue cells. Insert additional rows as necessary, where noted in the Offeror's implementation plan. Ensure the calculations in the Total column (gray cells) carry through to the Total column for rows added. You may not delete rows once added. All figures should be in USD and whole dollars.

Post Implementation and Production Support Services

Support ServicesYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Total
Managed Services Support$ - 0
On-Going Production Support (Post Implementation)$ - 0
Add additional rows/deliverables as required$ - 0
`$ - 0
$ - 0
$ - 0
$ - 0
$ - 0
$ - 0
Post Implementation and Production Support Services Costs Total$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0

&"Arial Black,Regular"&9Phoenix Municipal Court

Attachment F - Cost Workbook

5. Software

Software Costs

Offeror will provide any and all costs for software which Offeror's solution will leverage to meet the requirements of this RFP. Costs shall include any licensing necessary to cover all environments (e.g., development, test, training, production, etc.). All costs associated with the purchase, delivery, installation, inspection, licenses, and production of the Software components shall be loaded into the Software Cost.

In the Software Specification table below, Offeror shall list the proposed software manufacturer, brand name, module name, and version number for the items being proposed.

It is the responsibility of Offeror to ensure spreadsheet calculations are correct.

Instructions: Enter all one-time and ongoing software costs for each fiscal year by item. Insert additional rows as necessary where noted. Ensure the calculations in the Total column (gray cells) carry through to the Total column for rows added. You may not delete rows once added. All figures should be in USD and whole dollars.

Software/Hosting Costs

Item #Software ItemPer Unit CostYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Total Item Cost
1Item 1$ - 0
2Item 2$ - 0
3Item 3$ - 0
4Item 4$ - 0
Add additional rows/deliverables as required$ - 0
Total Software Cost$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0

Software Specifications

Item #Software ItemEnvironment (e.g. Development, Test, Training, Production)ManufacturerLicense Type (e.g. enterprise, per user, per server)Brand NameModule NameVersion NumberSoftware TypeDetailed Description (e.g. functionality, purpose)Operating SystemEarliest Proposed Purchase Date
1Item 1
2Item 2
3Item 3
4Item 4
Add additional rows/deliverables as required

&"Arial Black,Regular"&9Phoenix Municipal Court

Attachment F - Cost Workbook

6. Cost Assumptions

Cost Assumptions

Offeror must state all assumptions upon which its pricing is determined. Assumptions shall not conflict with the terms and conditions or mandatory requirements of this RFP, and shall not change the requested scope of the RFP as described in the proposal. Offeror must provide a clear understanding to the City of the cost impact to the City if any assumption is determined to be invalid; The City may use these values in consideration of the Cost Proposal.

Instructions: Complete the table below using as many rows as needed. Offeror shall provide a list of all business, economic, legal, programmatic, or practical assumptions that underlie Offeror's response to this RFP along with the associated rationale. Clearly describe the location of the references to the RFP and/or proposal, description of the assumption, rationale for the need of the assumption, and the cost impact to the City should the assumption be invalid. Insert additional rows as needed.

Cost Assumptions

Item #Proposal Section, Page, ParagraphDescriptionRationaleCost Impact if the Assumption is Invalid
1
2
3
4`
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

&"Arial Black,Regular"&9Phoenix Municipal Court

Attachment F - Cost Workbook

7. Value-Added Services

Value-Added Services and Features

Offeror is invited to propose value-added services and/or features that may be deemed beneficial to the ongoing improvement of Enterprise Asset Management System, both near-term and long-term.

Offeror will provide costs for any proposed value-added services and/or features, but these costs will not be included in the Total Cost Summary. Costs for value-added services and/or optional features will not be scored, but are informational for citywide departments.

It is the responsibility of Offeror to ensure spreadsheet calculations are correct. All costs must be fully inclusive.

Instructions: Enter original and annual costs for all value-added services and/or features proposed. Insert additional rows as necessary where noted if Offeror suggests more than five services and/or features. Ensure the calculations in the Total column (gray cells) carry through to the Total column for rows added. You may not delete rows once added. All figures should be in USD and whole dollars.

Value-Added Services

DescriptionYear 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5Total
Value-added Services or Feature #1$ - 0
Value-added Services or Feature #2$ - 0
Value-added Services or Feature #3$ - 0
Value-added Services or Feature #4$ - 0
Value-added Services or Feature #5$ - 0
Add additional rows/deliverables as required$ - 0
Value-Added Services and Features Total Cost$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0$ - 0
Optional Features/Hardware
DescriptionUnit of MeasureUnit Price
Add additional rows/deliverables as required
Value-Added Services and Features Total Cost$ - 0

&"Arial Black,Regular"&9Phoenix Municipal Court

Attachment F - Cost Workbook

Data Validation

Hosting Environment Size
Small
Medium
Large

image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .