Attachment 0013 - Past Peformance Questionnaire - CNR - FINAL - 24 June 2021.pdf
PDF 115 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Combat Net Radio (CNR) Solicitation
- Solicitation number
- W15P7T-21-R-0009
About this file
This solicitation is seeking proposals for a modernized Combat Net Radio Receiver Transmitter to replace existing systems. The Army Contracting Command at Aberdeen Proving Ground is soliciting proposals on behalf of Program Executive Office Command Control Communications - Tactical to procure a new RT-1523E/F radio. Proposals are due by July 5, 2021.
The solicitation requires delivery of a modernized Receiver Transmitter that meets the performance specifications outlined in the Performance Requirements Document. Offerors must also submit plans for hardware evaluation, first article testing, logistics support, training, and life cycle sustainment. Pricing information should be provided using the pricing spreadsheet attachment. Small business participation goals and past performance questionnaires are also included as attachments. Access to certain controlled documents requires verification of eligibility through a DoD contract number or Joint Certification Program membership.
View the file
Other files
Show all 47
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W15P7T-21-R-0009 - ATTACHMENT 0013
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM
Contractor __________________ Contract No.:
POC: Title:
(Name) (e.g., PCO/ACO/TM) (Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)
The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years, from the issue date of this RFP) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
Acceptable
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
The entire questionnaire shall be completed and submitted as part of their proposal submission. Thank you for your assistance.
Signature Date
Typed or Printed Name
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
| W15P7T-21-R-0009 - ATTACHMENT 0013 |
| PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror) |
| PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) |
| Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) |
| PART III. RETURN INFORMATION |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .