Attachment 0002 - TDP Requirements.pdf

Attachment 0002 – Technical Data Package (TDP) Requirements

TDP OPTION SELECTION WORKSHEET

SYSTEM: PdM AWS Vessels DATE PREPARED: 03/16/2022

A. CONTRACT NO. B. EXHIBIT/ATTACHMENT NO. C. CLIN D. CDRL DATA

ITEM NO(s). A007

1. TDP Level (X and complete as applicable.)

A. CONCEPTUAL LEVEL

DEVELOPMENTAL LEVEL

PRODUCTION LEVEL

B. REMARKS:

A Production Level TDP will be required when directed by a Task Order.

2. TYPE AND FORMAT (X all that apply and complete as applicable.)

A.

TYPE 2D: 2D DRAWINGS

TYPE 3D: 3D MODELS ONLY

TYPE 3D: 3D MODELS WITH

ASSOCIATED 2D DRAWINGS

B.

CAD (SPECIFY TYPE) AutoCAD or PTC Creo ISO 10303 STEP FORMAT (Specify STEP PROTOCOL AP203 ed2, AP 214 etc.)

ISO 32000 PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT Adobe Acrobat at minimum 300 dpi

OTHER ELECTRONIC FORMAT (SPECIFY TYPE)

HARDCOPY:

REMARKS: 2D drawings required for all TDP deliverables, 3D may be required by Task Order. If contractor elects to complete 3D models when only 2D is required, contractor shall deliver to the government all 3D models completed under this contract.

3. CAGE CODE AND DOCUMENT

NUMBERS

A. CONTRACTOR CAGE AND DOCUMENT NUMBERS

GOVERNMENT CAGE (COMPLETE 3B & 3C OR 3D)

D. To Be Assigned by CM Gov’t Rep.

B. USE CAGE CODE: 19207 C. USE DOCUMENT NUMBERS: As Assigned

4. DRAWING FORMATS (X one and complete as applicable)

CONTRACTOR FORMAT.

GOVERNMENT FORMAT.

REMARKS: Government CAD Standard Operating Procedure (SOP), PTC Creo start part files, Creo drawing formats, parameters, IBOM sample, and TDP validation checklist will be made available to contractor at SOWM.

5. TDP ELEMENTS REQUIRED (X all that apply )

THE FOLLOWING TDP ELEMENTS ARE REQUIRED:

CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGS/MODELS AND ASSOCIATED LISTS

DEVELOPMENTAL DESIGN DRAWINGS/MODELS AND ASSOCIATED LISTS

PRODUCT DRAWINGS/MODELS AND ASSOCIATED LISTS

COMMERCIAL DRAWINGS/MODELS AND ASSOCIATED LISTS

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS

SPECIAL INSPECTION EQUIPMENT (SIE) DRAWINGS/MODELS AND ASSOCIATED LISTS

SPECIAL TOOLING (ST) DRAWINGS/MODELS AND ASSOCIATED LISTS

SPECIFICATIONS

SOFTWARE DOCUMENTATION

SPECIAL PACKAGING INSTRUCTIONS (SPI) DRAWINGS/MODELS AND ASSOCIATED LISTS

6. ASSOCIATED LIST (X and complete as applicable)

A. PARTS LIST (X ONE) (1) INTEGRAL (2) SEPARATE

B. DATA LISTS (X ONE) (1) NOT REQUIRED (2) REQUIRED (SPECIFY LEVELS OF ASSEMBLY)

C. INDEX LISTS (X ONE) (1) NOT REQUIRED (2) REQUIRED (SPECIFY LEVELS OF ASSEMBLY)

D. WIRING LISTS (X ONE) (1) NOT REQUIRED (2) REQUIRED (SPECIFY LEVELS OF ASSEMBLY)

E. INDENTURED DATA LISTS (X ONE) (1) NOT REQUIRED (2) REQUIRED (SPECIFY LEVELS OF ASSEMBLY)

F. APPLICATION LISTS (X ONE) (1) NOT REQUIRED (2) REQUIRED (SPECIFY LEVELS OF ASSEMBLY)

7. APPLICABILITY OF STANDARDS. The following Standards apply: (X as applicable)

ASME Y14.100

ENGINEERING DRAWING PRACTICES

WITH APPENDICES:

B C D E

ASME Y14.24 TYPES AND APPLICATIONS OF

ENGINEERING DRAWINGS

ASME Y14.34 ASSOCIATED LIST

ASME Y14.35M REVISION OF ENGINEERING

DRAWINGS AND ASSOCIATED LIST

ASME Y14.41 DIGITAL PRODUCT DEFINITION DATA

PRACTICES

ASME Y14.5 DIMENSIONING AND TOLERANCING

OTHER STANDARDS APPLY AS

DESCRIBED: ASME Y14.1

COMPANY STANDARDS PERMITTED

YES NO

8. OTHER TAILORING (Attach additional sheets as necessary)

BLOCK 5.

Delivered TDP shall include PRODUCT DRAWINGS/MODELS AND ASSOCIATED LISTS

Special Tooling Drawings and Associated Lists. Special tooling (e.g. jigs, dies, fixtures, molds, patterns, and other equipment or manufacturing aids) drawings developed for the Government under contract and required for production, maintenance, and logistics support shall be delivered. These models/drawings and associated lists shall permit the Government or a competent manufacturer to produce the special tooling that duplicates the performance characteristics of the original tooling and manufacturing of an acceptable item

TDP Validation and Quality Control The contractor shall perform the validation checklist as defined in this attachment, or in a superseding list provided by the government, before submitting TDP to the Government. The contractor shall verify that TDP components open without errors before each delivery.

File Naming Convention Parts and assemblies shall be named using the following convention with the appropriate file extension: CAGE_Part Number_revision_Drawing title_date.ext i.e.

19207_12678810_A_PENETRATIONS, HULL, FWD, INSTALLATION_20210923.pdf

Security Markings All statements, notices, and data rights legends shall be applied to all drawings on each sheet, adjacent to the title block. Associated lists and other related documents that are primarily of a textual nature shall have markings applied to each page. On models, all markings shall be applied to initial layer at opening. There shall be no ‘FOUO’ (For Official Use Only) markings on any technical data.

Item Unique Identification (IUID) Marking Requirement All items requiring IUID markings in accordance with DFAR 252.211-7003 (paragraph C) shall incorporate labeling or marking information as part of the TDP in accordance with MIL-STD-130. Applicable 2D CAD drawings and 3D CAD solid model TDP shall include IUID marking information. The IUID information in drawings, solid models and associated lists shall indicate method of marking or labeling, label or plate material composition, data matrix location and orientation and other applicable information in accordance with MIL-STD-130.

Version Control Each revision shall be a new master, and the contractor shall retain all approved revisions (versions) of each document and model representation to provide a traceable history in order to access the correct revision when needed. The contractor shall ensure that all representations (i.e., Adobe PDF, CAD, STEP, etc.) of a single version or revision of data are identical. Revised data shall cite the Engineering Release Record (ERR) Number in the description of change block, in addition to a detailed description of the changes, and applicable CAD parameter as authorization to release the data.

3D-Specific Requirements The following requirements apply to 3D models. If only 2D drawings are to be delivered, requirements labeled “3D” do not apply.

Metadata Attributes - All 3D CAD parts and assemblies shall incorporate parameters for Government configuration and data management requirements.

3D Solid Model Geometric Validation Proprieties (GVP) Checks. Contractor shall conduct geometric validation properties checks on all Government native (fully defined feature based parametric) part and assembly solid models. Disregard manufacturing process models.

The minimum 3-D Component Geometry, Assembly Construction, Validation Checks are:

3D Component Geometry

1) Each model must contain only 1 solid.

2) Models are single part files consisting of modeling entities and attributes.

3) Models contain drafting entities necessary to present geometrical dimensioning and tolerancing information.

4) Models are generated for every part number that is production intent, production related, or to be prototyped.

5) No reference geometry models reside within the model.

6) Models contain no surface data (non-commercial components).

7) Parameters (attributes) are present and contain acceptable values.

8) Models contain proper density

9) Layers contain correct objects.

10) Models contain coordinate system.

11) Models that are positioned in more than one location on the vehicle end-item shall be designated at the absolute coordinated system and located in the vehicle end-item position in the assembly. All other models shall be designated in this vehicle position.

12) Models are saved in an isometric view.

13) Models and views not used are deleted.

14) All corner and fillet radii are modeled

15) All unnecessary wireframes are deleted.

16) Models passed all native CAD system (design software) solid model validation checks.

17) Models passed all interference checks (bolt/nut and gasket is ok).

18) Models contain no tiny objects or tiny edges.

19) Modeling tolerances applied in accordance with Contractor’s geometry and CAD creation standard. A default tolerance value shall be indicated in standard.

20) Model does not have any unnecessary parent/child relationships.

3D Assembly Construction

21) Assembly contains CSYS/WCS displayed in absolute zero (x=0, y=0, z=0).

22) Assembly in body position.

23) Assembly can contain standard parts; however, standard parts must be UNMODIFIED from original.

24) Assembly is fully constrained.

-tailoring continued on next page-

-tailoring continued from previous page-

3D Component and Assembly in Explicit Non-Parametric Merged Solid Shrink-Wrap Format

25) Part and assemblies in merged solid format.

26) Complete with sufficient envelope.

27) Accurate mounting and mating dimensions (intefaces to Governent baseline configuraiton items).

28) Body position in accordance with absolute coordinate system.

29) Includes applicable interface characteristics.

30) Current mass proprieties, weight, center of gravity and inertia information.

31) Incorporation of user-defined TDP metadata attributes.

32) Quality level at highest reasonable selection.

33) Skeletons, quilts, and small surfaces removed.

34) Real colors not gray-neutral colors presented.

ASME Y14.100 TAILORING CHECKLIST – SHEET 1

A. Drawing Media (Choose all that apply)

(1) Non-digital (Specify )

(2) Digital Data (3D Native, 2D neutral CAD, Adobe PDF, Word, etc.)

(3) Other (Specify )

B. Drawing Format (Choose One)

(1) Contractor

(2) Government (forms supplied by the Government)

(3) Government (forms supplied by the Contractor)

C. Drawing Sheet Size and Format (Choose One)

(1) ASME Y14.1

(2) ASME Y14.1M

D. Application Data (Choose all that apply)

(1) Contractor option

(2) Required

(a) On drawing

(b) By reference (Specify )

(c) Contractor option

(3) General use or multi-use notations

(a) allowed

(b) not allowed

E. Drawing Detail (ASME Y14.24) (Choose all that apply)

(1) Monodetail

(2) Multidetail

(3) Tabulated

F. Dimensioning and Tolerancing (Choose all that apply)

(1) Metric

(2) Decimal-inch

(3) Application of ASME Y14.5M

(a) Specific issue (revision) required (Specify issue )

(b) Issue in effect ( IAW latest ASME Y14.5 )

(4) Fractional-inch

G. Drawing Notes (Choose One)

(1) On drawing

(2) By reference (Specify )

(3) Contractors option

H. Types of Drawings (ASME Y14.24) (both, as needed)

(1) Contractor selects (as needed)

(2) Government selects (as needed)

ASME Y14.100 TAILORING CHECKLIST – SHEET 2

I. Maintenance of Multi-Sheet Drawings (ASME Y14.35M) (Choose all that apply)

(1) Drawing revision level (DOD preferred)

(2) All sheets same revision level

(3) Sheet revision level

J. Redrawn Drawings (redrawing without change) (ASME Y14.35M ) (Choose one)

(1) Advance revision level

(2) Revision level is not advanced

K. Maintenance of Revision History (Choose all that apply)

(1) Contractor option

(2) Optional methods

(a) Remove one or more revision record as required

(b) Remove all previous revision history

(c) Remove all revision history but retain line entry for revision authorization and date of revision

(d) Remove all except revision preceding current

(e) Maintain revision history in its entirety

L. Adding Sheets (ASME Y14.35M) (Choose all that apply)

(1) Contractor option

(2) Optional methods

(a) Renumber sheets using consecutive whole numbers

(b) Number added sheets in decimal-number sequence

(c) Number added sheets in alpha-numeric sequence

M. Deleting Sheets (ASME Y14.35M) (Choose all that apply)

(1) Contractor option

(2) Optional methods

(a) Renumber all affected remaining sheets

(b) Affected remaining sheets not renumbered (revision status of sheets block is updated with notations such as CANC or DEL)

N. Markings on Engineering Drawings (Choose one)

(1) Special items and processes apply

(a) Applicable symbols (IAW latest ASME Y14.100)

(b) Applicable special notes (Specify )

(2) Special items and processes do not apply

O. Associated Lists (ASME Y14.34M) (Choose all that apply)

(1) Non-digital (Specify )

(2) Digital Data (Native CAD Models, Drawings, and PDF)

(3) Other (Specify )

ASME Y14.100 TAILORING CHECKLIST – SHEET 3

P. Types of Associated Lists (ASME Y14.34M) (Choose all that apply)

(1) Parts Lists

(a) Integral

(b) Separate

(c) Contractors option

(2) Application List (on drawing)

(3) Data Lists

(4) Index Lists

(5) Indentured Data List

(6) Wire List (as needed)

(7) Other (Specify )

Q. Angle of Projection (ASME Y14.3M) (Choose one)

(1) 3rd Angle

(2) 1st Angle

R. Language (Choose one )

(1) English required

(2) Other (Specify )

S. Applicability of Appendices

(1) Appendix B

(a) as detailed herein

(b) as modified

(2) Appendix C

(a) as detailed herein

(b) as modified

(3) Appendix D

(a) as detailed herein

(b) as modified

(4) Appendix E

(a) as detailed herein

(b) as modified

US ARMY - TACOM/TARDEC

CAD MODEL AND DRAWING VALIDATION CHECKLIST

Do the PDF drawings match CAD 2D drawings?

Are the parts/assemblies fully constrained?

Are dimensions on drawings sourced from models? Are drawings free of Cosmetic Dimensions? Are dimensions mostly driving dimensions?

Are Parameters in models correct?

Are Notes, Markings, Title blocks, and Revision blocks sourced from models?

Are the model tree (in model) and parts lists (in drawings) the same?

Did the CAD models pass geometric integrity checks?

Are NHA and Used-On properly populated on drawings?

Do Notes include…

"APPLICABLE STANDARDS/SPECIFICATIONS:

A. ASME Y14.100-2013

B. ASME Y14.5M-2009" (when applicable)"

Is Distribution statement accurate and complete?

Is Export Control statement accurate?

Is ‘Destruction Statement’ accurate and complete?

Are accurate 'data rights' included with appropriate legends per DFARS?

Is Title Block consistent with standards? Is Title Block complete?

Is Revision block complete?

Do specs and stds listed exist? Are spec part numbers structured properly?

Is the IBOM consistent with Parts lists?

Are weldments' notes applied correctly?

Are GD&T markings correct?

Are assigned part numbers correct? Are sub-assemblies and sub-parts using correct Government and commercial numbers?

Are Vendor Item Control (VIC) and Source Control (SC) drawings accurate? Did contractor receive approval for SC drawings? Are the drawing formats correct?

Are the Material and SPEC callouts correct?

Is the design accurate and complete?

Can it be produced by a third party from the TDP developed?

Do drawings contain inspection and acceptance criteria?