Attach_9_Relevant_Project_Experience_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 40 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 140P8326R0002
About this file
This is a Relevant Project Experience Questionnaire template for solicitation 140P8326R0002, issued by the National Park Service for the Olympic National Park Hurricane Ridge Water rehabilitation project. Offerors are required to submit responses demonstrating relevant experience completing similar projects, limited to the quantity and timeframes specified in the solicitation documents.
The questionnaire requires offerors to provide detailed information for each referenced project, including project title, location, period of performance, brief description, and project owner contact information. Offerors must list all contractors (prime and subcontractors) involved in the referenced project, specifying their role, trade, price, and performance period in calendar days for both original and final schedules. Responses must address seven specific evaluation questions: description of work performed, alignment with Project Experience elements in Section L of the solicitation, explanation of any price and schedule changes with supporting reasons, problems encountered and resolutions implemented, successful means and methods with rationale for replication on the proposed project, and any additional relevant project information. The template is expandable to multiple pages as needed to adequately address each question.
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Relevant Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P8326R0002
Submit responses to the questions below that demonstrate your relevant experience successfully completing projects of a similar nature and scope as this requirement per the instructions in the Solicitation. Limit submittals to the quantity of projects and timeframes required in the solicitation. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror |
| Company Name |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Period of Performance: |
| MM/DD/YYYY – MM/DD/YYYY |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
Choose an item.
Choose an item.
Choose an item.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .