Att J-1_Past Performance Letter and Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 43 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FY25 Underground Utilities IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA448424R0026
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for an Underground Utilities contract at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst (JBMDL), New Jersey, issued by the 87th Contracting Squadron of the Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command. The questionnaire is designed to assess a contractor's past performance across multiple evaluation areas including performance and supportability, management capabilities, and timeliness/scheduling, using a 1-5 rating scale.
The related federal contract opportunity (Solicitation Number FA448424R0026) is for a Fiscal Year 2025 Underground Utilities Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. The scope of work includes repair and construction of water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater systems, including lift stations, water wells, treatment plants, infrastructure improvements, concrete work, asphalt paving, excavation, grading, and related civil engineering services. The contracting officers for this opportunity are Dana Wright and Will Kearns, who can be contacted for questions about the solicitation or past performance evaluation.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE AND COVER LETTER
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO:
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This company is currently being considered for an Underground Utilities contract at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey (JBMDL, NJ)
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact the Contracting Officer, Dana Wright, at dana.wright.6@us.af.mil or, the Contract Specialist, Will Kearns, at william.kearns.4@us.af.mil
1 Attachment Past and Present Performance Questionnaire Controlled Unclassified Information When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.
PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT QUESTIONAIRE
87th Contracting Squadron ATTN: Will Kearns Phone Number: 518-882-8723 william.kearns.4@us.af.mil
A. OFFEROR’S INFORMATION:
Company Name:
Unique Entity ID (UEI)
Address:
Point of Contact (POC):
Title of POC:
Telephone Number:
Email:
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Company/Organization Name:
Address:
Point of Contact (POC):
Title of POC:
Telephone Number:
Email:
C. CONTRACT INFORMATION:
Contract Title:
Contract Number:
Contractor’s Roll (Prime or Sub)
Contracting Officer (CO):
(CO) Phone Number:
(CO) Email:
Status (i.e. on-going, complete):
Contract Amount
(total amount of base plus any options):
Type of Contract (FFP, CPFF, etc):
Performance Period (Specific Dates)
D. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS (relevant contract deliverables):
E. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on a scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the Offeror’s performance or situation. If you are unable to provide a rating because the contract did not include performance for a certain aspect, and/or performance was not observed, and/or information was not available, then mark “NA”.
| 5 |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 2 |
| 1 |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
a. PERFORMANCE and SUPPORTABILITY:
(1) The Contractor provided quality service that adhered to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of professional conduct.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
(2) The Contractor provided quality personnel that met or exceeded the required qualifications
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
(3) The Contractor successfully met deliverables established by the contract
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
(4) The labor turnover in key personnel and other labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Contractor Performance.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
(5) The Contractor had the ability to respond effectively to contract performance issues.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
b. MANAGEMENT:
(1) The Contractor demonstrated an overall effective and quality management effort.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
| (2) The Contractor maintained an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) or Project manager (PM) was apprised of technical and cost issues. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
| (3) The Contractor cooperated with the Government or Customer in providing flexible, proactive, and effective solutions to critical contract issues. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
| (4) The Contractor provided proactive and effective management of its subcontractors. (If applicable) |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
(5) The Contractor maintained an effective ongoing Quality Control Plan to provide for monitoring, analyzing and improving quality contract performance.
NA
c. TIMELINESS/SCHEDULE:
(1) The Contractor consistently demonstrated an ability to quickly recruit instructors or replacement personnel on time to meet the Government or Customer needs.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
| (2) The Contractor demonstrated the ability to retain instructors or employees to support contract/task order requirements so that work schedules would not be disrupted. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
(3) The Contractor demonstrated the ability to plan for and provide replacement candidates during the life of the contract to include pre- planned absences, unplanned illnesses, or an extended leave of absence.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| N/A |
| (4) Credentialing Packages/On-Site Access requests (to include current and complete information) were presented in timely fashion to the applicable facility. |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
(5) The Contractor was able to resolve customer complaints quickly and effectively.
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| NA |
F. OTHER:
(1) Would you award this firm another contract? ( ) Yes, ( ) No. If you answered “No” provide an explanation.
(2) Was the contract terminated for default? ( ) Yes, ( ) No. If you answered “Yes”, provide an explanation.
(3) Has the Contractor ever been given a cure notice, show cause notice, suspension of progress payments, etc.?
( ) Yes, ( ) No. If you answered “Yes”, provide an explanation.
(4) Based upon the information you provided and using the definitions provided in the evaluation criteria above, the overall performance rating you would give this Contractor is:
Exceptional___ Very Good___ Satisfactory___ Marginal___ Unsatisfactory___ Unknown___ COMMENTS: (ALL Unsatisfactory, Marginal, or Exceptional ratings require comments to support the same. Failure to provide comments will render questionnaire void and will not be accepted by the Government):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .