Atch 6_Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 53 KB Posted

Attached to
VTE Elevator Maintenance Services at Whiteman AFB Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA462525Q1004
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Global Strike Command

About this file

The document is a Past Performance Questionnaire for a VTE Elevator Maintenance Services contract (Solicitation FA462525Q1004) at Whiteman Air Force Base. The 509th Contracting Squadron is seeking to evaluate potential contractors' past performance through this detailed questionnaire, which requests comprehensive performance ratings across 14 key areas including professional relationships, staffing, safety, problem identification, timeliness, regulatory compliance, and overall contract execution.

The associated federal contract opportunity is a small business set-aside procurement for vertical transportation equipment maintenance services, with a base year and four option years running from October 2025 through September 2030. The contract will be administered by the Department of the Air Force Global Strike Command, with a NAICS code of 238290 and a small business size standard of $22.0 million. Respondents are asked to complete the questionnaire electronically and email it to specified Air Force contracting personnel, with ratings ranging from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory to help assess a contractor's capability to perform the required elevator maintenance services.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to VTE Elevator Maintenance Services at Whiteman AFB, newest first.
File Type Posted
Atch 1_VTE PWS Rev1 22Jul2025.pdf PDF
Atch 2_Bid Schedule 25Q1004 Rev1 21Jul2025.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
25Q1004 VTE Elevator Mx Vendor Questions and Answers.pdf PDF
Atch 3_WD 1986-0497 Rev 59 dtd 12Feb2025.pdf PDF
Atch 5_VTE Location Map.pdf PDF
VTE Combo 25Q1004.pdf PDF
Atch 7_Provisions and Clauses.pdf PDF
Atch 2_Bid Schedule 25Q1004.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 1_VTE PWS 30 Apr 2025.pdf PDF
Atch 4_Elevator Asbestos Rpt.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CUI

When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

FA462525Q1004, Attachment 6 – Past Performance Questionnaire The 509th Contracting Squadron of the Air Force Global Strike Command is in the process of competitively selecting a source for VTE Elevator Maintenance Services on Whiteman AFB.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors’ past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offerors’ ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offerors’ performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to: volcious.shelton@us.af.mil and amanda.fragoso@us.af.mil (Attn: A1C Volcious Shelton, Amanda Fragoso). Please call A1C Volcious Shelton at 660-687-2945 or Amanda Fragoso at 660-687-3668 if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated, and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Amanda Fragoso Contracting Officer

Attachment Past Performance Questionnaire

Controlled By: 509 Bomb Wing Controlled By: 509th Contracting Squadron CUI Category: PROCURE Distribution/Dissemination Controls: FED ONLY POC: Amanda Fragoso, amanda.fragoso@us.af.mil, 660-687-3668

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division and CAGE Code):
Click or tap here to enter text.
B. Contract Number:
Click or tap here to enter text.
C. Contract Type (e.g., fixed price, cost reimbursable, etc.):
Click or tap here to enter text.
D. Project Title:
Click or tap here to enter text.
F. Period of Performance
1. Original Completion Date:
Click or tap to enter a date.
2. Actual Completion Date:
Click or tap to enter a date.
3. Reason for difference (if applicable):
Click or tap to enter a date.
G. Contract Dollar Value
1. Original contract dollar value:
$Click or tap here to enter text.
2. Actual contract dollar value:
$Click or tap here to enter text.

3. Reasons for difference (if applicable):

Click or tap here to enter text.

H. Description of work performed:

Type description of work here.

I. Was this a competitively awarded contract?
☐Yes ☐ No
J. Contractor’s Role:
☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:
Click or tap here to enter text.
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
Click or tap here to enter text.
C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):
Click or tap here to enter text.

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:
Click or tap here to enter text.
B. Respondent’s title:
Click or tap here to enter text.
C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:
Click or tap here to enter text.

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/ANOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.
The Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
N/A

1. Developed and maintained a cooperative and productive professional working relationship through all phases of the contract.

Comments:

2. Provided licensed, experienced technicians needed to meet contract requirements.

3. Maintained sufficient staffing and equipment to complete the work in an effective and efficient manner for the duration of the contract.

4. Kept/Provided a full and comprehensive record of all required actions, as required by the terms of the contract.

5. Demonstrated the ability to complete work in a safe and timely manner.

6. Promptly, identified problems, hazardous material, or other site issues to the Agency.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and corrective action was effective.

8. Paid all employees, subcontractors, and suppliers as required by the terms of the contract.

9. Discarded all waste or hazardous material in accordance with state, federal, local, and environmental procedures/regulations.

10. Provided and used the proper personal protective equipment (PPE) for all work in accordance with OSHA regulations.

11. Provided suggested solutions for the Agency’s consideration and partnered with the Agency to find cost effective solutions to issues encountered during the course of work.

12. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance on this contract?

13. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain.

☐ Yes ☐ No

14. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes ☐ No

Additional remarks (these are important; please include comments):

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-Mail to: volcious.shelton@us.af.mil & amanda.fragoso@us.af.mil (Attn: A1C Volcious Shelton, Amanda Fragoso) CUI Page 2 of 6

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .