Atch 4 MS Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

196 KB Posted

Attached to
Mobile Sensors Operation & Maintenance Follow-on
Solicitation number
FA702221R0002
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for evaluating offerors on a solicitation for mobile sensor operation and maintenance services. The services include supporting the operation and maintenance of radars located on United States Naval ships for the Air Force Technical Applications Center. The questionnaire evaluates technical, schedule, cost, product assurance, testing, training, integrated logistics support, management, responsiveness, personnel, subcontract management, and maintenance factors. Respondents are asked to provide ratings and remarks on the offeror's performance across these factors for previous relevant contracts. The completed questionnaires should be returned to specified Air Force email addresses by the response deadline.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Industry Questions MS 030421.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation Amendment FA702221R00020002.pdf PDF
Atch 8 Mobile Sensors Sec L rev1.docx DOCX document
Atch 1 MS PWS rev1.pdf PDF
Industry Questions MS 021921.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 15 Brevard County WD.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 9 Mobile Sensors Section M rev1.docx DOCX document
Atch 13 SubK_consent_letter rev1.docx DOCX document
Solicitation Amendment FA702221R00020001.pdf PDF
Atch 9 Mobile Sensors Section M.docx DOCX document
Atch 7 MS DD254.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRLs.pdf PDF
Atch 11 MS Section L M Cross Reference.pdf PDF
dRFP betaSAM Q and A.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 12 Total Evaluated Price.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 6 MS WD.pdf PDF
Atch 5 CBA MS 2017-2021.pdf PDF
Atch 14 Professional Comp Matrix .xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation - FA702221R0002.pdf PDF
Atch 3 MS Past Performance Information Sheet.docx DOCX document
Atch 10 Cross Ref Matrix.docx DOCX document
Exhibit B CMP.pdf PDF
Atch 13 SubK_consent_letter.docx DOCX document
Atch 2 MS GFP.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 1 MS PWS.pdf PDF
Atch 8 Mobile Sensors Sec L.docx DOCX document
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information IAW FAR2.101 & 3.104

I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Role (e.g., Prime, Subcontractor, Teaming Partner, Joint Venture Partner):

E. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF):

F. Clearance Requirement (e.g., Unclassified, N AC, Secret, Top Secret):

G. Program Title:

H. Brief Program Description:

I. Period of Performance:

II. RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE

A. Respondent Name(s)/Agency:

B. Phone Number(s)/E-mail:

C. Position Title(s) (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO):

D. Other suggested points of contact:

III. GENERA L COMM ENTS:

IV. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Please indicate your performance rating for the contractor by circling or place an "X" over the appropriate code using the performance evaluation scale below. Ratings are defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE RATING

E EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

S SATISFACTORY -The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT A PPLICABLE - Unable to rate the contractor's performance.

Attachment 4 – Past Performance Questionnaire

FA7022-21-R-0002

Respondents should explain their rating in the remarks section for any rating of Unsatisfactory or Not Applicable, and ratings that might contradict official Past Performance documentation (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARs)). If more space is needed, remarks may be continued on separate pages. Please identify Factor and Sub-factor and question number.

TECHNICAL FACTOR - Rate the Offeror's performance for the following sub-factors:

A. Product/System Performance

1. Overall performance in planning and controlling the program.
E
S
M
U
N
2. Overall consistency and reliability of performance.
E
S
M
U
N

A 1. Engineering Analysis

3. Sustainment and obsolescence engineering.
E
S
M
U
N
4. Studies and analysis methodology.
E
S
M
U
N
5. Reports and Briefings quality.
E
S
M
U
N

A 2. Engineering Design/Support

6. Design, test, integration and demonstration of systems to meet specifications & sustainability of aging systems.
E
S
M
U
N
7. Design of systems to meet required reliability/maintainability specifications or goals.
E
S
M
U
N
8. Integration or implementation of new technology & services.
E
S
M
U
N
9. Performance on innovative or highly complex tasks.
E
S
M
U
N
10. Reconfiguration of Government-owned software & hardware.
E
S
M
U
N

A 3. Software Development

11. Software maintenance performance.
E
S
M
U
N

12. Configuration management, control identification, status accounting & base-lining of software.

E
S
M
U
N

REMARKS:

B. Schedule

13. Completion of major technical milestones on schedule (e.g. PDR/CDR)
E
S
M
U
N
14. Adherence to logistics milestones.
E
S
M
U
N
15. Adherence to overall contract schedule goals.
E
S
M
U
N
16. Adherence to required deliveries of technical data, plans, software documentation, reports, and other CDRL items.
E
S
M
U
N
17. Data submittals are IAW contractual specifications.
E
S
M
U
N

16. Timeliness of ECP (CCR) submissions.

E
S
M
U
N

REMARKS:

C. Cost Performance

17. Adherence to estimated costs & contract cost goals.
E
S
M
U
N
18. Achievement on incentive type contract performance, cost, schedules, including award fees.
E
S
M
U
N
19. Accuracy of costs reports.
E
S
M
U
N
20. Timeliness of cost reports.
E
S
M
U
N
21. Quality & completeness of cost reports.
E
S
M
U
N
22. Ability to control costs.
E
S
M
U
N

REMARKS:

D. Product Assurance

23. Produces quality products that meet contractual specification for design & performance.

E
S
M
U
N
24. Configuration Control procedures are in place and used when reasonable.
E
S
M
U
N

REMARKS:

E. Test and Evaluation

25. First article test and test reports are IAW contractual specifications.
E
S
M
U
N
26. Completion of Government quality acceptance and performance tests on schedule
E
S
M
U
N
27. Performance in planning, conducting and reporting on tests and/or demonstrations.
E
S
M
U
N

REMARKS:

F. Training

28. Training plan meets training objectives.
E
S
M
U
N

REMARKS:

G. ILS PROGRAM

29. Development of logistics plan to include travel, working with foreign nationals, and support in remote locations worldwide.
E
S
M
U
N
30. Identification of incomplete/late tasks (causes, impacts, & resolution)
E
S
M
U
N
31. Response to government directed changes.
E
S
M
U
N
32. Identification of pre-operational support provided during system testing.
E
S
M
U
N
33. Develops & implements a high quality maintenance program to include documentation (e.g. technical data & drawings) and training.
E
S
M
U
N
34. Performs timely & accurate trend analysis & incorporates results into engineering reports.
E
S
M
U
N

REMARKS:

H. MANAGEMENT

35. Government property control.
E
S
M
U
N
36. Safety
E
S
M
U
N
37. Security to include COMSEC, physical and personnel
E
S
M
U
N
38. Shipping and handling.
E
S
M
U
N
39. Compliance with contract terms and conditions.
E
S
M
U
N
40 Working relationship (both management and technical) with Government personnel and associate contractors.
E
S
M
U
N
41. Organization structure adequate in span of supervision
E
S
M
U
N

I. RESPONSIVENESS

42. Responsiveness to technical contract changes.
E
S
M
U
N
43. Managing and resolving problems.
E
S
M
U
N
44. Ability to respond to short and no notice emergencies.
E
S
M
U
N
45. Management cooperation in negotiations and problem resolution.
E
S
M
U
N

REMARKS:

J. PERSONNEL

46. Ability to recruit and retain quality, qualified personnel.
E
S
M
U
N
47. Sufficiently manned to meet contractual requirements.
E
S
M
U
N

REMARKS:

K. SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT

48. Overall performance in planning and controlling subcontractors.
E
S
M
U
N

REMARKS:

L. OPERATION

49. Operates technical complex equipment during critical timelines.
E
S
M
U
N
50. Solid operational knowledge of radar systems.
E
S
M
U
N
51. Solid working knowledge of communications, cryptographic, and support systems.
E
S
M
U
N
52. Solid operational knowledge of high powered phased array and dish radar systems.
E
S
M
U
N
53. Fundamental operations knowledge of navigation and weather systems, and supporting subsystems.
E
S
M
U
N
54. Specific knowledge of radar tracking operations.
E
S
M
U
N

REMARKS:

M. MAINTENANCE

55. Maintains technically complex equipment during operational mission requirements.
E
S
M
U
N
56. Solid maintenance knowledge of radar systems.
E
S
M
U
N
57. Solid working knowledge of communications cryptographic, and supporting systems.
E
S
M
U
N
58. Solid maintenance knowledge of high powered phased array and dish radar systems.
E
S
M
U
N
59. Fundamental maintenance knowledge of navigation and weather systems, and supporting subsystems.
E
S
M
U
N
60. Specific maintenance knowledge of radar tracking operations.
E
S
M
U
N
61. Solid maintenance knowledge of remote radar systems and subsystems.
E
S
M
U
N

REMARKS:

N. OTHER

62. Number of award/incentive fees denied.
E
S
M
U
N

State Reasons as Appropriate:

63. Number of incidences of suspended progress payments, cure notices, show cause notices, or other Government remedial actions (please specify).

Suspended Progress Payments: Cure Notices: Show Cause Notices: Other:

State Reasons as Appropriate:

64. Please discuss any additional information that might be applicable to future contract awards to this contractor:

65. Please provide the following information regarding cost/price:

(1) Original Contract Cost or Pr

(2) Value of Negotiated Contr

(3) Actual/Projected Cost to Co

(4) Baseline Estimate at Compl

(5) Total Negotiated Changes

(6) Cost Under run/Over run

GENERAL COMMENT (Choose proper response and explain your choice in the remarks)E

l. Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I __________ award to him today given that I had a choice.

*Circle one of the following:

a) Definitely would, b) probably would, c) might or might not, d) probably not, e) definitely not

2. Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for convenience or default or are there any pending terminations? (Applicable only to Government Contracts)

*Circle one of the following:

a l ) Yes or b 1 ) No: and *Circle one of the following a 2) Convenience, b 2) Default, or c 2) Pending Termination.

3. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

*Circle one of the following:

a) Yes or b) No

4. Do you know of another source that has knowledge of this contractor's performance?

*Circle one of the following:

a) Yes [please provide Name/Company/Phone/E-mail below] or b) No

REMARKS:

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Email Address:

Dawn M. Melchione dawn.melchione@us.af.mil Tanya Turner-Fells Tanya.turner-fells@us.af.mil image2.png image20.png image1.png image10.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .