Atch 11 MS Section L M Cross Reference.pdf

PDF 644 KB Posted

Attached to
Mobile Sensors Operation & Maintenance Follow-on
Solicitation number
FA702221R0002
Issued by

About this file

This document contains evaluation criteria for a technical proposal in response to solicitation FA702221R0002 for operation and maintenance of radars located on United States Naval Ships. Key elements include staffing plans to recruit, hire and retain qualified personnel; configuration management plans to perform software and hardware control and track systems; integrated logistics support plans to ensure personnel, parts and equipment are available as needed; quality control plans to evaluate compliance and resolve issues; and transition/mobilization plans to recruit and train personnel within one month. The Air Force Technical Applications Center seeks these non-personal services to maintain radars and communications equipment aboard ships and at shore facilities on a 24/7 basis.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Industry Questions MS 030421.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation Amendment FA702221R00020002.pdf PDF
Atch 8 Mobile Sensors Sec L rev1.docx DOCX document
Atch 1 MS PWS rev1.pdf PDF
Industry Questions MS 021921.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 15 Brevard County WD.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 9 Mobile Sensors Section M rev1.docx DOCX document
Atch 13 SubK_consent_letter rev1.docx DOCX document
Solicitation Amendment FA702221R00020001.pdf PDF
Atch 9 Mobile Sensors Section M.docx DOCX document
Atch 7 MS DD254.pdf PDF
Exhibit A CDRLs.pdf PDF
Atch 4 MS Past Performance Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
dRFP betaSAM Q and A.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 12 Total Evaluated Price.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 6 MS WD.pdf PDF
Atch 5 CBA MS 2017-2021.pdf PDF
Atch 14 Professional Comp Matrix .xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation - FA702221R0002.pdf PDF
Atch 3 MS Past Performance Information Sheet.docx DOCX document
Atch 10 Cross Ref Matrix.docx DOCX document
Exhibit B CMP.pdf PDF
Atch 13 SubK_consent_letter.docx DOCX document
Atch 2 MS GFP.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch 1 MS PWS.pdf PDF
Atch 8 Mobile Sensors Sec L.docx DOCX document
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA7022-21-R-0002

Atch 11

L.5.2.4. Technical Capability to Perform Mission Sub-factor 1, Staffing Plan

Section M Section II, C. Factor 1: Technical Capability & Technical Risk – Volume II

3. Subfactor 1 Staffing Plan

L.5.2.4.1Element 1: Recruit, qualify, hire and retain qualified and experienced personnel to operate and maintain the systems in a harsh marine environment; Element 2: Ensure qualified personnel at contract award; Element 3: Demonstrate staffing subject matter expertise in mission operations; Element 5: Demonstrate staffing understanding of the importance of relationships with our Mission Partners (MSC, Planners, Analysts, DLA, Riverside Research Institute, etc.) for Radar manning/O&M

3.1 Element 1: Recruit, qualify, hire and retain qualified and experienced personnel to operate and maintain the systems in a harsh marine environment; Element 2: Ensure qualified personnel at contract award; Element 3: Demonstrate staffing subject matter expertise in mission operations; Element 5: Demonstrate staffing understanding of the importance of relationships with our Mission Partners (MSC, Planners, Analysts, DLA, Riverside Research Institute, etc.) for Radar manning/O&M

L.5.2.4.1 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s capability to provide radar operations and maintenance support as described in the PWS, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to include:

3.1.1 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in providing radar operations and maintenance support as described in the PWS, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to include:

L.5.2.4.1.1 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s mechanisms and incentives applied to attract and retain high quality skillsets required to fulfill the radar requirements of the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Details regarding incentives used to hire, retain, maintain in a harsh marine environment.

3.1.1.1 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in the mechanisms and incentives applied to attract and retain the high quality skillsets required to fulfill the requirements of the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Details regarding incentives used to hire, retain, maintain in a harsh marine environment. Offeror’s proposed hiring and retention strategies will be evaluated to determine the proposed approach will sufficiently meet staffing requirements.

L.5.2.4.1.2 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s approach to provide subject matter experts at each remote location.

3.1.1.2 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in providing subject matter experts at each remote location.

L.5.2.4.2Element 1: Recruit, qualify, hire and retain qualified and experienced personnel to operate and maintain the systems in a harsh marine environment; Element 2: Ensure qualified personnel at contract award; Element 3: Demonstrate staffing subject matter expertise in mission operations; Element 5: Demonstrate staffing understanding of the importance of relationships with our Mission Partners (MSC, Planners, Analysts, DLA, Riverside Research Institute, etc.) for Communication manning/O&M:

3.2 Element 1: Recruit, qualify, hire and retain qualified and experienced personnel to operate and maintain the systems in a harsh marine environment; Element 2: Ensure qualified personnel at contract award; Element 3: Demonstrate staffing subject matter expertise in mission operations; Element 5: Demonstrate staffing understanding of the importance of relationships with our Mission Partners (MSC, Planners, Analysts, DLA, Riverside Research Institute, etc.) for Communication manning/O&M:

L.5.2.4.2 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s capability in operating and maintaining all Mobile Sensors communications equipment located aboard all platforms, along with certain equipment located within the MSMO/SMMF described in PWS, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to include: (PWS 2.7)

3.2.1 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in providing communication operation and maintenance support aboard all platforms, along with certain equipment located within the MSMO/SMMF, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to include:

L.5.2.4.2.1 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s mechanisms and incentives applied to attract and retain high quality skillsets required to fulfill the communications requirements of the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Details regarding incentives used to hire, retain, maintain in a harsh marine environment.

3.2.1.1 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in the mechanisms and incentives applied to attract and retain the high quality skillsets required to fulfill the requirements of the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Details regarding incentives used to hire, retain, maintain in a harsh marine environment. Offeror’s proposed hiring and retention strategies will be evaluated to determine the proposed approach will sufficiently meet staffing requirements.

L.5.2.4.3 Element 4 (Training/reach-back/MSMO and management/key positions:

3.3 Element 4 (Training/reach-back/MSMO and management/key positions:

L.5.2.4.3 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s capability to train, have reach-back capability, management office, and key personnel to provide operations and maintenance support as described in the PWS, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to include:

3.3.1 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in accomplishing the requirements of the Service Summary (SS) of the PWS to include.

L.5.2.4.3.1 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s management structure within the contractor’s management office and its extended management structure at the Mobile Sensors sites and how this supports contract responsibilities 24 hours per day. Additional duties at the MSMO office include managing the SMMF.

3.3.1.1 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in the management structure within the contractor’s management office (MSMO) and its extended management structure at the Mobile Sensors sites and how this supports contract responsibilities 24 hours per day.

L.5.2.4.3.2 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s organization by presenting a graphical organizational structure, including charts, with descriptions of proposed roles, responsibilities, and relationships for all organizational elements. Address mission coverage for all contract periods and provide a coverage plan for all positions.

3.3.1.2 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in the organizational structure, included charts and a graphical organizational structure, rationale for proposed roles, responsibilities, and relationships for all organizational elements. Adequately addressed mission coverage for all contract periods and provided an acceptable coverage plan for all positions.

L.5.2.4.3.3 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s effective cross-utilization of personnel. The proposal must detail percentage of workforce that will be cross-utilized, while maintaining required skill mix and staffing levels.

3.3.1.3 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in the cross-utilization of personnel. The proposal sufficiently detailed percentage of workforce that will be cross –utilized

L.5.2.4.3.4 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s identification of “one-deep” positions on the organizational chart and explain the plan for backing up these positions.

3.3.1.4 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in identifying “one-deep” positons on the organizational chart and sufficiently explained the plan for backing up these positions.

L.5.2.4.3.5 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s initial and continual training plan, mitigating, managing or eliminating performance risks and ensuring personnel, including alternatives/backups, are qualified for collection of 100% of operational events with no loss of effectiveness.

(PWS para 2.1.)

3.3.1.5 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in the initial and continued training plan which mitigated, managed or eliminated performance risks and ensure personnel, including alternatives/backups, are qualified for collection of 100% of operational events with no loss of effectiveness.

L.5.2.4.4 Element 6 Minor and Sustaining Engineering Tasks: 3.4. Element 6 Minor and Sustaining Engineering Tasks:

L.5.2.4.4 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s ability to prioritize resources and workload in an effort to support minor and sustaining engineering tasks that include: (PWS 2.8.2/2.8.4)

3.4.1 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in prioritizing resources and workload in an effort to support minor and sustaining engineering tasks.

L.5.2.4.4.1 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s capability in accomplishing the required repair, replacement or modification to correct deficiencies of system hardware and software.

3.4.2 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in accomplishing the required repair, replacement or modification to correct deficiencies of system hardware and software.

L.5.2.4.4.2 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s capability of making recommendations for improvements.

3.4.3 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in making recommendations for improvements.

L.5.2.4.4.3 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s ability to accomplish a rapid turnaround of mission critical discrepancies (system or equipment malfunction, incongruity, divergence, etc. which could cause mission failure).

3.4.4 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in accomplishing a rapid turnaround of mission critical discrepancies (system or equipment malfunction, incongruity, divergence, etc. which could cause mission failure).

L.5.2.5 Technical Capability to Perform Mission Sub-factor 2, Contractor Configuration Management Plan Initial configuration management plan (CMP) guidance will be provided by MSPO (Government)

4. Sub-factor 2: Contractor Configuration Management Plan

4.1 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in providing configuration management as described in the PWS to include:

4.1.1 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in performing software and hardware configuration control.

4.1.2 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in tracking all mobile sensor radar and communication systems.

L.5.2.5 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s capability to provide configuration management as described in the PWS to include:

L.5.2.5.1 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s ability to perform adequate software and hardware configuration control.

L.5.2.5.2 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s ability to track all mobile sensor radar and communication systems.

L.5.2.5.3 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s ability in implementing feedback and recommendations for improvement of the CMP process.

4.1.3 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in implementing feedback and recommendations for improvement of the CMP process.

L.5.2.6 Technical Capability to Perform Mission Subfactor 3, Integrated Logistics Support Plan

5. Sub-factor 3: Integrated Logistics Support Plan

L.5.2.6 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s ability to provide logistical support to highly technical seaborne mobile assets and operate worldwide, also include: (PWS 2.8)

5.1 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise to provide logistical support to highly technical seaborne mobile assets and operate worldwide which also included: (PWS 2.8)

L.5.2.6.1 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s ability to ensure all people, parts and pieces are where they should be when required to meet operational schedules.

5.1.1 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise that ensured all people, parts and pieces were in place to meet operational schedules.

L.5.2.6.2 The proposal shall provide insight into how the offeror plans to address remote overseas shipping, storage, and procurement of radar components as well as how to provide capability to repair systems to meet operational schedules.

5.1.2 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise that addressed remote overseas shipping, storage, and procurement of radar components as well as having the capability to repair systems to meet operational schedules.

L.5.2.6.3 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s risks associated with the management of personnel and resources required for maintaining and sustaining radar, communications, software, hardware and support equipment and impact on mission operations, to include shipyard.

5.1.3 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in mitigating the risks associated with the management of personnel and resources required for maintaining and sustaining radar, communications, software, hardware and support equipment and impact on mission operations, to include shipyard.

L.5.2.7 Technical Capability to Perform Mission Subfactor 4, Quality Control Plan (The technically acceptable Quality Control Plan will become an attachment to the awarded contract).

6. Sub-factor 4: Quality Control Plan

L.5.2.7.1 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s expertise in Quality Control for your organization, including lines of authority, and provide a proposal that will successfully evaluate compliance, find and document problems, and monitor corrective actions ensuring successful and timely problem resolution. Explain how recurring problems will be prevented.

6.1 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in Quality Control, including lines of authority, and provided a reasonable and effective proposal that will successfully evaluate compliance, find and document problems, and monitor corrective actions, ensuring successful and timely problem resolution while adequately explaining how recurring problems will be prevented.

L.5.2.7.2 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s system for recording, computing/assessing performance measurement data, and monitoring corrective actions to ensure successful and timely problem resolution.

6.2 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in the system process for recording, computing/assessing performance measurement data, and monitoring corrective actions to ensure successful and timely problem resolution.

L.5.2.7.3 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s documents and records your company will develop, maintain, and utilize as part of the Quality Control Plan.

6.3 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise of the documents and records that will be developed, maintained, and utilized as part of the Quality Control Plan.

L.5.2.7.4 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s method for gathering information, evaluating performance based on the requirements of the PWS, and reporting the results to the Government Contracting Officer Representative.

6.4 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in gathering information, evaluating performance based on the requirements of the PWS, and reporting the results to the Government Contracting Officer Representative.

L.5.2.7.5 The proposal shall present examples of how the Offeror has successfully implemented quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

6.5 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in a successfully implemented quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

L.5.2.8 Technical Capability to Perform Mission Sub-factor 5, Transition/Mobilization

7. Sub-factor 5: Transition/Mobilization

L.5.2.8.1 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s identification of risks and associated mitigations in transition planning.

7.1 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in identifying risks and associated mitigations in transition planning.

L.5.2.8.2 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s mobilization plan that addresses recruiting, training, certifying, and qualifying personnel during the one-month mobilization period that results in sufficient numbers of fully qualified employees. Provide a graphical time-line schedule that addresses start and completion of each event (e.g., interviewing, hiring, human resource actions, training, maritime medical checks and start work dates).

7.2 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in recruiting, training, certifying, and qualifying personnel during the one-month mobilization period that results in sufficient numbers of fully qualified employees; including graphical time-line that addresses start and completion of each event (e.g., interviewing, hiring, human resource actions, training, and start work dates).

L.5.2.8.3 The proposal shall provide insight into the offeror’s process for ensuring all employees performing on this contract possess a current clearance level, as required by the position, prior to performing services and the contractor possesses a current industrial clearance IAW PWS.

7.3 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal demonstrates an understanding of and expertise in ensuring that all employees performing services on this contract possess a current clearance level, as required by the position, prior to starting work. The Offeror also provided verification of current industrial clearance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .