Atch (1)_FY24_CC_DRAFT_SOW_31May23.docx

DOCX document 304 KB Posted

Attached to
N61340 - Draft RFP and Pre-Solicitation Conference - Ready Relevant Learning Fiscal Year 2024 Content Conversion Aviation (RRL FY24 CC Aviation)
Solicitation number
N6134023R0073
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RRL_FY24_CC_PSC_Brief_Final.pdf PDF
RRL_FY24CC_Aviation_PSC_Industry_RSVP_Attendance_Lists_12Jun23.pdf PDF
Atch (1)_APPENDIX D Risk Assessment Example Format - 24 Jan 2023.pptx PPTX presentation
GFI_U-ATI-1000_NTP_Workbook_Draft_6Jun23.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch (1)_APPENDIX G RRL Use of Blooms Taxonomy Action Verbs - 18Apr23.docx DOCX document
Atch (8)_RRLGM 22-0001 PALS_13May22.pdf PDF
Atch (1)_APPENDIX H RRL Media Characteristics - 05 Mar 2023.docx DOCX document
GFI_RRL_FY24CC_Aviation_Appendix_A_DRAFT_6Jun23.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch (L-3) Relevancy Information_N6134023R0073_6Jun23.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Exh_F_RRL_FY24CC_(F00X)_Training_CDRLs_18Apr23.docx DOCX document
Atch (2)_NAWCTSD_DIT_Form_Jan2023.pdf PDF
Exh_A_RRL_FY24CC_(A00X)_Eng_CDRLs_13Mar23.docx DOCX document
Atch (1)_APPENDIX B Acronym List - 22May23.docx DOCX document
Atch (L-1) Q-A Form_N6134023R0073.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch (7)_SOW Appendices C and H aligned_22May23.docx DOCX document
Atch (L-5) Small Business Participation Committment Document (SBPCD)_N6134023R0073.docx DOCX document
Exh_B_RRL_FY24CC_(B00X)_Admin_CDRLs_10Apr23.docx DOCX document
Atch (9)_Complex_Media_VSIM_Construct_1Jun23.docx DOCX document
Atch (L-4) CLIN Pricing Form_N6134023R0073_22May23.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch (1)_APPENDIX F RRL Operational Engaging Instructional Strategies_22May23.docx DOCX document
Atch (L-2) Contractor Performance Assessment Questionaire (CPAQ)_N6134023R0073.docx DOCX document
Atch (1)_APPENDIX C Terms and Definitions_22May23.docx DOCX document
Atch (3)_NETC_RRL_Style_Guide_19NOV2021.docx DOCX document
FY24_CC_N6134023R0073_DRAFT_6Jun23.docx DOCX document
Atch (5)_NAVEDTRA 136 Question Bank Layout Template_3May23.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch (L-6) Offeror Summary Table.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch (6)_RRL Interactive Media Definitons Examples_23Nov22.pdf PDF
Atch (1)_APPENDIX E RRL Content Delivery Modes - 18Apr23.docx DOCX document
Show all 28

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Statement of Work for the FY24 Content Conversion Effort 31 May 2023

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

FOR

READY RELEVANT LEARNING (RRL)

FISCAL YEAR 2024 (FY24) CONTENT CONVERSION (CC)

FOR

aVIATION tECHNICIAN (at) AND AIRCREW (AW) RatingS Prepared For:

Commander, United States Fleet Forces Command (CFFC) Norfolk, VA 23551-2487

Prepared By:

Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division (NAWCTSD) 12211 Science Drive Orlando, FL 32826

31 May 2023

DISTRIBUTION A. Approved for public release. Distribution is unlimited.

This page intentionally left blank.

Change Log

Date
Section Number
Section Title
Change

Statement of Work for the FY24 Content Conversion Effort 31 May 2023 vii Table of CONTENTS

Para.TitlePage
1Scope6
1.1Rating Requirements6
1.2Course, Module and Lesson Structure7
1.3Content Delivery Modes and Media Types7
1.4Coordination With Third Parties8
1.5List of SOW Appendices8
1.6Terms and Definitions9
1.7Terms and Definitions9
1.8Government-Furnished Information (GFI)9
1.9Government-Furnished Software, Tools, and Equipment10
1.10Government-Furnished Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)10
2Applicable Documents10
2.1Government Documents10
2.2Department of Defense (DOD) Documents11
2.3Department of the Navy (DON) Documents12
2.4Authoring Instructional Materials (AIM) Documents13
2.5Industry Standards13
2.6Other Documents14
3Requirements17
3.1General Requirements17
3.1.1RRL Content Conversion Planning17
3.1.1.1Life-Cycle Model Management17
3.1.1.2Infrastructure Management17
3.1.1.3Program Assessment and Control17
3.1.1.4Program Decision Management18
3.1.2Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs)18
3.1.3Online Management System (OMS)18
3.1.4Scrum Board Requirements19
3.1.5Configuration Management (CM)19
3.1.6Contractor Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)19
3.1.7Quality Assurance and Management Plan (QAMP)19
3.1.7.1Control of Government-Furnished Information (GFI)19
3.1.8Communications Plan20
3.2Security20
3.2.1Operations Security (OPSEC)20
3.2.2Unclassified Contractor-Owned Network Security – Safeguarding of Unclassified Controlled Technical Information21
3.2.3Cyber Incident and Compromise Reporting21
3.2.4Access to DOD Installations, Government Information and Information Technology (IT) Systems – Personnel Security Background Checks21
3.2.5Personnel Security – Background Checks22
3.2.6International Traffic and Arms Regulation22
3.2.7Personnel Security – Reporting of Adverse or Derogatory Information Related to Contractors22
3.2.8Government-Issued Personal Identification Credentials23
3.2.9Contractor “Out-Processing” Policy23
3.2.10Protection of Critical Program Information (CPI)23
3.2.11Transmission of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Via Email23
3.2.12Transmission of CUI via DOD Safe Access File Exchange (DOD SAFE)24
3.3Cybersecurity24
3.3.1Critical Program Information (CPI)24
3.3.2Cybersecurity Training and Certification24
3.3.3Software Integrity Testing and Certification25
3.4Management Requirements25
3.4.1Integrated Product Team (IPT)25
3.4.2Work Planning and Scheduling26
3.4.3Subcontractor Management and Reporting26
3.4.4Risk Management26
3.4.5Program Progress, Tracking, and Reporting27
3.4.6Conferences, Meetings, and Reviews27
3.4.6.1Post Award Conference (PAC)27
3.4.6.2In-Process Review (IPR) Meetings29
3.4.6.3Daily Standup Meeting, and or Biweekly Sprints29
3.4.6.4Sprint Planning Meetings29
3.4.6.5Sprint Demos and Product Design Reviews29
3.4.6.6Systems Engineering IPT (SEIT) Sprints29
3.4.6.7Data-Gathering Trips30
3.5RRL Content Conversion Requirements30
3.5.1Training Material Design30
3.5.1.1Design for Training Product Delivery Environments31
3.5.1.1.1Design Implementations to Reduce TRANET Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) Bandwidth Usage32
3.5.1.1.2Design for Experience Application Program Interface (xAPI) Requirements33
3.5.1.1.3Design for Mobile Requirements34
3.5.2IMI, Media Types34
3.5.2.1NETC Style Guide Updates34
3.5.2.2Lesson Prototypes35
3.5.2.3Photos and Graphics35
3.5.2.4Test Package Development (Assessments)36
3.5.2.5Course Testing Plan (Administration)36
3.5.2.6Training Conduct Support Document (TCSD)37
3.5.2.7Training Program Structure Documents (TPSD)37
3.5.2.8Training Systems Support Document (TSSD)37
3.5.2.9Test & Evaluation for IMI38
3.5.2.9.1T&E Program Components for NETC LMS-deployed IMI (LMS IMI)38
3.5.2.9.1.1LMS CHaRMS Record Process38
3.5.2.9.1.2LMS System Integration & Testing (LMS SI&T)38
3.5.2.9.1.3LMS Government Content Acceptance Testing (LMS GCAT)39
3.5.2.9.2T&E Program Components for Stand-Alone Configuration IMI (SAC IMI)39
3.5.2.9.2.1SAC Contractor Internal Testing39
3.5.2.9.2.2SAC Government Content Acceptance Testing (SAC GCAT)39
3.5.2.10T3 and Course Pilot Preparation40
3.5.2.10.1Instructional Media Package (Media Source Files)40
3.5.2.10.2Instructional Media Package (Final Curriculum Delivery)40
3.5.3Complex Media (VSIM) Types40
3.5.3.1Systems Engineering Processes40
3.5.3.1.1System Requirements Analysis40
3.5.3.1.2Traceability41
3.5.3.1.3System Architectural Design41
3.5.3.1.4Test Readiness Review41
3.5.3.1.5Design Baseline41
3.5.3.2Agile/Scrum Approach to Software Engineering42
3.5.3.2.1Agile Software Development42
3.5.3.2.2Complex Media (VSIM) SPD42
3.5.3.2.3Release Backlog In-Progress Review (RBIPR)42
3.5.3.2.4Complex Media (VSIM) Design Technical Interchange Meeting (TIM)43
3.5.3.2.4.1Complex Media (VSIM) Design TIM Entry Criteria44
3.5.3.2.4.2Complex Media (VSIM) Design TIM Exit Criteria44
3.5.3.2.5Complex Media (VSIM) In-Progress Reviews45
3.5.3.2.6Software Architectural Design45
3.5.3.2.7Software Product Design45
3.5.3.2.8Software Implementation45
3.5.3.2.8.1Software Unit Construction and Testing46
3.5.3.2.9Software Integration46
3.5.3.2.10Cold Start Process46
3.5.3.2.10.1Software Product Execution46
3.5.3.2.10.2Software Media Marking46
3.5.3.2.10.3Media and Storage Devices47
3.5.3.3Test & Evaluation for Complex Media (VSIM)47
3.5.3.3.1Test Methods47
3.5.3.3.1.1Quality of Test Data47
3.5.3.3.1.2Code Analysis48
3.5.3.3.2Software Changes during Test48
3.5.3.3.3Non-Conformance Reporting System48
3.5.3.3.4T&E Program Components for Complex Media (VSIM)49
3.5.3.3.4.1Internal Contractor Testing (Simulation DT-D1)49
3.5.3.3.4.2Test Readiness Review (TRR)49
3.5.3.3.4.3Government Acceptance Testing (Simulation IT-D1)50
3.5.3.3.4.4Test Discrepancy Review Board (TDRB)50
3.5.3.4Detailed Tasks for Complex Media (VSIM)50
3.5.3.4.1Complex Media (VSIM) SI Appendices to the Rating SPD51
3.5.3.4.2Training Support Products51
3.5.3.4.2.1Complex Media (VSIM) T3 and Course Pilot Preparation51
3.5.3.4.2.2Instructional Media Package (Media Source Files)51
3.5.3.4.2.3Instructional Media Package (Final Curriculum Delivery)51
3.5.4Human Factors Engineering (HFE)52
3.5.5Train the Trainer (T3)52
3.5.5.1T3 Entry Criteria52
3.5.5.2T3 Exit Criteria53
3.5.6Course Pilot53
3.5.6.1Course Pilot Entry Criteria54
3.5.6.2Course Pilot Exit Criteria54
3.5.6.3Regression Testing Following T3 and Course Pilot Events54
3.5.6.3.1Post Pilot GCAT55
3.5.6.3.2Post-Pilot Complex Media (VSIM) Regression Test55

Statement of Work for the FY24 Content Conversion Effort 31 May 2023

Statement of Work for the FY24 Content Conversion Effort 31 May 2023

Table of CONTENTS

Para. Title Page viii

LIST OF TABLES

Table and TitlePage
Table 1. Rating Classification Requirements1
Table 2. Content Delivery Modes and Media Types3
Table 3. Government Documents5
Table 4. DOD Documents6
Table 5. DON Documents7
Table 6. AIM Documents7
Table 7. Industry Standards8
Table 8. Other Documents9

Table 9. Photo/Graphic Traceability Cross Reference Matrix

STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)

FOR RRL FY24 CC

FOR AVIATION TECHNICAIN (AT) AND AIRCREW (AW) RATINGS

1 Scope This Statement of Work (SOW) defines the basic requirements to be performed under this Ready Relevant Learning Content Conversion (RRL CC) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) contract for Fiscal Year 2024 Content Conversion (FY24CC). The detailed requirements will be defined in this ID/IQ SOW and each specific Delivery Order (DO). This ID/IQ SOW documents the contractor tasks for the design, development, testing, and delivery of products in support of the RRL CC effort using innovative instructional systems design, systems engineering, and training assessment approaches in conjunction with new and modernized technologies to support accession training while simultaneously supporting the broader Sailor 2025 (S2025) overarching goal of improving Sailors’ transfer of training to the operational work environment. The following represents examples of the broader S2025 goals:

a. Modernize and/or improving designated courses through the conversion, development and modification of data, as prescribed by the government, so they are compatible with the waterfront or shipboard environment and contribute to the acquisition of actionable knowledge (i.e., practical knowledge that will be activated by and recognized as relevant to operational work contexts and events).

b. Employing modernized media, instructional, and motivational strategies that are engaging (see Appendices G and I).

In context of RRL, Content Conversion focuses on the instructional design, strategies, media, and content within a given course. The effort requires using Fleet-validated data and designing, developing and delivering improved training products that meet the concepts of innovative instructional systems design and modernized technologies. Content Conversion is far more involved than simply converting existing media from one format to another (e.g., converting PowerPoint or Flash files to HTML5), it includes correcting content errors, developing new content, modernizing and developing new media, and resolving content discrepancies in erroneous data as part of the effort.

This effort requires agile methodologies. The increasing complexity of systems, decentralization of tools and technologies, and rapid pace of change pose challenges in delivering meaningful, secure, and modern capabilities that meet user expectations on time and within budget. In the context of RRL, addressing these challenges requires a significant change in approach to planning, acquiring, and delivering capability to the warfighter. This methodology identifies key focus areas that merit special attention to the NAVAIR mission encompassing “Speed to the Fleet” by:

· Fostering a paradigm shift from a waterfall to an Agile approach in training systems solutions.

· Encouraging incremental approaches to planning, designing and delivering.

· Providing continuous elaboration of requirements and design.

· Expecting daily collaboration between Government and contractor cross-functional teams. In this, Government is embedded as part of the contractor workflow, product backlogs and sprint cycles.

· Developing mutually agreed-upon definition of done for a sprint/release cycle, and metrics informing the Government about the quality of capability developed and delivered allow the Government to continually assess contractor performance toward achieving program outcomes.

· Demonstration of Minimum Viable Products (MVP) to identify capabilities that will be deployed.

Rating Requirements The contractor shall perform tasks for the design, development, testing, and delivery of products for the ratings listed in Table 1 (highest classification of GFI is SECRET).

Table 1. Rating Classification Requirements

Rating
Highest Information Classification
Facilities Access Classification
When Classification Required

Aviation Technician (AT)

· Aviation Electronics Technician – Intermediate (ATI)

· Aviation Electronics Technician – Organizational (ATO)

SECRET
SECRET
At Contract Award

Aircrew Ratings

· Naval Aircrewman Mechanical (AWF)

· Naval Aircrewman Helicopter (AWS)

· Naval Aircrewman Operator (AWO)

· Naval Aircrewman – Tactical Helicopter (AWR)

· Naval Aircrewman – Avionics (AWV)

SECRET
SECRET
At Contract Award

Course, Module and Lesson Structure Using the Government provided Functional Requirements Document (FRD), Instructional Performance Requirements Document (IPRD), Instructional Media Requirements Document (IMRD), complex media (e.g., Virtual simulation (VSIM)) fidelity data, and requirements workbook (SOW Appendix A) as a basis, the contractor shall determine the course, module, and lesson structure for each AT and AW rating’s curricula. The contractor shall derive the requirements for the software solutions, design, develop, test, and deliver products meeting the specified requirements.

Content Delivery Modes and Media Types Training products are grouped under two content delivery modes: Instructor-Facilitated Interactive Training (IFIT) and Self-Directed Interactive Training (SDIT) (see Appendices C and F). Table 2 shows the two overarching content delivery modes and a high-level view of associated media types to support the RRL effort, as identified in the requirements workbook and complex media fidelity data.

NOTE: There is no traditional Instructor-Led Training Computer-Assisted Instruction (ILT-CAI) media type or instructional strategy in the RRL Content Conversion effort; rather, the contractor shall design and develop interactive multimedia instruction (IMI) for use as IFIT that meets the requirements for being hosted in Navy eLearning (NeL). In context for Ready Relevant Learning, “IMI” is the preferred term and shall be interpreted generically as electronic media, replacing both Interactive Courseware (“ICW”) with “SDIT” and “ILT-CAI” with “IFIT” as terms regardless of whether the product is instructor-led or student-led, and including considerations for software management tools (e.g., Learning Management System, Learning Record Store).

Table 2. Content Delivery Modes and Media Types

Media
Delivery Method
IFIT
SDIT
Actual Equipment
X
Actual Equipment Trainer
X
Augmented Reality (AR)
X
Checklist
X
X
Decision Tables
X
X
Demonstration Animation
X
X
Demonstration Video
X
X
Hybrid Mobile App
X
X
Immersive Virtual Environment (IVE)
X
X

Intelligent Tutoring System

X

Level 1 IMI
X
X
Level 2 IMI
X
X
Level 3 IMI
X
X
Mixed Reality (MR)
X
Mobile Friendly/Mobile Ready Website
X
X
Mobile Optimized Website
X
X
Native App
X
X
Paper/Paper-based
X
X
Personal Computer (PC) Simulation
X
X
Picture/Diagram
X
X
Responsive Design Website
X
X
Training Aid
X
X
Training Support Material
X
X
Virtual Reality (VR)
X

Coordination With Third Parties As required, the contractor shall coordinate with the Government and any third-party contractor responsible for developing complex media (e.g., VSIM, Augmented/Mixed/Virtual Reality, or Immersive Virtual Environment) system development (e.g., Government labs, Multipurpose Reconfigurable Training System (MRTS) 3D, PORTS). In such cases, the contractor shall design and develop training support materials that work together with the third-party developed system.

List of SOW Appendices To complete this effort, the contractor shall follow the guidance and requirements in this SOW to include the following Content Conversion appendices to this SOW:

· Appendix A: Rating requirements covered by this SOW.

· Appendix B: Acronyms used within this SOW.

· Appendix C: Terms and definitions used within and outside this SOW regarding RRL Content Conversion.

· Appendix D: Risk Assessment Example Format.

· Appendix E: Descriptions of the RRL content delivery modes.

· Appendix F: Operational definitions of engaging instructional strategies to be used in content development under this SOW.

· Appendix G: List of Bloom’s taxonomy action verbs.

· Appendix H: Description of media type characteristics.

Terms and Definitions Appendix C provides the terms and definitions that are critical to this SOW. These terms and definitions supersede any similar terms and definitions that may be found in other sources.

Terms and Definitions Appendix C provides the terms and definitions that are critical to this SOW. These terms and definitions supersede any similar terms and definitions that may be found in other sources.

Government-Furnished Information (GFI) The Government will provide the following on an as-is basis for the ratings:

a. Complex media fidelity data for each rating, as available.

b. IPRD, at DO award.

c. IMRD, at DO award.

d. FRD, at DO award.

e. Initial Training Project Plan (TPP) for each course, at DO award.

f. Initial Training Course Control Document (TCCD), at DO award.

g. Existing Trainee Guides, Lesson Plans, Training Course Control Document (TCCD), Training Project Plan (TPP), Curriculum Outline of Instruction (COI) ) for each rating, as available, at DO award.

h. Access to existing data for each rating in Content Planning Module/Learning Object Module (CPM/LOM), if available, such as existing Trainee Guides, Lesson Plans, TCCD, TPP, COI, NLT 30 days after DO award.

i. Examples of existing courseware, if available, at contract award. (For RRL the Government does not intend to provide all existing IMI or source files as GFI to discourage the contractor from simply copying and pasting content into a different format. The contractor shall plan as though no existing courseware materials are available.)

j. Applicable Style Guides, if available, at contract award. Updates, if available, NLT 30 days after contract award.

k. Technical Publications (e.g., technical manuals), if available, at contract award. Updates, if available, NLT 30 days after contract award.

Government-Furnished Software, Tools, and Equipment The contractor shall request access to the NAWCTSD TRANET-U Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) to test training materials. The contractor shall provide the necessary hardware, software, tools, personnel, materials, and facilities, not otherwise furnished by the Government, to perform the tasks specified by this SOW.

Government-Furnished Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) Government SME access will be provided on a not-to-interfere basis. The Government’s SMEs will be available face-to-face for key data collection activities (interviews, workshops, and reviews) and will be available for providing follow up information via phone, video-teleconference (VTC), or approved virtual meeting tools, whenever practical.

Applicable Documents The following represent a list of applicable guidance documents for this effort. In the event of a conflict between the SOW and the references cited herein, the contents of this SOW take precedence. Nothing in this SOW, however, supersedes applicable laws and regulations, unless a specific exemption has been obtained. These documents will be provided to the contractor as GFI, if they are not readily available to the contractor via the Internet. For all documents listed below, the latest versions apply.

Government Documents Table 3. Government Documents

Document Number
Document Title and/or Description

National Security Agency (NSA) Configuration Guide

NAVAIRINST 4355.19E
System Engineering Technical Review Process
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 800-44
Guidelines on Securing Public Web Servers

United States (U.S.) Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Final Credentialing Standards for Issuing Personal Identity Verification

Copies of Defense Intelligence Security Agency (DISA) Configuration Guide can be obtained from http://disa.mil/.

Copies of NSA Configuration Guides can be obtained from http://www.nsa.gov/ia/mitigation_guidance/security_configuration_guides/index.shtml.

Copies of National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) documents can be obtained from http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/PubsSPs.html. Copies of OSHA standards can be obtained from http://www.osha.gov.

Copies of OPM document can be obtained from http://www.opm.gov/investigate/resources/index.aspx.

Department of Defense (DOD) Documents Table 4. DOD Documents

DOD Document Number
Document Title and/or Description
Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 1322.26
Distributed Learning (DL) dated 05 October 2017

(https://adlnet.gov/dodi/dodi-xapi)

DODI 5000.02
Operation of the Defense Acquisition System
DODI 5200.39
Critical Program Information (CPI) Identification and Protection Within Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E) dated October 15, 2018
DODI 5200.48
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) dated March 6, 2020
DODI 8500.01
Department of Defense Instruction 8500.01 Cyber Security dated 14 Mar 2014
DODI 8510.01
Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DOD Information Technology (IT), Change 1, dated 24 May 2016
DODI 5220.22-M
National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual, dated 28 Feb 2006
DOD 8570.01-M
Information Assurance (IA) Workforce Improvement Program, dated 19 Dec 2005 w/Change 4, 11/10/2015

DOD Implementation Plan for Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) dated 19 May 2000

Military Handbook (MIL-HDBK)-881D
Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materiel Items
MIL-HDBK-29612-1A
Department of Defense Handbook for Guidance for Acquisition of Training Data Products and Services (Part 1 of 5)
MIL-HDBK-29612-2A
Department of Defense Handbook for Instructional Systems Development/Systems Approach to Training and Education (Part 2 of 5)
MIL-HDBK-29612-3A
Development of Interactive Multimedia Instruction (Part 3 of 5)
MIL-HDBK-29612-5A
Department of Defense Handbook for Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) Products and Systems (Part 5 of 5)
MIL-PRF-29612B
Performance Specification Training Data Products
MIL-HDBK-217F, Notice 2
Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment
MIL-HDBK-472, Notice 1
Maintainability Prediction

Copies of DOD Directives and Instructions can be obtained from the DOD Issuances Website (http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/).

DOD Implementation Plan for ADL can be obtained from http://prhome.defense.gov/Portals/52/Documents/RFM/Readiness/docs/adl_implementplan.pdf.

Copies of the DOD Specifications and Handbooks can be obtained online from the DOD Single Stock Point or from the Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information System (ASSIST) website (http://everyspec.com/DOD/DOD-HDBK/)

Department of the Navy (DON) Documents Table 5. DON Documents

DON Documents
Document Title and/or Description

DON Department of Defense Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process (DIACAP) Handbook Version 1, dated 15 July 2008

NETCINST 5510.1
Content Segmentation and Classification Guide
NETCNOTE 1500.6
Metadata Instruction
NMCI.10011.01.UA3.E
Core Build Contents Version 2.3, 02 Aug 07

Copies of the Navy Marine Corps Intranet (NMCI) Core Build Standard can be obtained from http://www.nmci-eds.com/downloads/core-build

OPNAVINST 1500.76C
Naval Training System Requirements, Acquisition, and Management
Secretary of the Navy Instruction (SECNAVINST) 5000.36A
Department of the Navy Information Technology Application and Data Management
SECNAVINST 5870.4A
Copyright, dated 16 Aug 2005
Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) M-5239.1
Department of the Navy Information Assurance Program, Information Assurance Manual, dated Nov 2005
SECNAV M-5510.36
Department of the Navy, Information Security Program, dated Jun 2006
RRLGM #21-0005A
RRL Guidance Memorandum, NETC Approved Content Authoring Tools, 26 October 2022
RRLGM #22-0001
Ready Relevant Learning Guidance Memorandum, Implementation of Practical Applications of Learning Science (PALS), 13 May 2022

Copies of the CON DIACAP Handbook can be obtained from https://www.doncio.navy.mil/tagResults.aspx?ID=96 Copies of the DON documents can be obtained online from the Navy’s Integrate Learning Environment website: https://www.secnav.navy.mil/doni/Directives/Forms/AllItems.aspx

Authoring Instructional Materials (AIM) Documents Table 6. AIM Documents

Document Number
Document Title and/or Description

AIM Content Planning Module (CPM) User’s Manual

AIM Learning Object Module (LOM) User’s Manual

Copies of the AIM documentation can be obtained from https://www.public.navy.mil/netc/ntt/pdfs/End_to_End_Process_SOP_(7-11-14)_Final.pdf

Industry Standards Table 7. Industry Standards

Document Owner
Document Title and/or Description
ADL Co-Laboratories
Shareable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM®) 2004—SCORM® is a collection of standards and specifications adapted from multiple sources to provide a comprehensive suite of e-learning capabilities that enable interoperability, accessibility and reusability of Web-based learning content. SCORM® documents and important information about SCORM® can be obtained from: http://www.adlnet.gov/policy.
ADL Co-Laboratories
SCORM 2004 Conformance Testing Tool—This is a self-testing tool downloaded from http://www.adlnet.org to verify SCORM® compliant courseware.
ADL Co-Laboratories
The Advanced Distributed Learning Registry (ADL-R): Best Practices for Updating Registered Content https://www.atsc.army.mil/tadlp/implementation/scorm/conformance/tools_scorm.asp
Experience API SCORM Profile
Guidelines for representing SCORM® data and events as xAPI Statements. Provides a representation of the SCORM® data model as well as limited SCORM®-specific features, but uses xAPI for run time communications and tracking. The SCORM® profile was created as a compatibility approach to xAPI. It can be used to:

Create content that can track to both a Learning Management System (LMS) and learning record store (LRS).

Convert existing SCORM® data to xAPI Statements that can be stored in an LRS.

Track experiences from a learning record provider in a manner consistent with how they would've been tracked in SCORM®.

(http://adlnet.github.io/xAPI-SCORM-Profile/)

xAPI LRS Conformance Requirements
The Experience API (xAPI) Conformance Requirements for Learning Record Stores

(https://adl.gitbooks.io/xapi-lrs-conformance-requirements/content/)

cmi5 (Case Mix Index) Profile Specification
A profile specification for xAPI that describes packaging, launch, and important data capture concepts for traditional LMSs that include an LRS.

(https://github.com/AICC/CMI-5_Spec_Current) Aviation Industry CBT Committee (AICC)

ANSI/ASQ Q9000-2000
Quality Management Systems - Fundamentals and Vocabulary
ANSI/ASQ Q9001-2000
Quality Management Systems - Requirements
ANSI/ASQ Q9004-2000
Quality Management Systems - Guidelines for Performance Improvements
ANSI Z535.1-2006 (R 2011)
Safety Colors
ANSI Z535.2-2011
Environmental and Facility Safety Signs
ANSI Z535.3-2011
Criteria for Safety Symbols
ANSI Z535.4-2011
Product Safety Signs and Labels
ANSI Z535.5-2011
Safety Tags and Barricade Tapes (for Temporary Hazards)
Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) Global Learning Consortium
Question & Test Interoperability (QTI) Specification
Joint ADL Co-Lab
Best Practices Guide for Design and Development of SCORM Assessments (https://adlnet.gov/research/scorm/scorm-2004-4th-edition/scorm-2004-4th-edition-conformance-test-suite/)

Copies of the industry standard documents can be found by visiting the web addresses indicated.

Copies of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/American Society for Quality Control (ASQC) Standards can be obtained from the (http://www.ansi.org).

Other Documents Table 8. Other Documents

Document Number
Document Title and/or Description
CJCSI 6510.01F
IA and Computer Network Defense (CND)
NMCI.10011.01.UF0.E
Core Build Contents Version 7, 22 May 2012
NAVAIRINST 5000.21B
Naval Systems Command (SYSCOM) Risk Management Policy dated 24 Jan 2008
Unnumbered Document
Joint ADL Co-Lab, ADL Acquisition Guidance, dated 9 Aug 2006
NAVPERS 18068F
Volume I Navy Enlisted Occupational Standards
Unnumbered Document
NeL Content Hosting Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Unnumbered Document
Navy Education and Training Center (NETC) Course Hosting Process
Unnumbered Document
Content Hosting and Report Management Service (CHaRMS) Developer User Guide V2
Unnumbered Document
Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) Specifications Brief
Unnumbered Document
VDI Risk Management Framework package
Unnumbered Document
NETC Common Reference Profile (https://netc.usalearning.net/xapi-library/resources/pdf/NETC-Common-Reference-Profile.pdf)
Unnumbered Document
NETC E-learning Profile (https://netc.usalearning.net/xapi-library/resources/pdf/NETC-E-learning-Profile.pdf)
Unnumbered Document
NETC Performance Support Profile (https://netc.usalearning.net/xapi-library/resources/pdf/NETC-Performance-Support-Profile.pdf)
Unnumbered Document
NETC Simulation Base Profile (https://netc.usalearning.net/xapi-library/resources/pdf/NETC-Simulation-Profile.pdf)
Unnumbered Document
NETC xAPI Glossary

(https://netc.usalearning.net/xapi-library/resources/pdf/NETC-xAPI-Glossary.pdf)

Unnumbered Document
NETC xAPI Implementation Guidelines (https://netc.usalearning.net/xapi-library/resources/pdf/NETC-xAPI-Implementation-Guidelines.pdf)
Unnumbered Document
OPNAV N96, Surface Training Advanced Virtual Environment (STAVE) Interoperability Standard (SIS) Version 2.0, February 2021 (or latest version)
Unnumbered Document
The Scrum Guide, The Definitive Guide to Scrum: The Rules of the Game, November 2020 (or latest), by Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland

Copies of the CJCSI document can be obtained from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/.

Copies of the Presidential document can be obtained from the Federal Register at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/08-1348.pdf.

Copies of the NMCI document can be obtained from the Navy’s Integrate Learning Environment website (https://www.public.navy.mil/netc/ile/Default.aspx).

Copies of the SCORM documents can be obtained from http://www.adlnet.gov/capabilities/scorm/scorm-2004-4th#tab-resources.

Copies of the Joint ADL Co-Lab document can be obtained from https://adlnet.gov/collaboration/dadlac.

Copies of NAVAIRINST 5000.21B can be obtained from https://directives.navair.navy.mil/.

OPNAVINST 11010.20H
Facilities Project Instruction

Copies of these instructions are available at http;//doni.daps.dla.mil.

MIL-STD--130N
Department of Defense (DOD) Standard Practices – Identification Markings of U.S. Military Property

Copies of this standard is available online at: http://quicksearch.dla.mil/qsSearch.aspx.

DOD 5010-12M
Procedures for Acquisition Management of Technical Data

The publication shown above is available at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/501012m.pdf.

DODD 8140.01
Cyberspace Workforce management, dated 11 August 2015
DODI 8520.02
Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and Public Key (PK) Enabling, dated 24 May 2011
NIST SP 800-53r4
National Institute of Standards and technology (NIST) – Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations, dated 22 January 2015
CNSSI 1253
Committee on National Security Systems Instruction (CNSSI) – Security Categorization and Control Selection for National Security Systems, dated 27 March 2014
SECNAV M-5239.2
Department of the Navy Cyberspace Information Technology and Cybersecurity Workforce management and Qualification manual, dated June 2016

(The above documents are available from the following sources:

DOD Instructions, Directives, and Manuals are available at http://www.esd.whs.mil/DD/DOD-Issuances/.

NIST Special Publications are available at https://csrc.nist.gov/Publications.

CNSSI Instructions are available at https://www.cnss.gov.

SECNAV Manuals are available at https://doni.documentservices.dla.mil/manuals-secnav.aspx).

DoN NAVEDTRA Documents

NAVEDTRA 130B (series)
Task Based Curriculum Development Manual, (Volumes 1-3)
NAVEDTRA 131B (series)
Personnel Performance Profile Based Curriculum Development Manual, Volumes (1 – 3)
NAVEDTRA 132 (series)
Navy School Testing Program Management Manual
NAVEDTRA 136
Naval Education and Training Command Integrated Learning Environment Course Development and Life Cycle Maintenance

Copies of the NAVEDTRA documents are available for download from https://www.public.navy.mil/netc/ntt/pdfs/.

Naval Air Systems Command Instructions (NAVAIRINST)

NAVAIRINST 4355.19E
Systems Engineering Technical Reviews, dated 6 February 2015

· Copies of the NAVAIRINSTs are available for download from https://directives.navair.navy.mil.

NAWCTSD Documents

NAVAIR Training Systems Domain Guide
Naval Air Systems Command Training Systems Domain Guide, version 1.0, dated October 2016
Security Assessment Procedures Document
NAWCTSD Assessment Procedures for the Omnibus Standalone-Unclassified Training Systems, dated 22 September 2016

Copies of these NAWCTSD documents will be provided as part of the contract or Government Furnished Information (GFI).

Non-Government Documents

Industry Standards

ANSI = American National Standards Institute ISO = International Organization for Standardization

ANSI/ASQ/ISO 9001-2015
Quality Management Systems - Requirements

Copies of the ANSI/ISO document is available from http://www.ansi.org.

Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA)/SAE International

SAE/EIA-649-B
Configuration Management Standard
SAE/EIA-649-1 2014
Configuration Management Requirements for Defense Contracts
SAE/EIA 748-C
Earned Value Management Systems
GEIA-HB-649-A
Configuration Management Standard Implementation Guide, Revision A of February 2016

Copies of the EIA/SAE documents are available from http://ansi.org.

Requirements The contractor shall organize, coordinate, and control RRL content conversion activities to ensure compliance with contract requirements and timely delivery of products specified herein.

General Requirements The contractor shall provide the necessary hardware, software, personnel, supervision, management, materials, services, equipment, facilities, technical, logistics, and clerical support to perform the tasks specified in this SOW. The requirements defined herein form the basis for work performed for the Government during the entire contract. The contractor shall meet the requirements of the SOW in accordance with (IAW) the guidance documents provided and the contents of this document.

RRL Content Conversion Planning The contractor shall

a. Identify objectives and constraints of the contract

b. Establish a work breakdown structure based on the system architecture

c. Define achievement criteria for the life cycle stages delivery dates and dependencies on external resources

d. Define roles, responsibilities, accountabilities and authorities

Life-Cycle Model Management The contractor shall define, maintain, and assure availability of policies, life cycle processes, life cycle models, and procedures.

Infrastructure Management The contractor shall provide the infrastructure to support organization and program objectives throughout the life cycle of the contract.

Program Assessment and Control The contractor shall track the status of the program, technical and process performance that ensures the performance is in accordance with the plans and schedules that satisfy the technical objectives.

Program Decision Management The contractor shall

a. Select the most beneficial course of action for the government where alternatives exist

b. Inform the government of decisions encountered

c. Record the decisions and rationale to support future decision-making.

Contract Data Requirements Lists (CDRLs) The contractor shall update, improve, manage, and deliver acceptable contractually-required data. The contractor shall implement data management procedures and policies to provide control and configuration management (CM) of contractually-required data. The contractor shall:

a. Establish data management procedures and policies to provide control and CM of contractually-required data. To ensure sub-contractors meet the contract data requirements set forth in the CDRL, the prime contractor shall maintain control of work completed by sub-contractors.

b. Establish and maintain data libraries via an online management system consisting of technical manuals, parent system technical description, and software documentation for the work completed for academic training systems and other data pertaining to training systems.

Online Management System (OMS) The contractor shall establish, implement, and make available a secure, web-accessible OMS hosted at the contractor’s location throughout contract/order performance, with the functionality for Government content reviewers and project managers to review, consolidate, and submit deliverable review comments produced by the contractor. The OMS shall serve as a data library consisting of documentation, data, and information used, maintained, updated, and improved for use in this effort. The contractor shall use the OMS as a tool for communication between the contractor and the Government. The contractor’s OMS shall have the functionality to share files between the contractor and the Government reviewers with an intuitive file structure and naming convention, file directories, working files released for Government comment, and final deliverables. The contractor shall maintain deliverables (all versions) and Government comments on the OMS. Reviewers will submit review comments for documents, IMI and supporting materials, and complex media in external files via a comment resolution matrix (CRM). The contractor shall provide an OMS with the following basic characteristics and functionality:

a. Accessible via standard internet browsers supported by NMCI computers.

b. Control access through login and password protection.

c. Traceability of each comment.

The contractor shall also include supporting materials, agendas, and minutes for conferences (e.g., Post Award Conference [PAC]), meetings (e.g., Integrated Product Team [IPT]), reviews (e.g., In-Progress Report [IPR]) and materials (presentations, agendas, etc.). The contractor shall make the OMS available for initial use at the PAC.

Scrum Board Requirements The contractor shall provide browser-based access to its Scrum Board hosted at the contractor’s location. The contractor shall maintain and make visible to the government at all times during the contract performance a current Scrum Board, including at a minimum the product backlog, sprint backlog, increments, and expected government engagement in each sprint. The contractor shall provide a Scrum Board with the following basic characteristics and functionality:

a. Accessible via standard internet browsers supported by NMCI computers.

b. Control access through login and password protection.

Configuration Management (CM) The contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply a CM process. The contractor shall control CM to ensure only files associated with a specific date and location are in the directory for those files. The contractor shall notify the Government, via e-mail, what directories on the OMS have new or revised files by close of business each Friday.

Contractor Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) The contractor shall employ personnel who are recent technical content SMEs in the AT and AW domain areas with experience in operations and maintenance as required by the rating. The Government requires the contractor to employ Instructional Systems Design and Systems Engineering SMEs to ensure technical accuracy, data, information, and reports developed by the contractor meet Government specification and requirements. The contractor shall ensure personnel assigned to the contract have the appropriate security clearance necessary to access information and facilities required (see Table 1).

Quality Assurance and Management Plan (QAMP) The contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply a QAMP, including flowcharts, documenting multiple reviews at the program and corporate level. The contractor shall document processes (e.g., inter-rater agreements for data categorization) and management controls employed to ensure requirements are met. The QAMP shall, at a minimum, include specific work required and methods used to determine product quality and technical adequacy and include methods for conducting intermittent and ongoing reviews of deliverables.

Control of Government-Furnished Information (GFI) The contractor shall perform the following tasks to control GFI as part of the quality management process:

a. Examine upon receipt, consistent with practicality, to detect damage.

b. Log receipt and track each GFI item.

c. Provide storage that precludes deterioration.

d. Protect from improper use or disposition.

e. Verify and audit IAW the contractor’s GFI control and management process.

f. Confer with Government at contract closeout whether to return or destroy each GFI item.

Communications Plan The contractor shall define, document, manage, and apply a Communications Plan including internal and external communications. The contractor shall document the Communications Plan methods relative to planning, developing, accomplishing, and reporting management, technical, and administrative tasks relevant to requirements.

Security The security requirements specified herein shall apply to the contractor and subcontractors. The contractor shall comply with applicable on-site security regulations related to Government installation and facility access. The contractor shall meet the personnel security clearance requirements for handling classified data and accessing classified spaces (up to SECRET-NOFORN) IAW the DD-254. Contractor personnel shall submit Joint Personnel Adjudication System (JPAS) visit requests to applicable schoolhouse/Learning Center (LC) and will be issued unescorted badges by the schoolhouse/LC for building access. The contractor shall work with the NAWCTSD security representative for issuance of Common Access Cards (CACs). The contractor shall comply with applicable on-site security regulations related to facility access and building access. The contractor shall safeguard U.S. Government controlled unclassified information (CUI) (sensitive information) IAW the contractor’s locally-established Security/Operations Security (OPSEC) Plan (if the contractor already has an established plan). The contractor shall enforce these safeguards throughout the life of the contract including the transport and delivery phases and the disposition and storage of CUI at contract completion.

Operations Security (OPSEC) The contractor shall develop, implement, and maintain an OPSEC program to protect controlled unclassified and classified activities, information, equipment, and material used or developed by the contractor and any subcontractor during performance of the contract. The OPSEC program shall be IAW National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 298. If the contractor does not have an established OPSEC Plan that addresses the protection of critical information, sensitive, proprietary, or CUI, the Government can provide a template for the contractor’s internal development of an OPSEC Plan. The contractor shall prepare the OPSEC Plan IAW the CDRL B006. Additional OPSEC program planning guidance can be found in DI-MGMT-80934C, OPERATIONS SECURITY (OPSEC) PLAN and NAVAIR OPERATIONS SECURITY (OPSEC) REQUIREMENTS (Annex included with CDRL B006). The OPSEC program, at a minimum, shall include:

a. Assignment of responsibility for OPSEC direction and implementation.

b. Issuance of procedures and planning guidance for the use of OPSEC techniques to identify vulnerabilities and apply applicable countermeasures.

c. Establishment of OPSEC education and awareness training to include Basic OPSEC training, produced by the Interagency OPSEC Support Staff (IOSS), which can be found at https://www.opsecprofessionals.org/articles/onlineopsectraining.html.

d. OPSEC1301 OPSEC Fundamentals.

e. Provisions for management, annual review, and evaluation of OPSEC programs.

f. Flow down of OPSEC requirements to subcontractors when applicable.

Unclassified Contractor-Owned Network Security – Safeguarding of Unclassified Controlled Technical Information The safeguarding of Controlled Unclassified Technical Information applies to prime contractors and their subcontractors (if applicable) for information resident on or transiting through contractor unclassified information systems. The contractor shall provide security to safeguard unclassified controlled technical information on their unclassified information systems from unauthorized access and disclosure. The contractor shall take means (defense-in-depth measures) necessary to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of Government CUI.

a. The contractor shall manage and maintain contractor-owned unclassified IT network assets used to process U.S. Government CUI (sensitive information).

1. The security requirements in National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 800-171, “Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Information Systems and Organizations,” http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-171 that is in effect at the time the solicitation is issued or as authorized by the Contracting Officer, as soon as practical, but not dated prior to December 31, 2017. The contractor shall notify the DOD Chief Information Officer (CIO), via email at osd.dibcsia@mail.mil, within 30 days of contract award, of any security requirements specified by NIST SP 800-171 not implemented at the time of contract award; or

2. Alternative but equally effective security measures used to compensate for the inability to satisfy a particular requirement and achieve equivalent protection accepted in writing by an authorized representative of the DOD CIO; and

b. Apply other information systems security measures when the contractor reasonably determines that information systems security measures, in addition to those identified in paragraph (b)(1) of FAR 252.204-7012, may be required to provide adequate security in a dynamic environment based on an assessed risk or vulnerability.

Cyber Incident and Compromise Reporting The contractor shall report to DOD certain cyber incidents that affect unclassified controlled technical information resident on or transiting contractor unclassified information systems set forth IAW the contract clauses. The contractor shall also provide the report to the NAWCTSD Contracting Officer, NAWCTSD Security Manager, and the NAWCTSD Information Systems Security Manager (ISSM).

Access to DOD Installations, Government Information and Information Technology Systems – Personnel Security Background Checks The contractor shall comply with the following:

a. The Common Access Card (CAC) shall be the principal identity credential for supporting interoperable access to DOD installations, facilities, buildings, controlled spaces, and access to U.S. Government information systems. The contractor shall coordinate with the appropriate NAWCTSD TPOC, Government sponsor, and NAWCTSD Security Office Trusted Agents for issuance of the CAC via the Trusted Associate Sponsorship System (TASS) Program. More information for obtaining the CAC can be found at http://www.cac.mil/common-access-card/getting-your-cac/for-contractors/.

b. Contractor personnel whom do not have a security clearance, but require a CAC in performance of their sensitive duties (including access to controlled unclassified information, but not access classified information), shall coordinate with the NAWCTSD Security Office to complete a TIER 1 background investigation, submission of fingerprints and the Standard Form SF-85. The contractor shall submit the Standard Form SF-85 to the NAWCTSD Security Office for processing. There shall be no additional National Agency Check with Local Agency Checks (NACLC)/TIER-3 submissions for contractors holding a valid national security clearance. The Government may issue the credential upon favorable return of the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) fingerprint check, pending final favorable completion of the TIER 1.

c. Access to restricted areas, CUI or Government Information Technology by contractor personnel shall be limited to those individuals who have been determined trustworthy as a result of the favorable completion of a NACLC/TIER-3R or who are under the escort of appropriately cleared personnel. Where escorting such persons is not feasible, a NACLC/TIER 3 shall be conducted and favorably reviewed by the appropriate DOD component, agency, or activity prior to permitting such access. A classified visit, due to content or space, request is required to access SECRET spaces.

d. The contractor shall comply with the cybersecurity and personnel security requirements for accessing U.S. Government IT systems specified in the contract. The contractor shall review and become familiar with the credentialing standards presented in OPM Memorandum for Issuing Personal Identity Verification cards to use as an aid in their employee selection process. The NAWCTSD Security Office will apply the credentialing standards and execute the credentialing process for individual contractors.

Personnel Security – Background Checks Contractor personnel shall undergo the company internal vetting process prior to gaining access to U.S. Government CUI. To comply with immigration law, the contractor shall use the Employment Eligibility Verification Program (E-Verify).

International Traffic and Arms Regulation The contractor shall ensure that foreign persons, as defined under section 120.16 of the International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR) (22 CFR, Parts 120 – 130), are not given access to U.S. Government CUI, sensitive information, defense articles, defense services, or technical data, as defined in the ITAR, Part 120, without proper issuance of an export license from the U.S. Government authority.

Personnel Security – Reporting of Adverse or Derogatory Information Related to Contractors The contractor shall report to the NAWCTSD Security Office adverse or derogatory information pertaining to on-site Contractor Service Support (CSS) personnel (when applicable) or contractor personnel in direct support of this contract. Information reported to the Government Contracting Agency shall be integrated and reported in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) on contractor performance of PERsonnel SECurity (PERSEC) related aspects of contractor performance.

a. Adverse or derogatory information reporting of contractor personnel. Example: Domestic Violence arrest; or other violent or sexual crime arrest or self-report.

b. When contractor personnel receive a revocation of an Interim or denial for the issuance of a CAC until final adjudication.

c. When a denial or suspension of clearance occurs for a contractor employee.

d. When contractor employee receives a final denial of eligibility for a security clearance.

Government-Issued Personal…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .