Asbestos Documents.pdf

ASBESTOS DETERMINATION SURVEY

Conducted At:

Bedford VA Hospital Complex

Building No. 12

200 Springs Road

Bedford, MA 01730

Prepared For:

ENRM Veterans Hospital

Bedford, MA 01730

Attention: Stacey Wallace

Prepared By:

Joseph Cooney

MAC Services, LLC

21 Mill Pond Drive

Rochester, MA 02770

September 7, 2017

Building No.12

Basement Level

200 Springs Road

Bedford, MA

Asbestos Determination Survey

Table of Contents:

Page

Project Summary 3

Section I

A. Scope of Work 3-4

B. Description of Survey 4

Section II

Bulk Sample Analytical Summary 5

Tables

List of Tables: 5

Table 1: Suspect Building Materials 6-7

Table 2: Asbestos Containing Building Materials 8

BULK Asbestos Sample Analytical Data 9-22

Basement Level

200 Springs Road

PROJECT SUMMARY

On August 30, 2017, MAC Services, LLC (MAC) conducted a comprehensive Asbestos Determination

Survey for all accessible building materials within a specified area of Building No.12 at the Bedford VA

Hospital Complex located at 200 Spring Road in Bedford, MA.

The survey focused on all suspect building materials associated with the interior of the building area as well as the exterior of the area. Materials sampled included but were not limited to: ceiling tile, floor tile and associated mastic, caulking, insulation materials, plaster, joint compound, gypsum board, tile grout and adhesive as well as carpet glue. All materials listed in Table I were sampled and analyzed as suspect materials. All materials determined to be asbestos containing are listed in Table II.

There was one (1) material sampled that was determined to be asbestos containing. In addition, there was one other material that was less than 1%. This material (plaster) only needs to be disposed of as asbestos containing material not removed as such and does not need to be handled by a Licensed Abatement contractor. The one identified asbestos containing material (exterior white caulking) must be removed by a licensed Asbestos Abatement contractor before being disturbed.

SECTION I

Section one of this report details the survey methodology and scope of investigation.

A. SCOPE OF WORK

The buildings specified for Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) determination were inspected by a

Massachusetts Licensed Inspector, Joseph Cooney (AI 000187) who physically touched material, collected bulk samples, assessed the physical condition of the materials suspected of being asbestos containing, and completed the field survey forms. The inspector is experienced and has conducted previous asbestos surveys, specifications, asbestos air sample analysis, and monitoring as well as reporting of asbestos repair and removal projects. Standardized forms were used to gather data, including chain of custody records to accompany samples to the laboratory.

Samples were collected, with each homogenous area of material sampled. Typically, materials are broken down into three separate categories described as follows:

Surfacing Material (SM): is defined as material that is sprayed on, troweled on, or otherwise permanently applied to surfaces, such as acoustical plaster on ceilings, and fireproofing materials on structural members, or other materials on surfaces for acoustical, fireproofing, or other purposes.

Thermal System Insulation (TSI): are materials applied to pipes, fittings, boilers, breaching, tanks, ducts, or interior structural components to prevent heat loss or water condensation, or for other purposes.

Miscellaneous Material (MM): are interior and exterior building material on structural components, structural members or fixtures, such as floor and ceiling tiles, and vinyl sheeting and does not include surfacing material or thermal systems insulation.

Basement Level

200 Springs Road

Some definitions of terms are as follows:

A homogeneous material is a surfacing material, thermal system insulation material, or miscellaneous material that is uniform in color and texture.

A friable material is one which, when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

Non-friable materials typically contain bonding agents (e.g., cement, plastics, asphalt, and glue) that lock the asbestos fibers into the product. The inspector identified all visible flooring material that could potentially contain asbestos.

All suspect materials, presented as homogeneous materials in each functional space, are listed in Table

(1). There were nine (9) materials determined to be asbestos containing from sampling completed during this survey.

B. SAMPLING SURVEY

MAC has developed standard procedures to be used in order to randomly sample each material suspected of being asbestos containing. In order to classify any homogeneous material as a non-asbestos containing building material, a sufficient number of samples are collected and analyzed. All samples analyzed must show the lack of asbestos content (less than one percent asbestos) in order to be considered non-asbestos containing. If a material has trace amounts of asbestos (less than 1%) the material is not considered

‘Asbestos Containing’ and therefore, doesn’t have to be removed as asbestos containing, however, it must be disposed of as asbestos containing.

Samples were taken and logged in on a chain of custody form and delivered to Asbestos Identification

Laboratory of Woburn, MA for analysis. The bulk samples were analyzed by polarized light microscopy

(PLM) (EPA Interim Method: Appendix A of Subpart F-40 CFR Part 763 and/or EPA 600/R-93/116).

Asbestos Identification Lab is licensed by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (#AA 000208) for bulk asbestos analysis and is a NVLAP accredited laboratory.

CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIAL CONDITION

Where applicable, all identified asbestos containing material is classified as to physical condition as follows:

GOOD (G):

Asbestos containing building material in good condition at the time of the survey was whole and complete and typical of newer installation.

Basement Level

200 Springs Road

DAMAGED (D):

Asbestos containing building material in damaged condition at the time of the survey was generally complete but showed some signs of damage or deterioration. Material is classified as damaged when the damage or deterioration covers less than one tenth of the material's surface and is evenly distributed, or when it covers less than one quarter of the material's surface and is localized. This material typically needs attention but does not constitute emergency removal.

SIGNIFICANTLY DAMAGED (SD):

Asbestos containing building material is determined to be significantly damaged when at the time of the survey, the material was damaged or deteriorated, often with pieces missing. A material is classified as significantly damaged when the damage/deterioration covers more than one tenth of the material's surface and is evenly distributed, or when it covers more than one quarter of the materials surface and is localized.

SECTION II

ANALYTICAL DATA

Thirty-three (33) samples of materials suspected to be asbestos containing were collected. Thirty-two (32) were analyzed. Analytical Data is presented on the following pages. There was one (1) material determined to be asbestos containing. All materials suspected of containing asbestos and that were sampled, are identified in Table 1. All materials determined to be asbestos containing are listed in Table 2

The white caulking at the window exteriors must be removed by a licensed Asbestos Abatement contractor prior to being disturbed. There is approximately 140 Linear Feet of white caulking to be removed.

Table 1:

"Suspect Homogeneous Building Materials", lists all building materials, related to the planned renovations, suspected of containing asbestos. Asbestos containing materials are divided into the three categories established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Asbestos Hazard

Emergency Response Act (AHERA): Thermal Systems Insulation (TSI) Surfacing Material (SM), and

Miscellaneous Material (MM). Each material is identified by the appropriate two-letter prefix

Table 2:

"Asbestos Containing Building Materials", lists all building materials that were determined to contain a minimum of 1% asbestos by PLM analysis. This table specifies the material by description and where the sample was obtained from as well as the type and % of asbestos that exist for that material. In addition, there is an estimated quantity of that material to be removed. Actual quantity should be verified by the

Abatement Contractor who is to remove the material.

Basement Level

200 Springs Road

TABLE 1

SUSPECT ASBESTOS CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS SAMPLED

Sample Field

ID

Description Location Color Material

Type

V083017-01A Black vibration gasket 5’Th floor HVAC area- southeast (SE) end Black MM

V083017-01B Black vibration gasket 5’Th floor HVAC area- southeast (SE) end Black MM

V083017-01C Black caulking 5’Th floor HVAC area- southeast (SE) end Black MM

V083017-01D Black caulking 5’Th floor HVAC area- center area Black MM

V083017-01E Black caulking 5’Th floor HVAC area- northwest (NW) end Black MM

V083017-02A White skim coat duct insulation

5’Th floor HVAC area- NW horizontal section White MM

V083017-02B White skim coat duct insulation

5’Th floor HVAC area- NW end vertical section White MM

V083017-03A White skim coat duct insulation

5’Th floor HVAC area- northwest SE end White MM

V083017-03B White vibration gasket SE end air handler unit White MM

V083017-04A White vibration gasket SE end air handler unit White MM

V083017-04B White caulking 5’Th floor HVAC area- southeast (SE) end duct work White MM

V083017-05A White caulking 5’Th floor HVAC area- southeast (SE) end duct work White MM

V083017-05B Brown glue daub

(duct work pins)

5’Th floor HVAC area- NW end Brown MM

V083017-06A Brown glue daub

(duct work pins)

5’Th floor HVAC area- NW end Brown MM

V083017-06B Pipe fitting insulation

(elbow fitting)

5’Th floor HVAC area- SE end White TSI

V083017-07A Pipe fitting insulation

(T-fitting) 5’Th floor HVAC area- NW end White TSI

V083017-07B Pipe fitting insulation

(valve fitting) 5’Th floor HVAC area- NW end White TSI

V083017-08A Red fire stop caulking 5’Th floor HVAC area- stairwell door Red MM

V083017-08B Red fire stop caulking 5’Th floor HVAC area- rooftop door Red MM

V083017-08C

V083017-09A 6” black cove base 4’Th floor conference room 404 Black MM

Basement Level

200 Springs Road

Sample Field

ID

Description Location Color Material

Type

V083017-09B 6” black cove base 4’Th floor conference room 404 Black MM

V083017-10A Brown mastic associated with sample053117-09A

4’Th floor conference room 404 Brown MM

V083017-10B Brown mastic associated with sample053117-09B

4’Th floor conference room 404 Brown MM

V083017-11A 2’x4’ wavy pattern ceiling tile

4’Th floor conference room 404 White MM

V083017-11B 2’x4’ wavy pattern ceiling tile

4’Th floor conference room 404 White MM

V083017-11C 9” x 9” black and white specs pattern floor tile 4’Th floor room 403 Multi MM

V083017-11D 9” x 9” black and white specs pattern floor tile 4’Th floor room 403 Multi MM

V083017-11E Black mastic associated with sample 053117-12A

4’Th floor room 403 Black MM

V083017-12A Black mastic associated with sample 053117-12B

4’Th floor room 403 Black MM

V083017-12B 2’x4’ pin hole pattern ceiling tile

4’Th floor conference room 404 White MM

V083017-13A 2’x4’ pin hole pattern ceiling tile

4’Th floor conference room 404 White MM

V083017-13B Leveler 4’Th floor room 403 under 9”x9” floor tile Gray MM

V083017-14A Leveler 4’Th floor room 403 under 9”x9” floor tile Gray MM

V083017-14B White 4”x4” ceramic tile grout Room 401 bathroom wall White MM

Basement Level

200 Springs Road

TABLE 2

ASBESTOS CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS

Lab ID Field ID Description Location

Condition

Result

Asbest os

Asbestos

Type

Quantity

(Estimate)

288488 V083017-

14A White caulking

Window exterior at room B01 G 5 Chrysotile 140 LF

Basement Level

200 Springs Road

BULK ASBESTOS SAMPLE ANALYTICAL DATA

Batch: 25539

165 New Boston St., Ste 227 Woburn, MA 01801

781-932-9600 Web: www.asbestosidentificationlab.com

Email: mikemanning@asbestosidentificationlab.com

Asbestos Identification Laboratory

Dear Joe Cooney, Thank you Joe Cooney for your business.

Michael Manning Owner/Director

Asbestos Identification Laboratory has completed the analysis of the samples from your office for the above referenced project .

The information and analysis contained in this report have been generated using the EPA /600/R-93/116 Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. Materials or products that contain more than 1% of any kind or combination of asbestos are considered an asbestos containing building material as determined by the EPA. This Polarized Light Microscope (PLM) technique may be performed either by visual estimation or point counting. Point counting provides a determination of the area percentage of asbestos in a sample. If the asbestos is estimated to be less than 10% by visual estimation of friable material, the determination may be repeated using the point counting technique. The results of the point counting supersede visual PLM results. Results in this report only relate to the items tested. This report may not be used by the customer to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other U.S. Government Agency.

Laboratory results represent the analysis of samples as submitted by the customer. Information regarding sample location, description, area, volume, etc., was provided by the customer. Asbestos Identification Laboratory is not responsible for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Unless notified in writing to return samples, Asbestos Identification Laboratory discards customer samples after 30 days. Samples containing subsamples or layers will be analyzed separately when applicable. Reports are kept at Asbestos Identification Laboratory for three years. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Asbestos Identification Laboratory.

Work Received:

2017-08-31

2017-08-30

Bedford VA Medical Center

Joe Cooney MaC Services, LLC 21 Mill Pond Drive Rochester, MA 02770

2017-08-30

2017-258Project Number:

Project Name:

September 01, 2017

Date Sampled:

Analysis Method: BULK PLM ANALYSIS EPA/600/R-93/116

Work Analyzed:

• NVLAP Lab Code: 200919-0

• Massachusetts Certification License: AA000208

• State of Connecticut, Department of Public Health Approved Environmental Laboratory Registration Number: PH-0142

• State of Maine, Department of Environmental Protection Asbestos Analytical Laboratory License Number: LB-0078(Bulk) LA-0087(Air)

• State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations. Department of Health Certification: AAL-121

• State of Vermont, Department of Health Environmental Health License AL934461

Work Received:

2017-08-31

2017-08-30

Bedford VA Medical Center

Joe Cooney MaC Services, LLC 21 Mill Pond Drive Rochester, MA 02770

2017-08-30

2017-258Project Number:

Project Name:

September 01, 2017

Date Sampled:

Analysis Method: BULK PLM ANALYSIS EPA/600/R-93/116

Work Analyzed:

Asbestos % Material Color Non-Asbestos % Location FieldID

LabID white Non-Fibrous 100

288415

V083017-01A Hallway at Room B01White Skim Coat Plaster None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

288416

V083017-01B Room B01White Skim Coat Plaster None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

288417

V083017-01C Room B03White Skim Coat Plaster None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

288418

V083017-01D Room B04White Skim Coat Plaster None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

288419

V083017-01E Room B02White Skim Coat Plaster None Detected multi Non-Fibrous 100

288420

V083017-02A Hallway at Room B0112" X 12" Off White w/ Gray Spec Pattern Floor Tile

None Detected multi Non-Fibrous 100

288421

V083017-02B Room B1912" X 12" Off White w/ Gray Spec Pattern Floor Tile

None Detected yellow Non-Fibrous 100

288422

V083017-03A Room B01Yellow Mastic assoc. w/ V083017-02A

None Detected yellow Non-Fibrous 100

288423

V083017-03B Room B19Yellow Mastic assoc. w/ V083017-02B

None Detected black Non-Fibrous 100

288424

V083017-04A Room B4" Gray Cove Base None Detected gray Non-Fibrous 100

288425

V083017-04B Room B184" Gray Cove Base None Detected yellow Non-Fibrous 100

288426

V083017-05A Room BMastic assoc. w/ V083017- 04A

None Detected yellow Non-Fibrous 100

288427

V083017-05B Room B18Mastic assoc. w/ V083017- 04B

None Detected multi Mineral Wool 40 Cellulose 40 Non-Fibrous 20288428

V083017-06A Room B032' X 2' Pin Hole Pattern Ceiling Tile

None Detected

Page 1 of 3Friday 01 September

Asbestos % Material Color Non-Asbestos % Location FieldID

LabID multi Mineral Wool 40

Cellulose 40 Non-Fibrous 20288429

V083017-06B Room B182' X 2' Pin Hole Pattern Ceiling Tile

None Detected gray Non-Fibrous 100

288430

V083017-07A Above Ceiling Tile at Room B03

Gray Duct Sealant None Detected gray Non-Fibrous 100

288431

V083017-07B Above Ceiling Tile at Room B03

Gray Duct Sealant None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

288432

V083017-08A Room B04Joint Compound None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

288433

V083017-08B Room B19Joint Compound None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

288434

V083017-08C Room B18Joint Compound None Detected multi Fiberglass 2 Cellulose 10 Non-Fibrous 88288435

V083017-09A Room B04 Exterior WallPink Gypsum Board None Detected multi Cellulose 40 Non-Fibrous 60

288436

V083017-09B Room B04 Exterior WallPink Gypsum Board None Detected multi Fiberglass < 1 Cellulose 15 Non-Fibrous 85288437

V083017-10A Room B19Gray Gypsum Board None Detected multi Fiberglass < 1 Cellulose 30 Non-Fibrous 70288438

V083017-10B Room B18Gray Gypsum Board None Detected

Detected Chrysotile < 1 tan Non-Fibrous 100

288439

V083017-11A Hallway at Room B01Gray Base Coat Plaster tan Non-Fibrous 100

288440

V083017-11B Room B01Gray Base Coat Plaster None Detected tan Non-Fibrous 100

288441

V083017-11C Room B03Gray Base Coat Plaster None Detected tan Non-Fibrous 100

288442

V083017-11D Room B04Gray Base Coat Plaster None Detected

Detected Chrysotile < 1 tan Non-Fibrous 100

288443

V083017-11E Room B02Gray Base Coat Plaster black Fiberglass 20 Non-Fibrous 80

288444

V083017-12A Mechanical Room next to Room B01

Black Vibration Gasket None Detected black Fiberglass 20 Non-Fibrous 80

288445

V083017-12B Mechanical Room next to Room B01

Black Vibration Gasket None Detected brown Non-Fibrous 100

288446

V083017-13A Exterior Room B01 Window at Side

Brown Caulking None Detected

Page 2 of 3Friday 01 September

Asbestos % Material Color Non-Asbestos % Location FieldID

LabID brown Non-Fibrous 100

288447

V083017-13B Exterior Room B04 Window at Side

Brown Caulking None Detected

Detected Chrysotile 5 multi Non-Fibrous 95

288448

V083017-14A Exterior Room B01 Window at Top

White Caulking

288449

V083017-14B Exterior Room B01 Window at Top

White Caulking Not Analyzed

Analyzed by: 25539Batch:

Page 3 of 3Friday 01 September End of Report

Phillip Worby, Environmental Chemistry Laboratory Director

Approved By:

Fax:

Phone: (508) 789-0983

The following analytical report covers the analysis performed on samples submitted to EMSL Analytical, Inc. on 9/27/2017. The results are tabulated on the attached data pages for the following client designated project:

Bedford, VA

The reference number for these samples is EMSL Order #011707759. Please use this reference when calling about these samples. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (856) 303-2500.

9/28/2017Attn: Joseph Cooney Mac Services, LLC 21 Mill Pond Drive Rochester, MA 02770

The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAP and/or the specific certification program that is applicable, unless otherwise noted.

NELAP Certifications: NJ 03036, NY 10872, PA 68-00367, CA ELAP 1877

The samples associated with this report were received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report relates only to those items tested as received by the laboratory. The QC data associated with the sample results meet the recovery and precision requirements established by the NELAP, unless specifically indicated. All results for soil samples are reported on a dry weight basis, unless otherwise noted. This report may not be reproduced except in full and without written approval by EMSL Analytical, Inc.

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone: (856) 303-2500 Fax: (856) 858-4571 Email: EnvChemistry2@emsl.com mailto:EnvChemistry2@emsl.com

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 858-4571 http://www.EMSL.com EnvChemistry2@emsl.com

011707759 CustomerID: MSVS42 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

Analytical Results

Attn: Joseph Cooney Mac Services, LLC 21 Mill Pond Drive Rochester, MA 02770

Received: 09/27/17 9:30 AM

Bedford, VA

Fax:

Phone: (508) 789-0983

Project:

Client Sample Description Lab ID:PCB-01 011707759-0001Collected: 9/26/2017

Method Parameter Result Units Analysis Date AnalystRL

Prep Date Analyst

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1016 TLND mg/Kg 9/28/20170.97 9/27/2017 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1221 TLND mg/Kg 9/28/20170.97 9/27/2017 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1232 TLND mg/Kg 9/28/20170.97 9/27/2017 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1242 TLND mg/Kg 9/28/20170.97 9/27/2017 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1248 TLND mg/Kg 9/28/20170.97 9/27/2017 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1254 TLND mg/Kg 9/28/20170.97 9/27/2017 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1260 TLND mg/Kg 9/28/20170.97 9/27/2017 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1262 TLND mg/Kg 9/28/20170.97 9/27/2017 AB

3540C/8082A Aroclor-1268 TLND mg/Kg 9/28/20170.97 9/27/2017 AB

ND - indicates that the analyte was not detected at the reporting limit RL - Reporting Limit (Analytical)

Definitions:

Page 2 of 2ChemSmplw/RDL/NELAC-7.44.3 Printed: 9/28/2017 6:29:09 PM http://www.EMSL.com mailto:EnvChemistry2@emsl.com

MAC Services, LLC * 21 Mill Pond Drive, Rochester, MA 02770 * Phone (508)789-0983

Environmental Specialist

October 3, 2017

Bedford VA Hospital 200 Springs Road Bedford, MA 01730 Attention: Stacey Wallace

Re: Sampling of caulk for PCB levels at the Bedford VA Hospital complex located at 200 Springs Road in Bedford, MA, Building #12.

On September 26, 2017, per your request, MAC Services, LLC (MAC) obtained samples of exterior caulking at the location referenced above for the purpose of determining the Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) content. The sample was obtained from the perimeter of a window located on the rear side (parking lot side) of the Building #12. The samples were obtained by an experienced Environmental Technician, Joseph Cooney, who documented all samples on a standard chain of custody form.

Samples were immediately sent to EMSL Laboratories located at 200 Route 130 North in Cinnaminson, NJ. EMSL is NVLAP as well as AIHA accredited and Certified (#03036) for PCB analysis.

Analytical method 3540C/8082A was used to determine PCB content. Results for PCB's were determined to be none detected (ND) for exterior caulk sample.

Please call me with any questions you may have with regards to this matter.

Regards, Joseph P. Cooney

Cell (508)789-0983

VOLUME II

ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL &

LEAD CONTAINING PAINT

SURVEY REPORT

BUILDING 12

VISN 1

Bedford VA Medical Center

Bedford, Massachusetts

Project No. 2009023.008

February 15, 2011

5 Alfred Circle Bedford, MA 01730-2318

Telephone: (781) 275-6050 Toll Free: (800) 877-6050 Facsimile: (781) 275-5651 info@mabbett.com www.mabbett.com

© 2011, Mabbett & Associates, Inc.

mailto:info@mabbett.com http://www.mabbett.com/

Bedford VAMC - Building 12 February 2011 ©2011, Mabbett & Associates, Inc. Page i Survey Report Bedford Building 12_2-11_FINAL.doc

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) and Lead Containing Paint (LCP) Building Survey Report was prepared for the Veterans Affairs (VA) New England Healthcare System (VISN 1) in accordance with an established scope of work as defined in Contract Number VA241-P-1653. The information presented herein is based on the facts and information conveyed to or received by Mabbett & Associates, Inc. (M&A) during the preparation of this report. If any of the information provided to M&A that was used in preparing this report is incorrect, incomplete, or subject to change, M&A would wish to alter its opinion(s) accordingly. In addition, the professional opinions and information contained in this report are based solely on the requirements of the applicable regulations and technical data as known to M&A as of the date of this report and considered applicable to this report.

This individual building report within Volume II, which contains building specific lead and asbestos findings, is part of the Comprehensive VAMC Lead and Asbestos Survey Report consisting of the following volumes:

Volume I - General

Chapter 1 - Introduction and Executive Summary Chapter 2 - Asbestos Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Plan Chapter 3 - Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) Survey Tables Chapter 4 - Lead Containing Paint Survey Tables

Volume II – Individual Building Reports

Individual Building Reports Chapters including:

• Cover page with building number

• Building narrative summary

• Floor plans

• Relevant asbestos findings for the building

• Relevant lead containing paint findings for the building

• Relevant photos

Volume III – Appendices and Supporting Data

Appendix A - Asbestos Laboratory Analysis Reports and Laboratory Certifications Appendix B - Inspector Field Data Sheets/Chains-of-Custody Appendix C - Personnel Certifications & Licenses Appendix D - XRF Performance Characteristics/Calibration Records Appendix E - Lead Laboratory Analysis Reports and Laboratory Certifications (If Applicable)

Volume IV – HUD Residential LBP Reports (If Applicable)

©2011, Mabbett & Associates, Inc. Page ii Survey Report Bedford Building 12_2-11_FINAL.doc

This report was prepared by the following Mabbett & Associates, Inc. personnel:

Michael F. Delaney Project Manager Massachusetts Asbestos Inspector AI031436 Massachusetts Management Planner AP000048

This report has been reviewed and approved by:

MABBETT & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Robert K. McKinley, MPH, CIH, LIH Director of Industrial Hygiene Services Massachusetts Asbestos Inspector AI000314

©2011, Mabbett & Associates, Inc. Page iii Survey Report Bedford Building 12_2-11_FINAL.doc

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Description Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION & EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION

3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY

3.1 Sampling Methodology

3.2 Analytical Methodology

3.3 Summary of Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) Findings

4.0 LEAD SCREENING SURVEY

4.1 Screening Survey Methodology

4.2 Summary of Lead Screening Survey Findings

5.0 LIMITATIONS

6.0 CLOSING REMARKS

6.1 Asbestos

6.2 Lead Containing Paint

Tables Table 1 – Specific Inaccessible Areas Table 2 – Summary of Positive ACM Samples Table 3 – Summary of XRF Measurements Above VISN 1 Threshold of >0.1 mg/cm2 Table 4 – Summary of ACM Building Survey Results, including negative results...... Appendix A Table 5 – Summary of XRF Measurements............................................................... Appendix B

Figures Figure 1 – Asbestos Survey Summary Plan - Building 12, Basement Figure 2 – Asbestos Survey Summary Plan - Building 12, Floor 1 Figure 3 – Asbestos Survey Summary Plan - Building 12, Floor 2 Figure 4 – Lead Survey Summary Plan - Building 12, Basement Figure 5 – Lead Survey Summary Plan - Building 12, Floor 1 Figure 6 – Lead Survey Summary Plan - Building 12, Floor 2

Appendices Appendix A – Table 4, Summary of ACM Building Survey Results, including negative results Appendix B – Table 5, Summary of XRF Measurements Appendix C – Representative Photographs of ACM Appendix D – Representative Photographs of Non-Intact Lead Containing Paint

©2011, Mabbett & Associates, Inc. Page 1 of 8 Survey Report Bedford Building 12_2-11_FINAL.doc

1.0 INTRODUCTION & EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Mabbett and Associates, Inc. (M&A), with Covino Environmental Associates, Inc. (Covino) as sub-contractors, performed surveys for suspect asbestos containing building materials (ACM) and screenings of suspect lead containing paint (LCP) surfaces utilizing an X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzer. Surveys were performed of selected buildings at the VA Medical Center (VAMC) located at 200 Springs Road, Bedford, MA, under Contract VA241-P-1653. A complete list of buildings surveyed is in Volume I of this report. Site survey work was performed in July, 2010, by appropriately credentialed personnel as required. Collected suspect ACM samples were submitted to a certified analytical laboratory for asbestos analysis by polarized light microscopy (PLM) using positive stop methodology and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) where indicated. When necessary, paint chip samples were collected and submitted to a certified analytical laboratory for lead content analysis using atomic absorption spectroscopy. The survey effort involved the collection or screening of the following samples, resulting in the following conclusions:

• 70 bulk samples for suspect ACM were collected in this building.

• Based on laboratory analysis of suspect ACM, 6 of the collected samples contained asbestos greater than or equal to 1%.

• 66 XRF analyzer screening measurements of building surfaces were taken in this building.

• Based on XRF screening measurements, 35 of the XRF measurements revealed concentrations of lead in paint that exceeded 0.1 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm2).

This building report consists of a summary of findings, floor plans that indicate positive sample locations, detailed analytical findings for the specific surveyed building materials, and photos of identified ACM and LCP, greater than 1.0 mg/cm2 and in an other than intact condition.

Laboratory certificates of analysis and field data sheets for this building report are available in Volume III of the Comprehensive VAMC Lead and Asbestos Survey Report.

2.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION

According to information provided by the VAMC Office of Facilities Management and observations made by the M&A team at the time of the survey, Building 12 was a three-story Office Building built in 1928 and occupied approximately 10,010 square feet.

3.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY

3.1 Sampling Methodology

A visual screening inspection was conducted to identify locations of suspect ACM throughout the building by state licensed asbestos inspectors. Only areas that were accessible during the field work phase were inspected. Every effort was made during the initial field survey work to access areas as necessary to complete the survey; however, areas that remained inaccessible to the survey team are indicated in Table 1 below.

©2011, Mabbett & Associates, Inc. Page 2 of 8 Survey Report Bedford Building 12_2-11_FINAL.doc

Table 1 – Specific Inaccessible Areas

Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 12

Building Floor Room

No.

Reason Area Was Inaccessible and Survey

Impacts, If Applicable

There were no inaccessible areas identified during this survey.

Other general areas that were inaccessible or where the survey was limited to visual observation only are identified below:

• Within walls • Within fire doors

• Enclosed pipe/duct chases • Inside mechanical equipment/ductwork

• Above fixed drywall or plaster ceilings

Due to these access restrictions, ACM surveys should be performed prior to any proposed renovations or maintenance involving inaccessible areas.

Bulk samples were collected of suspect ACM in accordance with US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Asbestos Hazard and Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and VISN 1 approved M&A VISN 1 Survey Program Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). Roofing materials were not sampled unless otherwise indicated in order to maintain applicable warranties. Bulk suspect ACM sampling was conducted according to the following sampling plan:

(a) Surfacing material:

(1) At least three bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is 1,000 ft2 or less.

(2) At least five bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is greater than 1,000 ft2 but less than or equal to 5,000 ft2.

(3) At least seven bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is greater than 5,000 ft2.

(b) Thermal system insulation:

(1) At least three bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area of thermal system insulation.

(2) At least one bulk sample shall be collected from each homogeneous area of patched area of thermal system insulation.

(3) Sufficient samples shall be collected from elbows and fittings to determine if it contains

ACM.

(4) Bulk samples shall not be collected from any homogeneous area where the state licensed asbestos inspector determined that the thermal system insulation is fiberglass, foam glass, rubber, or other non-ACM.

©2011, Mabbett & Associates, Inc. Page 3 of 8 Survey Report Bedford Building 12_2-11_FINAL.doc

(c) Miscellaneous material:

(1) At least one bulk sample shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is less than 100 ft2.

(2) At least three bulk samples shall be collected from each homogeneous area that is greater than 100 ft2.

3.2 Analytical Methodology

The collected bulk samples were submitted under chain of custody procedures to ProScience Analytical Services, Inc. (ProScience) of Woburn, MA for polarized light microscopy (PLM) analysis of bulk materials using EPA Method 600/R-93/116. When required, sample results that revealed trace concentrations (greater than 0% but less than or equal to 1%) of asbestos by PLM were analyzed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis. ProScience is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) and participates in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP Lab Code 200090-0). Duplicate bulk samples were submitted for PLM analysis to Covino. Covino is accredited by the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) and participates in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP Lab Code 101781-0). A summary table containing the duplicate bulk sample results is provided in Volume I, Chapter 1, Table 4. Copies of the laboratory accreditations are included in Volume III of the Comprehensive VAMC Lead and Asbestos Survey Report.

All bulk sample results are summarized in Table 4 – Summary of ACM Building Survey Results.

The EPA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Division of Occupational Safety (DOS) defines any material that contains greater than one percent (>1%) asbestos as being an ACM. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) defines any material that contains equal to or greater than one percent (≥1%) asbestos as being an ACM. As such, the analytical laboratory identified bulk samples as positive for asbestos that met the regulatory criteria of equal to or greater than one percent (≥1%) asbestos.

3.3 Summary of Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) Findings

3.3.1 Data Tables, Laboratory Results, and Field Notes

Collected bulk samples confirmed by the analytical laboratory to contain ≥1% asbestos are listed in Table 2 - Summary of Positive ACM Samples. Samples analyzed by PLM containing trace levels of asbestos, defined as greater than 0% but less than 1%, are listed in Table 4 with the TEM analysis results. Volume III of the Comprehensive VAMC Lead and Asbestos Survey Report includes copies of the laboratory certificates of analysis (including duplicate samples) and Inspector Data Sheets.

©2011, Mabbett & Associates, Inc. Page 4 of 8 Survey Report Bedford Building 12_2-11_FINAL.doc

Table 2 - Summary of Positive ACM Samples

Estimated Quantity

Sample No.

Sample Location

ACM

Location

Description of Material

Percent and Type of

Asbestos

Amount Units

Condition

VISN 1

RISK

Hazard Category

1-4*

1A B20 1B B08A 1C B20

Basement Corridors

12"x12" Dark Gray Floor Tile 3% Chrysotile 360 SF Good 4

14A Entry 14B 121C 14C 222

Throughout 1st & 2nd

Floors

12"x12" Off- White Floor Tile

Mastic 3% Chrysotile 8,100 SF Good 4

18A 18B 18C

212A Rooms 212A & 220C

9"x9" Red Floor Tile 3% Chrysotile 50 SF Good 4

19A 19B 19C

212A Rooms 212A & 220C

9"x9" Red Floor Tile Mastic 2% Chrysotile 50 SF Good 4

20A 20B 20C

Exterior Basement & 1st Floor Front Door

Door Caulk 2% Chrysotile 60 LF Good 4

22A 22B 22C

Exterior Exterior Flashing Caulk 5% Chrysotile 100 LF Good 4

Footnotes: SF - Square Feet 1 - Analyzed by TEM LF - Linear Feet EA - Each

CF - Cubic Feet

* The VISN 1 risk hazard assessment scale 1 – 4 is a relative indicator of the risk and need for response/remediation. (1) represents the highest priority (e.g. removal or encapsulation) whereas a (4) represents the lowest priority (monitor as part of 6 month O&M program). The rating assigned by an Asbestos Management Planner, takes into account: condition, friable vs. non-friable, accessibility, occupancy (e.g. continuous, intermittent or occasional and patients/staff/visitors), potential for air erosion, potential for vibration damage, potential for disturbance/damage (e.g. exposed and in an accessible location), and potential for water damage.

3.3.2 Photographs

Representative photographs of identified ACM are provided in Appendix C of this report.

3.3.3 CADD Drawings

The location of each collected bulk sample and its abridged sample ID is shown on the CADD drawings in the Figures Section of this report. The sample ID on the drawings has been abridged (by excluding the individual room number from the full sample ID) for aesthetic purposes. Each

©2011, Mabbett & Associates, Inc. Page 5 of 8 Survey Report Bedford Building 12_2-11_FINAL.doc positive ACM sample location is colored red and marked with an asterisk (*), while stop positives are marked with two asterisks (**). Collected bulk samples that were not positive are identified solely by the abridged sample ID. Building areas containing ACM have been indicated with hatching to identify the location of the identified ACM.

4.0 LEAD SCREENING SURVEY

4.1 Screening Survey Methodology

M&A completed a Lead Containing Paint Risk Analysis in accordance with the SOP and determined that a LCP screening survey was warranted in this building. The LCP screening survey was performed by trained lead inspectors/screeners meeting the qualifications outlined in the SOP. The screening survey measured lead concentrations in accessible building surfaces by using a Niton XLp 303A XRF (serial number 18580). The XRF instrument was calibrated at the frequency specified in the SOP.

4.2 Summary of Lead Screening Survey Findings

4.2.1 Data Tables

As specified by VISN 1, a description of XRF-screened painted interior and exterior building components containing lead at concentrations greater than 0.1 mg/cm2 have been included in Table 3 below:

Table 3 - Summary of Positive XRF Measurements

Reading No.

Floor Location Substrate and Component

Side Condition Color Results

(mg/cm2)

1241 First Exterior Metal Lintel West Intact Gray 30

1245 Second Exterior Wood Window Casing West Intact Gray 34

1248 Second Exterior Metal Lintel West Intact Gray 31.6

1249 Basement Exterior Metal Drain Pipe North Intact Black 0.16

1250 Basement Exterior Metal Door Casing North Peeling Gray 37.6

1252 Basement Exterior Metal Vent South Intact Gray 0.4

1253 First Exterior Wood Column South Intact Gray 44.7

1254 Basement Exterior Wood Door Casing South Intact Gray 37.4

1258 Second 222 Wood Window Sill North Intact White 6.7

1259 Second 222 Wood Window Sash North Intact White 5.7

1262 Second 222 Metal Door Casing South Intact Gray 6.2 1264 Second 222 Metal Radiator North Peeling White 0.11 1266 Second 210 Metal Radiator South Peeling White 0.5

1271 Second 210 Wood Window Sash South Intact White 4.9

©2011, Mabbett & Associates, Inc. Page 6 of 8 Survey Report Bedford Building 12_2-11_FINAL.doc

Table 3 - Summary of Positive XRF Measurements Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 12

Reading No.

Floor Location Substrate and Component

Side Condition Color Results

(mg/cm2)

1272 Second 210 Wood Window Sill South Intact White 7.5 1273 Second 210 Metal Door Casing North Intact Gray 3.8

1276 Second Stairwell Plaster Wall (Exterior) North Intact White 1.7

1277 Second Stairwell Plaster Wall (Interior) West Intact White 2.2

1278 Second Stairwell Metal Stringer West Intact White 5.4 1279 Second Stairwell Metal Newel Post North Intact White 4.9 1280 Second Stairwell Metal Riser South Intact White 7.7

1282 Second Stairwell Wood Window Casing North Intact White 0.5

1283 Second Stairwell Wood Window Sill North Intact White 8.6

1285 First 108 Wood Window Sash South Intact White 4.2

1286 First 108 Wood Window Sill South Intact White 4.1 1288 First 108 Metal Radiator South Fair White 1.5

1290 First 108 Plaster Wall (Interior) East Intact White 0.19

1292 First 108 Metal Door Casing North Intact Gray 3.9

1294 First 104 Plaster Wall (Exterior) South Intact White 1.6

1295 First 104 Plaster Wall (Interior) West Intact White 1.9

1297 First 104 Wood Window Casing South Intact White 0.6

1298 First 104 Wood Window Sill South Fair White 7

1299 First 104 Wood Window Sash South Intact White 6.8

1300 First Exterior Wood Window Sill South Intact Gray 3.6

1303 First B13 Plaster Wall (Interior) West Intact Blue 2.4

In addition, XRF measurements collected during the screening survey of interior and exterior building components are included in Table 5 – Summary of XRF Measurements. Table 5 includes a description of each screened surface and resulting XRF-measured lead concentration.

4.2.2 Photographs

Representative photographs of building materials greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/cm2 and where in other than intact condition (e.g. fair, peeling, cracking) are provided in Appendix D of this report.

4.2.3 CADD Drawings

Based on the results of the lead screening survey, a table of LCP components identified with > 0.1 mg/cm2 lead content was developed. This table is presented on the CADD drawings for use by the VAMC for exposure assessments and preliminary renovation planning. Based on the results

©2011, Mabbett & Associates, Inc. Page 7 of 8 Survey Report Bedford Building 12_2-11_FINAL.doc of the survey, these components identified in the CADD table and on the plan should be assumed to be LCP unless otherwise determined.

5.0 LIMITATIONS

This survey report is the result of a diligent search of the building for ACM and LCP. Only accessible areas were included in this survey. Although a comprehensive inspection was performed, M&A does not claim to have identified all of the ACM and LCP that could be present in the facility (for example, materials potentially located within aforementioned inaccessible areas discussed in Section 3.1). M&A’s survey was performed with limitations inherent to visual inspections. M&A has conducted this assessment with reasonable care and has performed this project within generally accepted industry standards. There can be no assurances, and M&A makes no assurances, that the information, research, and technology used to prepare this report may not change in the future, thus affecting the results reported herein.

6.0 CLOSING REMARKS

Prior to initiating plans for maintenance, renovation or demolition activities, the VAMC should review the asbestos and lead survey results to determine whether any of the materials identified as ACM or LCP will be disturbed by proposed work activities.

6.1 Asbestos

The purpose of the ACM survey was to identify ACM in the building within the limitations of the survey for worker protection purposes and future renovation or demolition planning purposes. In regards to asbestos, any suspect material encountered during renovation/demolition that is not identified in this report as being non-ACM should be assumed to be ACM unless laboratory analytical data for bulk samples prove otherwise. Suspect ACM that may be present within the walls, above inaccessible hard ceilings, or in other inaccessible locations, and that accordingly was not inspected should be assumed to contain asbestos if discovered until otherwise verified, as previously described. If ACM must be disturbed, the ACM must be removed by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor and be performed in accordance with applicable regulations. If proposed work activities will not disturb intact ACM, continuous monitoring of ACM should be conducted throughout work activities to ensure the ACM remains in an intact condition.

Additionally, prior to commencing work activities, personnel involved with the work activities should be made aware of the location of ACM, within the building in which they will be working. Additional information regarding asbestos management and the Operations & Maintenance (O&M) program is outlined in the VAMC campus wide Asbestos O&M Management Plan available in Volume I of the Comprehensive VAMC Lead and Asbestos Survey Report.

6.2 Lead Containing Paint

The purpose of the LCP screening survey was to identify patterns of LCP. For the purpose of this LCP screening survey, representative interior and exterior building components were tested. The regulations addressing LCP in non-residential buildings are focused on protecting workers involved with paint disturbing activities and related waste disposal activities.

©2011, Mabbett & Associates, Inc. Page 8 of 8 Survey Report Bedford Building 12_2-11_FINAL.doc

Worker protection is regulated by OSHA regulations as well as applicable state regulations. These regulations involve air monitoring of workers to determine exposure levels when disturbing paint containing measurable lead. A LCP determination cannot determine a safe level of lead, but is intended to provide guidance as to the locations of where LCP is present. VA employees and contractors may use this information to better determine exposures of workers to airborne lead by understanding the different concentrations of lead paint on representative components and surfaces. Worker exposure controls can then be implemented and air monitoring can then be performed during activities that disturb paint on representative surfaces.

A concentration of lead greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/cm2 exceeds HUD residential standards and is an indicator of risk. OSHA does not specify a safe concentration of LCP. However, for the purposes of this LCP screening survey a lead concentration greater than 0.1 mg/cm2 has been utilized as a threshold established by VISN 1 for areas where possible worker exposures may occur.

Figures

Appendix A

Table 4 Summary of ACM Building Survey Results, including negative results

Amount Units

1A B20 Basement

Corridors

12"x12" Dark Gray

Floor Tile 3% Chrysotile 360 SF Good 4

1B B08A Basement

Corridors

12"x12" Dark Gray

Floor Tile

1C B20 Basement

Corridors

12"x12" Dark Gray

Floor Tile

2A B20 - 12"x12" Dark Gray

Floor Tile Mastic

TR - - - -

2B B08A - 12"x12" Dark Gray

Floor Tile Mastic

TR - - - -

2C B20 - 12"x12" Dark Gray

Floor Tile Mastic

TR - - - -

3A B18 - 2'x2' Fissured Ceiling

Tile

NAD - - - -

3B B19 - 2'x2' Fissured Ceiling

Tile

NAD - - - -

3C B20 - 2'x2' Fissured Ceiling

Tile

NAD - - - -

4A B06 - 12"x12" Dark Green

Floor Tile

NAD - - - -

4B B06 - 12"x12" Dark Green

Floor Tile

NAD - - - -

4C B06 - 12"x12" Dark Green

Floor Tile

NAD - - - -

5A B06 - 12"x12" Dark Green

Floor Tile Mastic

NAD - - - -

5B B06 - 12"x12" Dark Green

Floor Tile Mastic

NAD - - - -

5C B06 - 12"x12" Dark Green

Floor Tile Mastic

NAD - - - -

6A B07 - 2'x2' Flat Ceiling Tile NAD - - - -

6B B07 - 2'x2' Flat Ceiling Tile NAD - - - -

6C B12 - 2'x2' Flat Ceiling Tile NAD - - - -

7A B20 - 4" Cove Base Mastic NAD - - - -

7B 230 - 4" Cove Base Mastic NAD - - - -

7C B03 - 4" Cove Base Mastic NAD - - - -

8A B04 - Drywall NAD - - - -

8B B19A - Drywall NAD - - - -

8C B04 - Drywall NAD - - - -

9A B04 - Joint Compound NAD - - - -

9B B19A - Joint Compound NAD - - - -

9C B04 - Joint Compound NAD - - - -

10A B06 - White Sink

Undercoating

NAD - - - -

10B B06 - White Sink

Undercoating

NAD - - - -

Stop Positive See 1A

Stop Positive See 1A

Percent and

Type of

Asbestos

Estimated

Quantity Condition

VISN 1

RISK

Hazard

Category

1-4*

Sample

No.

Sample

Location

ACM

Location

Description of

Material

Table 4 - Summary of ACM Building Survey Results

Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 12

Bedford VAMC - Building 12

©2011, Mabbett & Associates, Inc. Page 1 of 3 February 2011

Appendix A, Table 4 - Survey Report Bedford Building 12

Percent and

Type of

Asbestos

Estimated

Quantity Condition

VISN 1

RISK

Hazard

Category

1-4*

Sample

No.

Sample

Location

ACM

Location

Description of

Material

Table 4 - Summary of ACM Building Survey Results

Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 12

10C B06 - White Sink

Undercoating

NAD - - - -

11A Entry - 2'x2' Textured Ceiling

Tile

NAD - - - -

11B 112 - 2'x2' Textured Ceiling

Tile

NAD - - - -

11C 126 - 2'x2' Textured Ceiling

Tile

NAD - - - -

12A Entry - Carpet Mastic NAD - - - -

12B 110 - Carpet Mastic NAD - - - -

12C 202 - Carpet Mastic NAD - - - -

13A Entry - 12"x12" Off-White

Floor Tile

TR - - - -

13B 121C - 12"x12" Off-White

Floor Tile

TR - - - -

13C 222 - 12"x12" Off-White

Floor Tile

TR - - - -

14A Entry

Throughout

1st & 2nd

Floors

12"x12" Off-White

Floor Tile Mastic 3% Chrysotile 8,100 SF Good 4

14B 121C

Throughout

1st & 2nd

Floors

12"x12" Off-White

Floor Tile Mastic

14C 222

Throughout

1st & 2nd

Floors

12"x12" Off-White

Floor Tile Mastic

15A 105 - Plaster Base Coat NAD - - - -

15B 108 - Plaster Base Coat NAD - - - -

15C 208 - Plaster Base Coat NAD - - - -

15D 228 - Plaster Base Coat NAD - - - -

15E 202 - Plaster Base Coat NAD - - - -

16A 105 - Plaster Skim Coat NAD - - - -

16B 108 - Plaster Skim Coat NAD - - - -

16C 208 - Plaster Skim Coat NAD - - - -

16D 228 - Plaster Skim Coat NAD - - - -

16E 202 - Plaster Skim Coat NAD - - - -

17A Stairs - 2'x2' Fissured Pinhole

Ceiling Tile

NAD - - - -

17B 213 - 2'x2' Fissured Pinhole

Ceiling Tile

NAD - - - -

17C 202 - 2'x2' Fissured Pinhole

Ceiling Tile

NAD - - - -

18A 212A

Rooms

212A &

220C

9"x9" Red Floor Tile 3% Chrysotile 50 SF Good 4

18B 212A

Rooms

212A &

220C

9"x9" Red Floor Tile

Stop Positive See 14A

Stop Positive See 14A

Stop Positive See 18A

Bedford VAMC - Building 12

©2011, Mabbett & Associates, Inc. Page 2 of 3

Percent and

Type of

Asbestos

Estimated

Quantity Condition

VISN 1

RISK

Hazard

Category

1-4*

Sample

No.

Sample

Location

ACM

Location

Description of

Material

Table 4 - Summary of ACM Building Survey Results

Bedford VA Medical Center, Building 12

18C 212A

Rooms

212A &

220C

9"x9" Red Floor Tile

19A 212A

Rooms

212A &

220C

9"x9" Red Floor Tile

Mastic 2% Chrysotile 50 SF Good 4

19B 212A

Rooms

212A &

220C

9"x9" Red Floor Tile

Mastic

19C 212A

Rooms

212A &

220C

9"x9" Red Floor Tile

Mastic

20A Exterior

Basement

& 1st Floor

Front Door

Door Caulk 2% Chrysotile 60 LF Good 4

20B Exterior

Basement

& 1st Floor

Front Door

Door Caulk

20C Exterior

Basement

& 1st Floor

Front Door

Door Caulk

21A Exterior - Window Caulk NAD - - - -

21B Exterior - Window Caulk NAD - - - -

21C Exterior - Window Caulk NAD - - - -

22A Exterior Exterior Flashing Caulk 5% Chrysotile 100 LF Good 4

22B…