Appendix H(g) - Building 188 Hazardous Materials Report.pdf
PDF 14 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Demolition of Facilities Phase 6 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4819-20-R-1000
About this file
This document contains a pre-demolition survey report and federal contract opportunity solicitation. The pre-demolition survey report identifies asbestos-containing materials, hazardous materials, and soil contaminants at Building 188 on Tyndall Air Force Base in Florida in preparation for demolition. It details the survey methods and findings for asbestos, lead-based paint, TCLP metals, PCBs, and soil sampling. The federal contract opportunity solicitation is for demolition services of facilities in Phase 6 at Tyndall Air Force Base. It is a service-disabled veteran-owned small business set-aside with a NAICS code of 238910 and size standard of $16.5 million. Quotes are due by June 5, 2020 at 12:00 PM Central Time for this firm fixed price contract to be awarded by the 325th Contracting Squadron of the Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 37
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TYNDALL AFB PRE-DEMOLITION SURVEY
W912DY-19-P-0053
Pre-Demolition Report for
Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing
For:
Facilities Reduction Program FY19 Tyndall II
Tyndall AFB, Florida Building 188 Armament Sys.
Prepared For:
US Army Corps of Engineers Engineering & Support Service Center
4910 University Square, Suite 4 Huntsville, Alabama 35816-1822
Facilities Reduction Program
ATTN: CEHNC-ISF
March 2020
AQ#: 15671
ii
CERTIFICATION PAGE
Pre-Demolition Report for Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soils Testing
Facilities Reduction Program FY19 Tyndall II Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida Building 188 Armament Sys.
AirQuest Project #15671
Prepared For:
US Army Corps of Engineers Engineering & Support Service Center
4910 University Square, Suite 4 Huntsville, Alabama 35816-1822
ATTN: CEHNC-ISF
Prepared By:
AirQuest Environmental, Inc.
6851 Southwest 45th Street
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33314
Adrian Amicucci Traci-Anne Boyle, CIH, CSP Asbestos Building Inspector FL Asbestos Consultant #AX-60
Ted Smith, PG
FL Professional Geologist No. PG1368 iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1 INTRODUCTION AND SITE DESCRIPTION 1
1.1 PURPOSE 1
1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION 1
1.3 DEMOLITION OVERVIEW 1
2 ASBESTOS SURVEY 2
2.1 SURVEY METHODS 2
2.2 LABORATORY ANALYSIS 2
2.3 SUSPECT ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS 3
3 LEAD BASED PAINT SCREENING 5
4 TCLP RCRA METALS 6
4.1 TCLP SAMPLE COLLECTION 6
4.2 TCLP SAMPLE RESULTS 7
5 PCBS 7
6 OTHER REGULATED MATERIALS INVENTORY 7
7 SOIL TESTING FOR ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES 14
8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16
8.1 ASBESTOS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDED RESPONSE ACTION 16
8.2 LEAD SCREENING & OSHA LEAD GUIDANCE 17
8.3 TCLP RCRA METALS / LEAD 17
8.4 PCBS 18
8.5 OTHER REGULATED MATERIALS 18
8.6 SOIL CONCLUSIONS 18
9 LIMITATIONS 18
iv
TABLES
Table 1 – Survey Information Table 2 – Asbestos Laboratory Analysis and Summary Table 3 - Lead Based Paint Screening Information Table 4 - Waste Stream Composition Table 5 – Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure Results Table 6 – PCB Results Table 7 – Other Regulated Materials Inventory Table 8 – Soil Sample Analytical Results Table 9 - Asbestos Containing Materials and OSHA Regulated Material
APPENDICES
Appendix I – Certifications
Appendix II – Sample Location Diagrams
Appendix III – Structure Demolition Overview (Diagram, Aerial Photographs, Photographs)
Appendix IV – Asbestos Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Record
Appendix V – Suspect Asbestos Containing Material Photographs, Asbestos Location Diagram, and OSHA Regulated Material Diagram
Appendix VI – TCLP Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Record
Appendix VII – PCB Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Record
Appendix VIII – Soil Boring Log and Soil Boring Location Photographs
Appendix IX – Soil Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Record
AirQuest Environmental, Inc.
AirQuest Project #15671 1 Building 188 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing
1 INTRODUCTION AND SITE DESCRIPTION
In accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS) for contract W912DY-19-P-0053, AirQuest Environmental, Inc. (“AirQuest”) performed pre-demolition asbestos, hazardous materials, and soil testing for Building 188 located at Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida (“the site”).
The surveys were performed by AirQuest Project Team Members as shown in Table 1. Copies of applicable licenses and accreditations are included in Appendix I.
Table 1 – Survey Information
Survey Name Survey Date
Asbestos Adrian Amicucci 23 November 2019 06 January 2020
TCLP Waste Stream Jason Cronin 05 December 2019
PCB Waste Stream Jason Cronin 05 December 2019
Other Regulated Materials Adrian Amicucci 23 November 2019
Soil Sample Collection Ted Smith 23 November 2019
TCLP – Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure PCB – Polychlorinated Biphenyl
1.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this survey was to identify asbestos-containing materials (ACM) within the interior, exterior and roof of the building; to determine if Other Regulated Materials (ORM) materials were present; to complete a waste stream analysis for Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)-8 metals and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); and to collect soil samples for organochlorine pesticides (OCP) for each structure. Diagrams depicting sampling locations are provided in Appendix II.
The investigation was conducted to facilitate the repairs at Tyndall Air Force Base following Hurricane Michael.
1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION
Building 188 Armament Sys was a 10,212 square foot, single-story structure built in 1994. The building was constructed of metal on a concrete slab foundation. The roof deck was constructed of metal over foam insulation. The ceilings were constructed of acoustical ceiling tile. Interior walls were constructed of concrete block and finished with drywall system. The concrete floors were finished with ceramic tile and vinyl floor tile.
1.3 DEMOLITION OVERVIEW
A diagram illustrating the general layout of the site was prepared using files provided by the client if available or drawn onsite by the AirQuest inspector. AirQuest prepared aerial photographs and photographed an overview of the interior and exterior of the building for purposes of assisting
AirQuest Project #15671 2 Building 188 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing contractors in evaluation of the demolition requirements. The diagram and photographs are included in Appendix III.
2 ASBESTOS SURVEY
A pre-demolition asbestos survey suitable to meet the requirements of the National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) and State of Florida regulations was performed at the site.
2.1 SURVEY METHODS
The sampling protocol used generally followed Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) guidelines. AHERA was promulgated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1987 and regulated public schools.
Suspect materials were differentiated into three categories: surfacing material, thermal system insulation, or miscellaneous material. Surfacing material is anything that is sprayed or troweled onto a surface; thermal system insulation is material used to insulate HVAC pipes, tanks, etc., and miscellaneous material is any other type of material.
A homogeneous area is defined as an area of surfacing material, thermal system insulation material, or miscellaneous material that is uniform in color and texture. A homogeneous area is not limited to only a room but can be found in several rooms. Sample selection in the building was determined by identifying the homogeneous areas and basing sampling locations upon these areas.
In conducting the building inspection in compliance with local, state, and federal regulations, all suspected ACM which were accessible to the inspector, were either sampled to confirm the actual presence of asbestos or assumed to contain asbestos.
2.2 LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Analysis was performed using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining. The laboratory is rated proficient through National Institute of Standards and Technology- National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NIST-NVLAP) for bulk asbestos analysis.
NESHAP defines ACM as containing more than 1% asbestos as determined using PLM (as specified in Appendix E, Subpart E, 40 CFR part 763, Section 1, Polarized Light Microscopy).
NESHAP defines friable ACM as any material containing more than 1% asbestos that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to a powder by hand pressure. If the asbestos content of a friable material is less than ten (10) percent as determined by a method other than point counting by PLM, the client may elect to verify the asbestos content by point counting using PLM.
Because of the inherent limitations of PLM bulk sample analysis, any friable sample reported as <2% asbestos by PLM was automatically analyzed by the PLM point count method to determine whether it may be regulated under the asbestos NESHAP.
AirQuest Project #15671 3 Building 188 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing
Estimates of quantities of ACM were based upon the identification of suspect materials. Where suspect ACM were located behind walls, above ceilings, beneath carpeting, or other concealed conditions and the quantities cannot be verified, the estimate is based upon the conditions present during the survey. These estimates are not to be considered absolute and should be verified when the ACM is exposed.
2.3 SUSPECT ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS
Homogenous areas (HA) of suspect material were identified and samples were collected and submitted under chain of custody to EMSL Analytical, Inc. (“EMSL”) for laboratory analysis of asbestos by PLM. If identified, friable samples with <2% asbestos were further analyzed by the PLM point count method to confirm the PLM results. A copy of the laboratory report and chain of custody record is included in Appendix IV.
Sample descriptions and laboratory results are summarized in Table 2. Photographs of each HA are included in Appendix V. A diagram illustrating the location of ACM and OSHA regulated materials is also provided in Appendix V.
Table 2 – Asbestos Laboratory Analysis and Summary
HA Sample Number
Description of Suspect Material
Location Asbestos Content %
1 188-1 2’ x 2’ ACT Dots – Ceiling 1 Center ND
1 188-2 2’ x 2’ ACT Dots – Ceiling 9 South ND
1 188-3 2’ x 2’ ACT Dots – Ceiling 2 South ND
2 188-4 Drywall System – Wall 9 South Drywall: ND
Joint Compound:
<0.25% Chrysotile*
2 188-5 Drywall System – Wall 2 South Drywall: ND Joint Compound: ND
2 188-6 Drywall System – Wall 11 Southeast Drywall: ND Joint Compound: ND
3 188-7 Yellow Wall Panel Mastic 14 Southeast ND
3 188-8 Yellow Wall Panel Mastic 2 South ND
4 188-9 8” x 8” Gray Ceramic Tile – Floor 6 Northwest ND
4 188-10 8” x 8” Gray Ceramic Tile – Floor 2 South ND
5 188-11 12” x 12” Beige Vinyl Tile – Floor 6 Northwest Floor Tile: ND
Mastic: ND
5 188-12 12” x 12” Beige Vinyl Tile – Floor 11 Northeast Floor Tile: ND
Mastic: 2% Chrysotile
AirQuest Project #15671 4 Building 188 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing
HA Sample Number
Description of Suspect Material
Location Asbestos Content %
5 188-13 12” x 12” Beige Vinyl Tile – Floor 1 Northeast Floor Tile: ND
Mastic: ND
6 188-14 1” x 1” Green Ceramic Tile – Floor 23 North ND
6 188-15 1” x 1” Green Ceramic Tile – Floor 15 East ND
7 188-16 White A/C Duct Mastic 1 Southwest ND
7 188-17 White A/C Duct Mastic 1 Center ND
7 188-18 White A/C Duct Mastic 10 West ND
8 188-19 4” Gray Vinyl Base Cove 14 Southeast ND
8 188-20 4” Gray Vinyl Base Cove 3 East ND
8 188-21 4” Gray Vinyl Base Cove 2 North ND
9 188-22 Spray-On Insulation 10 South ND
9 188-23 Spray-On Insulation 22 Northwest ND
9 188-24 Spray-On Insulation 10 North ND
9 188-25 Spray-On Insulation 10 Northeast ND
9 188-26 Spray-On Insulation 13 Southeast ND
10 188-27 Gray A/C Duct Mastic 10 Northwest ND
10 188-28 Gray A/C Duct Mastic 10 West ND
11 188-29 Concrete Block – Wall 10 West ND
11 188-30 Concrete Block – Wall 16 South ND
11 188-31 Concrete Block – Wall 22 West ND
12 188-32 Concrete Slab – Floor Exterior Northwest ND
12 188-33 Concrete Slab – Floor Exterior Northwest ND
AirQuest Project #15671 5 Building 188 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing
HA Sample Number
Description of Suspect Material
Location Asbestos Content %
12 188-34 Concrete Slab – Floor Exterior Northwest ND
12 188-35 Concrete Slab – Floor Exterior South ND
12 188-36 Concrete Slab – Floor Exterior East ND
13 188-37 Gray Rain Gutter Mastic Exterior Northwest ND
13 188-38 Gray Rain Gutter Mastic Exterior Southwest ND
14 188-39 Gray Mastic at Metal Roof Seams Exterior Northwest ND
14 188-40 Gray Mastic at Metal Roof Seams Exterior Northeast ND
15 188-41 Brown Mastic at Penetration
– Roof Exterior Northeast ND
15 188-42 Brown Mastic at Penetration
– Roof Exterior Southwest ND
16 188-43 Brown Mastic at Metal Roof Patch Exterior East ND
16 188-44 Brown Mastic at Metal Roof Patch Exterior East ND
17 188-45 Brown Vinyl Base Cove 19 East ND
17 188-46 Brown Vinyl Base Cove 21 East ND
HA- Homogenous Area ND – None Detected ACT- Acoustical Ceiling Tile A/C- Air Conditioner *This Sample was Point Counted
3 LEAD BASED PAINT SCREENING
An inspection was conducted to screen for the existence of lead containing painted building components. Testing of the painted building components was performed using an XRF Spectrometer. The XRF is a screening instrument currently recommended by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for analysis of lead levels in paint. The screening was used to assist in determining the need and relative concentrations of lead on painted building components for purposes of designing a sampling scheme for a composite waste stream analysis and demolition contractor worker protection information. The screening was not intended to be a
AirQuest Project #15671 6 Building 188 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing lead-based paint survey in accordance with HUD guidelines. A summary of the screening results is included in Table 3.
Table 3 - Lead Based Paint Screening Information
Structure Color Substrate Location Results1 Pb (mg/cm2)
Door Brown Metal Interior Negative -0.2 Door Brown Wood Interior Negative 0.0 Wall Beige Metal Interior Negative 0.1 Wall Beige Concrete Interior Negative 0.2 Floor Gray Concrete Interior Negative 0.2 Floor Red Concrete Interior Negative 0.2
Window Brown Wood Interior Negative 0.1 I-Beam Beige Metal Interior Negative 0.1 Door Brown Metal Exterior Negative 0.1 Wall Beige Metal Exterior Negative 0.0
Gutter Brown Metal Exterior Negative 0.0 Window Brown Metal Exterior Negative 0.2
Floor Brown Concrete Exterior Negative 0.3 Pb - Lead mg/cm2 – milligrams per square centimeter 1Indicates if the material meets the Department of Housing and Urban Development definition of Lead Based Paint
4 TCLP RCRA METALS
A waste stream composite sample was collected from the building for laboratory analysis of TCLP RCRA-8 Metals.
4.1 TCLP SAMPLE COLLECTION
The sample composition was determined by the composition of the materials comprising the building. Each major building component (such as wood, metal, concrete, glass, etc.) was estimated as a percentage of the weight of the building whole. Once the composition of the building was estimated, representative samples were collected of each material, in an approximate weight proportion as shown in Table 4.
Table 4 - Waste Stream Composition
Waste Stream Component Percentage of Waste Concrete 25
Wood 10 Metal 40
Drywall 15 Miscellaneous 10
Total Percentage 100
AirQuest Project #15671 7 Building 188 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing
4.2 TCLP SAMPLE RESULTS
The samples were submitted under chain of custody to Spectrum Environmental Laboratories (“Spectrum”), a National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC) accredited laboratory, for analysis of TCLP-RCRA-8 Metals by EPA via 1311/6010C/7470A. The results are summarized in Table 5.
Table 5 – Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure Results
Sample TCLP Results (milligrams/liter)
Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury Selenium Silver 188-
ND 0.329 0.0270 0.0470 ND ND ND ND
Limit1 5.0 100.0 1.0 5.0 5.0 0.2 1.0 5.0 1Regulatory Limit per 40 CFR 261.24 ND – None Detected
5 PCBS
Samples for PCBs were collected in general accordance with the EPA Region 1 Standard Operating Procedure for Sampling Porous Surfaces for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs), May 2011.
The samples were collected from representative painted surfaces to include up to a half-inch of the substrate. The samples were submitted under chain of custody to Spectrum for analysis by EPA Method SW 846 3540C/8020A.
Table 6 – PCB Results
Sample Results (mg/kg)
Aroclor-
Aroclor-
Aroclor-
Aroclor-
Aroclor-
Aroclor-
Aroclor-
188-001 Concrete
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
188-002 Paint
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
1Regulatory Limit per 40 CFR 761.50 Subpart D is 50 mg/kg mg/kg – milligrams/kilogram ND – None Detected
6 OTHER REGULATED MATERIALS INVENTORY
AirQuest conducted another regulated/hazardous materials inventory in general accordance with the Recommended Management Practices for the Removal of Hazardous Materials from Buildings Prior to Demolition prepared by the University of Florida and sponsored by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 1999. The inventory included lamps, thermostats, and
AirQuest Project #15671 8 Building 188 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing light switches potentially containing mercury; exit signs, emergency lights, and smoke alarms that have batteries; lighting ballasts which contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); transformers;
freon, hazardous chemicals and petroleum products; and lead pipes and roof vent flashings.
Certain assumptions for the inspection of fluorescent light ballasts for PCBs were utilized for the building inspections to be completed in a timely and cost-effective manner. As required by regulation, lighting ballasts must not contain PCBs and the label on the ballast must state “No PCB”. AirQuest inventoried 100% of the fluorescent lighting fixtures and inspected a representative of each type of fixture (i.e. 2-foot, 4-foot, etc.) for the “No PCB” labeling.
Each exit sign and emergency lights were presumed to each contain a single lead-acid rechargeable battery. Quantities and types of any ORM found are summarized in Table 7.
Table 7 – Other Regulated Materials Inventory
ORM Component
Type/Location
Quantity
Photographs
Recyclables
Fluorescent Bulbs 24" Lamp 2
Fluorescent Bulbs 48" Lamp 231
AirQuest Project #15671 9 Building 188 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing
Fluorescent Bulbs Compact Bulbs 4
Fluorescent Bulbs Round Bulb 1
Light Ballasts In 24" Fluorescent Fixtures
Light Ballasts In 48" Fluorescent Fixtures
AirQuest Project #15671 10 Building 188 Pre-Demolition
Lead-Acid Rechargeable Batteries
In Exit Signs 7
Thermostats Digital - No Mercury Observed
Fire Pull Down System
Cleaning Supplies
AirQuest Project #15671 11 Building 188 Pre-Demolition
Aerosol Cans 8
Miscellaneous Spray Bottles (Lubricants and Adhesives)
Printer with Toner
Locked Flammable Hazmat Stock
Unknown
AirQuest Project #15671 12 Building 188 Pre-Demolition
Used Oil Tank 1
Specialized ORM
Freon In Drinking Fountains
Freon Refrigerator Units
AirQuest Project #15671 13 Building 188 Pre-Demolition
Transformers Exterior Pad Mounted
Fire Extinguishers 9
Emergency Lights Interior 36
AirQuest Project #15671 14 Building 188 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing
ORM Component Type/Location Quantity Photographs
Emergency Lights Exterior 6
7 SOIL TESTING FOR ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES
AirQuest advanced four (4) soil borings and collected two (2) samples at each boring location at depths of zero to six inches (0 - 6 in.) and eighteen to twenty-four inches (18 – 24 in.) below land surface using a properly decontaminated hand bucket auger. The samples were generally collected near the four corners of the building as shown in Appendix II.
The soil sampling was conducted in accordance with Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Standard Operating Procedures SOP-001-01 FS 3000 (Soil) and SOP-001-01 FQ1000 (Field Quality Control Requirements). One boring log was completed for the building documenting the observed lithology, visually estimated moisture content, noticeable odors, soil color, sample collection times, sampler’s name, sampling interval and boring completion method.
The soil boring log and soil boring location photographs are included in Appendix VIII.
Samples were placed in dedicated sample containers provided by the laboratory and labeled according to the referenced building/structure, collection time, sampler’s name and analysis. A chain of custody form was completed to document the chronology of ownership, control and transfer of the samples. All samples were placed in a cooler filled with ice for transfer to the laboratory.
The soil samples were shipped to Eurofins TestAmerica (“TestAmerica”) in Pensacola, Florida, a NELAC accredited environmental laboratory licensed in the State of Florida, for analysis by EPA Method: 8081B (Organochlorine Pesticides by GC). Analytical results are summarized in Table
8. A copy of the laboratory report and chain of custody record is included in Appendix IX.
The analytical results indicate traces of OCPs 4,4’-DDD, 4,4’-DDE, 4,4’-DDT, Aldrin, Dieldrin, Heptachlor, and Total Chlordane above laboratory method detection limit and some above the practical quantitation limits, in the soil samples. Sample OCP-188.1 analytical results indicate Dieldrin concentrations above the Residential Soil Cleanup Target Level (SCTL) but below the Commercial/Industrial SCTL. All other detected OCP constituents were below the Residential or Commercial/Industrial SCTLs provided in Chapter 62-777 FAC, the criteria used by the FDEP.
AirQuest Project #15671 15 Building 188 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing
Table 8 – Soil Sample Analytical Results
Sample Sample Depth
(Inches)
Results (mg/kg)
4,4’-DDD 4,4’-DDE 4,4’-DDT Aldrin Dieldrin Heptachlor Total Chlordane
OCP-188.1 0-6 ND ND 0.041I 0.012I 0.10 ND ND
OCP-188.2 18-24 ND 0.0033I ND ND 0.047 ND ND
OCP-188.3 0-6 0.023 0.19 0.36 ND 0.035 ND 0.0097I
OCP-188.4 18-24 0.0071I 0.065 0.11 ND 0.011 ND 0.0015I
OCP-188.5 0-6 ND 0.031 0.021 ND 0.012 ND 0.036
OCP-188.6 18-24 ND 0.016 ND ND 0.026 0.0021I 0.049
OCP-188.7 0-6 ND ND ND ND 0.0028I ND ND
OCP-188.8 18-24 0.0021I 0.020 ND ND 0.017 ND ND
OCP-188.9 DUP
(Sample 7) 0-6 ND 0.0020I ND ND 0.0044I ND ND
SCTL
(Commercial/Industrial) 22 15 15 0.3 0.3 1 14
SCTL (Residential) 4.2 2.9 2.9 0.06 0.06 0.2 2.8 mg/kg – milligrams/kilogram ND – None Detected Above the Method Detection Limit SCTL – Soil Cleanup Target Level, Chapter 62-777 Florida Administrative Code I – The Reported Value is Between the Laboratory Method Detection Limit and the Laboratory Practical Quantitation Limit
AirQuest Project #15671 16 Building 188 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing
8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A thorough pre-demolition inspection for asbestos and hazardous materials was conducted at the site and an inventory of the materials was created. The soils surrounding the site were sampled and analyzed for pesticides. Based upon the results of the inspections, recommendations for each contaminant are discussed separately below.
8.1 ASBESTOS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDED RESPONSE ACTION
Table 9 summarizes the results of our observation and laboratory analysis of identified ACM and OSHA Regulated Materials.
Table 9 - Asbestos Containing Materials and OSHA Regulated Material
Homogenous Area (HA) Material
Percentage/ Type
Material Condition/ Friability
Approximate Quantity1 Category
HA 2:
Drywall System Wall
Drywall: ND Joint Compound: ND - <0.25% Chrysotile*
Good/ Friable 2,564 SF OSHA
(non-ACM)
HA 5:
12” x 12” Beige Vinyl Tile – Floor
Tile: ND Mastic: ND - 2% Chrysotile
Good/ Non-Friable 1, 365 SF Category I
NESHAPs 1Note: Quantities were updated from original estimates based upon field verification of the location of the material for purposes of creating the ACM location diagram provided in Appendix IV.
Friable- Material that may be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry.
ND- None Detected NESHAP– National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants Non-Friable- Material that, when dry, may not be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.
OSHA- Occupational Safety and Health Administration SF- Square Feet National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Category Recommendations:
• Category I: Category I nonfriable ACM refers to asbestos-containing packing, gaskets, resilient floor coverings, and asphalt roofing products.
o Demolition Activities: NESHAP regulations do not require that Category I nonfriable ACM be removed prior to demolition activities as long as the material is not rendered friable by demolition practices, kept wet during demolition activities, is segregated from the waste stream and disposed of in a Class I landfill capable of accepting such material.
The demolition crew must abide by OSHA regulations pertaining to asbestos exposure. The owner should consider removal prior to demolition as this may be
AirQuest Project #15671 17 Building 188 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing more cost-effective than complying with OSHA regulations, the costs associated with segregating the waste stream and the additional disposal costs.
Prior to the removal or in-place wet demolition of the identified asbestos containing material, notification to the appropriate County and the State of Florida agencies is required.
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA): The results of the laboratory analysis were all <1% chrysotile asbestos. As such, the EPA does not consider these materials to be ACM. However, OSHA regulations pertaining to asbestos personnel exposure still apply to materials that contain <1% asbestos.
• Special Considerations for Mastic on Concrete: AirQuest recommends that if the concrete slabs will be recycled during the demolition process, formal asbestos remediation oversight be performed during the removal of all asbestos containing mastics from the concrete slabs. It is common that remediation will remove the thick, three dimensional “easily remediated” mastic layer and that patches of residual mastic remain in the cracks, corners and depressions in the concrete. AirQuest recommends oversight and proper documentation during the mastic remediation process to avoid any potential delays or liability with the recycling contractors.
8.2 LEAD SCREENING & OSHA LEAD GUIDANCE
Lead was identified in the paint at the site. Under the present OSHA lead construction standard, all identified lead-containing materials affected by construction activities falls under the requirements of 29 CFR 1926. There are no current government guidelines defining a lead-based paint or lead concentration that creates a hazardous atmosphere when disturbed. Based on current OSHA guidelines, for those employees who will be disturbing lead-containing paint (LCP), their employer must make an initial determination by monitoring employee exposure if any employee is exposed to lead at or above 30 micrograms per cubic meter for an eight-hour time weighted average (30 µg/m3 8-hour time weighted average). The employer must implement OSHA prescribed protective measures until they can demonstrate that the employee exposure is not in excess of the action level.
In general, relatively low levels of lead were detected in the various coated surfaces surveyed.
Depending on the degree and type of disturbance of these surfaces (i.e. sanding, cutting, or demolishing), employers may be required to implement varying degrees of OSHA prescribed protective measures. These protective measures must be maintained until it can be demonstrated that employee exposures do not exceed the action level. The employer should also implement and maintain a written compliance program detailing the protective measures they will utilize to control lead exposure during renovation activities.
8.3 TCLP RCRA METALS / LEAD
The results of the laboratory analysis indicate that the waste stream generated from the site is non-hazardous.
AirQuest Project #15671 18 Building 188 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing
8.4 PCBS
The results of the sampling and analysis did not identify PCBs in composite waste stream paint and concrete samples.
8.5 OTHER REGULATED MATERIALS
In general, the items inventoried may be recycled and reclaimed. Special disposal requirements may be required for the transformer.
8.6 SOIL CONCLUSIONS
The soil analytical results identified the compound Dieldrin at a concentration of 0.10 mg/kg in the 0-6 inch interval of borehole number 1 (sample OCP-188.1). The reported concentration is above the Residential SCTL of 0.06 mg/kg but below the Commercial/Industrial SCTL of 0.3 mg/kg. Dieldrin was also detected in sample OCP-188.2 (18-24 inch interval) at a concentration of 0.047 mg/l, just below the residential SCTL.
Upon completion of building demolition and concrete pad removal, AirQuest recommends that the area of impacted soil (northwest corner of building) be excavated and stockpiled onsite.
The excavation should extend to a depth of four (4) feet below land surface (BLS) and extend out in an approximate three (3) foot radius around borehole number 1. Five (5) confirmation samples should be collected from the excavation area and submitted for laboratory analysis to confirm Dieldrin and other OCP constituents are below the residential FDEP SCTLs.
The stockpiled soil should be protected with proper engineering controls to prevent cross contamination of surrounding soil. At a minimum, the soil should be in a secured beamed area lined and covered with polyethylene sheeting. It is recommended that demolition personnel should utilize Level C PPE protection to reduce the potential for exposure to any impacted soils.
Once it has been confirmed that all contaminated soils have been removed from the excavation and stockpiled, the excavated soil must be sampled and characterized for proper disposal.
9 LIMITATIONS
If any suspect hazardous/asbestos containing building materials are encountered during demolition activities that were not sampled in this report, the materials should not be disturbed until they have been sampled and identified as non-hazardous and non-ACM through appropriate investigation and/or laboratory analysis. Many of the roofs at Tyndall Air Force Base were sealed with an EPDM roofing system covering all the original roofing materials. It is possible, if not likely, that additional suspect asbestos materials are present under the EPDM and were not identified during the asbestos survey.
This report was prepared in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the client and assigned agents and is not intended for any other purposes. Our report is based on the information available to us at the time of our investigation and limited in scope to the stated purpose and/or the area(s) inspected. Other conditions elsewhere in the site may differ from those in the inspected/ surveyed locations and
AirQuest Project #15671 19 Building 188 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing such conditions are unknown, may change over time, and/or have not been considered. This report does not claim to identify all potential hazards and/or contaminants that may be present, nor does it imply any medical opinion on the relationship of potential health effects with any reported hazards and/ or contaminants. Our opinions are based on our findings and professional expertise, with no guaranty or warranty implied herein. Should additional information become available, we reserve the right to determine the impact, if any, of the new information on our opinions, conclusions, and recommendations if necessary, as warranted by the discovery of the additional information. AirQuest accepts no responsibility for interpretation of this report by others. Its contents shall not be used or relied upon by other parties without prior written authorization by AirQuest.
Appendix I Certifications
JONATHAN ZACHEM, SECRETARYRICK SCOTT, GOVERNOR
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
ASBESTOS LICENSING UNIT
THE ASBESTOS CONSULTANT HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 469, FLORIDA STATUTES
BOYLE, TRACI-ANNE
Do not alter this document in any form.
AIRQUEST ENVIRONMENTAL INC
LICENSE NUMBER: AX60
EXPIRATION DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 2020
This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document.
6851 SW 45 ST
DAVIE FL 33314
Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=8c21d1d6249bcaa3338cefa039457259
JONATHAN ZACHEM, SECRETARYRICK SCOTT, GOVERNOR
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL GEOLOGISTS
THE PROFESSIONAL GEOLOGIST HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 492, FLORIDA STATUTES
SMITH, TED J
Do not alter this document in any form.
1735 CLARENDON AVENUE
LICENSE NUMBER: PG1368
EXPIRATION DATE: JULY 31, 2020
This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document.
LAKELAND FL 33803
Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=6b0348687cc372fc3b319e7b329b1312
Appendix II Sample Location Diagrams
Sampling Locations
LEGEND
ASBESTOS SAMPLE # 1
PCB PAINT COMPOSITE P
PCB CONCRETE COMPOSITE C
SOIL BORING LOCATION 1
Contract
FACILITIES REDUCTION PROGRAM
FY19 TYNDALL II
W912DY-19-P-0053
DATE: MARCH 2020
Site
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE
FLORIDA
BUILDING: ARMAMENT SYS
BUILDING #: 188
6851 SW 45TH STREET
FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33314
AIRQUEST PROJECT 15671
Appendix III Structure Demolition Overview Diagram, Aerial
Photographs and Demolition Overview Photographs
Demolition Overview
BUILDING INFORMATION
NAME ARMAMENT SYS
NUMBER 188
YEAR BUILT 1994
SQUARE FEET 10,212
STORIES 1
Contract
FACILITIES REDUCTION PROGRAM
FY19 TYNDALL II
W912DY-19-P-0053
DATE: MARCH 2020
Site
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE
FLORIDA
BUILDING: ARMAMENT SYS
BUILDING #: 188
6851 SW 45TH STREET
Building 188 – Pre-Hurricane Aerial Photographs
Overview
Side Angle Side Angle
Side Angle Side Angle
Images Obtained Using Google Earth
Bld 188 - ARMAMENT SYS Tyndall Air Force Base
AirQuest Environmental, Inc.
Project #15671
Exterior
Tyndall Air Force Base
AirQuest Environmental, Inc.
Interior
Appendix IV Asbestos Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Record
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
6340 CastlePlace Dr. Indianapolis, IN 46250
Tel/Fax: (317) 803-2997 / (317) 803-3047 http://www.EMSL.com / indianapolislab@emsl.com
161924390EMSL Order:
Customer ID: AQE63
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Attention: Phone:Lab Results (954) 792-4549
Fax:AirQuest Environmental, Inc. (954) 792-2221
Received Date:6851 Southwest 45th Street 11/26/2019 9:27 AM
Analysis Date:Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314 11/26/2019
Collected Date: 11/23/2019
Project: TYNDALL AFB 15671 - 188
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
188-1
161924390-0001
None DetectedPerlite
Non-fibrous (Other)
15%
5%
Cellulose
Min. Wool
50%
30%
White
Fibrous
Homogeneous
1 Center - 2'x2'
Ceiling - ACT Dots
HA: 1
188-2
161924390-0002
None DetectedPerlite
Non-fibrous (Other)
15%
5%
Cellulose
Min. Wool
50%
30%
White
Fibrous
Homogeneous
9 South - 2'x2' Ceiling
- ACT Dots
HA: 1
188-3
161924390-0003
None DetectedPerlite
Non-fibrous (Other)
15%
5%
Cellulose
Min. Wool
50%
30%
Gray/White
Fibrous
Homogeneous
2 South - 2'x2' Ceiling
- ACT Dots
HA: 1
188-4-Drywall
161924390-0004
None DetectedGypsum
Non-fibrous (Other)
60%
10%
Cellulose30%Brown/White
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
9 South - Wall -
Drywall System
HA: 2
188-4-Joint Compound
161924390-0004A
<1% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)100%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
9 South - Wall -
Drywall System
HA: 2
188-5-Drywall
161924390-0005
None DetectedGypsum
Non-fibrous (Other)
60%
10%
Cellulose30%Brown/White
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
2 South - Wall -
Drywall System
HA: 2
188-5-Joint Compound
161924390-0005A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
2 South - Wall -
Drywall System
HA: 2
188-6-Drywall
161924390-0006
None DetectedGypsum
Non-fibrous (Other)
70%
10%
Cellulose20%Brown/White
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
11 Southeast - Wall -
Drywall System
HA: 2
188-6-Joint Compound
161924390-0006A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
11 Southeast - Wall -
Drywall System
HA: 2
188-7
161924390-0007
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
14 Southeast - Yellow
Wall Panel Mastic
HA: 3
188-8
161924390-0008
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
2 South - Yellow Wall
Panel Mastic
HA: 3
188-9-Ceramic Tile
161924390-0009
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray/Red
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
6 Northwest - 8"x8"
Gray Floor - Ceramic
Tile
HA: 4
Initial report from: 11/27/2019 08:59:34
Page 1 of 5ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 11/27/2019 8:59 AM
Tel/Fax: (317) 803-2997 / (317) 803-3047 http://www.EMSL.com / indianapolislab@emsl.com
161924390EMSL Order:
Customer ID: AQE63
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
188-9-Grout
161924390-0009A
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
80%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
6 Northwest - 8"x8"
Gray Floor - Ceramic
Tile
HA: 4
188-10-Ceramic Tile
161924390-0010
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray/Red
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
2 South - 8"x8" Gray
Floor - Ceramic Tile
HA: 4
188-10-Grout
161924390-0010A
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
80%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
2 South - 8"x8" Gray
Floor - Ceramic Tile
HA: 4
188-11-Floor Tile
161924390-0011
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Beige
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
6 Northwest - 12"x12"
Beige Floor - Vinyl
Tile
HA: 5
188-11-Mastic
161924390-0011A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
6 Northwest - 12"x12"
Beige Floor - Vinyl
Tile
HA: 5
188-12-Floor Tile
161924390-0012
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Beige
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
11 Northeast -
12"x12" Beige Floor -
Vinyl Tile
HA: 5
188-12-Mastic
161924390-0012A
2% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)98%Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
11 Northeast -
12"x12" Beige Floor -
Vinyl Tile
HA: 5
188-13-Floor Tile
161924390-0013
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Beige
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
1 Northeast - 12"x12"
Beige Floor - Vinyl
Tile
HA: 5
188-13-Mastic
161924390-0013A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Yellow
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
1 Northeast - 12"x12"
Beige Floor - Vinyl
Tile
HA: 5
188-14-Ceramic Tile
161924390-0014
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Green
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
23 North - 1"x1"
Green Floor -
Ceramic Tile
HA: 6
188-14-Grout
161924390-0014A
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
80%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
23 North - 1"x1"
Green Floor -
Ceramic Tile
HA: 6
188-15-Ceramic Tile
161924390-0015
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Green
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
15 East - 1"x1" Green
Floor - Ceramic Tile
HA: 6
188-15-Grout
161924390-0015A
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
10%
90%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
15 East - 1"x1" Green
Floor - Ceramic Tile
HA: 6
188-16
161924390-0016
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
1 Southwest - White
A/C Duct Mastic
HA: 7
Page 2 of 5ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 11/27/2019 8:59 AM
Tel/Fax: (317) 803-2997 / (317) 803-3047 http://www.EMSL.com / indianapolislab@emsl.com
161924390EMSL Order:
Customer ID: AQE63
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
188-17
161924390-0017
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
1 Center - White A/C
Duct Mastic
HA: 7
188-18
161924390-0018
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
10 West - White A/C
Duct Mastic
HA: 7
188-19-Cove Base
161924390-0019
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
14 Southeast - 4"
Gray Vinyl Base Cove
HA: 8
188-19-Mastic
161924390-0019A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
14 Southeast - 4"
Gray Vinyl Base Cove
HA: 8
188-20-Cove Base
161924390-0020
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
3 East - 4" Gray Vinyl
Base Cove
HA: 8
188-20-Mastic
161924390-0020A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
3 East - 4" Gray Vinyl
Base Cove
HA: 8
188-21-Cove Base
161924390-0021
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
2 North - 4" Gray
Vinyl Base Cove
HA: 8
188-21-Mastic
161924390-0021A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
2 North - 4" Gray
Vinyl Base Cove
HA: 8
188-22
161924390-0022
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Green
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
10 South - Spray-On
Insulation
HA: 9
188-23
161924390-0023
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Green
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
22 Northwest -
Spray-On Insulation
HA: 9
188-24
161924390-0024
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Green
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
10 North - Spray-On
Insulation
HA: 9
188-25
161924390-0025
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
10 Northeast -
Spray-On Insulation
HA: 9
188-26
161924390-0026
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Green
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
13 Southeast -
Spray-On Insulation
HA: 9
188-27
161924390-0027
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
10 Northwest - Gray
A/C Duct Mastic
HA: 10
Page 3 of 5ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 11/27/2019 8:59 AM
Tel/Fax: (317) 803-2997 / (317) 803-3047 http://www.EMSL.com / indianapolislab@emsl.com
161924390EMSL Order:
Customer ID: AQE63
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
188-28
161924390-0028
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
10 West - Gray A/C
Duct Mastic
HA: 10
188-29
161924390-0029
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
80%
Various
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
10 West - Wall -
Concrete Block
HA: 11
188-30
161924390-0030
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
80%
Various
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
16 South - Wall -
Concrete Block
HA: 11
188-31
161924390-0031
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
80%
Various
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
22 West - Wall -
Concrete Block
HA: 11
188-32
161924390-0032
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
80%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior Northwest -
Floor - Concrete Slab
HA: 12
188-33
161924390-0033
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
80%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior Northwest -
Floor - Concrete Slab
HA: 12
188-34
161924390-0034
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
80%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior Northwest -
Floor - Concrete Slab
HA: 12
188-35
161924390-0035
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
80%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior South - Floor
- Concrete Slab
HA: 12
188-36
161924390-0036
None DetectedQuartz
Non-fibrous (Other)
20%
80%
Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior East - Floor -
Concrete Slab
HA: 12
188-37
161924390-0037
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior Northwest -
Gray Rain Gutter
Mastic
HA: 13
188-38
161924390-0038
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior Southwest -
Gray Rain Gutter
Mastic
HA: 13
188-39
161924390-0039
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior Northwest -
Gray Mastic at Metal
Roof Seams
HA: 14
188-40
161924390-0040
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior Northeast -
Gray Mastic at Metal
Roof Seams
HA: 14
188-41
161924390-0041
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior Northeast -
Brown Roof - Mastic at Penetration
HA: 15
Page 4 of 5ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 11/27/2019 8:59 AM
Tel/Fax: (317) 803-2997 / (317) 803-3047 http://www.EMSL.com / indianapolislab@emsl.com
161924390EMSL Order:
Customer ID: AQE63
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
188-42
161924390-0042
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown/Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior Southwest -
Brown Roof - Mastic at Penetration
HA: 15
188-43
161924390-0043
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior East - Brown
Mastic at Metal Roof
Patch
HA: 16
188-44
161924390-0044
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior East - Brown
Mastic at Metal Roof
Patch
HA: 16
Analyst(s)
Abigail Sheehan (36)
Trevor Maggart (21)
Richard Harding, Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 "Interim
Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations . Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non -friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Indianapolis, IN NVLAP Lab Code 200188-0, AZ0939, CA 2575, CO AL-15132, TX 300262
Page 5 of 5ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 11/27/2019 8:59 AM
3303 PARKWAY CENTER COURT Orlando, FL 32808
Tel/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab@emsl.com
342000457EMSL Order:
Customer ID: AQE63
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Attention: Phone:Adrienne LeBlanc
Fax:AirQuest Environmental, Inc. (954) 792-2221
Received Date:6851 SW 45th Street 01/10/2020 9:45 AM
Analysis Date:Ft Lauderdale, FL 33314 01/10/2020
Collected Date: 01/06/2020
Project: 15671-188 Tyndall AFB
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
188-45-Cove Base
342000457-0001
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
19 East - 4" Brown
Vinyl Base Cove
188-45-Mastic
342000457-0001A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
19 East - 4" Brown
Vinyl Base Cove
188-46-Cove Base
342000457-0002
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
21 East - 4" Brown
Vinyl Base Cove
188-46-Mastic
342000457-0002A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
21 East - 4" Brown
Vinyl Base Cove
Analyst(s)
Bryan Lopez-Duenas (4) Carlos Rivadeneyra, Laboratory Director or Other Approved Signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 "Interim
Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations . Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non -friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Orlando, FL NVLAP Lab Code 101151-0
Initial report from: 01/13/2020 09:21:34
Page 1 of 1ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 1/13/2020 9:21 AM
O r d e r I D
P a g e f d e r I D
P a g e d e r I D
P a g e
OrderID: 342000457
Appendix V Suspect Asbestos Containing Material Photographs, Asbestos Location Diagram, and OSHA Regulated Material Diagram
HA Photolog
Tyndall Air Force Base
AirQuest Environmental, Inc.
HA 1 – 2’ x 2’ Dots Acoustic Ceiling Tile
HA 2 - Drywall System Wall
HA 3 - Yellow Wall Panel Mastic
HA 4 - 8” x 8” Gray Ceramic Floor Tile
HA 5 - 12” x 12” Beige Vinyl Floor Tile
HA 6 - 1” x 1” Green Ceramic Floor Tile
Tyndall Air Force Base
AirQuest Environmental, Inc.
HA 7 - White A/C Duct Mastic
HA 8 - 4” Gray Vinyl Base Cove
HA 9 - Spray-On Insulation Ceiling
HA 10 - Gray A/C Duct Mastic
HA 11 - Concrete Block Wall
HA 12 - Concrete Slab
Tyndall Air Force Base
AirQuest Environmental, Inc.
HA 13 - Gray Rain Gutter Mastic
HA 14 - Gray Mastic at Metal Roof Seam
HA 15 - Brown Mastic at Metal Roof
Penetration
HA 16 - Brown Mastic at Metal Roof Patch
HA 17 - 4” Brown Vinyl Base Cove
Legend
OSHA REGULATED MATERIALS
THE RESULTS OF THE LABORATORY
ANALYSIS WERE ALL <1%
CHRYSOTILE ASBESTOS. AS SUCH,
THE EPA DOES NOT CONSIDER THESE
MATERIALS TO BE ACM. HOWEVER,
OSHA REGULATIONS PERTAINING
TO ASBESTOS EXPOSURE STILL APPLY
TO MATERIALS THAT CONTAIN <1%
ASBESTOS.
Contract
FACILITIES REDUCTION PROGRAM
FY19 TYNDALL II
DATE: MARCH 2020
Site
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE
FLORIDA
BUILDING: ARMAMENT SYS
BUILDING #: 188
6851 SW 45TH STREET
Drywall System & Joint Compound
2,564 SF
ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIALS
MASTIC BENEATH
12”X 12” BEIGE
(LAYERED) VINYL
FLOOR TILE
1,365 SF
Contract
FACILITIES REDUCTION PROGRAM
FY19 TYNDALL II
DATE: MARCH 2020
Site
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE
FLORIDA
BUILDING: ARMAMENT SYS
BUILDING #: 188
6851 SW 45TH STREET
Appendix VI TCLP Laboratory Report and
Chain of Custody Record
1460 West McNab Road
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
1-800-ANALYTE Phone
(954) 978-6400 Phone
(954) 978-2233 Fax
16 December 2019
Dear Paul LeBlanc:
This report details the analytical results of samples collected at the above -referenced project location as well as the results of any associated quality control samples. These samples were received by Florida Spectrum Environmental
Services at 12/05/2019 09:25.
All Analyses were performed according to the TNI/NELAP standard unless indicated by a "~" on the report.
Your samples will be retained by Florida Spectrum Environmental for a period of at least 30 days following sample receipt or until the longest of the preparation and/or analytical hold times expires, whichever is shorter.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .