Appendix H(c) - Building 108 Hazardous Materials Report.pdf
PDF 12 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Demolition of Facilities Phase 6 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4819-20-R-1000
About this file
This document contains a pre-demolition survey report for Building 108 located at Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida. The report identifies asbestos-containing materials found within the building totaling approximately 5,498 square feet constructed in 1961. Suspect materials were sampled and analyzed with results showing drywall joint compound and floor tile mastic containing asbestos. Soil samples were also collected and analyzed with no detections of organochlorine pesticides above laboratory reporting limits. The report provides conclusions and recommendations for response actions regarding asbestos abatement and handling of hazardous materials during demolition.
A separate federal contract opportunity posting seeks demolition services for facilities at Tyndall Air Force Base as part of Phase 6 under solicitation number FA4819-20-R-1000. The requirement is set aside for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses. A firm fixed price contract will be awarded and submissions are due by June 5, 2020. The North American Industry Classification System code is 238910 for specialty trade contractors with a small business size standard of $16.5 million.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 37
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TYNDALL AFB PRE-DEMOLITION SURVEY
W912DY-19-P-0053
Pre-Demolition Report for Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing
For:
Facilities Reduction Program FY19 Tyndall II Tyndall AFB, Florida
Building 108 2nd F-22 AME Storage Building
Prepared For:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Engineering & Support Service Center 4910 University Square, Suite 4
Huntsville, Alabama 35816-1822 Facilities Reduction Program
ATTN: CEHNC-ISF
March 2020
AQ#: 15671
ii
CERTIFICATION PAGE
Pre-Demolition Report for Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soils Testing
Facilities Reduction Program FY19 Tyndall II Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida
Building 108 2nd F-22 AME Storage Building
AirQuest Project #15671
Prepared For:
US Army Corps of Engineers Engineering & Support Service Center
4910 University Square, Suite 4 Huntsville, Alabama 35816-1822
ATTN: CEHNC-ISF
Prepared By:
AirQuest Environmental, Inc.
6851 Southwest 45th Street
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33314
Adrian Amicucci Gomes Traci-Anne Boyle, CIH, CSP Asbestos Building Inspector FL Asbestos Consultant #AX-60
Ted Smith, PG
FL Professional Geologist No. PG1368 iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1 INTRODUCTION AND SITE DESCRIPTION 1
1.1 PURPOSE 1
1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION 1
1.3 DEMOLITION OVERVIEW 1
2 ASBESTOS SURVEY 2
2.1 SURVEY METHODS 2
2.2 LABORATORY ANALYSIS 2
2.3 SUSPECT ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS 3
3 LEAD BASED PAINT SCREENING 4
4 TCLP RCRA METALS 5
4.1 TCLP SAMPLE COLLECTION 5
4.2 TCLP SAMPLE RESULTS 6
5 PCBS 6
6 OTHER REGULATED MATERIALS INVENTORY 7
7 SOIL TESTING FOR ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES 10
8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11
8.1 ASBESTOS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDED RESPONSE ACTION 11
8.2 LEAD SCREENING & OSHA LEAD GUIDANCE 11
8.3 TCLP RCRA METALS / LEAD 11
8.4 PCBS 11
8.5 OTHER REGULATED MATERIALS 13
8.6 SOIL CONCLUSIONS 13
9 LIMITATIONS 13
iv
TABLES
Table 1 – Survey Information Table 2 – Asbestos Laboratory Analysis and Summary Table 3 - Lead Based Paint Screening Information Table 4 - Waste Stream Composition Table 5 – Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure Results Table 6 – PCB Results Table 7 – Other Regulated Materials Inventory Table 8 – Soil Sample Analytical Results
APPENDICES
Appendix I – Certifications
Appendix II – Sample Location Diagrams
Appendix III – Structure Demolition Overview (Diagram, Aerial Photographs, Photographs)
Appendix IV – Asbestos Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Record
Appendix V – Suspect Asbestos Containing Material Photographs
Appendix VI – TCLP Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Record
Appendix VII – PCB Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Record
Appendix VIII – Soil Boring Logs and Soil Boring Location Photographs
Appendix IX – Soil Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Record
AirQuest Environmental, Inc.
AirQuest Project #15671 1 Building 108 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing
1 INTRODUCTION AND SITE DESCRIPTION
In accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS) for contract W912DY-19-P-0053, AirQuest Environmental, Inc. (“AirQuest”) performed pre-demolition asbestos, hazardous materials, and soil testing for Building 108 located at Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida (“the site”).
The surveys were performed by AirQuest Project Team Members as shown in Table 1. Copies of applicable licenses and accreditations are included in Appendix I.
Table 1 – Survey Information
Survey Name Survey Date
Asbestos Adrian Amicucci 03 December 2019
TCLP Waste Stream Travis Holland 02 December 2019
PCB Waste Stream Travis Holland 02 December 2019
Other Regulated Materials Melissa Suarez 03 December 2019
Soil Sample Collection Ted Smith 23 November 2019
TCLP – Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure PCB – Polychlorinated Biphenyl
1.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this survey was to identify asbestos-containing materials (ACM) within the interior, exterior and roof of the building; to determine if Other Regulated Materials (ORM) materials were present; to complete a waste stream analysis for Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)-8 metals and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); and to collect soil samples for organochlorine pesticides (OCP) for each structure. Diagrams depicting sampling locations are provided in Appendix II.
The investigation was conducted to facilitate the repairs at Tyndall Air Force Base following Hurricane Michael.
1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION
Building 108 2nd F-22 AME Storage Bldg. was a 5,498 square foot, single-story structure built in 1961. The building was constructed of concrete block on a concrete slab foundation. The building had a standing seam metal roof deck. The interior walls were constructed of concrete block and drywall system. The floor was an unfinished concrete slab.
1.3 DEMOLITION OVERVIEW
A diagram illustrating the general layout of the site was prepared using files provided by the client if available or drawn onsite by the AirQuest inspector. AirQuest prepared aerial photographs and photographed an overview of the interior and exterior of the building for purposes of assisting contractors in evaluation of the demolition requirements. The diagram and photographs are included in Appendix III.
AirQuest Project #15671 2 Building 108 Pre-Demolition
2 ASBESTOS SURVEY
A pre-demolition asbestos survey suitable to meet the requirements of the National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) and State of Florida regulations was performed at the site.
2.1 SURVEY METHODS
The sampling protocol used generally followed Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) guidelines. AHERA was promulgated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1987 and regulated public schools.
Suspect materials were differentiated into three categories: surfacing material, thermal system insulation, or miscellaneous material. Surfacing material is anything that is sprayed or troweled onto a surface; thermal system insulation is material used to insulate HVAC pipes, tanks, etc., and miscellaneous material is any other type of material.
A homogeneous area is defined as an area of surfacing material, thermal system insulation material, or miscellaneous material that is uniform in color and texture. A homogeneous area is not limited to only a room but can be found in several rooms. Sample selection in the building was determined by identifying the homogeneous areas and basing sampling locations upon these areas.
In conducting the building inspection in compliance with local, state, and federal regulations, all suspected ACM which were accessible to the inspector, were either sampled to confirm the actual presence of asbestos or assumed to contain asbestos.
2.2 LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Analysis was performed using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining. The laboratory is rated proficient through National Institute of Standards and Technology- National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NIST-NVLAP) for bulk asbestos analysis.
NESHAP defines ACM as containing more than 1% asbestos as determined using PLM (as specified in Appendix E, Subpart E, 40 CFR part 763, Section 1, Polarized Light Microscopy).
NESHAP defines friable ACM as any material containing more than 1% asbestos that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to a powder by hand pressure. If the asbestos content of a friable material is less than ten (10) percent as determined by a method other than point counting by PLM, the client may elect to verify the asbestos content by point counting using PLM.
Because of the inherent limitations of PLM bulk sample analysis, any friable sample reported as <2% asbestos by PLM was automatically analyzed by the PLM point count method to determine whether it may be regulated under the asbestos NESHAP.
Estimates of quantities of ACM were based upon the identification of suspect materials. Where suspect ACM were located behind walls, above ceilings, beneath carpeting, or other concealed conditions and the quantities cannot be verified, the estimate is based upon the conditions present during the survey. These estimates are not to be considered absolute and should be verified when the ACM is exposed.
AirQuest Project #15671 3 Building 108 Pre-Demolition
2.3 SUSPECT ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS
Homogenous areas (HA) of suspect material were identified and samples were collected and submitted under chain of custody to EMSL Analytical, Inc. (“EMSL”) for laboratory analysis of asbestos by PLM. If identified, friable samples with <2% asbestos were further analyzed by the PLM point count method to confirm the PLM results. A copy of the laboratory report and chain of custody record is included in Appendix IV.
Sample descriptions and laboratory results are summarized in Table 2. Photographs of each HA are included in Appendix V.
Table 2 – Asbestos Laboratory Analysis and Summary
HA Sample Number
Description of Suspect Material
Location Asbestos Content %
1 108-1 Drywall System 2 North ND
1 108-2 Drywall System 1 East ND
1 108-3 Drywall System 1 North ND
2 108-4 4” Gray Vinyl Base Cove 2 East ND
2 108-5 4” Gray Vinyl Base Cove 1 North ND
3 108-6 Wall – Concrete Block 1 North ND
3 108-7 Wall – Concrete Block 1 North ND
3 108-8 Wall – Concrete Block Exterior North ND
3 108-9 Wall – Concrete Block Exterior South ND
3 108-10 Wall – Concrete Block Exterior East ND
4 108-11 Floor – Concrete Slab 1 West ND
4 108-12 Floor – Concrete Slab 1 North ND
4 108-13 Floor – Concrete Slab Exterior North ND
4 108-14 Floor – Concrete Slab Exterior West ND
AirQuest Project #15671 4 Building 108 Pre-Demolition
HA Sample Number
Description of Suspect Material
Location Asbestos Content %
4 108-15 Floor – Concrete Slab Exterior South ND
5 108-16 Gray Electrical Putty 1 East ND
5 108-17 Gray Electrical Putty 1 East ND
6 108-18 White Mastic at TSI Pipe 1 South ND
6 108-19 White Mastic at TSI Pipe 1 South ND
7 108-20 Red Fire Putty 1 South ND
7 108-21 Red Fire Putty 1 South ND
8 108-22 Brown Exterior Floor Expansion Material Exterior North ND
8 108-23 Brown Exterior Floor Expansion Material Exterior North ND
9 108-24 Gray Exterior Floor Expansion Mastic Exterior South ND
9 108-25 Gray Exterior Floor Expansion Mastic Exterior East ND
10 108-26 Brown Exterior Door Caulk Exterior North ND
10 108-27 Brown Exterior Door Caulk Exterior West ND
11 108-28 Brown Mastic at Rain Gutter Exterior North ND
11 108-29 Brown Mastic at Rain Gutter Exterior North ND
HA- Homogenous Area ND – None Detected TSI- Thermal System Insulation
3 LEAD BASED PAINT SCREENING
An inspection was conducted to screen for the existence of lead containing painted building components. Testing of the painted building components was performed using an XRF Spectrometer. The XRF is a screening instrument currently recommended by the US Department
AirQuest Project #15671 5 Building 108 Pre-Demolition of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for analysis of lead levels in paint. The screening was used to assist in determining the need and relative concentrations of lead on painted building components for purposes of designing a sampling scheme for a composite waste stream analysis and demolition contractor worker protection information. The screening was not intended to be a lead-based paint survey in accordance with HUD guidelines. A summary of the screening results is included in Table 3.
Table 3 - Lead Based Paint Screening Information
Structure Color Substrate Location Results1 Pb (mg/cm2)
Wall Brown Metal Exterior Negative 0.0 Wall Brown Metal Exterior Negative -0.2 Wall Brown Metal Exterior Negative 0.0 Wall Beige Brick Exterior Negative -0.3 Wall Beige Brick Exterior Negative 0.5 Wall Beige Concrete Exterior Negative -0.6 Wall White Concrete Interior Negative 0.2 Wall White Concrete Interior Negative 0.1 Wall White Concrete Interior Negative 0.0 Wall White Drywall Bathroom Negative 0.0 Wall White Drywall Bathroom Negative 0.0
Pb - Lead mg/cm2 – milligrams per square centimeter 1Indicates if the material meets the Department of Housing and Urban Development definition of Lead Based Paint
4 TCLP RCRA METALS
A waste stream composite sample was collected from the building for laboratory analysis of TCLP RCRA-8 Metals.
4.1 TCLP SAMPLE COLLECTION
The sample composition was determined by the composition of the materials comprising the building. Each major building component (such as wood, metal, concrete, glass, etc.) was estimated as a percentage of the weight of the building whole. Once the composition of the building was estimated, representative samples were collected of each material, in an approximate weight proportion as shown in Table 4.
AirQuest Project #15671 6 Building 108 Pre-Demolition
Table 4 - Waste Stream Composition
Waste Stream Component Percentage of
Waste Concrete 80
Metal 10 Wood 3
Drywall 2 Miscellaneous 5
Total Percentage 100
4.2 TCLP SAMPLE RESULTS
The samples were submitted under chain of custody to Spectrum Environmental Laboratories (“Spectrum”), a National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC) accredited laboratory, for analysis of TCLP-RCRA-8 Metals by EPA via 1311/6010C/7470A. The results are summarized in Table 5.
Table 5 – Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure Results
Sample TCLP Results (milligrams/liter)
Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury Selenium Silver 108-
ND 0.145 ND 0.0370 ND ND ND ND
Limit1 5.0 100.0 1.0 5.0 5.0 0.2 1.0 5.0 1Regulatory Limit per 40 CFR 261.24 ND – None Detected
5 PCBs Samples for PCBs were collected in general accordance with the EPA Region 1 Standard Operating Procedure for Sampling Porous Surfaces for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs), May 2011.
The samples were collected from representative painted surfaces to include up to a half-inch of the substrate. The samples were submitted under chain of custody to Spectrum for analysis by EPA Method SW 846 3540C/8020A.
Table 6 – PCB Results
Sample Results (mg/kg)
Aroclor-
Aroclor-
Aroclor-
Aroclor-
Aroclor-
Aroclor-
Aroclor-
108-001 Concrete ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 108-002 Paint
ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
1Regulatory Limit per 40 CFR 761.50 Subpart D is 50 mg/kg mg/kg – milligrams/kilogram ND – None Detected
AirQuest Project #15671 7 Building 108 Pre-Demolition
6 OTHER REGULATED MATERIALS INVENTORY
AirQuest conducted another regulated/hazardous materials inventory in general accordance with the Recommended Management Practices for the Removal of Hazardous Materials from Buildings Prior to Demolition prepared by the University of Florida and sponsored by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 1999. The inventory included lamps, thermostats, and light switches potentially containing mercury; exit signs, emergency lights, and smoke alarms that have batteries; lighting ballasts which contain polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); transformers;
freon, hazardous chemicals and petroleum products; and lead pipes and roof vent flashings.
Certain assumptions for the inspection of fluorescent light ballasts for PCBs were utilized for the building inspections to be completed in a timely and cost-effective manner. As required by regulation, lighting ballasts must not contain PCBs and the label on the ballast must state “No PCB”. AirQuest inventoried 100% of the fluorescent lighting fixtures and inspected a representative of each type of fixture (i.e. 2-foot, 4-foot, etc.) for the “No PCB” labeling.
Each exit sign and emergency lights were presumed to each contain a single lead-acid rechargeable battery. Quantities and types of any ORM found are summarized in Table 7.
Table 7 – Other Regulated Materials Inventory
ORM Component
Type/Location
Quantity
Photographs
Recyclables
Fluorescent Bulbs 48" Lamp 26
Fluorescent Bulbs U-Shaped Bulb 2
AirQuest Project #15671 8 Building 108 Pre-Demolition
Light Ballasts In 48" Fluorescent Fixtures
Fire Pull-Down System
Combustible Tank 1
AirQuest Project #15671 9 Building 108 Pre-Demolition
Specialized ORM
Freon In A/C Units 3
Fire Extinguishers 3
Batteries 6
AirQuest Project #15671 10 Building 108 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing
ORM Component Type/Location Quantity Photographs
Electric Battery- Operated Equipment
7 SOIL TESTING FOR ORGANOCHLORINE PESTICIDES
AirQuest advanced four (4) soil borings and collected two (2) samples at each boring location at depths of zero to six inches (0 - 6 in.) and eighteen to twenty-four inches (18 – 24 in.) below land surface using a properly decontaminated hand bucket auger. The samples were generally collected near the four corners of the building as shown in Appendix II.
The soil sampling was conducted in accordance with Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Standard Operating Procedures SOP-001-01 FS 3000 (Soil) and SOP-001-01 FQ1000 (Field Quality Control Requirements). One boring log was completed for each building location documenting the observed lithology, visually estimated moisture content, noticeable odors, soil color, sample collection times, sampler’s name, sampling interval and boring completion method. The soil boring log and soil boring location photographs are included in Appendix VIII.
Samples were placed in dedicated sample containers provided by the laboratory and labeled according to the referenced building/structure, collection time, sampler’s name and analysis. A chain of custody form was completed to document the chronology of ownership, control and transfer of the samples. All samples were placed in a cooler filled with ice for transfer to the laboratory.
The soil samples were shipped to Eurofins TestAmerica (“TestAmerica”) in Pensacola, Florida, a NELAC accredited environmental laboratory licensed in the State of Florida, for analysis by EPA Method 8081B (Organochlorine Pesticides by GC). Analytical results are summarized in Table
8. A copy of the laboratory report and chain of custody record is included in Appendix IX.
The analytical results indicate trace to moderate levels of OCPs 4,4’-DDD, 4,4’-DDE, 4,4’-DDT, Aldrin, Dieldrin, Endrin, Endrin Ketone, Heptachlor Epoxide, and Total Chlordane above laboratory method detection limits and mostly above practical quantitation limits, in the soil samples. Sample OCP-108.2 analytical results indicate Dieldrin concentrations above Commercial/Industrial and Residential Soil Cleanup Target
AirQuest Project #15671 11 Building 108 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing
Levels (SCTLs). Sample OCP-108.8 analytical results indicate Dieldrin concentrations above the Residential SCTL, but below the Commercial/Industrial SCTL. All other detected OCP constituents were below the Residential or Commercial/Industrial SCTLs listed in Chapter 62-777 FAC, the criteria used by the FDEP.
8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A thorough pre-demolition inspection for asbestos and hazardous materials was conducted at the site and an inventory of the materials was created. The soils surrounding the site were sampled and analyzed for pesticides. Based upon the results of the inspections, recommendations for each contaminant are discussed separately below.
8.1 ASBESTOS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDED RESPONSE ACTION
The results of our observation and laboratory analysis did not identify ACM within the samples collected from the site.
8.2 LEAD SCREENING & OSHA LEAD GUIDANCE
Lead was identified in the paint at the site. Under the present OSHA lead construction standard, all identified lead-containing materials affected by construction activities falls under the requirements of 29 CFR 1926. There are no current government guidelines defining a lead-based paint or lead concentration that creates a hazardous atmosphere when disturbed.
Based on current OSHA guidelines, for those employees who will be disturbing lead-containing paint (LCP), their employer must make an initial determination by monitoring employee exposure if any employee is exposed to lead at or above 30 micrograms per cubic meter for an eight-hour time weighted average (30 µg/m3 8-hour time weighted average). The employer must implement OSHA prescribed protective measures until they can demonstrate that the employee exposure is not in excess of the action level.
In general, relatively low levels of lead were detected in the various coated surfaces surveyed. Depending on the degree and type of disturbance of these surfaces (i.e. sanding, cutting, or demolishing), employers may be required to implement varying degrees of OSHA prescribed protective measures. These protective measures must be maintained until it can be demonstrated that employee exposures do not exceed the action level. The employer should also implement and maintain a written compliance program detailing the protective measures they will utilize to control lead exposure during renovation activities.
8.3 TCLP RCRA METALS / LEAD
The results of the laboratory analysis indicate that the waste stream generated from the site is non-hazardous.
8.4 PCBS
The results of the sampling and analysis did not identify PCBs in composite waste stream paint and concrete samples.
AirQuest Project #15671 12 Building 108 Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing
Table 8 – Soil Sample Analytical Results
Sample Sample Depth (Inches)
Results (mg/kg)
4,4’-DDD 4,4’-DDE 4,4’-
DDT Aldrin Dieldrin Endrin Endrin
Ketone Heptachlor
Epoxide Total
Chlordane
OCP-108.1 0-6 0.0046 0.054 0.10 0.00064I 0.038 ND ND ND 0.0041I
OCP-108.2 18-24 0.036 0.23 0.45 0.0098 0.64 ND ND 0.0036I 0.055
OCP-108.3 0-6 0.0038 0.040 0.090 ND 0.0077 ND ND ND 0.0032I
OCP-108.4 18-24 0.0080I 0.050 0.069 ND 0.0043I ND ND ND ND
OCP-108.5 0-6 0.0032I 0.015 0.014 ND 0.0033I 0.0011I ND ND 0.0015I
OCP-108.6 18-24 ND 0.0058I ND ND 0.0025I ND ND ND ND
OCP-108.7 0-6 0.0017I 0.019 0.014 ND 0.039 ND ND ND ND
OCP-108.8 18-24 ND 0.033 0.025 ND 0.20 ND 0.0023I ND ND
SCTL (Commercial/Industrial) 22 15 15 0.3 0.3 *510 *510 0.5 14
SCTL (Residential) 4.2 2.9 2.9 0.06 0.06 *25 *25 0.1 2.8 mg/kg – milligrams/kilogram ND – None Detected Above the Method Detection Limit SCTL – Soil Cleanup Target Level, Chapter 62-777 Florida Administrative Code I – The Reported Value is Between the Laboratory Method Detection Limit and the Laboratory Practical Quantitation Limit *Due to the lack of Assigned SCTLs for Endrin Ketone/Endrin Aldehyde which are Breakdown Products of the Parent Compound Endrin, the FDEP has confirmed that it is Acceptable to use the SCTL Listed for the Parent Compound.
AirQuest Project #15671 13 Building 108 Draft Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing
8.5 OTHER REGULATED MATERIALS
In general, the items inventoried may be recycled and reclaimed.
8.6 SOIL CONCLUSIONS
The soil analytical results identified the compound Dieldrin at a concentration of 0.64 mg/kg in the 18-24 inch interval of borehole number 1 (sample OCP-108.2) and 0.20 mg/kg in the 18-24 inch interval of borehole number 4 (sample OCP-108.8). The reported concentration for sample OCP-108.2 is above the Commercial/Industrial and Residential SCTLs of 0.3 mg/kg and 0.06 mg/kg, respectively. The reported concentration for sample OCP-108.8 is above the Residential SCTL but below the Commercial/Industrial SCTL.
Upon completion of building demolition and concrete pad removal, AirQuest recommends that the area of impacted soil (northwest and southwest corners of building) be excavated and stockpiled onsite. The excavation should extend to a depth of four (4) feet below land surface (BLS) and extend out in an approximate three (3) foot radius around borehole number 1, and 4. Five (5) confirmation samples should be collected from each excavation area and submitted for laboratory analysis to confirm Dieldrin and other OCPs are below the residential FDEP SCTL.
The stockpiled soil should be protected with proper engineering controls to prevent cross contamination of surrounding soil. At a minimum, the soil should be in a secured bermed area lined and covered with polyethylene sheeting. The demolition personnel should utilize Level C PPE protection to reduce the potential for exposure to any impacted soils. Once it has been confirmed that all contaminated soils have been removed from the excavation and stockpiled, the excavated soil must be sampled and characterized for proper disposal.
9 LIMITATIONS
If any suspect hazardous/asbestos containing building materials are encountered during demolition activities that were not sampled in this report, the materials should not be disturbed until they have been sampled and identified as non-hazardous and non-ACM through appropriate investigation and/or laboratory analysis. Many of the roofs at Tyndall Air Force Base were sealed with an EPDM roofing system covering all the original roofing materials. It is possible, if not likely, that additional suspect asbestos materials are present under the EPDM and were not identified during the asbestos survey.
This report was prepared in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions. This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the client and assigned agents and is not intended for any other purposes. Our report is based on the information available to us at the time of our investigation and limited in scope to the stated purpose and/or the area(s) inspected. Other conditions elsewhere in the site may differ from those in the inspected/ surveyed locations and such conditions are unknown, may change over time, and/or have not been considered. This report does not claim to identify all potential hazards and/or contaminants that may be present, nor does it imply any medical opinion on the relationship of potential health effects with any reported hazards and/ or contaminants. Our opinions are based on our findings and professional expertise, with no guaranty or warranty implied herein. Should additional information become available, we
AirQuest Project #15671 14 Building 108 Draft Pre-Demolition W912DY-19-P-0053 Asbestos, Hazardous Materials & Soil Testing reserve the right to determine the impact, if any, of the new information on our opinions, conclusions, and recommendations if necessary, as warranted by the discovery of the additional information. AirQuest accepts no responsibility for interpretation of this report by others. Its contents shall not be used or relied upon by other parties without prior written authorization by AirQuest.
Appendix I Certifications
JONATHAN ZACHEM, SECRETARYRICK SCOTT, GOVERNOR
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
ASBESTOS LICENSING UNIT
THE ASBESTOS CONSULTANT HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 469, FLORIDA STATUTES
BOYLE, TRACI-ANNE
Do not alter this document in any form.
AIRQUEST ENVIRONMENTAL INC
LICENSE NUMBER: AX60
EXPIRATION DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 2020
This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document.
6851 SW 45 ST
DAVIE FL 33314
Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=8c21d1d6249bcaa3338cefa039457259
JONATHAN ZACHEM, SECRETARYRICK SCOTT, GOVERNOR
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL GEOLOGISTS
THE PROFESSIONAL GEOLOGIST HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE
PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 492, FLORIDA STATUTES
SMITH, TED J
Do not alter this document in any form.
1735 CLARENDON AVENUE
LICENSE NUMBER: PG1368
EXPIRATION DATE: JULY 31, 2020
This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document.
LAKELAND FL 33803
Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=6b0348687cc372fc3b319e7b329b1312
Appendix II Sample Location Diagrams
Sampling Locations
LEGEND
ASBESTOS SAMPLE # 1
PCB PAINT COMPOSITE P
PCB CONCRETE COMPOSITE C
SOIL BORING LOCATION 1
Contract
FACILITIES REDUCTION PROGRAM
FY19 TYNDALL II
W912DY-19-P-0053
DATE: MARCH 2020
Site
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE
FLORIDA
BUILDING: 2ND F-22 AME STORAGE
BLDG
BUILDING #: 108
6851 SW 45TH STREET
FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33314
AIRQUEST PROJECT 15671
Appendix III Structure Demolition Overview Diagram, Aerial
Photographs and Demolition Overview Photographs
Demolition Overview
BUILDING INFORMATION
NAME 2ND F-22 AME STORAGE
BLDG
NUMBER 108
YEAR BUILT 1961
SQUARE
FEET 4,598
STORIES 1
Contract
FACILITIES REDUCTION PROGRAM
FY19 TYNDALL II
W912DY-19-P-0053
DATE: MARCH 2020
Site
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE
FLORIDA
BUILDING: 2ND F-22 AME STORAGE
BLDG
BUILDING #: 108
6851 SW 45TH STREET
FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33314
AIRQUEST PROJECT 15671
Building 108 – Pre-Hurricane Aerial Photographs
Overview
Side Angle Side Angle
Side Angle Side Angle
Images Obtained Using Google Earth
Bld 108 - 2ND F-22 AME STORAGE Tyndall Air Force Base
AirQuest Environmental, Inc.
Project #15671
Exterior
Tyndall Air Force Base
AirQuest Environmental, Inc.
Interior
Appendix IV Asbestos Laboratory Report and Chain of Custody Record
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
19501 NE 10th Ave. Bay A N. Miami Beach, FL 33179
Tel/Fax: (305) 650-0577 / (305) 650-0578 http://www.EMSL.com / miamilab@emsl.com
171908845EMSL Order:
Customer ID: AQE63
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Attention: Phone:Paul LeBlanc (954) 214-2640
Fax:AirQuest Environmental, Inc. (954) 792-2221
Received Date:6851 Southwest 45th Street 12/05/2019 9:55 AM
Analysis Date:Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314 12/05/2019 - 12/06/2019
Collected Date: 12/03/2019
Project: Tyndall AFB - 15671-108
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
15671-108-1-Drywall
171908845-0001
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)90%Cellulose
Glass
10%
<1%
White
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Drywall System
15671-108-1-Joint
Compound
171908845-0001A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Drywall System
15671-108-2-Drywall
171908845-0002
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)90%Glass10%White
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Drywall System
15671-108-2-Joint
Compound
171908845-0002A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Drywall System
15671-108-3-Drywall
171908845-0003
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)95%Glass5%White/Purple
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Drywall System
15671-108-4-Cove Base
171908845-0004
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Vinyl Base Cove
15671-108-4-Mastic
171908845-0004A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Vinyl Base Cove
15671-108-5-Cove Base
171908845-0005
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Vinyl Base Cove
15671-108-5-Mastic
171908845-0005A
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Vinyl Base Cove
15671-108-6
171908845-0006
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Wall - Concrete Block
15671-108-7
171908845-0007
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Wall - Concrete Block
15671-108-8
171908845-0008
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Wall - Concrete Block
15671-108-9
171908845-0009
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Wall - Concrete Block
15671-108-10
171908845-0010
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Wall - Concrete Block
15671-108-11
171908845-0011
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Floor - Concrete Slab
Initial report from: 12/06/2019 08:05:54
Page 1 of 3ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 12/6/2019 8:05 AM
Tel/Fax: (305) 650-0577 / (305) 650-0578 http://www.EMSL.com / miamilab@emsl.com
171908845EMSL Order:
Customer ID: AQE63
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized
Light Microscopy
Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous
Non-Asbestos Asbestos
% Type
15671-108-12
171908845-0012
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Floor - Concrete Slab
15671-108-13
171908845-0013
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Floor - Concrete Slab
15671-108-14
171908845-0014
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Floor - Concrete Slab
15671-108-15
171908845-0015
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Floor - Concrete Slab
15671-108-16
171908845-0016
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)97%Cellulose3%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Electrical Putty
15671-108-17
171908845-0017
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)97%Cellulose3%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Electrical Putty
15671-108-18
171908845-0018
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Mastic at TSI Pipe
15671-108-19
171908845-0019
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Mastic at TSI Pipe
15671-108-20
171908845-0020
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Glass<1%Red
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Fire Putty
15671-108-21
171908845-0021
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Glass<1%Red
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Fire Putty
15671-108-22
171908845-0022
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)3%Cellulose97%Brown
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
Exterior Floor
Expansion Material
15671-108-23
171908845-0023
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)3%Cellulose97%Brown
Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior Floor
Expansion Material
15671-108-24
171908845-0024
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior Floor
Expansion Matsic
15671-108-25
171908845-0025
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior Floor
Expansion Matsic
15671-108-26
171908845-0026
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior Door Caulk
15671-108-27
171908845-0027
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Exterior Door Caulk
15671-108-28
171908845-0028
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Mastic at Rain Gutter
15671-108-29
171908845-0029
None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black
Non-Fibrous
Homogeneous
Mastic at Rain Gutter
Page 2 of 3ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 12/6/2019 8:05 AM
Tel/Fax: (305) 650-0577 / (305) 650-0578 http://www.EMSL.com / miamilab@emsl.com
171908845EMSL Order:
Customer ID: AQE63
Customer PO:
Project ID:
Analyst(s)
Edgar Rodriguez (30)
Mary Hamel (3)
Kimberly Wallace, Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory
EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 "Interim
Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations . Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non -friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. N. Miami Beach, FL NVLAP Lab Code 200204-0
Page 3 of 3ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 12/6/2019 8:05 AM
O r d e r I D
P a g e f r d e r I D
P a g e f
Appendix V Suspect Asbestos Containing Material Photographs
HA Photolog
Tyndall Air Force Base
AirQuest Environmental, Inc.
HA 1 - Drywall System
HA 2 - 4” Gray Vinyl Base Cove
HA 3 - Concrete Block Wall
HA 4 - Concrete Slab Floor
HA 5 - Gray Electrical Putty
HA 6 - White Mastic at TSI Pipes
HA Photolog
Tyndall Air Force Base
AirQuest Environmental, Inc.
HA 7 - Red Fire Putty
HA 8 - Brown Exterior Floor Expansion
Material
HA 9 - Gray Exterior Floor Expansion Mastic
HA 10 - Brown Exterior Door Caulk
HA 11 - Brown Mastic at Rain Gutter
Appendix VI TCLP Laboratory Report and
Chain of Custody Record
1460 West McNab Road
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
1-800-ANALYTE Phone
(954) 978-6400 Phone
(954) 978-2233 Fax
13 December 2019
Dear Paul LeBlanc:
This report details the analytical results of samples collected at the above -referenced project location as well as the results of any associated quality control samples. These samples were received by Florida Spectrum Environmental
Services at 12/04/2019 09:15.
All Analyses were performed according to the TNI/NELAP standard unless indicated by a "~" on the report.
Your samples will be retained by Florida Spectrum Environmental for a period of at least 30 days following sample receipt or until the longest of the preparation and/or analytical hold times expires, whichever is shorter. After that time , they will be properly disposed without further notice, unless there exists an explicit contractual agreement to the contrary. We reserve the right to return any unused samples, extracts, or related materials or solutions to you if we consider it necessary. Examples might include those samples identified as hazardous wastes, submissions where the sample sizes significantly exceed those required for analysis, samples containing controlled substances, etc.
We thank you for selecting Florida Spectrum Environmental to serve your analytical needs. Should you have any questions or require additional information regarding any of the information in this report, please feel free to contact us at any time. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service.
Florida Spectrum Environmental Inc.
Paul LeBlanc
6851 SW 45th Street
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314
RE: 15671 Tyndall AFB
AirQuest Environmental, Inc.
Project Location: Tyndall AFB
Lab Work Order (COC): 19L0110
NELAP Certificate No. E86006
Report Printed:
6851 SW 45th Street
Paul LeBlanc
Ft. Lauderdale FL, 33314
12/13/2019
Report To:
19L0110Work Order #
Project: 15671 Tyndall AFB
Tyndall AFB
Client Sample ID Laboratory ID Matrix Collection Date
DETECTED ANALYTE SUMMARY
Collection TimeAnalyte Result Units
108-001 19L0110-01 Solid 12/2/2019 0:00Chromium mg/L0.0370
108-001 19L0110-01 Solid 12/2/2019 0:00Barium mg/L0.145
108-001 19L0110-01 Solid 12/2/2019 0:00Fluid Type (1,2,or 3) .1.00
Florida-Spectrum Environmental Services, Inc.
1460 W. McNab Road, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
Pembroke Laboratory
528 Gooch Rd.
Fort Mead, FL 33841
Big Lake Laboratory
610 Parrot Ave. N.
Okeechobee, FL 34972
Savannah Laboratory
108 Airport Park Dr.
Garden City, GA 31408 www.flenviro.com
Lakeland Laboratory
111 Easton Dr.
Lakeland, FL 33803
6851 SW 45th Street
Paul LeBlanc
Ft. Lauderdale FL, 33314
12/13/2019
Report To:
19L0110Work Order #
Project: 15671 Tyndall AFB
Tyndall AFB
ResultParameter MDL Date Analy.QC Units
Lab ID:
Client Sample ID: 108-001 19L0110-01 Collection Date:
Matrix: Solid
12/02/19 00:00
Laboratory Analysis Report
Received Date: 12/04/19 09:15
PQL Method Date Ext. Analyst
Travis HollandCollected By:
Dil
TCLP Extraction by EPA 1311
. EPA 1311 12/05 10:0012/04 16:00 MAZFluid Type (1,2,or 3) 1.00 1
TCLP Metals by 6000/7000 Series Methods mg/L 0.029 0.100 EPA 6010/3010 12/05 14:4912/05 10:30 MAZArsenic UND 1 mg/L 0.0008 0.0100 EPA 6010/3010 12/05 14:4912/05 10:30 MAZBarium 0.145 1 mg/L 0.0032 0.0100 EPA 6010/3010 12/05 14:4912/05 10:30 MAZCadmium UND 1 mg/L 0.0074 0.0500 EPA 6010/3010 12/05 14:4912/05 10:30 MAZChromium I0.0370 1 mg/L 0.014 0.100 EPA 6010/3010 12/05 14:4912/05 10:30 MAZLead UND 1 mg/L 0.0015 0.0045 EPA 7470 12/11 12:1112/10 09:00 MAZMercury UND 1 mg/L 0.031 0.150 EPA 6010/3010 12/05 14:4912/05 10:30 MAZSelenium UND 1 mg/L 0.0012 0.0080 EPA 6010/3010 12/05 14:4912/05 10:30 MAZSilver UND 1
Florida-Spectrum Environmental Services, Inc.
1460 W. McNab Road, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
Pembroke Laboratory
528 Gooch Rd.
Fort Mead, FL 33841
Big Lake Laboratory
610 Parrot Ave. N.
Okeechobee, FL 34972
Savannah Laboratory
108 Airport Park Dr.
Garden City, GA 31408 www.flenviro.com
Lakeland Laboratory
6851 SW 45th Street
Paul LeBlanc
Ft. Lauderdale FL, 33314
12/13/2019
Report To:
19L0110Work Order #
Project: 15671 Tyndall AFB
Tyndall AFB
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
TCLP Metals by 6000/7000 Series Methods - Quality Control
Batch 19L0011 - EPA 3010A
Blank (19L0011-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 12/05/2019
Arsenic mg/LND 0.100 U
Chromium "ND 0.0500 U
Cadmium "ND 0.0100 U
Lead "ND 0.100 U
Barium "ND 0.0100 U
Silver "ND 0.0080 U
Selenium "ND 0.150 U
LCS (19L0011-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 12/05/2019
Chromium mg/L0.4820 0.0050 0.5000 80-12096.4
Barium "0.4676 0.0010 0.5000 80-12093.5
Arsenic "0.4914 0.010 0.5000 80-12098.3
Cadmium "0.4865 0.0010 0.5000 80-12097.3
Selenium "0.4962 0.015 0.5000 80-12099.2
Lead "0.4743 0.010 0.5000 80-12094.9
Silver "0.4734 0.0008 0.5000 80-12094.7
Matrix Spike (19L0011-MS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 12/05/2019Source: 19L0112-01
Cadmium mg/L4.984 0.0100 5.000 0.0120 75-12599.4
Barium "4.967 0.0100 5.000 0.1510 75-12596.3
Arsenic "5.166 0.100 5.000 ND 75-125103
Silver "4.902 0.0080 5.000 ND 75-12598.0
Chromium "4.981 0.0500 5.000 0.0180 75-12599.3
Selenium "5.108 0.150 5.000 ND 75-125102
Lead "4.853 0.100 5.000 ND 75-12597.1
Matrix Spike Dup (19L0011-MSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 12/05/2019Source: 19L0112-01
Barium mg/L5.001 0.0100 5.000 0.1510 2075-125 0.68297.0
Cadmium "5.016 0.0100 5.000 0.0120 2075-125 0.640100
Chromium "5.037 0.0500 5.000 0.0180 2075-125 1.12100
Arsenic "5.216 0.100 5.000 ND 2075-125 0.963104
Selenium "5.140 0.150 5.000 ND 2075-125 0.625103
Florida-Spectrum Environmental Services, Inc.
1460 W. McNab Road, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
Pembroke Laboratory
528 Gooch Rd.
Fort Mead, FL 33841
Big Lake Laboratory
610 Parrot Ave. N.
Okeechobee, FL 34972
Savannah Laboratory
108 Airport Park Dr.
Garden City, GA 31408 www.flenviro.com
Lakeland Laboratory
6851 SW 45th Street
Paul LeBlanc
Ft. Lauderdale FL, 33314
12/13/2019
Report To:
19L0110Work Order #
Project: 15671 Tyndall AFB
Tyndall AFB
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
TCLP Metals by 6000/7000 Series Methods - Quality Control
Batch 19L0011 - EPA 3010A
Matrix Spike Dup (19L0011-MSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 12/05/2019Source: 19L0112-01
Silver mg/L4.939 0.0080 5.000 ND 2075-125 0.75298.8
Lead "4.886 0.100 5.000 ND 2075-125 0.67897.7
Batch 19L0030 - EPA 7470A Prep
Blank (19L0030-BLK1) Prepared: 12/10/2019 Analyzed: 12/11/2019
Mercury mg/LND 0.0045 U
LCS (19L0030-BS1) Prepared: 12/10/2019 Analyzed: 12/11/2019
Mercury mg/L0.0113 0.0004 0.01000 80-120113
Matrix Spike (19L0030-MS1) Prepared: 12/10/2019 Analyzed: 12/11/2019Source: 19L0112-01
Mercury mg/L0.0882 0.0045 0.1000 ND 80-12088.2
Matrix Spike Dup (19L0030-MSD1) Prepared: 12/10/2019 Analyzed: 12/11/2019Source: 19L0112-01
Mercury mg/L0.0864 0.0045 0.1000 ND 2080-120 2.0186.4
Florida-Spectrum Environmental Services, Inc.
1460 W. McNab Road, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
Pembroke Laboratory
528 Gooch Rd.
Fort Mead, FL 33841
Big Lake Laboratory
610 Parrot Ave. N.
Okeechobee, FL 34972
Savannah Laboratory
108 Airport Park Dr.
Garden City, GA 31408 www.flenviro.com
Lakeland Laboratory
6851 SW 45th Street
Paul LeBlanc
Ft. Lauderdale FL, 33314
12/13/2019
Report To:
19L0110Work Order #
Project: 15671 Tyndall AFB
Tyndall AFB
Notes and Definitions
Sample results reported on a dry weight basis
Relative Percent DifferenceRPD dry
Not ReportedNR
Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the detection limitND
Analyte DETECTEDDET
V Indicated that the analyte was detected in both the sample and the associated method blank.
The reported value is between the laboratory method detection limit and the laboratory practical quantitation limit.I
Z Too many colonies were present for accurate counting.
QC=Qualifier Codes as defined by DEP 62-160
Unless indicated, soil results are reported on actual (wet) weight basis.
Work performed by outside (subcontracted) labs denoted by SUB in Analyst Field.
Results relate only to this sample.
Authorized CSM Signature (954) 978-6400
Florida-Spectrum Environmental Services,Inc.
Certification# E86006
All NELAP certified analysis are performed in accordance with Chapter 64E-1 Florida Administrative code, which has been determined to be equivalent to NELAC standards. Analysis certified by programs other than NELAP are designated with a "~".
Maria Castellanos - Lab Manager
Florida-Spectrum Environmental Services, Inc.
1460 W. McNab Road, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
Pembroke Laboratory
528 Gooch Rd.
Fort Mead, FL 33841
Big Lake Laboratory
610 Parrot Ave. N.
Okeechobee, FL 34972
Savannah Laboratory
108 Airport Park Dr.
Garden City, GA 31408 www.flenviro.com
Lakeland Laboratory
Appendix VII PCB Laboratory Report and
1460 West McNab Road
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
1-800-ANALYTE Phone
(954) 978-6400 Phone
(954) 978-2233 Fax
10 December 2019
Dear Paul LeBlanc:
This report details the analytical results of samples collected at the above -referenced project location as well as the results of any associated quality control samples. These samples were received by Florida Spectrum Environmental
Services at 12/04/2019 09:15.
All Analyses were performed according to the TNI/NELAP standard unless indicated by a "~" on the report.
Your samples will be retained by Florida Spectrum Environmental for a period of at least 30 days following sample receipt or until the longest of the preparation and/or analytical hold times expires, whichever is shorter. After that time , they will be properly disposed without further notice, unless there exists an explicit contractual agreement to the contrary. We reserve the right to return any unused samples, extracts, or related materials or solutions to you if we consider it necessary. Examples might include those samples identified as hazardous wastes, submissions where the sample sizes significantly exceed those required for analysis, samples containing controlled substances, etc.
We thank you for selecting Florida Spectrum Environmental to serve your analytical needs. Should you have any questions or require additional information regarding any of the information in this report, please feel free to contact us at any time. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service.
Florida Spectrum Environmental Inc.
Paul LeBlanc
6851 SW 45th Street
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314
RE: 15671 Tyndall AFB
AirQuest Environmental, Inc.
Project Location: Tyndall AFB
Lab Work Order (COC): 19L0119
NELAP Certificate No. E86006
6851 SW 45th Street
Paul LeBlanc
Ft. Lauderdale FL, 33314
12/10/2019
Report To:
19L0119Work Order #
Project: 15671 Tyndall AFB
Tyndall AFB
Client Sample ID Laboratory ID Matrix Collection Date
DETECTED ANALYTE SUMMARY
Collection TimeAnalyte Result Units
Florida-Spectrum Environmental Services, Inc.
1460 W. McNab Road, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
Pembroke Laboratory
528 Gooch Rd.
Fort Mead, FL 33841
Big Lake Laboratory
610 Parrot Ave. N.
Okeechobee, FL 34972
Savannah Laboratory
108 Airport Park Dr.
Garden City, GA 31408 www.flenviro.com
Lakeland Laboratory
6851 SW 45th Street
Paul LeBlanc
Ft. Lauderdale FL, 33314
12/10/2019
Report To:
19L0119Work Order #
Project: 15671 Tyndall AFB
Tyndall AFB
ResultParameter MDL Date Analy.QC Units
Lab ID:
Client Sample ID: 108-001 19L0119-01 Collection Date:
Matrix: Solid
12/02/19 00:00
Laboratory Analysis Report
Received Date: 12/04/19 09:15
PQL Method Date Ext. Analyst
Travis HollandCollected By:
Dil
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (as Congeners) by EPA Method 8082 mg/kg wet 0.00386 0.0116 EPA 8082/3550 12/07 15:2612/05 10:50 ACPCB-1016 UND 3 mg/kg wet 0.00222 0.00665 EPA 8082/3550 12/07 15:2612/05 10:50 ACPCB-1221 UND 3 mg/kg wet 0.00584 0.0175 EPA 8082/3550 12/07 15:2612/05 10:50 ACPCB-1232 UND 3 mg/kg wet 0.00232 0.00697 EPA 8082/3550 12/07 15:2612/05 10:50 ACPCB-1242 UND 3 mg/kg wet 0.00144 0.00432 EPA 8082/3550 12/07 15:2612/05 10:50 ACPCB-1248 UND 3 mg/kg wet 0.00236 0.00707 EPA 8082/3550 12/07 15:2612/05 10:50 ACPCB-1254 UND 3 mg/kg wet 0.00430 0.0129 EPA 8082/3550 12/07 15:2612/05 10:50 ACPCB-1260 UND 3
Florida-Spectrum Environmental Services, Inc.
1460 W. McNab Road, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
Pembroke Laboratory
528 Gooch Rd.
Fort Mead, FL 33841
Big Lake Laboratory
610 Parrot Ave. N.
Okeechobee, FL 34972
Savannah Laboratory
108 Airport Park Dr.
Garden City, GA 31408 www.flenviro.com
Lakeland Laboratory
6851 SW 45th Street
Paul LeBlanc
Ft. Lauderdale FL, 33314
12/10/2019
Report To:
19L0119Work Order #
Project: 15671 Tyndall AFB
Tyndall AFB
ResultParameter MDL Date Analy.QC Units
Lab ID:
Client Sample ID: 108-002 19L0119-02 Collection Date:
Matrix: Solid
12/02/19 00:00
Laboratory Analysis Report
Received Date: 12/04/19 09:15
PQL Method Date Ext. Analyst
Travis HollandCollected By:
Dil
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (as Congeners) by EPA Method 8082 mg/kg wet 0.00773 0.0232 EPA 8082/3550 12/07 16:0012/05 10:50 ACPCB-1016 UND 6 mg/kg wet 0.00443 0.0133 EPA 8082/3550 12/07 16:0012/05 10:50 ACPCB-1221 UND 6 mg/kg wet 0.0117 0.0351 EPA 8082/3550 12/07 16:0012/05 10:50 ACPCB-1232 UND 6 mg/kg wet 0.00465 0.0139 EPA 8082/3550 12/07 16:0012/05 10:50 ACPCB-1242 UND 6 mg/kg wet 0.00288 0.00863 EPA 8082/3550 12/07 16:0012/05 10:50 ACPCB-1248 UND 6 mg/kg wet 0.00472 0.0141 EPA 8082/3550 12/07 16:0012/05 10:50 ACPCB-1254 UND 6 mg/kg wet 0.00861 0.0258 EPA 8082/3550 12/07 16:0012/05 10:50 ACPCB-1260 UND 6
Florida-Spectrum Environmental Services, Inc.
1460 W. McNab Road, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
Pembroke Laboratory
528 Gooch Rd.
Fort Mead, FL 33841
Big Lake Laboratory
610 Parrot Ave. N.
Okeechobee, FL 34972
Savannah Laboratory
108 Airport Park Dr.
Garden City, GA 31408 www.flenviro.com
Lakeland Laboratory
6851 SW 45th Street
Paul LeBlanc
Ft. Lauderdale FL, 33314
12/10/2019
Report To:
19L0119Work Order #
Project: 15671 Tyndall AFB
Tyndall AFB
Result Limit
Reporting
Units Level
Spike
Result
Source
%REC
%REC
Limits RPD
RPD
Limit Notes Analyte
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (as Congeners) by EPA Method 8082 - Quality Control
Batch 19L0215 - EPA 3550C
Blank (19L0215-BLK1) Prepared: 12/05/2019 Analyzed: 12/07/2019
PCB-1016 mg/kg wetND 0.00386 U
PCB-1221 "ND 0.00222 U
PCB-1232 "ND 0.00584 U
PCB-1242 "ND 0.00232 U
PCB-1248 "ND 0.00144 U
PCB-1254 "ND 0.00236 U
PCB-1260 "ND 0.00430 U
LCS (19L0215-BS1) Prepared: 12/05/2019 Analyzed: 12/07/2019
PCB-1016 mg/kg wet0.265 0.00386 0.3366 13-13978.7
PCB-1260 "0.281 0.00430 0.3336 20-11984.2
Matrix Spike (19L0215-MS1) Prepared: 12/05/2019 Analyzed: 12/07/2019Source: 19L0121-01
PCB-1016 mg/kg wet0.816 0.0116 1.004 ND 10-14981.3
PCB-1260 "0.852 0.0129 0.9950 ND 10-13785.6
Matrix Spike Dup (19L0215-MSD1) Prepared: 12/05/2019 Analyzed: 12/07/2019Source: 19L0121-01
PCB-1016 mg/kg wet0.717 0.0116 1.004 ND 3010-149 12.971.4
PCB-1260 "0.720 0.0129 0.9950 ND 3010-137 16.872.4
Blank (19L0215-BLK1) Prepared: 12/05/2019 Analyzed: 12/07/2019 mg/kg wet 0.03326 10-110Surrogate: Decachlorobiphenyl 67.00.0223
"…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .