Appendix D - Asbestos Survey.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- B229 PV Array
- Solicitation number
- AEW-0170-0555
- Issued by
- Macomb County, Westland City, Michigan
About this file
This document is an Asbestos Inspection Report for Building 229 at the United States Army Garrison-Detroit Arsenal (USAG-DTA), prepared by Professional Contract Services, Inc. (PCSI) under Contract No. W56HZV-15-C-L603. The inspection was conducted on February 1, 2016, and covered a comprehensive survey of the 209,020 square foot, three-story administrative building to identify and assess suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs). The survey involved a non-destructive examination of accessible interior and exterior areas, documenting 84 suspect homogeneous materials and identifying several confirmed and assumed asbestos-containing materials.
The report identified specific ACMs, including black mastic associated with floor tiles, paper gaskets on heat units, brown duct sealant, brown caulk near window walls, roof flashing, and exterior foundation sealant. Additionally, several materials were assumed to contain asbestos, such as fire door and door frame insulation, concrete masonry unit (CMU) mortar, vermiculite insulation within CMU walls, and roofing components. The inspection methodology followed AHERA (Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act) standards, with samples analyzed by polarized light microscopy. The report recommends managing identified ACMs in place, following the United States Army Garrison-Detroit Arsenal Asbestos Operations & Maintenance Program, and conducting proper asbestos abatement by licensed contractors when renovating or demolishing the building.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFS CIRM 2025-01_ BLDG 229 PV ARRAY_DRAWINGS_BID ISSUE__250129.pdf | ||
| Appendix G - ENG_FORM_4288-R.pdf | ||
| Appendix B - Rad Contractor Process.pdf | ||
| IMG_7927.JPG | JPG image | |
| IMG_7928.JPG | JPG image | |
| BLDG - 229 4TH FLR.pdf | ||
| IMG_7932.JPG | JPG image | |
| Appendix E - DTA-F-004-24_ClearancePermitRequest-v1.1 (new).pdf | ||
| BLDG - 229 3RD FLR.pdf | ||
| 00 20 00 - Request for Proposals.pdf | ||
| IMG_7925.MOV | MOV file | |
| Appendix C - Construction Impact Notification.pdf | ||
| IMG_7933.JPG | JPG image | |
| BLDG - 229 BASEMENT FLR.pdf | ||
| BLDG - 229 2ND FLR.pdf | ||
| IMG_7934.JPG | JPG image | |
| Appendix H - STA_Form17_FEB2024.v3.0_Single.pdf | ||
| 6-A Addenda #1_0170-0555_DTA B229_250218.pdf | ||
| IMG_7925.JPG | JPG image | |
| BLDG - 229 1ST FLR.pdf | ||
| IMG_7931.JPG | JPG image | |
| RFS CIRM 2025-01_ BLDG 229 PV ARRAY_SPEC_BID ISSUE__250129.pdf | ||
| IMG_7926.JPG | JPG image | |
| IMG_7930.JPG | JPG image | |
| Appendix F - SOW DTA IGSA-CI 25-01 B229 PV Array.pdf | ||
| IMG_7929.JPG | JPG image |
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Directorate of Public Works Detroit Arsenal
APPENDIX D
Appendix D - Asbestos Survey a [lilf:l;Mi]
Asbestos Inspection Report
USAG-DTA
Building 229
Submitted to:
U.S. Army Garrison-Detroit Arsenal (USAG-DTA)
Prepared by:
Contract No. W56HZV-15-C-L603
PWS Attachment 12, Section 2.2
February 29, 2016
REVISED: 5 March 2019
ASBESTOS INSPECTION REPORT
FOR THE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS:
DTA Building #229
6501 E. 11 Mile Rd.
Warren, MI 48397
INITIAL INSPECTION DATE(S):
01 February 2016
PREPARED FOR:
United States Army Garrison – Detroit Tank Arsenal (USAG-DTA)
ATTN: Stanley Grumeretz
REPORT PREPARED AND SUBMITTED BY:
Certified Asbestos Inspector(s):
Maureen Finn (Certification # A32877)
John Harris (Certification # A12781)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Initial Asbestos Inspection, Building 229
PCSI has completed an inspection of Building 229 (B229) for suspect asbestos containing materials, in accordance with Contract W56HZV-15-C-L603, PWS Attachment 12, Section 2.2. The following known and/or assumed ACMs have been identified within this structure:
• Mastic, black, associated with 12” X 12” orange floor tile
• Mastic, black, associated with 12” X 12” blue floor tile
• Paper gaskets, associated with heat units
• Duct sealant, brown
• Fire Door and Door Frame, Insulation
• CMU, associated CMU mortar and vermiculite insulation within CMU walls
• Roofing components
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary
1. BUILDING INSPECTION
1.1. Building Description
1.2. Inspection Methodology
1.3. Historical Data Review and Analysis
1.4. Sampling Methodology
1.5. Analytical Methodology
2. FINDINGS
2.1. Suspect Homogeneous Materials
2.2. ACM Identified
2.3. Assumed ACM
3. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4. LIMITATIONS
Appendices
I. Functional Space Diagrams II. Functional Space/Assessment Spreadsheet
III. Homogeneous Materials Summary IV. Analytical Reports/Chain of Custody Documentation
[1]
BUILDING INSPECTION
Professional Contract Services, Inc. (PCSI) has completed an inspection of Building 229 (B229) at the United States Army Garrison-Detroit Arsenal (USAG-DTA) for suspect asbestos containing materials, in general accordance with the requirements outlined in PWS Attachment 12, Section 2.2 of Contract Number W56HZV-15-C-L603. This report summarizes our methodologies, laboratory results, findings, conclusions and recommendations, and limitations.
Building Description
Building Number: B229 Building Name: Administrative Construction Date: 1981 Square Footage: 209,020 square feet Stories: 3 (including basement level)
B229 is an administrative building, primarily occupied by offices, cubicle bays, cafeteria and support areas.
Building Inspection
The initial asbestos building inspection was conducted on the following date(s):
• February 01, 2016
A non-destructive asbestos survey of the accessible interior and exterior areas of the building was performed by the following PCSI personnel accredited by the State of Michigan as an Asbestos Building Inspector:
• Peter L. Schappach (Certification # A8943)
[2]
Inspection Methodology
PCSI performed the asbestos inspection of B229 in general accordance with the Asbestos in Schools Hazard Assessment Reauthorization Act (40 CFR, Part 763; Title 15, Chapter 53, Subchapter II, Section 2641) and Section 2.2 of Performance Work Statement (PWS) Attachment 12.
The building inspection strategy was to provide an inspection report that could be used to manage identified ACMs in the building in order to protect building occupants, visitors and contractors. PCSI asbestos building inspectors delineated functional spaces within the building, and assigned unique functional space numbers to each functional space. Each accessible functional space was then evaluated for suspect ACMs. A functional space is defined as a room or group of rooms (including crawl spaces or the space between a dropped ceiling and the floor or roof deck above), such as office space(s), a cafeteria, gymnasium, hallway(s), etc., as designated by an accredited asbestos building inspector. Functional Space Diagrams are presented in Appendix I, and a Functional Space/Assessment Spreadsheet is included in Appendix II.
The asbestos survey included the identification of suspect materials and the definition of homogeneous materials (HMs), assessment of the condition of each material, estimation of the approximate quantity of the suspect ACMs, the potential for damage and the collection and analysis of bulk samples from each identified HM, if necessary. For the purpose of this inspection report, an HM is defined as an area of surfacing material, thermal system insulation or miscellaneous material that exhibited similar physical characteristics (e.g., texture, surface color, and appearance) and was applied or installed at the same time (if known) as determined by the accredited building inspectors utilizing professional judgment and experience.
Limitations to PCSI’s asbestos inspection are presented in Section IV of this report.
Homogeneous Material data previously generated by others was reviewed and verified in the field and, when applicable, PCSI collected additional bulk samples, as necessary.
Historical Data Review and Analysis
PCSI conducted a review of the asbestos inspections of Building 229 conducted by Versar dated 31 October 2006 and J&J/BMAR, JV, LLP dated 29 May 2009 and an analysis of the previous homogeneous materials and analytical results was performed to evaluate the data for inclusion in this report. Where historic data was absent or incomplete, PCSI conducted additional bulk sampling and analysis to supplement the existing data and provide a more complete understanding of the materials located within the structure. The previously defined homogeneous materials have been included in the Homogeneous Material Summary Sheets located in Appendix III and the corresponding analytical data has been included in Appendix IV, Analytical Reports/Chain of Custody Documentation.
[3]
Sampling Methodology
PCSI asbestos inspectors collected bulk samples of suspect HMs utilizing standard bulk sampling methods outlined in the AHERA Standard. Each sample was placed in an unused zip-top plastic bag and labeled with a unique sample identification number. Where supplemental samples were collected from previously identified HMs, the same HM number was utilized.
Suspect materials identified for the first time as part of this inspection were assigned a new, unique HM number, beginning with the next consecutive number after the last HM number reported in the previous inspection. Sample locations were recorded on the Homogeneous Material Summary Sheet and on the building diagram.
Sample numbers generated during this inspection were recorded using the following format:
Building #/year of inspection/HM#/Sample ID. The homogeneous material number is a 3-digit number corresponding to the HM# designated in the previous inspection or assigned by the inspector in the field. Sample ID refers to the designation A, B, C, etc., corresponding to the first sample collected, second sample collected, third sample collected, etc.
Analytical Methodology
Collected bulk samples were submitted to International Asbestos Testing Laboratories, Inc.
(IATL) for laboratory analysis, using standard Chain of Custody protocol. The submitted bulk samples were analyzed by polarized light microscopy (PLM), in accordance with EPA Method 600/R-93/116, Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Building Materials (40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart F, Appendix A, Section 1). The US EPA defines asbestos containing material (ACM) as any material containing more than 1 percent asbestos by weight.
Bulk samples which were reported to contain less than 10 percent asbestos by the visual estimation method were point counted to verify asbestos content.
Analytical results are presented in Appendix IV, Analytical Reports/Chain of Custody Documentation.
[4]
FINDINGS
Suspect Homogeneous Materials
A total of eighty-four (84) suspect Asbestos Containing Homogeneous Materials have been identified in the structure. Please refer to Appendix III, Homogeneous Materials Summary, for a complete list of the suspect Homogeneous Materials encountered during the building inspection.
ACM Identified
The following Homogeneous Materials were determined to be ACMs through sampling and laboratory analysis.
• Mastic, black, associated with 12” X 12” orange floor tile
• Mastic, black, associated with 12” X 12” blue floor tile
• Paper gaskets, associated with heat units
• Duct sealant, brown
• Caulk, brown, associated with window wall
• Roof flashing
• Exterior foundation sealant
Assumed ACM
The Homogeneous Materials listed below were not sampled based on the type of material, the inaccessible location of the material, or other factors deemed pertinent by the Accredited Asbestos Building Inspector(s). These materials should be assumed to be ACMs, until such time that they can be properly sampled and analyzed by an accredited laboratory for asbestos content.
• Fire Door and Door Frame, Insulation
• CMU, associated CMU mortar and vermiculite insulation within CMU walls
• Roofing components
[5]
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The data presented in Appendix II, Functional Space/Assessment Spreadsheet should be utilized to manage the identified ACMs in place until such time that they are removed from the building.
Interim controls are short-term, low-cost methods implemented in the management of the known and assumed ACMs in a building. Examples of interim controls include the proper training of building occupants and tradespeople, restricting access to the ACMs, cleaning and decontamination of surfaces with suspect debris and taking steps to minimize the impact to known and assumed ACMs. Further guidance for the management of ACMs at USAG-DTA can be found in the United State Army Garrison-Detroit Arsenal Asbestos Operations & Maintenance Program and Asbestos Management Plan for Asbestos Containing Materials, dated 01 September, 2005 (revised 10 October 2007).
The U.S. EPA defines regulated asbestos-containing material (RACM) as: (a) Friable asbestos material, (b) Category I non-friable ACM that has become friable, (c) Category I non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading, or (d) Category II non-friable ACM that has a high probability of becoming or has become crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by the forces expected to act on the material in the course of demolition or renovation operations.
The NESHAP asbestos regulations require the removal of all RACM from a facility being demolished or renovated prior to beginning any activity that might damage or disturb the material. The U.S. EPA requires written notification if the combined amount of RACM to be removed is at least 260 linear feet, at least 160 square feet, or at least one cubic meter of facility components where length or area could not be measured. PCSI recommends the removal of the RACM, and the ACM that might become RACM as a result of the project-specific demolition techniques, by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor.
A written Notification of Intent to Renovate/Demolish form is required to be submitted to the U.S. EPA or their designated authority at least ten working days prior to beginning any asbestos abatement and/or demolition project. There may also be additional state and local agency requirements.
LIMITATIONS
PCSI did not perform destructive testing as part of this building assessment and therefore, the suspect HMs identified herein represent those materials that were readily accessible and observable by PCSI asbestos building inspectors at the time of the survey. Inaccessible areas included, but were not limited to: spaces within and/or behind walls, areas beneath floors, areas above ceilings, ceiling plenums, confined spaces, tunnels, trenches, pits, sumps, classified and/or top secret areas, and/or other areas or materials for which data was deemed not reasonably ascertainable.
[6]
Due to the nature of the operations at USAG-DTA, access to certain areas was limited, based on security measures, ongoing testing, availability of authorized personnel to act as escorts, etc.
Where applicable, these inaccessible functional spaces, or portions of functional spaces, are noted in Appendix II, Functional Space/Assessment Spreadsheet.
The building assessment did not include activities that would compromise the physical or structural integrity of building components. Unless otherwise indicated, PCSI did not perform any destructive testing and this assessment is limited to areas that were accessible to and visually observed by PCSI at the time of the assessment. PCSI did not collect samples of suspect materials if such sampling would compromise the structural integrity of the materials such that it would present a material failure and/or the collection of samples would void material warranties (e.g., roofing materials).
PCSI has made reasonable efforts to identify and quantify suspect ACMs based upon readily available information and information provided by USAG-DTA. This survey only summarizes the potential presence and estimated quantities of ACMs based on available documentation and visual observations.
The referenced quantities are estimates only, based on observable, accessible materials documented at the time of PCSI’s review. The referenced quantities cannot be relied upon for developing asbestos abatement bids, project design documents, or for regulatory agency notification purposes.
Furthermore, this report is meant to serve as a general guidance to the known and assumed ACMs present within the referenced building. A NESHAP-compliant inspection identifying the specific types, locations and quantities of known and/or suspect ACMs expected to be impacted by future renovation/demolition activities should be developed, based on the completed design documents.
Additional suspect asbestos containing material disturbed during future renovation or demolition activities should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, especially materials that were previously undiscovered, hidden, obscured, or inaccessible, to determine if the material is included in this report, or prior existing documentation. If a given material is not described in this report and/or prior existing documentation, or cannot be identified as a non-suspect material by an accredited asbestos building inspector, the material should be assumed to contain asbestos, and renovation and/or demolition activities should be halted until sampling and analysis can be accomplished.
Parties conducting renovation and/or demolition activities should follow all applicable federal, state, and local regulations in handling identified and suspect ACMs.
The information contained in this report was based upon specific parameters and regulations in force at the time of the survey. The information herein is only for the specific use of PCSI, unless written authorization is obtained from PCSI. PCSI accepts no responsibility for the use, interpretation, or reliance by other parties on the information contained herein, nor does this report represent an instrument of regulatory compliance or an asbestos abatement project design or specification.
APPENDIX I
FUNCTIONAL SPACE DIAGRAMS
APPENDIX II
FUNCTIONAL SPACE/ASSESSMENT SPREADSHEET
Friability: NF = Nonfriable, F = friable Sampled: Y = Yes, N = No, A = Assumed Condition: N = Not Damaged, LD = Localized Damage, D = Damaged, SD = Significantly Damaged Potential for Damage: H = High, M = Medium, L = Low
APPENDIX III
HOMOGENEOUS MATERIALS SUMMARY
*Individual sample dates may vary; see original laboratory reports.
Homogeneous Material (HM) Summary Sheet
Building # 229 Inspector(s) Initials: (Greg McDonald &) Greg McDonald / Robert Jozwiak Date: (December 2005 &) April/May 2009
HM# Type Description Sample ID & Sample Location*
(FS#, location) Layers %
Asb.
Asb.
Type
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Wallboard System Color: White Size:
A. Center of S. wall in Penthouse A 0 B. N.S. main hall, E. side near elevator above ceiling panel – 3rd floor B 0
C. South wall – Elect. Room – 3rd floor C 0 D. E. side of main N S hallway near elevator
– 2nd floor – Corridor 2. . 0
E. N. wall of E W. E. hall – Abrams area O/S of Corridor – 4th floor.
F. N. E. corner of 1st floor Electrical room 0 G. W. wall above door in Rm B298 Basement 0
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Drywall tape Color: Cream
A. Center of South wall in Penthouse A 0 B. N.S. main hall, E. side near elevator above ceiling panel – 3rd floor. B 0
C. South wall Elect. Room – 3rd floor C 0 D. E. side of main N S hallway near elevator
– 2nd floor – Corridor 2. .
F. N. E. corner of 1st floor Electrical room 0
G. W. wall above door in Rm B298 Basement 0
Building # 229 Inspector(s) Initials: (Greg McDonald &) Greg McDonald / Robert Jozwiak Date: (December 2005 &) April/May 2009
HM# Type Description Sample ID & Sample Location* (FS#, location)
Layers % Asb.
Asb.
Type
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Joint Compound Color: white Size:
Other: for drywall
A. Center of S. wall in Penthouse A 0 B. N.S. main hall, E. side near elevator above ceiling panel – 3rd floor.
B 0
C. South wall Elect. Room – 3rd floor C 0 D. E. side of main N S hallway near elevator
– 2nd floor – Corridor 2.
. 0
F. N. E. corner of 1st floor Electrical room 0 G. W. wall above door in Rm B298 Basement 0
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Fireproofing Color: Grey
Other: Spray on ceiling
A. E. wall of Storage between elev. & stair to Penthouse across from Janitor closet – 4th floor
A
B. S. end of main N.S.E. side near door to room 3100
B 0
C. Above S. wall of Elect. Room – 3rd floor C 0 D. E. side of main N. S. hallway near elevator
– 2nd floor – Corridor 2
. 0
E. Center of Main Systems Integration Lobby 0 F. N.E. corner of 2555 Combat Conf. rm 2nd fl.
G. W. wall above door in B-298 basement 0
Building # 229 Inspector(s) Initials: (Greg McDonald &) Greg McDonald / Robert Jozwiak Date: (December 2005 &) April/May 2009
HM# Type Description Sample ID & Sample Location* (FS#, location)
Layers % Asb.
Asb.
Type
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Vibration damper Color: Black
Other: HVAC fabric
A. Penthouse Center S. wall on AH V 10034 A 0 B. FS-18, Basement HVAC Room B 0 C. FS-18, Basement HVAC Room C 0
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Fitting
Other: Mud on FG pipe insulation
A. E. wall Storage rm between elev. & stairs to P-house ac ross from 4th fl. Janitor closet
A 0
B. South wall of electrical room – 3rd floor B 0/0 C. West wall of Room 2390 – 2nd floor C 0/0
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Gaskets
Other: Paper on heat units
A. S.E. corner of Info Mgmt Office – 4th floor A 70 CH
B. Ctr of main systems Integrat. Lobby – 3rd fl B 70 CH C. N E corner of 2555 Combat Conf - 2nd fl. C 70 CH
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Duct joint caulk Color: Brown
A. Ctr of Man System Integration Lobby-3rd fl A 1.5 CH B. NE corner of 2555 Combat Conf. room B 1.5 CH C. E wall of main N/S hall outside S.W corner
- Room 1226
C 1.5 CH
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Ceiling Panel Color: White Size: 2 x 2
Other: Bumpy
A. N.W. corner of teams Abrams area – 4th fl. A 0 B. FS-54, 4th floor B 0 C. FS-54, 4th floor C 0
Building # 229 Inspector(s) Initials: (Greg McDonald &) Greg McDonald / Robert Jozwiak Date: (December 2005 &) April/May 2009
HM# Layer Type Description Sample
ID
Sample Location* (FS#, location, etc.)
Asb.
Asb.
Type
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l Ceiling Panel
Size 2’ x 4 ‘
Other: Dots & Gouges
A E. side of main N.S hall near Elevator
B FS-2, South stairwell 0 C FS-6, North stairwell 0
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Ceiling Panel Color: White Size: 2’ x 4’
Other: Textured
A S. end of main Hall, E side near door to Room 3100 – 3rd floor
B FS-1, Cafeteria 0 C FS-1, Cafeteria 0
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Ceiling Panel
Other: Pinhole
A Center of W. wall O/S B518 & B520 kitchen area
B FS-1, Cafeteria 0 C FS-1, Cafeteria 0
1 3 A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Ceiling Panel
Size: 2’ x 2’
Other: Textured bumpy
A N.S. hall on E. wall – 2 feet N. of telephone room door.
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Ceiling Panel
Other: Gypsum board
A E. wall of B520 Cooks line of kitchen in basement
B FS-1, Cafeteria 0 C FS-1, Cafeteria 0
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Rubber floor
Other: 1” raised dots
A N. wall of N. stairwell – 4th floor 0 B FS-2, South Stairwell 0 C FS-6, North Stairwell 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Mastic Color: Yellow
A N. wall of N. stairwell – 4th floor 0
Building # 229 Inspector(s) Initials: (Greg McDonald &) Greg McDonald / Robert Jozwiak Date: (December 2005 &) April/May 2009
HM# Layer Type Description Sample
ID
Sample Location* (FS#, location, etc.)
Asb.
Asb.
Type
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l : Vinyl Sheet Color: Grey White
Other: Marble Pattern
A Closet in Program .Exec. Office –S.
E .corner of Bldg. – 4th floor
B C
SM
TSI
MM
A Closet in Program .Exec. Office – S.E. corner of Bldg. – 4th floor
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Vinyl Sheet Color: Cream
Other: Diamond shape pattern
A In bathroom-Program Exec. Office
– S.E. corner of Bldg. – 4th floor
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Other: For HM 19
A In bathroom-Program Exec. Office
– S.E. corner of Bldg. – 4th floor
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Floor tile Color: Pink Size: 12” x 12”
A S.W corner of Room 4860 ,4th floor 0 B FS-56, Room 4860 0 C FS-56, Room 4855 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Other: For HM 21
A S.W corner of Room 4860 ,4th floor 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Floor tile Color: Orange
A W. wall of N.S. hall between Men’s & Ladies Rest rooms – 4th floor
B FS-16, IT Room 0 C FS-56, Hallway – 4th floor 0
Building # 229 Inspector(s) Initials: (Greg McDonald &) Greg McDonald / Robert Jozwiak Date: (December 2005 &) April/May 2009
HM# Layer Type Description Sample
ID
Sample Location* (FS#, location, etc.)
Asb.
Asb.
Type
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Color: black
Other: For HM 23
A W. wall of N.S. hall between Men’s & Ladies Rest rooms – 4th floor
2.5 CH
Shown on Lab as Sample 23B 3.5 CH Shown on lab as Sample 23C 3.7 CH
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Rubber Floor Color: blue
Other: w/1” raised dots
A E. side of hallway, lg. frt. elevator 0 B FS-11, elevator 0 C FS-11, elevator 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Color: black
Other: For HM 25
A E. side of hallway, lg. frt. elevator 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Floor tile Color: Grey & white specks
A S.E. corner,Prog. Mgr. kitchen area 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Other: For HM 27
A S.E. corner Prog. Mgr. kitchen area 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Floor Tile Color: Beige
A N.E. corner of Rm. 2210 2nd floor 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Other: For HM 29
A N.E. corner of Rm. 2210 2nd floor 0
Building # 229 Inspector(s) Initials: (Greg McDonald &) Greg McDonald / Robert Jozwiak Date: (December 2005 &) April/May 2009
HM# Layer Type Description Sample
ID
Sample Location* (FS#, location, etc.)
Asb.
Asb.
Type
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l Floor tile Color: Taupe Size 12” x 12”
A N.E. corner of Room 2210 – 2nd floor 0 B FS-3, Basement Main Corridor 0 C FS-3, Basement Main Corridor 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Other: For HM 32
A N.E. corner of Room 2210 – 2nd floor 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Vinyl Sheeting Color: Beige w/red & blue streak
A Behind door– Women’s room- -2nd 0 B FS-40, 2nd floor Women’s room 0 C FS-40, 2nd floor Women’s room 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Other: For HM 33
A Behind door– Women’s room- -2nd 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Floor Tile Color: Aqua & purple specks
A S.W.corner of foyer to men’s room 0 B FS-1, Cafeteria 0 C FS-3, Basement Main Corridor 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Color: Yellow & black
Other: For HM 35
A S.W.corner of foyer to men’s room 0 Shown on Lab as Sample 35B 0 Shown on Lab as Sample 35C 0
Building # 229 Inspector(s) Initials: (Greg McDonald &) Greg McDonald / Robert Jozwiak Date: (December 2005 &) April/May 2009
HM# Layer Type Description Sample
ID
Sample Location* (FS#, location, etc.)
Asb.
Asb.
Type
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Floor Tile Color: Black w/black/grey specks
A S.E corner of open area between B260 & B200 adjacent N.W. doors to B 200 basement
B FS-1, Cafeteria 0
C FS-3, Basement Main Corridor 0
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l Mastic
Other: For HM 37
A S.E corner of open area between B260 & B200 adjacent N.W. doors to B200 basement
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Floor tile Color: Blue w/lt. blue specks Size: 12” x 12 ”
A N E. corner of B530 Cafeteria 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Other: For HM 39
A N E. corner of B530 Cafeteria 1.5 CH
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Cove base
Size: 4”
A E. wall under stairs to Penthouse 0
B FS-14, B290 0
C FS-16, IT Room 0
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Other: For HM 41
A E. wall under stairs to Penthouse 0 Shown on Lab as Sample 41B 0 Shown on Lab as Sample 41C 0
Building # 229 Inspector(s) Initials: (Greg McDonald &) Greg McDonald / Robert Jozwiak Date: (December 2005 &) April/May 2009
HM# Layer Type Description
Sample
ID
Sample Location* (FS#, location, etc.)
Asb.
Asb.
Type
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Cove base Color: Tan Size: 6”
A N.W. corner of Team Abrams cubicle area – 4th floor
B FS-56, HBCT Cubical area 0 C FS-56, HBCT Cubical area 0
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Other: For HM 43
A N.W. corner of Team Abrams cubicle area – 4th floor
Shown on Lab as Sample 43B 0 Shown on Lab as Sample 43C 0
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l Cove Base
Size 4”
A N. wall of N. wall of Stairwell 0 B FS-43, 2nd floor 0 C FS-43, 2nd floor 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Other: For HM 45
A N. wall of N. wall of Stairwell 0 Shown on Lab as Sample 45B 0 Shown on Lab as Sample 45C 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Cove base Color: Dark grey
A S.E stairwell – 3rd floor 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Other: For HM 47
A S.E stairwell – 3rd floor 0
Building # 229 Inspector(s) Initials: (Greg McDonald &) Greg McDonald / Robert Jozwiak Date: (December 2005 &) April/May 2009
Sample Location* (FS#, location, etc.)
Asb.
Asb.
Type
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Cove base Color: Pink
A W. wall of Room 4860 – 4th floor 0 B FS-56 Room 4860 0 C FS-56 Room 4855 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Mastic
Other: For HM 49
A W. wall of Room 4860 – 4th floor 0 Shown on Lab as 49B 0 Shown on lab as 49C 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Sink Undercoat
A S. wall in kitchen adjacent to Abrams Exec. Room – 4th floor
B FS-56, Abraham’s Executive Area 0 C FS-56, Abraham’s Executive Area 0
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l Cove Base Color: Maroon Size 6”
A S. end of main Hall – E. side near
B FS-49, 3rd floor 0 C FS-49, 3rd floor 0
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Other: For HM 52
A S. end of main Hall – E. side near
Shown on Lab as 52B 0 Shown on lab as 52C 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Sink Undercoat
A S.E corner of Bldg Program. Mgr kitchen area
B FS-56, HBCT Kitchen area 0
C FS-56, HBCT Kitchen area 0
Building # 229 Inspector(s) Initials: (Greg McDonald &) Greg McDonald / Robert Jozwiak Date: (December 2005 &) April/May 2009
Sample Location* (FS#, location, etc.)
Asb.
Asb.
Type
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Cove base Color: Blue
A N.W. corner of Lobby Area of Man Systems Integration – 3rd floor
B FS-49, 3rd floor 0 C FS-49, 3rd floor 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Other: For HM 55 A N.W. corner of Lobby Area of Man Systems Integration – 3rd floor
Shown on Lab as 55B 0 Shown on lab as 55C 0
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Cove base
A S. wall of room 2290 – 2nd floor 0 B FS-43, 2nd floor 0 C FS-43, 2nd floor 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Other: For HM 57
A S. wall of room 2290 – 2nd floor 0
Shown on Lab as 57B 0 Shown on Lab as 57C 0
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l Cove Base
Size 4”
A N.W. corner behind door of Logistics S. end of Bldg. 4th floor
B FS-56, 4th floor 0 C FS-56, 4th floor 0
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Other: For HM 59
A N.W. corner behind door of Logistics S. end of Bldg. 4th floor
Shown on Lab as 59B 0 Shown on Lab as 59C 0
Building # 229 Inspector(s) Initials: (Greg McDonald &) Greg McDonald / Robert Jozwiak Date: (December 2005 &) April/May 2009
Sample Location* (FS#, location, etc.)
Asb.
Asb.
Type
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Cove base
A S.E. corner of open area between B260 & B200 adjacent N.W. door to B200
B FS-3, Basement main corridor 0 C FS-3, Basement main corridor 0
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Other: For HM 61
A S.E. corner of open area between B260 & B200 adjacent N.W. door to B200
Shown on Lab as Sample 61B & C 0
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Cove Base Color: Tan
A W. wall in kitchen adjacent to
B FS-56, 4th floor 0 C FS-56, 4th floor 0
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Other: For HM 63
A W. wall in kitchen adjacent to
Shown on Lab as 63B 0 Shown on Lab as 63C 0
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Window Caulk
A S.E. Reception area – N. of stairwell in 3100 area – 3rd floor
B FS-49, 3rd floor 0 C FS-56, 4th floor 0
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l Tank insulation Color: Gray
Other: Tank 0185
A Room 298 0/0 B Room 298 0/0 C Room 298 0/0
B C
SM
TSI
Mat’l: Doors & Frames
ASSUMED POSITIVE
Building # 229 Inspector(s) Initials: (Greg McDonald &) Greg McDonald / Robert Jozwiak Date: (December 2005 &) April/May 2009
Sample Location* (FS#, location, etc.)
Asb.
Asb.
Type
A B C
SM
TSI
Mat’l: CMU
ASSUMED POSITIVE
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Cove Base & Mastic Color: Dark Blue
A FS-25, BMD 0/0
B FS-16, MTV 0/0
C FS-33, 1st floor main corridor 0/0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Floor tile & Mastic Color: Green pebble
A FS-35, Room #1360 0 B FS-35, Room #1360 0 C FS-35, Room #1360 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Floor tile & Mastic Color: Tan & Brown checkerboard pattern
A FS-36, Copier room 0/0/0 B FS-37, Break room 0/0 C FS-43, 2nd floor 0/0/0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Roofing components Color: A =black shingle, B= tar, C=brown caulk
Other: asphaltic
(Sampled Dec . 2009)
A Roofing, Portico Canopy 0
B Roofing, flashing, Portico Canopy 0
C Roofing, flashing, Portico Canopy 2.3 CH
Building # 229 Inspector(s) Initials: (Greg McDonald &) Greg McDonald / Robert Jozwiak Date: (December 2005 &) April/May 2009
Sample Location* (FS#, location, etc.)
Asb.
Asb.
Type
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l Roofing Component Color: Brown Caulk
Metal flashing A FS-59 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Caulk
A FS-59 - Portico column 0/0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Caulk Color: Tan//grey
A FS-59 0/0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Caulk
Expansion joint A FS-59 0 B C
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Caulk
Waterproofing selalant A FS-59 – exterior foundation 1.5 CH
Building # 229 Inspector(s) Initials: (Greg McDonald &) Greg McDonald / Robert Jozwiak Date: (December 2005 &) April/May 2009
Sample Location* (FS#, location, etc.)
Asb.
Asb.
Type
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l : Caulk
A FS-59 – Window wall 2.2 CH
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Caulk
A FS-59 – Firedoor frame 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Caulk
A FS-59 – Exterior Facade
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Pipe Fitting Color: Tan Grey
Roof conductor Wrap insulation
A FS-33 – Roof conductor 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l: Insulation Color: Tan/grey
Fireproofing - sprayed A FS-33 0
B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l Concrete
A FS-59 – Portico Column 0
Building # 229 Inspector(s) Initials: (Greg McDonald &) Greg McDonald / Robert Jozwiak Date: (December 2005 &) April/May 2009
Sample Location* (FS#, location, etc.)
Asb.
Asb.
Type
A B C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l : Concrete Floor Color:
A FS#20 0
B FS#45 0
C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l:
Color:
C
SM
TSI
MM
C
SM
TSI
MM
C
SM
TSI
MM
C
SM
TSI
MM
Mat’l
APPENDIX IV
ANALYTICAL REPORTS/CHAIN OF CUSTODY DOCUMENTATION
THIS SECTION LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
ANALYTICAL RESULTS ARE SUMMARIZED IN APPENDIX III:
HOMOGENEOUS MATERIAL SUMMARY SHEETS
ORIGINAL LABORATORY CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSIS ARE AVAILABLE IN
THE ASBESTOS MANAGEMENT FILES MAINTAINED BY THE BASOPS
CONTRACTOR
| Appendix I - Asbestos Survey |
| Appendix I - Cover |
Asbestos Inspection Report B229 Spring 2019
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .