Appendix A.pdf
PDF 122 KB Posted
- Attached to
- National Architecture/Engineering/Interiors Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 47PF0020R0101
About this file
This notice announces a solicitation for an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity contract to provide architecture, engineering, and interior design services to the U.S. General Services Administration Region 5. The solicitation will result in multiple-award IDIQ contracts for a five-year base period with a minimum guarantee of $5,000 in the initial year. The maximum order limitation is $125 million per contract for Pool A, which covers national A/E/I services, and $25 million per contract for Pool B, which sets aside interior architecture services in Regions 1 and 10 for small businesses. Services include design, planning, construction documents, construction administration, and related specialties. The submission deadline is October 4, 2021, with evaluations based on specialized experience, qualifications, past performance, management plan, and location. The notice provides detailed instructions on the two-stage evaluation and selection process, including shortlisting and interviews.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 5 - SF30.pdf | ||
| Amendment 4 - SF30.pdf | ||
| Amendment 3 - SF30.pdf | ||
| RFQ 47PF0020R0101 Modified 10.4.2021.pdf | ||
| AEI Submission Clarification Sheet (10.4.21).pdf | ||
| Amendment 2 - SF30.pdf | ||
| AEI Submission Clarification Sheet.pdf | ||
| Application of 6 percent PIB 13 04 Attach 1.pdf | ||
| Amendment 1 - SF30.pdf | ||
| RFQ 47PF0020R0101 Modified 9.16.2021.pdf | ||
| Appendix A.pdf | ||
| PIB 13-04 Attachment 2 AE PROPOSAL FORM PROTECTED 23APR2014.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Questions Answers (Round1).pdf | ||
| SF330-16j.pdf |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
42�
APPENDIX�A�
ATTACHMENT�1,�SPECIALIZED�EXPERIENCE�AND�TECHNICAL�COMPETENCE�–�OFFEROR�WORKSHEET�
ATTACHMENT�2,�PAST�PERFORMANCE�QUESTIONNAIRE�
43�
ATTACHMENT�1,�SPECIALIZED�EXPERIENCE�AND�TECHNICAL�COMPETENCE�-�OFFEROR�WORKSHEET� Project�Title:� Location:� Name�and�location�of�the�project.� A�detailed�description�of�the�project:� Indicate�if�the�project�was�performed�under�an�IDIQ,�blanket�purchase�agreement�or�other�type�of�master� contract:�� Project�start�and�completion�dates:� Construction�cost�at�award�and�the�final�construction�cost�at�construction�completion:� Describe�your�role�in�the�project�(i.e.,�prime�or�subcontractor):� Describe�the�amount�and�type�of�work�you�performed�with�in-house�forces�and�the�work�that�was� accomplished�by�subcontractors:� Describe�any�problems�encountered�and�the�corrective�actions�taken:� Name,�Phone�number�and�email�address�of�the�client’s�contact�person,�a�primary�contract�and�a� secondary�contact�(at�least�one�contact�must�be�the�owner):� If�a�firm�is�proposing�as�a�joint�venture�(JV),�the�JV�will�be�required�to�discuss�if�the�joint�venture�has� experience�working�together�in�the�past.�If�proposing�as�a�joint�venture,�the�JV�will�be�required�to�provide� a�copy�of�the�joint�venture�agreement.��
44�
ATTACHMENT�2,�PBS�PAST�PERFORMANCE�QUESTIONNAIRE�
CONTRACT�INFORMATION�(Contractor/Offeror�to�complete�Blocks�1-4)�
1.�CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR�INFORMATION�
��Firm�Name:�
��Address:�
��Phone�Number:� � � �
DUNs�Number:�
��Contact�Name�
��Email�Address:�
Contact�Phone�Number:� � � �
2.�GENERAL�WORK�INFORMATION�
��Work�performed�as:�☐�Prime�Contractor����☐�Sub�Contractor�����☐�Joint�Venture����☐�Other�(Please�explain):�
��Percent�(%)�of�project�work�performed:�
��If�a�subcontractor,�who�was�the�prime�(Name/Phone�#):�
3.�CONTRACT�INFORMATION�
��Contract�Number:�
��Delivery/Task�Order�Number�(if�applicable):�
��Contract�Type:�����☐�Firm�Fixed�Price�����☐�Cost�Reimbursement�����☐�Other�(Please�explain)�
��Contract�Title:�
��Contract�Location:�
��Award�Date�(mm/dd/yy):�
��Contract�Completion�Date�(mm/dd/yy):�
��Actual�Completion�Date�(mm/dd/yy):�
��Explain�Differences:�
��Original�Contract�Price�(Award�Amount):�
��Final�Contract�Price�(to�include�all�modifications,�if�applicable):� �
��Explain�Differences:�� � � � � �
4.�PROJECT�DESCRIPTION�
��Complexity�of�Work:���☐�High�������☐�Med������☐�Routine���
��How�is�this�project�relevant�to�project�of�submission?�(Please�provide�details�such�as�similar�equipment,�requirements,� conditions,�etc.)�� � � � � �
INSTRUCTIONS�FOR�CLIENTS�COMPLETING�THIS�QUESTIONNAIRE:�PBS�requests�that�the�client�completes�this�questionnaire� and�submits�it�directly�back�to�the�offeror.��The�offeror�will�submit�the�completed�questionnaire�to�PBS�with�their�proposal�and�
45� may�duplicate�this�questionnaire�for�future�submission�on�PBS�solicitations.��Clients�are�highly�encouraged�to�submit� questionnaires�directly�to�the�offeror.��However,�questionnaires�may�be�submitted�directly�to�PBS.��Please�contact�the�offeror� for�PBS�POC�information.��The�government�reserves�the�right�to�verify�any�and�all�information�on�this�form.��
Use�the�following�adjective�ratings�and�definitions�in�your�evaluation�of�the�Contractor’s�performance.�
RATING� DEFINITION� NOTE�
(E)�Excellent� Performance�meets�contractual�requirements�and� exceeds�many�to�the�Government/Owner’s� benefit.��The�contractual�performance�of�the� element�or�sub-element�being�assessed�was� accomplished�with�few�minor�problems�for�which� corrective�actions�taken�by�the�contractor�was� highly�effective.�
An�Excellent�rating�is�appropriate�when�the� Contractor�successfully�performed�multiple� significant�events�that�were�of�benefit�to�the� Government/Owner.�A�singular�benefit,�however,� could�be�of�such�magnitude�that�it�alone� constitutes�an�Exceptional�rating.�Also,�there� should�have�been�NO�significant�weaknesses� identified.�
(VG)�Very�Good� Performance�meets�contractual�requirements�and� exceeds�some�to�the�Government’s/Owner’s� benefit.�The�contractual�performance�of�the� element�or�sub-element�being�assessed�was� accomplished�with�some�minor�problems�for�which� corrective�actions�taken�by�the�contractor�were� effective.�
A�Very�Good�rating�is�appropriate�when�the� Contractor�successfully�performed�a�significant� event�that�was�a�benefit�to�the� Government/Owner.�There�should�have�been�no� significant�weaknesses�identified.�
(G)�Good� Performance�meets�minimum�contractual� requirements.�The�contractual�performance�of�the� element�or�sub-element�contains�some�minor� problems�for�which�corrective�actions�taken�by�the� contractor�appear�or�were�satisfactory.�
A�Good�rating�is�appropriate�when�there�were�only� minor�problems,�or�major�problems�that�the� contractor�recovered�from�without�impact�to�the� contract.�There�should�have�been�NO�significant� weaknesses�identified.�Per�DOD�policy,�a� fundamental�principle�of�assigning�ratings�is�that� contractors�will�not�be�assessed�a�rating�lower� than�Satisfactory�solely�for�not�performing�beyond� the�requirements�of�the�contract.�
(F)�Fair� Performance�does�not�meet�some�contractual� requirements.�The�contractual�performance�of�the� element�or�sub-element�being�assessed�reflects�a� serious�problem�for�which�the�contractor�has�not� yet�identified�corrective�actions.�The�contractor's� proposed�actions�appear�only�marginally�effective� or�were�not�fully�implemented.�
A�Fair�is�appropriate�when�a�significant�event� occurred�that�the�contractor�had�trouble� overcoming�which�impacted�the� Government/Owner.��
(P)�Poor� Performance�does�not�meet�most�contractual� requirements�and�recovery�is�not�likely�in�a�timely� manner.�The�contractual�performance�of�the� element�or�sub-element�contains�serious� problem(s)�for�which�the�contractor's�corrective� actions�appear�or�were�ineffective.�
A�Poor�rating�is�appropriate�when�multiple� significant�events�occurred�that�the�contractor�had� trouble�overcoming�and�which�impacted�the� Government/Owner.�A�singular�problem,�however,� could�be�of�such�serious�magnitude�that�it�alone� constitutes�an�unsatisfactory�rating.��
(N)�Not� Applicable�
No�information�or�did�not�apply�to�your�contract� Rating�will�be�neither�positive�nor�negative.�
46�
TO�BE�COMPLETED�BY�CLIENT�
CLIENT�INFORMATION�
Client�Point�of�Contact�Information�
Name:�
Title:� � � � � �
Phone�Number:� � � � � �
Email�Address:�
Project�Information�
Contract�Type:� � � � � �
Contract�Title:�
Contract�Location:� � � � � �
Describe�your�role�in�the�project:�
Date�Questionnaire�was�completed�(mm/dd/yy):�
Client’s�Signature:�
Instructions:�Please�select�the�adjective�rating�that�best�reflects�your�evaluation�of�the�contractor’s�performance.�
1.��QUALITY:� ��E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�
(a)�Quality�of�technical�data/report�preparation�efforts.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
(b)�Ability�to�meet�quality�standards�specified�for�technical�performance.� �☐������☐������☐���������☐������☐������☐�
(c)�Timeliness/effectiveness�of�contract�problem�resolution�without� extensive�customer�guidance.� �☐������☐������☐���������☐������☐������☐�
(d)�Adequacy/effectiveness�of�quality�control�program�and�adherence�to� contract�quality�assurance�requirements�(without�adverse�effect�on� performance).�
2.�SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS�OF�PERFORMANCE:� ��E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�
(a)�Compliance�with�contract�delivery/completion�schedules�including� any�significant�intermediate�milestones.�(If�liquidated�damages�were� assessed�or�the�schedule�was�not�met,�please�address�below.)�
(b)�Rate�the�contractor’s�use�of�available�resources�to�accomplish�tasks� identified�in�the�contract.� �☐������☐������☐���������☐������☐������☐�
3.��CUSTOMER�SATISFACTION:� ���E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�
(a)�To�what�extent�were�the�end�users�satisfied�with�the�project?� �☐������☐������☐���������☐������☐������☐�
(b)�Contractor�was�reasonable�and�cooperative�in�dealing�with�your�staff� (including�the�ability�to�successfully�resolve�disagreements/disputes;� responsiveness�to�administrative�reports,�businesslike�and� communication).�
(c)�To�what�extent�was�the�contractor�cooperative,�businesslike,�and� concerned�with�the�interests�of�the�customer?� �☐������☐������☐���������☐������☐������☐�
(d)�Overall�customer�satisfaction.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
47�
4.�MANAGEMENT/�PERSONNEL/LABOR� ���E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�
(a)�Effectiveness�of�on-site�management,�including�management�of� subcontractors,�suppliers,�materials,�and/or�labor�force?� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
(b)�Ability�to�hire,�apply,�and�retain�a�qualified�workforce�to�this�effort.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
4.�MANAGEMENT/�PERSONNEL/LABOR�-�Continued� ���E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�
(c)�Government�Property�Control.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
(d)�Knowledge/expertise�demonstrated�by�contractor�personnel.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
(e)�Utilization�of�Small�Business�concerns.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
(f)�Ability�to�simultaneously�manage�multiple�projects�with�multiple� disciplines.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
(g)�Ability�to�assimilate�and�incorporate�changes�in�requirements�and/or� priority,�including�planning,�execution�and�response�to�Government� changes.�
(h)�Effectiveness�of�overall�management�(including�ability�to�effectively� lead,�manage�and�control�the�program).� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
5.�COST/FINANCIAL�MANAGEMENT� ���E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�
(a)�Ability�to�meet�the�terms�and�conditions�within�the�contractually� agreed�price(s)?� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
(b)�Contractor�proposed�innovative�alternative�methods/processes�that� reduced�cost,�improved�maintainability�or�other�factors�that�benefited� the�client.�
(c)�If�this�is/was�a�government�cost�type�contract,�or�a�CMc/CMc�at�Risk� Contract,�please�rate�the�Contractor’s�timeliness�and�accuracy�in� submitting�monthly�invoices�with�appropriate�back-up�documentation,� monthly�status�reports/budget�variance�reports,�compliance�with� established�budgets�and�avoidance�of�significant�and/or�unexplained� variances�(under�runs�or�overruns).�
(d)�Is�the�Contractor’s�accounting�system�adequate�for�management�and� tracking�of�costs?��(If�no,�please�explain�in�comment�section�below.)� ☐�Yes��������☐�No�
(e)�If�this�is/was�a�government�contract,�has/was�this�contract�been� partially�or�completely�terminated�for�default�or�convenience�or�are� there�any�pending�terminations?��(Indicate�if�show�cause�or�cure�notices� were�issued,�or�any�default�action�in�comment�section�below.)���
☐�Yes��������☐�No�
(f)�Have�there�been�any�indications�that�the�contractor�has�had�any� financial�problems?��(If�yes,�please�explain�in�the�comment�section� below.)�
☐�Yes��������☐�No�
6.�SAFETY/SECURITY� ��E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�
(a)�To�what�extent�was�the�contractor�able�to�maintain�an�environment� of�safety,�adhere�to�its�approved�safety�plan,�and�respond�to�safety� issues?�(Includes:�following�the�users’�rules,�regulations,�and� requirements�regarding�housekeeping,�safety,�correction�of�noted� deficiencies,�etc.).�
48�
(b)�Contractor�complied�with�all�security�requirements�for�the�project� and�personnel�security�requirements.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
7.�GENERAL� ��E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�
(a)�Ability�to�successfully�respond�to�emergency�and/or�surge�situations� (including�notifying�COR,�PM�or�Contracting�Officer�in�a�timely�manner� regarding�urgent�contractual�issues).�
(b)�Compliance�with�contractual�terms/provisions�(If�there�were�specific� issues,�please�explain�in�the�comments�sections�below� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
(c)�In�summary,�provide�an�overall�rating�for�the�work�performed�by�this� contractor.�� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
8.�SUSTAINABILITY� �
Did�this�project�include�sustainable�methods,�materials,�processes�or� certifications?�(See�Whole�Building�Design�Guide�for�acceptable� requirements.�Link�to�guide�WBDG�Green�Building�Standards�and� Certification�Systems.)�(If�yes,�please�explain�in�the�comments�section� below.)�
☐�Yes�☐�No�
9.�SUMMARY� �
Would�you�hire�or�work�with�this�firm�again?�(If�no,�please�explain�in�the� comments�section�below.)� ☐�Yes�☐�No�
COMMENTS�SECTION�
Please�provide�additional�information�below�and�attach�additional�pages�if�necessary.�
Please�provide�responses�to�the�above�questions�(if�applicable)�and/or�additional�remarks.�Also�please�provide�a�brief� narrative�addressing�specific�strengths,�weaknesses,�deficiencies,�or�other�comments�which�may�assist�our�office�in�evaluating� performance�risk�(please�attach�additional�pages�if�necessary):�
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .