Appendix A.pdf
PDF 122 KB Posted
- Attached to
- National Architecture/Engineering/Interiors Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract
- Solicitation number
- 47PF0020R0101
About this file
This notice announces a solicitation for an indefinite delivery indefinite quantity contract to provide architecture, engineering, and interior design services to the U.S. General Services Administration Region 5. The solicitation will result in multiple-award IDIQ contracts for a five-year base period with a minimum guarantee of $5,000 in the initial year. The maximum order limitation is $125 million per contract for Pool A, which covers national A/E/I services, and $25 million per contract for Pool B, which sets aside interior architecture services in Regions 1 and 10 for small businesses. Services include design, planning, construction documents, construction administration, and related specialties. The submission deadline is October 4, 2021, with evaluations based on specialized experience, qualifications, past performance, management plan, and location. The notice provides detailed instructions on the two-stage evaluation and selection process, including shortlisting and interviews.
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
42�
APPENDIX�A�
ATTACHMENT�1,�SPECIALIZED�EXPERIENCE�AND�TECHNICAL�COMPETENCE�–�OFFEROR�WORKSHEET�
ATTACHMENT�2,�PAST�PERFORMANCE�QUESTIONNAIRE�
43�
ATTACHMENT�1,�SPECIALIZED�EXPERIENCE�AND�TECHNICAL�COMPETENCE�-�OFFEROR�WORKSHEET� Project�Title:� Location:� Name�and�location�of�the�project.� A�detailed�description�of�the�project:� Indicate�if�the�project�was�performed�under�an�IDIQ,�blanket�purchase�agreement�or�other�type�of�master� contract:�� Project�start�and�completion�dates:� Construction�cost�at�award�and�the�final�construction�cost�at�construction�completion:� Describe�your�role�in�the�project�(i.e.,�prime�or�subcontractor):� Describe�the�amount�and�type�of�work�you�performed�with�in-house�forces�and�the�work�that�was� accomplished�by�subcontractors:� Describe�any�problems�encountered�and�the�corrective�actions�taken:� Name,�Phone�number�and�email�address�of�the�client’s�contact�person,�a�primary�contract�and�a� secondary�contact�(at�least�one�contact�must�be�the�owner):� If�a�firm�is�proposing�as�a�joint�venture�(JV),�the�JV�will�be�required�to�discuss�if�the�joint�venture�has� experience�working�together�in�the�past.�If�proposing�as�a�joint�venture,�the�JV�will�be�required�to�provide� a�copy�of�the�joint�venture�agreement.��
44�
ATTACHMENT�2,�PBS�PAST�PERFORMANCE�QUESTIONNAIRE�
CONTRACT�INFORMATION�(Contractor/Offeror�to�complete�Blocks�1-4)�
1.�CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR�INFORMATION�
��Firm�Name:�
��Address:�
��Phone�Number:� � � �
DUNs�Number:�
��Contact�Name�
��Email�Address:�
Contact�Phone�Number:� � � �
2.�GENERAL�WORK�INFORMATION�
��Work�performed�as:�☐�Prime�Contractor����☐�Sub�Contractor�����☐�Joint�Venture����☐�Other�(Please�explain):�
��Percent�(%)�of�project�work�performed:�
��If�a�subcontractor,�who�was�the�prime�(Name/Phone�#):�
3.�CONTRACT�INFORMATION�
��Contract�Number:�
��Delivery/Task�Order�Number�(if�applicable):�
��Contract�Type:�����☐�Firm�Fixed�Price�����☐�Cost�Reimbursement�����☐�Other�(Please�explain)�
��Contract�Title:�
��Contract�Location:�
��Award�Date�(mm/dd/yy):�
��Contract�Completion�Date�(mm/dd/yy):�
��Actual�Completion�Date�(mm/dd/yy):�
��Explain�Differences:�
��Original�Contract�Price�(Award�Amount):�
��Final�Contract�Price�(to�include�all�modifications,�if�applicable):� �
��Explain�Differences:�� � � � � �
4.�PROJECT�DESCRIPTION�
��Complexity�of�Work:���☐�High�������☐�Med������☐�Routine���
��How�is�this�project�relevant�to�project�of�submission?�(Please�provide�details�such�as�similar�equipment,�requirements,� conditions,�etc.)�� � � � � �
INSTRUCTIONS�FOR�CLIENTS�COMPLETING�THIS�QUESTIONNAIRE:�PBS�requests�that�the�client�completes�this�questionnaire� and�submits�it�directly�back�to�the�offeror.��The�offeror�will�submit�the�completed�questionnaire�to�PBS�with�their�proposal�and�
45� may�duplicate�this�questionnaire�for�future�submission�on�PBS�solicitations.��Clients�are�highly�encouraged�to�submit� questionnaires�directly�to�the�offeror.��However,�questionnaires�may�be�submitted�directly�to�PBS.��Please�contact�the�offeror� for�PBS�POC�information.��The�government�reserves�the�right�to�verify�any�and�all�information�on�this�form.��
Use�the�following�adjective�ratings�and�definitions�in�your�evaluation�of�the�Contractor’s�performance.�
RATING� DEFINITION� NOTE�
(E)�Excellent� Performance�meets�contractual�requirements�and� exceeds�many�to�the�Government/Owner’s� benefit.��The�contractual�performance�of�the� element�or�sub-element�being�assessed�was� accomplished�with�few�minor�problems�for�which� corrective�actions�taken�by�the�contractor�was� highly�effective.�
An�Excellent�rating�is�appropriate�when�the� Contractor�successfully�performed�multiple� significant�events�that�were�of�benefit�to�the� Government/Owner.�A�singular�benefit,�however,� could�be�of�such�magnitude�that�it�alone� constitutes�an�Exceptional�rating.�Also,�there� should�have�been�NO�significant�weaknesses� identified.�
(VG)�Very�Good� Performance�meets�contractual�requirements�and� exceeds�some�to�the�Government’s/Owner’s� benefit.�The�contractual�performance�of�the� element�or�sub-element�being�assessed�was� accomplished�with�some�minor�problems�for�which� corrective�actions�taken�by�the�contractor�were� effective.�
A�Very�Good�rating�is�appropriate�when�the� Contractor�successfully�performed�a�significant� event�that�was�a�benefit�to�the� Government/Owner.�There�should�have�been�no� significant�weaknesses�identified.�
(G)�Good� Performance�meets�minimum�contractual� requirements.�The�contractual�performance�of�the� element�or�sub-element�contains�some�minor� problems�for�which�corrective�actions�taken�by�the� contractor�appear�or�were�satisfactory.�
A�Good�rating�is�appropriate�when�there�were�only� minor�problems,�or�major�problems�that�the� contractor�recovered�from�without�impact�to�the� contract.�There�should�have�been�NO�significant� weaknesses�identified.�Per�DOD�policy,�a� fundamental�principle�of�assigning�ratings�is�that� contractors�will�not�be�assessed�a�rating�lower� than�Satisfactory�solely�for�not�performing�beyond� the�requirements�of�the�contract.�
(F)�Fair� Performance�does�not�meet�some�contractual� requirements.�The�contractual�performance�of�the� element�or�sub-element�being�assessed�reflects�a� serious�problem�for�which�the�contractor�has�not� yet�identified�corrective�actions.�The�contractor's� proposed�actions�appear�only�marginally�effective� or�were�not�fully�implemented.�
A�Fair�is�appropriate�when�a�significant�event� occurred�that�the�contractor�had�trouble� overcoming�which�impacted�the� Government/Owner.��
(P)�Poor� Performance�does�not�meet�most�contractual� requirements�and�recovery�is�not�likely�in�a�timely� manner.�The�contractual�performance�of�the� element�or�sub-element�contains�serious� problem(s)�for�which�the�contractor's�corrective� actions�appear�or�were�ineffective.�
A�Poor�rating�is�appropriate�when�multiple� significant�events�occurred�that�the�contractor�had� trouble�overcoming�and�which�impacted�the� Government/Owner.�A�singular�problem,�however,� could�be�of�such�serious�magnitude�that�it�alone� constitutes�an�unsatisfactory�rating.��
(N)�Not� Applicable�
No�information�or�did�not�apply�to�your�contract� Rating�will�be�neither�positive�nor�negative.�
46�
TO�BE�COMPLETED�BY�CLIENT�
CLIENT�INFORMATION�
Client�Point�of�Contact�Information�
Name:�
Title:� � � � � �
Phone�Number:� � � � � �
Email�Address:�
Project�Information�
Contract�Type:� � � � � �
Contract�Title:�
Contract�Location:� � � � � �
Describe�your�role�in�the�project:�
Date�Questionnaire�was�completed�(mm/dd/yy):�
Client’s�Signature:�
Instructions:�Please�select�the�adjective�rating�that�best�reflects�your�evaluation�of�the�contractor’s�performance.�
1.��QUALITY:� ��E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�
(a)�Quality�of�technical�data/report�preparation�efforts.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
(b)�Ability�to�meet�quality�standards�specified�for�technical�performance.� �☐������☐������☐���������☐������☐������☐�
(c)�Timeliness/effectiveness�of�contract�problem�resolution�without� extensive�customer�guidance.� �☐������☐������☐���������☐������☐������☐�
(d)�Adequacy/effectiveness�of�quality�control�program�and�adherence�to� contract�quality�assurance�requirements�(without�adverse�effect�on� performance).�
2.�SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS�OF�PERFORMANCE:� ��E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�
(a)�Compliance�with�contract�delivery/completion�schedules�including� any�significant�intermediate�milestones.�(If�liquidated�damages�were� assessed�or�the�schedule�was�not�met,�please�address�below.)�
(b)�Rate�the�contractor’s�use�of�available�resources�to�accomplish�tasks� identified�in�the�contract.� �☐������☐������☐���������☐������☐������☐�
3.��CUSTOMER�SATISFACTION:� ���E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�
(a)�To�what�extent�were�the�end�users�satisfied�with�the�project?� �☐������☐������☐���������☐������☐������☐�
(b)�Contractor�was�reasonable�and�cooperative�in�dealing�with�your�staff� (including�the�ability�to�successfully�resolve�disagreements/disputes;� responsiveness�to�administrative�reports,�businesslike�and� communication).�
(c)�To�what�extent�was�the�contractor�cooperative,�businesslike,�and� concerned�with�the�interests�of�the�customer?� �☐������☐������☐���������☐������☐������☐�
(d)�Overall�customer�satisfaction.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
47�
4.�MANAGEMENT/�PERSONNEL/LABOR� ���E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�
(a)�Effectiveness�of�on-site�management,�including�management�of� subcontractors,�suppliers,�materials,�and/or�labor�force?� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
(b)�Ability�to�hire,�apply,�and�retain�a�qualified�workforce�to�this�effort.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
4.�MANAGEMENT/�PERSONNEL/LABOR�-�Continued� ���E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�
(c)�Government�Property�Control.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
(d)�Knowledge/expertise�demonstrated�by�contractor�personnel.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
(e)�Utilization�of�Small�Business�concerns.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
(f)�Ability�to�simultaneously�manage�multiple�projects�with�multiple� disciplines.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
(g)�Ability�to�assimilate�and�incorporate�changes�in�requirements�and/or� priority,�including�planning,�execution�and�response�to�Government� changes.�
(h)�Effectiveness�of�overall�management�(including�ability�to�effectively� lead,�manage�and�control�the�program).� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
5.�COST/FINANCIAL�MANAGEMENT� ���E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�
(a)�Ability�to�meet�the�terms�and�conditions�within�the�contractually� agreed�price(s)?� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
(b)�Contractor�proposed�innovative�alternative�methods/processes�that� reduced�cost,�improved�maintainability�or�other�factors�that�benefited� the�client.�
(c)�If�this�is/was�a�government�cost�type�contract,�or�a�CMc/CMc�at�Risk� Contract,�please�rate�the�Contractor’s�timeliness�and�accuracy�in� submitting�monthly�invoices�with�appropriate�back-up�documentation,� monthly�status�reports/budget�variance�reports,�compliance�with� established�budgets�and�avoidance�of�significant�and/or�unexplained� variances�(under�runs�or�overruns).�
(d)�Is�the�Contractor’s�accounting�system�adequate�for�management�and� tracking�of�costs?��(If�no,�please�explain�in�comment�section�below.)� ☐�Yes��������☐�No�
(e)�If�this�is/was�a�government�contract,�has/was�this�contract�been� partially�or�completely�terminated�for�default�or�convenience�or�are� there�any�pending�terminations?��(Indicate�if�show�cause�or�cure�notices� were�issued,�or�any�default�action�in�comment�section�below.)���
☐�Yes��������☐�No�
(f)�Have�there�been�any�indications�that�the�contractor�has�had�any� financial�problems?��(If�yes,�please�explain�in�the�comment�section� below.)�
☐�Yes��������☐�No�
6.�SAFETY/SECURITY� ��E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�
(a)�To�what�extent�was�the�contractor�able�to�maintain�an�environment� of�safety,�adhere�to�its�approved�safety�plan,�and�respond�to�safety� issues?�(Includes:�following�the�users’�rules,�regulations,�and� requirements�regarding�housekeeping,�safety,�correction�of�noted� deficiencies,�etc.).�
48�
(b)�Contractor�complied�with�all�security�requirements�for�the�project� and�personnel�security�requirements.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
7.�GENERAL� ��E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�
(a)�Ability�to�successfully�respond�to�emergency�and/or�surge�situations� (including�notifying�COR,�PM�or�Contracting�Officer�in�a�timely�manner� regarding�urgent�contractual�issues).�
(b)�Compliance�with�contractual�terms/provisions�(If�there�were�specific� issues,�please�explain�in�the�comments�sections�below� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
(c)�In�summary,�provide�an�overall�rating�for�the�work�performed�by�this� contractor.�� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�
8.�SUSTAINABILITY� �
Did�this�project�include�sustainable�methods,�materials,�processes�or� certifications?�(See�Whole�Building�Design�Guide�for�acceptable� requirements.�Link�to�guide�WBDG�Green�Building�Standards�and� Certification�Systems.)�(If�yes,�please�explain�in�the�comments�section� below.)�
☐�Yes�☐�No�
9.�SUMMARY� �
Would�you�hire�or�work�with�this�firm�again?�(If�no,�please�explain�in�the� comments�section�below.)� ☐�Yes�☐�No�
COMMENTS�SECTION�
Please�provide�additional�information�below�and�attach�additional�pages�if�necessary.�
Please�provide�responses�to�the�above�questions�(if�applicable)�and/or�additional�remarks.�Also�please�provide�a�brief� narrative�addressing�specific�strengths,�weaknesses,�deficiencies,�or�other�comments�which�may�assist�our�office�in�evaluating� performance�risk�(please�attach�additional�pages�if�necessary):�
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .