About this file

This document summarizes a solicitation for a National Architecture/Engineering/Interiors Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract. The General Services Administration Public Buildings Service Region 5 is seeking proposals for excellence in design services including architecture, engineering, interior design, and workplace strategy for federal projects. The contract will result in multiple awards for a five-year period with a minimum $5,000 guarantee for the initial year. Pool A is for national A/E/I services with no set aside and a maximum order limitation of $125 million per contract. Pool B is a partial small business set aside for interior architecture services in Regions 1 and 10 with a maximum order limitation of $25 million per contract. Proposals are due October 4, 2021 and should address factors for specialized experience, professional qualifications, past performance, management and quality control plan, and office location. Interviews will be conducted with shortlisted firms to determine final award recipients for negotiations.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to National Architecture/Engineering/Interiors Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contract, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment 5 - SF30.pdf PDF
Amendment 4 - SF30.pdf PDF
Amendment 3 - SF30.pdf PDF
RFQ 47PF0020R0101 Modified 10.4.2021.pdf PDF
AEI Submission Clarification Sheet (10.4.21).pdf PDF
Amendment 2 - SF30.pdf PDF
AEI Submission Clarification Sheet.pdf PDF
Application of 6 percent PIB 13 04 Attach 1.pdf PDF
Amendment 1 - SF30.pdf PDF
RFQ 47PF0020R0101 Modified 9.16.2021.pdf PDF
PIB 13-04 Attachment 2 AE PROPOSAL FORM PROTECTED 23APR2014.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Questions Answers (Round1).pdf PDF
SF330-16j.pdf PDF
Appendix A.pdf PDF
Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

APPENDIX�A�

ATTACHMENT�2,�PAST�PERFORMANCE�QUESTIONNAIRE

ATTACHMENT�2,�PBS�PAST�PERFORMANCE�QUESTIONNAIRE�

CONTRACT�INFORMATION�(Contractor/Offeror�to�complete�Blocks�1-4)�

1.�CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR�INFORMATION�

��Firm�Name:�

��Address:�

��Phone�Number:� � � �

DUNs�Number:�

��Contact�Name�

��Email�Address:�

Contact�Phone�Number:� � � �

2.�GENERAL�WORK�INFORMATION�

��Work�performed�as:�☐�Prime�Contractor����☐�Sub�Contractor�����☐�Joint�Venture����☐�Other�(Please�explain):�

��Percent�(%)�of�project�work�performed:�

��If�a�subcontractor,�who�was�the�prime�(Name/Phone�#):�

3.�CONTRACT�INFORMATION�

��Contract�Number:�

��Delivery/Task�Order�Number�(if�applicable):�

��Contract�Type:�����☐�Firm�Fixed�Price�����☐�Cost�Reimbursement�����☐�Other�(Please�explain)�

��Contract�Title:�

��Contract�Location:�

��Award�Date�(mm/dd/yy):�

��Contract�Completion�Date�(mm/dd/yy):�

��Actual�Completion�Date�(mm/dd/yy):�

��Explain�Differences:�

��Original�Contract�Price�(Award�Amount):�

��Final�Contract�Price�(to�include�all�modifications,�if�applicable):� �

��Explain�Differences:�� � � � � �

4.�PROJECT�DESCRIPTION�

��Complexity�of�Work:���☐�High�������☐�Med������☐�Routine���

��How�is�this�project�relevant�to�project�of�submission?�(Please�provide�details�such�as�similar�equipment,�requirements,� conditions,�etc.)�� � � � � �

INSTRUCTIONS�FOR�CLIENTS�COMPLETING�THIS�QUESTIONNAIRE:�PBS�requests�that�the�client�completes�this�questionnaire� and�submits�it�directly�back�to�the�offeror.��The�offeror�will�submit�the�completed�questionnaire�to�PBS�with�their�proposal�and� may�duplicate�this�questionnaire�for�future�submission�on�PBS�solicitations.��Clients�are�highly�encouraged�to�submit� questionnaires�directly�to�the�offeror.��However,�questionnaires�may�be�submitted�directly�to�PBS.��Please�contact�the�offeror� for�PBS�POC�information.��The�government�reserves�the�right�to�verify�any�and�all�information�on�this�form.��

Use�the�following�adjective�ratings�and�definitions�in�your�evaluation�of�the�Contractor’s�performance.�

RATING� DEFINITION� NOTE�

(E)�Excellent� Performance�meets�contractual�requirements�and� exceeds�many�to�the�Government/Owner’s� benefit.��The�contractual�performance�of�the� element�or�sub-element�being�assessed�was� accomplished�with�few�minor�problems�for�which� corrective�actions�taken�by�the�contractor�was� highly�effective.�

An�Excellent�rating�is�appropriate�when�the� Contractor�successfully�performed�multiple� significant�events�that�were�of�benefit�to�the� Government/Owner.�A�singular�benefit,�however,� could�be�of�such�magnitude�that�it�alone� constitutes�an�Exceptional�rating.�Also,�there� should�have�been�NO�significant�weaknesses� identified.�

(VG)�Very�Good� Performance�meets�contractual�requirements�and� exceeds�some�to�the�Government’s/Owner’s� benefit.�The�contractual�performance�of�the� element�or�sub-element�being�assessed�was� accomplished�with�some�minor�problems�for�which� corrective�actions�taken�by�the�contractor�were� effective.�

A�Very�Good�rating�is�appropriate�when�the� Contractor�successfully�performed�a�significant� event�that�was�a�benefit�to�the� Government/Owner.�There�should�have�been�no� significant�weaknesses�identified.�

(G)�Good� Performance�meets�minimum�contractual� requirements.�The�contractual�performance�of�the� element�or�sub-element�contains�some�minor� problems�for�which�corrective�actions�taken�by�the� contractor�appear�or�were�satisfactory.�

A�Good�rating�is�appropriate�when�there�were�only� minor�problems,�or�major�problems�that�the� contractor�recovered�from�without�impact�to�the� contract.�There�should�have�been�NO�significant� weaknesses�identified.�Per�DOD�policy,�a� fundamental�principle�of�assigning�ratings�is�that� contractors�will�not�be�assessed�a�rating�lower� than�Satisfactory�solely�for�not�performing�beyond� the�requirements�of�the�contract.�

(F)�Fair� Performance�does�not�meet�some�contractual� requirements.�The�contractual�performance�of�the� element�or�sub-element�being�assessed�reflects�a� serious�problem�for�which�the�contractor�has�not� yet�identified�corrective�actions.�The�contractor's� proposed�actions�appear�only�marginally�effective� or�were�not�fully�implemented.�

A�Fair�is�appropriate�when�a�significant�event� occurred�that�the�contractor�had�trouble� overcoming�which�impacted�the� Government/Owner.��

(P)�Poor� Performance�does�not�meet�most�contractual� requirements�and�recovery�is�not�likely�in�a�timely� manner.�The�contractual�performance�of�the� element�or�sub-element�contains�serious� problem(s)�for�which�the�contractor's�corrective� actions�appear�or�were�ineffective.�

A�Poor�rating�is�appropriate�when�multiple� significant�events�occurred�that�the�contractor�had� trouble�overcoming�and�which�impacted�the� Government/Owner.�A�singular�problem,�however,� could�be�of�such�serious�magnitude�that�it�alone� constitutes�an�unsatisfactory�rating.��

(N)�Not� Applicable�

No�information�or�did�not�apply�to�your�contract� Rating�will�be�neither�positive�nor�negative.�

TO�BE�COMPLETED�BY�CLIENT�

CLIENT�INFORMATION�

Client�Point�of�Contact�Information�

Name:�

Title:� � � � � �

Phone�Number:� � � � � �

Email�Address:�

Project�Information�

Contract�Type:� � � � � �

Contract�Title:�

Contract�Location:� � � � � �

Describe�your�role�in�the�project:�

Date�Questionnaire�was�completed�(mm/dd/yy):�

Client’s�Signature:�

Instructions:�Please�select�the�adjective�rating�that�best�reflects�your�evaluation�of�the�contractor’s�performance.�

1.��QUALITY:� ��E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�

(a)�Quality�of�technical�data/report�preparation�efforts.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�

(b)�Ability�to�meet�quality�standards�specified�for�technical�performance.� �☐������☐������☐���������☐������☐������☐�

(c)�Timeliness/effectiveness�of�contract�problem�resolution�without� extensive�customer�guidance.� �☐������☐������☐���������☐������☐������☐�

(d)�Adequacy/effectiveness�of�quality�control�program�and�adherence�to� contract�quality�assurance�requirements�(without�adverse�effect�on� performance).�

2.�SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS�OF�PERFORMANCE:� ��E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�

(a)�Compliance�with�contract�delivery/completion�schedules�including� any�significant�intermediate�milestones.�(If�liquidated�damages�were� assessed�or�the�schedule�was�not�met,�please�address�below.)�

(b)�Rate�the�contractor’s�use�of�available�resources�to�accomplish�tasks� identified�in�the�contract.� �☐������☐������☐���������☐������☐������☐�

3.��CUSTOMER�SATISFACTION:� ���E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�

(a)�To�what�extent�were�the�end�users�satisfied�with�the�project?� �☐������☐������☐���������☐������☐������☐�

(b)�Contractor�was�reasonable�and�cooperative�in�dealing�with�your�staff� (including�the�ability�to�successfully�resolve�disagreements/disputes;� responsiveness�to�administrative�reports,�businesslike�and� communication).�

(c)�To�what�extent�was�the�contractor�cooperative,�businesslike,�and� concerned�with�the�interests�of�the�customer?� �☐������☐������☐���������☐������☐������☐�

(d)�Overall�customer�satisfaction.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�

4.�MANAGEMENT/�PERSONNEL/LABOR� ���E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�

(a)�Effectiveness�of�on-site�management,�including�management�of� subcontractors,�suppliers,�materials,�and/or�labor�force?� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�

(b)�Ability�to�hire,�apply,�and�retain�a�qualified�workforce�to�this�effort.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�

4.�MANAGEMENT/�PERSONNEL/LABOR�-�Continued� ���E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�

(c)�Government�Property�Control.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�

(d)�Knowledge/expertise�demonstrated�by�contractor�personnel.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�

(e)�Utilization�of�Small�Business�concerns.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�

(f)�Ability�to�simultaneously�manage�multiple�projects�with�multiple� disciplines.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�

(g)�Ability�to�assimilate�and�incorporate�changes�in�requirements�and/or� priority,�including�planning,�execution�and�response�to�Government� changes.�

(h)�Effectiveness�of�overall�management�(including�ability�to�effectively� lead,�manage�and�control�the�program).� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�

5.�COST/FINANCIAL�MANAGEMENT� ���E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�

(a)�Ability�to�meet�the�terms�and�conditions�within�the�contractually� agreed�price(s)?� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�

(b)�Contractor�proposed�innovative�alternative�methods/processes�that� reduced�cost,�improved�maintainability�or�other�factors�that�benefited� the�client.�

(c)�If�this�is/was�a�government�cost�type�contract,�or�a�CMc/CMc�at�Risk� Contract,�please�rate�the�Contractor’s�timeliness�and�accuracy�in� submitting�monthly�invoices�with�appropriate�back-up�documentation,� monthly�status�reports/budget�variance�reports,�compliance�with� established�budgets�and�avoidance�of�significant�and/or�unexplained� variances�(under�runs�or�overruns).�

(d)�Is�the�Contractor’s�accounting�system�adequate�for�management�and� tracking�of�costs?��(If�no,�please�explain�in�comment�section�below.)� ☐�Yes��������☐�No�

(e)�If�this�is/was�a�government�contract,�has/was�this�contract�been� partially�or�completely�terminated�for�default�or�convenience�or�are� there�any�pending�terminations?��(Indicate�if�show�cause�or�cure�notices� were�issued,�or�any�default�action�in�comment�section�below.)���

☐�Yes��������☐�No�

(f)�Have�there�been�any�indications�that�the�contractor�has�had�any� financial�problems?��(If�yes,�please�explain�in�the�comment�section� below.)�

☐�Yes��������☐�No�

6.�SAFETY/SECURITY� ��E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�

(a)�To�what�extent�was�the�contractor�able�to�maintain�an�environment� of�safety,�adhere�to�its�approved�safety�plan,�and�respond�to�safety� issues?�(Includes:�following�the�users’�rules,�regulations,�and� requirements�regarding�housekeeping,�safety,�correction�of�noted� deficiencies,�etc.).�

(b)�Contractor�complied�with�all�security�requirements�for�the�project� and�personnel�security�requirements.� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�

7.�GENERAL� ��E�������VG�����G��������F��������P�������N/A�

(a)�Ability�to�successfully�respond�to�emergency�and/or�surge�situations� (including�notifying�COR,�PM�or�Contracting�Officer�in�a�timely�manner� regarding�urgent�contractual�issues).�

(b)�Compliance�with�contractual�terms/provisions�(If�there�were�specific� issues,�please�explain�in�the�comments�sections�below� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�

(c)�In�summary,�provide�an�overall�rating�for�the�work�performed�by�this� contractor.�� �☐������☐������☐��������☐������☐������☐�

8.�SUSTAINABILITY� �

Did�this�project�include�sustainable�methods,�materials,�processes�or� certifications?�(See�Whole�Building�Design�Guide�for�acceptable� requirements.�Link�to�guide�WBDG�Green�Building�Standards�and� Certification�Systems.)�(If�yes,�please�explain�in�the�comments�section� below.)�

☐�Yes�☐�No�

9.�SUMMARY� �

Would�you�hire�or�work�with�this�firm�again?�(If�no,�please�explain�in�the� comments�section�below.)� ☐�Yes�☐�No�

COMMENTS�SECTION�

Please�provide�additional�information�below�and�attach�additional�pages�if�necessary.�

Please�provide�responses�to�the�above�questions�(if�applicable)�and/or�additional�remarks.�Also�please�provide�a�brief� narrative�addressing�specific�strengths,�weaknesses,�deficiencies,�or�other�comments�which�may�assist�our�office�in�evaluating� performance�risk�(please�attach�additional�pages�if�necessary):�

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .