Addendum 1 250049C001 final.pdf
PDF 127 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CAMP WITHYCOMBE SECURITY GATE ENHANCEMENTS
- Solicitation number
- S-24800-00014638
- Issued by
- Clackamas County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an Addendum 1 to a Request for Quote (RFQ 250049C001) issued by the Oregon Military Department's Joint Force Headquarters, Installations Division for Camp Withycombe Security Gate Enhancements. The addendum provides clarifications and responses to bidder questions regarding security gate improvements, including specifications for a barrier arm, remote activation, and a pedestrian gate. The document outlines specific technical requirements such as providing a 10' or optional 20' HySecurity Strong Arm barrier arm, installing open and close control buttons in the guard shack, and creating a small equipment pad for the barrier arm installation.
The addendum includes two unit price options: Unit price #1 offers a 20' center yoke aluminum barrier arm as an alternative to the base 10' design, with pricing to reflect the equipment differences, and Unit price #2 involves installing a lockable pedestrian gate matching the existing security fence's height, style, and color. Bidders are instructed to coordinate the pedestrian gate's final location with the owner. The document provides technical specifics on installation methods, such as using 14" rebar spikes to attach the equipment pad to asphalt, and requires remote operation capabilities for the barrier arm, with control buttons to be placed in the guard shack counter.
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
OREGON MILITARY DEPARTMENT
JOINT FORCE HEADQUARTERS, OREGON NATIONAL GUARD
INSTALLATIONS DIVISION
1776 MILITIA WAY
P.O. BOX 14350
SALEM, OREGON 97309-5047
RFQ 250049C001 Addendum 1 Page 1 of 1
August 27, 2025
Installations Division
SUBJECT: Addendum 1 to RFQ 250049C001
PROJECT: CAMP WITHYCOMBE SECURITY GATE ENHANCEMENTS
TO ALL PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS AND ALL OTHERS CONCERNED
1. The changes, clarifications, omissions, additions, and alterations in, on, and to the solicitation information and specifications shall apply to the bids submitted for and to the project indicated above. Except as modified by this
Addendum, all of the terms and provisions of the Request for the Quote for the above listed project remain in full force and effect. This Addendum Number 1 supersedes all previous instructions pertaining to the items listed:
CHANGES TO RFQ
2. Changes to ITB: The following changes are made to the RFQ. (Where applicable, additions are indicated with bold and underlined and deletions are indicated by strikethrough).
RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS RECEIVED
1. Barrier arm- Is there a preferred length on the barrier arm?
RESPONSE: Please provide 10’ as shown in base bid documents. Provide Unit price #1: Provide HySecurity Strong
Arm 20 with 20’ center yoke aluminum barrier arm or equal, in lieu of Door King 1601 10’ barrier arm. Increase equipment pad size and type if needed. (This represents the cost difference between the 10’ and 20’ versions.)
2. Remote Activation- Is remote operation needed for Barrier Arm?
RESPONSE:Yes, please provide open and close control buttons in guard shack counter.
3. Preferred Barrier arm location and existing fence modification?
RESPONSE: Yes, please provide small 2’Wx2’Tx2”H equipment pad, similar to, Diversitech EP2424-2. Locate barrier arm East of existing gate stop. Use 14” rebar spikes or similar, to attach pad to asphalt.
4. Provide unit price #2: Provide one lockable pedestrian gate to match height, style, and color of existing security fence. Will be cut into existing fence line located by guard shack, coordinate final location with Owner.
PROTEST OF ANY CHANGES TO THE ITB MADE BY THIS ADDENDUM MUST BE SUBMITTED IN
WRITTEN FORM VIA EMAIL TO SAM.A.GOFF@OMD.OREGON.GOV BY 10 AM ON AUGUST 28, 2025
Sam Goff - CPPB
Procurement & Contract Specialist
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .