Addenda Questions Solicitaion Number 123374 O3.docx

DOCX document 28 KB Posted

Attached to
Financial Institution Data Match Services
Solicitation number
123374 O3
Issued by
Lancaster County, Nebraska

About this file

This solicitation addendum for Solicitation Number 123374 O3 addresses questions and answers regarding financial institution data match services for the State of Nebraska Department of Revenue. The addendum, effective November 12, 2025, clarifies key contractual terms and requirements for vendors responding to the Request for Proposal. The State confirmed its willingness to post answers prior to the November 13, 2025 proposal deadline to allow bidders adequate time to incorporate changes. Critical clarifications include the State's refusal to accept digital handwritten signatures or DocuSign signatures on contractual agreements, requiring wet signatures instead. The State also confirmed removal of a Pollution Liability Policy requirement as non-applicable to data matching services, amendment of on-site work provisions to reflect that all work will be performed off-site, and removal of a duplicative question in the communications environment section. The contract will be non-exclusive, based on matching services with financial institutions rather than individual debtors, with variable numbers of debtors to be submitted for matching purposes.

The addendum addresses procurement specifications and vendor qualifications critical to proposal preparation. Vendors will not receive Felony Tax Imposed (FTI) information under this contract, and the State clarified that non-publicly held corporations must still provide banking references despite submitting audited financial reports and fiscal representative contact information. Significantly, the State approved alternative cost proposal methodologies, allowing vendors to propose pricing on a "Cost per Financial Institution, Per Quarter" basis as an alternative to the standard line item for cost per file transfer occurrence. The State confirmed that the vendor's pre-existing software and source code will remain the vendor's property with no ownership transfer to the State, and clarified that outreach process requirements in Section V.C.4 pertain to providing examples of cover letters and Financial Institution agreements to facilitate institutional engagement.

View the file

Other files

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOLICITATION ADDENDUM 123374 O3

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

SOLICITATION NUMBER: 123374 O3

Financial Institution Data Matching Opening Date: November 13, 2025, 2 P.M.

Addendum Effective Date: November 12, 2025

Questions and Answers

Following are the questions submitted and answers provided for the above-mentioned solicitation. The questions and answers are to be considered as part of the solicitation. It is the responsibility of bidders to check the State Purchasing Bureau website for all addenda or amendments.

Question Number
RFP/ITB

Section Reference

RFP/ITB

Page Number

Question
State Response
1.
General
Would the state consider posting answers earlier than the 12th so the bidders have sufficient time to incorporate changes to their proposals prior to the due date of the 13th?
Yes.
2.
Section I.H.1 and Section I.N.1.
Pg 4 and Pg 5
Will the State accept a digital handwritten signature on the Contractual Agreement Form, or does it need to be either a wet signature or by DocuSign?
No
3.
Section III.I.
Pg 16
Will the State agree to the addition of the following sentence at the end of this section: “The State shall have no ownership interest or title in Vendor’s pre-existing software or source code.”
Yes
4.
Section III.J.
Pg 18
Due to the nature of the Data Match services to be provided under the contract, a Pollution Liability Policy does not align with the nature of the services. Will the State dispense with the Pollution Liability policy under Insurance Requirements and allow for a Deviation from this requirement?
Yes
5.
Section III.M.
Pg 19
Because Vendor will not be performing any on-site work on State premises, will the State agree to remove this section?
State will amend this provision to state all work will be performed off-site.
6.
Section V.B
Pg 23
Will the vendor receive FTI under this contract?
No
7.
Section V.B
Pg 23
How many debtors does DOR intend to send to the vendor for purposes of matching?
The number of debtors is variable. This contract is based on matching with the number of Financial Institutions not the number of debtors.
8.
Section V.C.4
Pg 24
Does this pertain to the outreach process and providing examples of cover letters and FI agreements to the financial institutions? If not, can more detail be provided in terms of what this request pertains to?
Yes, this pertains to the outreach process and examples of cover letters and FI agreements.
9.
Section V.F.vii.5
Pg 25
This question seems to be the exact same as question 3 in Section V.F.vii Communications Environment. Should this question be different or can it be removed?
Yes, it can be removed.
10.
Section VI.A.1.b
Pg 27
If a non-publicly held corporation provides its most recent audited financial reports and statements and the name, address and telephone number of the fiscally responsible representative of bidder’s financial or banking organization, is a banking reference still required to be submitted as part of its response to this section?

The reference is still required.

11.
Cost Sheet
N/A
In our experience, ongoing data match services are typically billed as a “Cost per Financial Institution, Per Quarter”. May we propose this line item in lieu of the currently listed line item # 2. “Cost for each subsequent file transfer occurrence”?

Yes.

This addendum will be incorporated into the solicitation.

SPB Form 26 Last Revised 4-17-2025

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .