ABM_MAC_N00421-18-R-0032_Q_&_A_1.pdf
PDF 153 KB Posted
- Attached to
- AIR-4. 11 ABM Multiple Award Contract (MAC) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- Not on record
About this file
This document contains questions and answers related to a federal contract solicitation for mobile air battle management systems and communication-electronic support systems. The incumbent contractor is Engility Corporation under contract number N00421-11-D-0036, which is set to expire on September 10, 2016. The follow-on contract will be a competitively awarded multiple award contract with a five-year ordering period to provide operational, technical, logistical and system engineering support. Eligible contractors must be small businesses with no more than $38.5 million in annual revenue. The response deadline is October 10, 2018 at 2:00 PM Eastern Time.
ABM MAC N00421-18-R-0032 Solicitation Q & A 1
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 25
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ABM MAC OFFERORS QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
Question 1: On page 72 of 90 the NAICS code is 344511 with a small business size standard being
$38,500,000; however, the U. S. Small Business Administration, Table of Small Business Size Standards for 344511 says the corresponding small business size standard is 1250 employees. Which standard is
Correct?
Government Response: Please see amendment 1 that revises the SB Size Standard for NAICS Code
334511 from $38,500,000 to 1,250 employees.
Question 2: Hurricane Florence is expected to hit the East Coast on 9/13/18. Based on the anticipated size and strength of this storm, contractors are likely to lose time needed to respond to the Solicitation there is a potential impact the timeliness of Q&A. Based on the high probability that both the
Contractors and the Government will be impacted with power outages, etc. would the Government extend the due date by one week to 10/17/18?
Government Response: No extensions are anticipated at this time, but please monitor FBO for any proposal due date revisions.
Question 3: Would you mind confirming that the subject RFP documents released this morning on FBO are FINAL RFP documents (not Draft) with a due date of 10/10/18 at 2pm? There seems to be some confusion based on the FBO record and the fact that the SF-33 has a Draft watermark. Thanks for your assistance.
Government Response: Yes, the revised solicitation was posted to FBO on 9/10/18, which removed the draft watermark.
Question 4: Section L, Part A, paragraph 3.0 indicates a 3-page limit for past performance summaries.
Section L, Part B, paragraph 2.1 indicates the past performance is to be submitted using the Past
Performance Information Form, Attachment P1. This form is only 2 pages and provides limited space when printed at the bottom of Page 1 for summary information to address Section M criteria. Is the 3-page limit including the PPIF or in addition to the PPIF? If it includes the PPIF, does the government have a preference for addressing the limited content when printing the form in the "Contract Effort
Description" block?
Government Response: Past Performance narrative should be provided separately under volume 2 Past
Performance.
Question 5: Please provide the prime contract numbers associated with the incumbents listed in section
3.0.
Government Response: Please see amendment 1, which provides the incumbents contract numbers.
Question 6: As part of the response are offerors required to provide a signed SF-33, signed amendments, Section K and offer letter? And if so, in what Volume?
Government Response: Please see amendment 1, which adds volume 3 Executive Summary.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .